Search

To determine the reliability of food safety studies carried out in rodents with genetically modified (GM) crops, a Food Safety Study Reliability Tool (FSSRTool) was adapted from the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods' (ECVAM) ToxRTool. Reliability was defined as the inherent quality of the study with regard to use of standardized testing methodology, full documentation of experimental procedures and results, and the plausibility of the findings. Codex guidelines for GM crop safety evaluations indicate toxicology studies are not needed when comparability of the GM crop to its conventional counterpart has been demonstrated. This guidance notwithstanding, animal feeding studies have routinely been conducted with GM crops, but their conclusions on safety are not always consistent. To accurately evaluate potential risks from GM crops, risk assessors need clearly interpretable results from reliable studies. The development of the FSSRTool, which provides the user with a means of assessing the reliability of a toxicology study to inform risk assessment, is discussed. Its application to the body of literature on GM crop food safety studies demonstrates that reliable studies report no toxicologically relevant differences between rodents fed GM crops or their non-GM comparators.

A complete mode of action human relevance analysis--as distinct from mode of action (MOA) analysis alone--depends on robust information on the animal MOA, as well as systematic comparison of the animal data with corresponding information from humans. In November 2003, the International Life Sciences Institute's Risk Science Institute (ILSI RSI) published a 2-year study using animal and human MOA information to generate a four-part Human Relevance Framework (HRF) for systematic and transparent analysis of MOA data and information. Based mainly on non-DNA-reactive carcinogens, the HRF features a "concordance" analysis of MOA information from both animal and human sources, with a focus on determining the appropriate role for each MOA data set in human risk assessment. With MOA information increasingly available for risk assessment purposes, this article illustrates the further applicability of the HRF for reproductive, developmental, neurologic, and renal endpoints, as well as cancer. Based on qualitative and quantitative MOA considerations, the MOA/human relevance analysis also contributes to identifying data needs and issues essential for the dose-response and exposure assessment steps in the overall risk assessment.

Dimethoate is an organophosphate (OP) pesticide used to control a wide variety of insects on agricultural crops and ornamentals. To ensure that dimethoate is used safely, it is important to determine exposure levels that protect against adverse effects at all life stages, including the developing fetus, infant, and child. Based on an analysis of a developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) study, a cholinesterase (ChE) sensitivity study, a cross-fostering study, and several single- and multigenerational reproductive toxicity studies, two potential critical endpoints for dimethoate were identified: brain ChE inhibition (ChEI) in adult females, and pup mortality. An initial evaluation concluded that pup mortality was a preferable endpoint, based on an increased number of pup deaths born to dams dosed with ≥3 mg/kg dimethoate via oral gavage. Closer examination, however, revealed that the pup deaths were clustered in a small number of litters in which the dams providing postnatal care exhibited maternal care deficits. When the data were analyzed using the dam as the unit of statistical significance, a significant increase in the average litter proportion of pup deaths was observed only when the dams were dosed postnatally with 6 mg/kg dimethoate while they were raising the pups. Gestational exposure (i.e., during pregnancy only) to 6 mg/kg dimethoate exerted no effect on pup survival. This leads to the conclusion that it is postnatal exposure of the nursing dams that is associated with pup mortality. Furthermore, a previous benchmark dose (BMD) meta-analysis approach revealed that BMDL10 for adult females (the lower 95% bound of the dose resulting in a 10% reduction in the parameter of interest) for ChEI was > 3-fold lower than the BMDL10 for pup mortality (0.19 and 0.68 mg/kg, respectively). Overall, this study underscores the importance of using the dam as the unit of statistical significance when assessing data collected in the perinatal period, and it is concluded that adult brain ChEI is the correct critical endpoint for assessing risk of dimethoate toxicity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Children differ from adults both physiologically and behaviorally. These differences can affect how and when exposures to xenobiotics occur and the resulting responses. Testing using animal models may be used to predict whether children display novel toxicities not observed in adults or whether children are more or less sensitive to known toxicities. Historically, evaluation of developmental toxicity has focused on gestational exposures and morphological changes resulting from this exposure. Functional consequences of gestational exposure and postnatal exposure have not been as well studied. Difficulties with postnatal toxicity evaluations include divergent differentiation of structure, function and physiology across species, lack of understanding of species differences in functional ontogeny, and lack of common end points and milestones across species. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]