Search

Background: The optimal treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in patients 55 to 70 years old remains controversial. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of closed reduction and internal fixation with cannulated screws (IF) compared with total hip arthroplasty (THA) on hip pain and function, with use of data for outcome measures, complications, and reoperations.Methods: This multicenter randomized controlled trial included all patients 55 to 70 years old who presented with a low-energy displaced femoral neck fracture between December 2013 and December 2018. Patients were randomly allocated to undergo either IF or THA. The primary outcome was the Harris Hip Score (HHS) at 12 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were the HHS at 4 and 24 months postoperatively, Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-3L [EuroQol 5 Dimensions 3 Levels] index score and EQ-VAS [visual analogue scale]), VAS for pain, and VAS for patient satisfaction at 4, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Complications and reoperations were continuously monitored. The primary analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat principle.Results: A total of 102 patients with a mean (± standard deviation) age of 63.7 ± 4.2 years were allocated to IF (n = 51) or THA (n = 51). The mean difference in the primary outcome, the HHS at 12 months postoperatively (5.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.9 to 9.7; p = 0.017), was below the predefined minimal clinically important difference of 10 points. However, patients who underwent THA had a significantly higher HHS at 4 and 12 months, better OHS at 4 and 12 months, and better HOOS at 4, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Patients who underwent THA also reported better health-related quality of life at 4 months postoperatively and reported greater satisfaction and less pain at 4 and 12 months postoperatively. A total of 26 patients in the IF group (51%; 95% confidence interval, 37% to 65%) and 2 patients in the THA group (4%; 95% confidence interval, 0.5% to 13%) underwent a major reoperation.Conclusions: In this randomized controlled trial, we showed that patients between 55 and 70 years old who underwent THA for a low-energy displaced femoral neck fracture experienced better outcomes than those who underwent closed reduction and internal fixation.Level Of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To examine whether the 1-year effects from a previous walking skill training program on walking and stair climbing still persist 5 years following total hip arthroplasty (THA), to examine recovery of physical functioning from before to 5 years after surgery, and to identify predictors of physical activity 5 years after THA from preoperative measures.Methods: We performed a 5-year followup of a randomized controlled trial and a longitudinal study. Sixty participants with a mean age of 70 years (range 50-87 years; 95% confidence interval 68, 72 years) were assessed. Outcome measures were the 6-minute walk test, the stair climbing test (SCT), active hip range of motion (ROM), self-efficacy, Hip Dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), and University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity scale. Data were analyzed by Student's t-tests, generalized linear model, and multivariate regression analyses.Results: The training and control groups were approximately equal on outcome measures of physical functioning, pain, and self-efficacy at 5 years (P > 0.05). In the total group, the recovery course was unchanged from 1 to 5 years (P > 0.05), except for 9% improvement in ROM (P < 0.001) and an increase in time on SCT of 18% (P = 0.004). Preoperative HOOS pain (P = 0.022) and HOOS sport (P = 0.019) predicted UCLA activity scale 5 years after THA.Conclusion: At 5 years after THA, the control group had caught up with the training group on physical functioning, and the participants led an active lifestyle. Those with worse preoperative scores on pain and physical functioning in sport were at risk of being less physically active in the long term following THA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) is a feared complication in hip arthroplasty, especially following femoral neck fracture in the elderly, associated with substantially increased morbidity, mortality, and costs. Gentamicin-containing collagen sponges are widely used for prevention of SSIs, but their effectiveness in joint replacement surgery remains unclear. Methods: We performed a multicenter, randomized trial between February 2011 and July 2013. Eligible patients with femoral neck fracture undergoing hemiarthroplasty were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis alone or with the addition of 2 gentamicin-containing collagen sponges into the hip joint perioperatively. The primary end point was SSI according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria within 30 days after surgery. Results: Seven hundred thirty-nine patients were randomly assigned, 684 of whom were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. There was no statistical significant difference in SSI between the gentamicin-collagen group (16 of 329 patients [4.9%]) and the control group (19 of 355 patients [5.4%]) (relative risk [RR], 0.91 [95% confidence interval, .48-1.79]; P = .77). No significant differences were observed between the groups in superficial SSI (2 of 329 [0.6%] vs 3 of 355 [0.8%]; P = .99) and deep SSI (14 of 329 [4.3%] vs 16 of 355 [4.5%]; P = .87). There were no significant differences between the groups regarding type of bacteria isolated. Conclusions: Locally administered gentamicin-collagen sponges did not reduce the incidence of SSI in elderly patients treated with a hemiarthroplasty because of femoral neck fracture. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Radiostereometry (RSA) is considered to be the most precise and accurate method for wear-measurements in total hip replacement. Post-operative stereoradiographs has so far been necessary for wear measurement. Hence, the use of RSA has been limited to studies planned for RSA measurements. We compared a new RSA method for wear measurements that does not require previous radiographs with conventional RSA. Instead of comparing present stereoradiographs with post-operative ones, we developed a method for calculating the post-operative position of the center of the femoral head on the present examination and using this as the index measurement. We compared this alternative method to conventional RSA in 27 hips in an ongoing RSA study. We found a high degree of agreement between the methods for both mean proximal (1.19 mm vs. 1.14 mm) and mean 3D wear (1.52 mm vs. 1.44 mm) after 10 years. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were 0.958 and 0.955, respectively ( p < 0.001 for both ICCs). The results were also within the limits of agreement when plotted subject-by-subject in a Bland-Altman plot. Our alternative method for wear measurements with RSA offers comparable results to conventional RSA measurements. It allows precise wear measurements without previous radiological examinations. © 2012 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 31: 480-484, 2013 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and purpose Conversion total hip replacement (THR) is a common procedure after failed hemiarthroplasty, but there have been few reports describing the long-term outcome of this procedure. Patients and methods Between 1987 and 2004, 595 THRs were reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register as conversion THR for failed hemiarthroplasty after a femoral neck fracture in patients aged 60 years and older. 122 operations left the femoral stem intact, whereas 473 were converted with exchange of the femoral stem. Results We found a lower risk of failure (revision surgery for any reason) for the conversion procedures with stem exchange (RR = 0.4; 95% CI: 0.25-0.81) than for the conversion procedures that retained the femoral stem. For the 473 conversion arthroplasties with exchange of the stem, we found no difference in risk of failure compared to all revision stems in the register, either for the complete prosthesis (RR = 0.8; CI: 0.50- 1.20) or for the stem (RR = 0.9; CI: 0.53-1.59). However, for the 122 conversion procedures in which the femoral stem was retained, we found a significantly increased risk of failure for both the complete prosthesis (RR = 4.6; CI: 2.8-7.6) and for the acetabular cup (RR = 4.8; CI: 2.3-10) compared to primary hip arthroplasties. Interpretation Our findings indicate that the seemingly easy operation of implanting an acetabular cup to convert a hemiarthroplasty to a total hip arthroplasty is an uncertain procedure and that the threshold for replacing the stem should be low. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The evidence supporting rifampin combination therapy in prosthetic joint infections (PJI) is limited due to the lack of controlled studies. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of adding rifampin to conventional antimicrobial therapy in early staphylococcal PJIs treated with debridement and retention of the implant (DAIR). Methods: In this multicenter randomized controlled trial, 99 patients with PJI after hip and knee arthroplasties were enrolled. They were randomly assigned to receive rifampin or not in addition to standard antimicrobial treatment with cloxacillin or vancomycin in case of methicillin resistance. The primary endpoint was no signs of infection after 2 years of follow-up. Results: Forty-eight patients were included in the final analyses. There were no differences in patient characteristics or comorbidities between the two groups. There was no significant difference in remission rate between the rifampin combination group (17 of 23 (74%)) and the monotherapy group (18 of 25 (72%), relative risk 1.03, 95% confidence interval 0.73 to 1.45, p = 0.88). Conclusion: This trial has not proven a statistically significant advantage by adding rifampin to standard antibiotic treatment in acute staphylococcal PJIs. Trial registration: The Regional Ethics Committee and the Norwegian Medicines Agency approved the study (EudraCT 2005-005494-29), and the study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov at Jan 18, 2007 (NCT00423982). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To compare early complications after the posterior and the direct lateral (transgluteal) approach, when using hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly.Patients and Methods: A prospective clinical study from four Norwegian hospitals, consisting of 583 patients with 1year follow-up. All the hospitals used the same uncemented femoral stem and bipolar heads. Data were collected for gender, age, surgical approach, prosthetic dislocation, postoperative infection, perioperative fracture, duration of surgery, ASA score, diabetes, alcoholism, cognitive failure, BMI, 30-day mortality and 1-year mortality.Results: Mean age was 83 years (SD 7.8) and 434/583 (74%) were female. There were no relevant differences between the treatment groups. A higher risk was found for prosthetic dislocation in the posterior group compared to the lateral group (15/186 (8%) vs. 4/397 (1%); RR=8.0, 95% CI 2.7-23.8, p-value<0.001), both as a one-time event and for the risk of recurrent dislocations (9/186 (5%) vs. 2/395 (0.5%); RR 9.6, 95% CI 2.1-44.0, p-value=0.001). 11/19 patients with dislocation had recurrent dislocations. 10/11 patients with more than one dislocation needed further open surgery. Of those 6/10 needed more than one additional open procedure. Three patients had a resection arthroplasty and one patient had a chronic infection as final result after a dislocation. No other risk factor for dislocation than surgical approach was identified. There were no differences between the approach groups for other complications.Conclusion: There was an 8-fold increased risk for prosthetic dislocations after the posterior approach compared to lateral approach. There was a high risk for recurrent prosthetic dislocations and a subsequent risk for further surgeries and a poor end result. The potential advantages of the posterior approach have not been demonstrated after femoral neck fractures and we advise against its continued use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]