Search

In the context of autonomous vehicles on highways, one of the first and most important tasks is to localize the vehicle on the road. For this purpose, the vehicle needs to be able to take into account the information from several sensors and fuse them with data coming from road maps. The localization problem on highways can be distilled into three main components. The first one consists of inferring on which road the vehicle is currently traveling. Indeed, Global Navigation Satellite Systems are not precise enough to deduce this information by themselves, and thus a filtering step is needed. The second component consists of estimating the vehicle’s position in its lane. Finally, the third and last one aims at assessing on which lane the vehicle is currently driving. These two last components are mandatory for safe driving as actions such as overtaking a vehicle require precise information about the current localization of the vehicle. In this survey, we introduce a taxonomy of the localization methods for autonomous vehicles in highway scenarios. We present each main component of the localization process, and discuss the advantages and drawbacks of the associated state-of-the-art methods.

In the context of autonomous robots, one of the most important tasks is to prevent potential damage to the robot during navigation. For this purpose, it is often assumed that one must deal with known probabilistic obstacles, then compute the probability of collision with each obstacle. However, in complex scenarios or unstructured environments, it might be difficult to detect such obstacles. In these cases, a metric map is used, where each position stores the information of occupancy. The most common type of metric map is the Bayesian occupancy map. However, this type of map is not well suited for computing risk assessments for continuous paths due to its discrete nature. Hence, we introduce a novel type of map called the Lambda Field, which is specially designed for risk assessment. We first propose a way to compute such a map and the expectation of a generic risk over a path. Then, we demonstrate the benefits of our generic formulation with a use case defining the risk as the expected collision force over a path. Using this risk definition and the Lambda Field, we show that our framework is capable of doing classical path planning while having a physical-based metric. Furthermore, the Lambda Field gives a natural way to deal with unstructured environments, such as tall grass. Where standard environment representations would always generate trajectories going around such obstacles, our framework allows the robot to go through the grass while being aware of the risk taken.