Search

Existing literature has barely explored the role of tourist experiences in the tourism-led migration process. Focusing on surfing-oriented migrants in a coastal municipality, this paper explores th...

This study examined the effects the presence of Westerners at historic districts in Japan has on Japanese evaluations of the districts. Sixty-three Japanese students rated 18 slide photographs with no people, photographs with mainly Japanese, and photographs with mainly Westerners. The presence of Westerners had positive effects on the subjects’ overall evaluations of the districts regarding a sense of activity and touristic uniqueness. Negative effects were found regarding a sense of calmness and harmony. These results imply the importance of the characteristics of tourist attractions and of the observable characteristics of foreign tourists for tourism promotion in historic districts.

This study elucidates the relationships between the elements that visitors gaze at in a historical district and the objectives perceived to have been achieved. This study differs from previous studies on visitors’ evaluations of historical districts (carried out using the theoretical frameworks and methods of architectural/environmental psychology), because the research focuses on interpersonal differences in tourist gazes. Research was conducted between 09:30 and 14:00 on July 13, 2013 in front of the railway station, near the tourist information center in Sanmachi, and around the entrance to and in the waiting room of Takayama Jinya. One thousand visitors to Takayama city, Japan were asked to complete and return questionnaires, using stamped, pre-addressed envelopes. They were first asked whether they had seen 19 elements, and then asked to rate the impressiveness of those they had seen. Respondents also rated the extent to which seven objectives related to learning and interaction had been achieved during their visits. The findings suggest that visitors who gaze at various elements may strongly perceive opportunities to achieve their objectives, that is, learning about a destination and interacting with other people. For visitors who specifically focus on local elements that do not relate to people, opportunities for learning may not be curtailed, but then again, the chances to interact with others may not necessarily be facilitated. Gazing at the multifaceted aspects of a historical district appears to foster a visitor’s understanding of the district. Drawing upon these findings, future studies should investigate the effects of visitors’ pretravel motives on their gaze.

A historical district is a comprehensive form of historical attractions, and has diverse features that visitors can gaze on. This study proposes the application of the caption evaluation method, participatory research involving photographing by subjects, to a study of visitors’ evaluation of a historical district as a tourism destination. Thirty Japanese undergraduates who majored in commerce and 27 Japanese adults with an interest in architecture and/or town planning photographed settings of their choice in a Japanese historical district and stated how they perceived the captured settings in an open-ended form. Their statements were subjected to analysis using a software package as well as manual analysis. The results indicate relationships between various elements in the district and the subjects’ feelings and desires. Particularly, favourable evaluations of old objects and unfavourable perceptions of modern objects were implied. The results also suggest the types of activities visitors may wish to participate in.

This study investigates the efficacy of Lew's (1987) “cognitive perspective” in assessing how tourists evaluate destinations. Using 11 bipolar word pairs derived from Sasaki (2000) and Lew, 139 high school students were surveyed about six destinations in and around Tokyo Prefecture, Japan, which they visited on a group tour. Analysis of the survey results suggests that the cognitive perspective, as represented by the 11 word pairs, supports the grouping of destinations into two types: tourist-oriented or non-tourist oriented; that different evaluative components represented by different word pairs are associated with different types of destinations; and that the influence and relative importance of certain evaluative components vary according to destination type.