Search

There is accumulating evidence that the coordinate transcription of the virulence genes in Listeria monocytogenes constitutes a very complex regulation mechanism which might require other factors in addition to PrfA. We previously described an unknown proteinaceous component from crude bacterial cell extracts, which, together with PrfA, formed a specific complex (CI) in electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) with an hly promoter probe. Here we identify the RNA polymerase (RNAP) of L. monocytogenes as an essential component of the CI complex. Addition of purified RNAP plus PrfA to the hly promoter probe allowed reconstitution of a complex migrating at the same height as CI. By using EMSA and DNaseI footprint experiments it could be shown that PrfA leads to an enhanced and specific binding of RNAP. Transcriptional activity of RNAP in vitro, using the actA promoter, was strictly dependent on PrfA.

Most Listeria monocytogenes virulence genes are positively regulated by the PrfA protein, a transcription factor sharing sequence similarities with cyclic AMP (cAMP) receptor protein (CRP). Its coding gene, prfA, is regulated by PrfA itself via an autoregulatory loop mediated by the upstream PrfA-dependent plcA promoter. We have recently characterized prfA* mutants from L. monocytogenes which, as a result of a single amino acid substitution in PrfA, Gly145Ser, constitutively overexpress prfA and the genes of the PrfA virulence regulon. Here, we show that about 10 times more PrfA protein is produced in a prfA* strain than in the wild type. Thus, the phenotype of prfA* mutants is presumably due to the synthesis of a PrfA protein with higher promoter-activating activity (PrfA*), which keeps its intracellular levels constantly elevated by positive feedback. We investigated the interaction of PrfA and PrfA* (Gly145Ser) with target DNA. Gel retardation assays performed with a DNA fragment carrying the PrfA binding site of the plcA promoter demonstrated that the PrfA* mutant form is much more efficient than wild-type PrfA at forming specific DNA-protein complexes. In footprinting experiments, the two purified PrfA forms interacted with the same nucleotides at the target site, although the minimum amount required for protection was 6 to 7 times lower with PrfA*. These results show that the primary functional consequence of the Gly145Ser mutation is an increase in the affinity of PrfA for its target sequence. Interestingly, similar mutations at the equivalent position in CRP result in a transcriptionally active, CRP* mutant form which binds with high affinity to target DNA in the absence of the activating cofactor, cAMP. Our observations suggest that the structural similarities between PrfA and CRP are also functionally relevant and support a model in which the PrfA protein, like CRP, shifts from transcriptionally inactive to active conformations by interaction with a cofactor.

The interaction of the purified PrfA transcription factor with the regulatory sequences located upstream of the PrfA-dependent listeriolysin (hly) and internalin (inlA) genes was studied in the presence and in the absence of Paf (PrfA-activating factor)-containing extracts. It is shown that PrfA protein is able to bind, independently of additional factors, to a 109bp DNA fragment including the entire hly promoter sequence with the anticipated PrfA binding site ('PrfA-box'). PrfA alone, but not in combination with Paf, can also bind to a shorter target sequence of 28 bp comprising essentially the PrfA-box of the hly promoter. The addition of a Paf-containing extract does not lead to significant protein binding to these two hly target sequences in the absence of PrfA but converts the complex (CIII) consisting of PrfA and the 109 bp hly DNA fragment to a slower migrating PrfA-Paf-DNA complex (CI). Incubation of cell-free extracts of wild-type Listeria monocytogenes with the 109 bp DNA fragment leads to the formation of CI. The addition of polyclonal PrfA antibodies causes a supershift of CIII. Purified PrfA and PrfA-Paf also bind to a DNA fragment containing the PrfA-dependent promoter P2 of inlA, albeit at a lower rate when compared with the corresponding hly sequence. In contrast to the hly target DNA, the inlA promoter sequence efficiently binds Paf alone, and this Paf binding reduces that of PrfA and PrfA-Paf to the inlA target DNA. DNase I footprint experiments show that purified PrfA protects sequences of dyad symmetry previously proposed as PrfA binding sites in the hly and in the inlA promoter regions.

The iap gene of Listeria monocytogenes encodes the extracellular protein p60, which possesses a murein hydrolase activity necessary for septum separation. We constructed L. monocytogenes EGD strains harbouring plasmids that carry the iap gene under the control of the PrfA-regulated promoters of the L. monocytogenes genes hly, mpl, and actA. After insertional inactivation of the chromosomal iap gene in L. monocytogenes EGD, p60 synthesis was strictly dependent on PrfA. Elevated temperature (40 degrees C) enhanced synthesis of p60 in L. monocytogenes when the iap gene was under the control of the hly promoter; this appeared to be associated with increased synthesis of PrfA at this temperature. Synthesis of p60 in L. monocytogenes was significantly lower when the iap gene was placed under the control of the actA or the mpl promoter. Transcription of the iap gene was repressed in L. monocytogenes in the presence of PrfA when iap expression was under the control of the prfA promoter P2. Under the control of the hly promoter the gene produced low levels of secreted p60 in the presence of low amounts of PrfA, and this in turn led to the generation of long listerial cell filaments consisting of bacteria that had failed to separate. Overexpression of p60 in the presence of high levels of PrfA caused formation of single cells, which showed reduced viability depending on the level of secreted p60. These data suggest that the iap gene may be a valuable tool for monitoring virulence gene regulation by PrfA under in vivo conditions, without disturbing the integrity of the infected host cells.

The PrfA protein, which is a member of the Crp/Fnr family of prokaryotic transcription activators, regulates the virulence genes of Listeria monocytogenes. In this work, specific binding of PrfA to its target DNA was determined by electrophoretic mobility-shift assays (EMSAs) using cell-free extracts from the two L. monocytogenes strains EGD and NCTC 7973. PrfA-specific binding differs between the two strains, even when the concentration of PrfA was adjusted to similar levels. Both strains exhibited increased PrfA-specific binding after a shift into minimal essential medium (MEM) without showing a significant change in the amount of PrfA protein, relative to extracts from bacteria grown in brain-heart infusion (BHI). The purified PrfA protein from strain EGD produced in Escherichia coli did not exhibit specific binding to the target DNA but did so upon addition of PrfA-free extracts from various Listeria species and Bacillus subtilis. The observed activation of PrfA seems to be caused by a PrfA-activating factor (Paf), which is probably a protein since elevated temperature, but not RNase treatment, destroyed the activation potential of such PrfA-free extracts. Moreover, fractionation of these extracts by sucrose gradient centrifugation yielded the Paf activity in a fraction sedimenting at 3.2 S. Specific binding of PrfA-containing extracts from strain EGD to the hly and actA promoter sequences was strongly inhibited by iron, whereas that of extracts from strain NCTC 7973 was only slightly reduced. The iron effect seems to be mediated by Paf rather than by PrfA itself.