Search

Cerebellar brain inhibition (CBI) is an inhibitory output from the cerebellum to the primary motor cortex, which is decreased in early motor learning. Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation to induce brain plastic changes; however, the effects of cerebellar tRNS on CBI and motor learning have not been investigated yet to our knowledge. In this study, whether cerebellar tRNS decreases CBI and improves motor learning was examined, and pupil diameter was measured to examine physiological changes due to the effect of tRNS on motor learning. Thirty-four healthy subjects were assigned to either the cerebellar tRNS group or the Sham group. The subjects performed visuomotor tracking task with ten trials each in the early and late learning stages while receiving the stimulus intervention. CBI and motor evoked potentials were measured before the learning task, after the early learning stage, and after the late learning stage, and pupil diameter was measured during the task. There was no change in CBI in both groups. No group differences in motor learning rates were observed at any learning stages. Pupil diameter was smaller in the late learning stage than in the early learning stage in both groups. The cerebellar tRNS was suggested not to induce changes in CBI and improvement in motor learning, and it did not affect pupil diameter., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

A theory has been posited that microscale learning, which involves short intervals of a few seconds during explicit motor skill learning, considerably enhances performance. This phenomenon correlates with diminished beta-band activity in the frontal and parietal regions. However, there is a lack of neurophysiological studies regarding the relationship between microscale learning and implicit motor skill learning. In the present study, we aimed to determine the effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) during short rest periods on microscale learning in an implicit motor task. We investigated the effects of 20-Hz β-tACS delivered during short rest periods while participants performed an implicit motor task. In Experiments 1 and 2, β-tACS targeted the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the right frontoparietal network, respectively. The participants performed a finger-tapping task using their nondominant left hand, and microscale learning was separately analyzed for micro-online gains (MOnGs) and micro-offline gains (MOffGs). Contrary to our expectations, β-tACS exhibited no statistically significant effects on MOnGs or MOffGs in either Experiment 1 or Experiment 2. In addition, microscale learning during the performance of the implicit motor task was improved by MOffGs in the early learning phase and by MOnGs in the late learning phase. These results revealed that the stimulation protocol employed in this study did not affect microscale learning, indicating a novel aspect of microscale learning in implicit motor tasks. This is the first study to examine microscale learning in implicit motor tasks and may provide baseline information that will be useful in future studies., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Various situations in our everyday life call for response inhibition, mechanisms deputed to outright stop an ongoing course of action. This function reportedly involves the activity of the right intraparietal sulcus (rIPS). This study aimed to determine whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) intervention to the rIPS alters response inhibition. We investigated 15 healthy adults performing a stop signal task before and after tDCS intervention. We applied tDCS with 1.5 mA to the rIPS directly above (P4) and the left supraorbital area for 20 min. The stimulation conditions involved Anodal, cathodal, and pseudo-stimulation. Each participant performed a stop signal task under all stimulation conditions. The changes in response inhibition function were evaluated by comparing the stop signal reaction times (SSRT) before and after the tDCS intervention. Under the Anodal condition, SSRT was significantly shorter after than before the intervention (p = 0.014). Under the Anodal and Cathodal conditions, we could observe a significantly positive correlation between the SSRT before the tDCS intervention and the difference in SSRT before and after tDCS intervention (Anodal condition: r = 0.823, p < 0.001; Cathodal condition: r = 0.831, p < 0.001). No such correlation could be found under the Sham condition. In summary, this study demonstrated that Anodal-tDCS intervention for rIPS improves response-inhibitory function and the stimulus effect depends on the response-inhibitory function of the participant prior to stimulation., Competing Interests: Declaration of interest None., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The intraparietal sulcus region, which is part of the posterior parietal cortex (PPC), has been shown to play an important role in discriminating object shapes using the fingers. Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) and anodal transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS) are noninvasive strategies widely used to modulate neural activity in cortical regions. Therefore, we investigated the effects of tRNS and anodal tPCS applied to left or right PPC on the tactile discrimination performance of the right index finger in 20 neurologically healthy subjects. A grating orientation task (GOT) was performed before and immediately after delivering tRNS (stimulus frequency 0.1-640 Hz) in Experiment 1 or anodal tPCS (pulse width 50 ms and inter-pulse interval 5 ms) in Experiment 2. Performing tRNS over the right PPC significantly improved discrimination performance on the GOT. Subjects were classified into low and high baseline performance groups. Conducting tRNS over the left PPC significantly reduced the GOT discrimination performance in the high-performance group. By contrast, anodal tPCS delivered to the PPC of the left and right hemispheres had no significant effect on the tactile GOT discrimination performance of the right hand. We show that transcranial electric stimulation over the PPC may improve tactile perception but the effect depends on stimulus modality, parameters, and on the stimulated hemisphere., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) are two methods of noninvasively modulating cortical excitability below the placed electrode. Anodal tDCS over the cerebellum has been shown to modulate cerebellar brain inhibition (CBI), which is an indication of cerebellar excitability, but does not alter contralateral M1 excitability. However, the effect of tRNS over the cerebellum has not been investigated. The purpose of this study was thus to compare the effects of tDCS and tRNS over the cerebellum on CBI and the contralateral motor evoked potentials (MEPs), as well as on the relationship between CBI and contralateral MEPs. A total of 15 healthy subjects completed four-condition transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) interventions (anodal tDCS&#95;1 mA, anodal tDCS&#95;2 mA, tRNS, and Sham) on separate days. CBI and MEPs were measured using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) before and after the 20 min tES intervention. For all conditions, there were no significant differences before and after tES in CBI or contralateral MEPs. In contrast, following tRNS, changes in CBI and MEPs were significantly correlated. No significant correlations were found in the other three conditions, indicating that cerebellar tDCS and tRNS have distinct effects on the relationship between CBI and contralateral MEPs. Taken together, these findings suggest that cerebellar tRNS may modulate the cerebellar to contralateral M1 pathway., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: Bimanual movements require sophisticated coordination of both hands. For improving bimanual motor skills, previous studies employed non-invasive brain stimulation methods to evaluate their effects on symmetrical and/or gross bimanual motor skills. However, asymmetrical and elaborate movements were not sufficiently improved. Studies using non-invasive brain stimulation have examined the effects of stimulation on the primary and supplementary motor areas (SMA), but not on the cerebellar regions., Objective: We investigated whether the transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), which modulates oscillations in the cerebral cortex, of the cerebellum and SMA improves bimanual movements., Methods: Bimanual movements were assessed in 22 healthy young adults (mean age: 21.3 ± 1.5 years) via 13 trials of the Purdue Pegboard Test (PPT). A DC stimulator delivered 70 Hz tACS (γ-tACS) at 1 mA intensity via electrodes placed over the SMA, cerebellum and left shoulder in 5 s fade in/out cycles of 5 s for a total stimulus duration of 60 s for in each trial. Four stimulation conditions were applied and compared for statistical differences., Results: The γ-tACS of the cerebellum, γ-tACS of the SMA and simultaneous stimulation of both regions caused significant improvement in PPT performance scores. The γ-tACS of the cerebellum improved PPT performance in all subjects and was more effective than the γ-tACS of the SMA., Conclusion: The γ-tACS of the cerebellum effectively and reliably improves complex bimanual motor skills. Although the neural mechanisms of the stimulation effect remain unclear, these results can guide the future development of new stimulation methods for improving bimanual motor skills., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Spontaneous oscillations in the somatosensory cortex, especially of the alpha (8 - 14 Hz) and gamma (60 - 80 Hz) frequencies, affect tactile perception; moreover, these oscillations can be selectively modulated by frequency-matched transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on the basis of ongoing oscillatory brain activity. To examine whether tACS can actually improve tactile perception via alpha and gamma modulation, we measured the effects of 10-Hz and 70-Hz tACS (α- and γ-tACS) on the left somatosensory cortex on right-finger tactile spatial orientation discrimination, and the associations between performance changes and individual alpha and gamma activities., Methods: Fifteen neurologically healthy subjects were recruited into this study. Electroencephalography (EEG) was performed before the first day, to assess the normal alpha- and gamma-activity levels. A grating orientation discrimination task was performed before and during 10-Hz and 70-Hz tACS., Results: The 10-Hz tACS protocol decreased the grating orientation discrimination threshold, primarily in subjects with low alpha event-related synchronization (ERS). In contrast, the 70-Hz tACS had no effect on the grating orientation discrimination threshold., Conclusions: This study showed that 10-Hz tACS can improve tactile orientation discrimination in subjects with low alpha activity. Alpha-frequency tACS may help identify the contributions of these oscillations to other neurophysiological and pathological processes., (© 2021 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) can regulate the frequency of neuronal activity in the cerebral cortex. Beta (β) activity in the supplementary motor area (SMA) is involved in motor planning and maintenance while gamma (γ) activity is involved in updating motor plans. We investigated the effect of tACS in the β- and γ-bands (β-tACS and γ- tACS) applied to the SMA on bimanual movement performance. This study included 32 right-handed healthy participants performing a Purdue Pegboard Test (PPT) during the administration of either β-tACS (20 Hz), γ-tACS (80 Hz), or sham stimulation over the SMA. Each participant performed nine PPT trials during each stimulation condition. The linear approximation of the number of parts and their differences for the 9 trials performed by each participant was calculated. A significant positive correlation was found between the difference from linear approximation for the β-tACS condition and the intercept of the linear approximation (p = 0.007, Pearson's r = 0.464), and significant negative correlation was found for the γ-tACS condition (p = 0.012, Pearson's r = -0.438). In the low-performance subgroup, the mean values of the difference from linear approximation under the γ-tACS condition was significantly larger than that under the β-tACS condition (p = 0.048). These results were opposite for the high-performance subgroup (p = 0.002) and sham group (p = 0.014). We demonstrated that the effect of tACS over the SMA depended on the stimulus frequency and the participant's motor performance and may modulate the maintenance and updating of motor plans., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest All authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is a non-invasive method of brain stimulation that modulates oscillatory neural activity in the cortical area under the electrodes. Gamma (γ)-tACS applied over the primary motor cortex (M1) and cerebellar hemisphere is known to improve motor performance; however, it is not yet known whether it affects motor learning. Thus, here we investigated whether γ-tACS applied over the M1 and cerebellar hemisphere affects motor learning. This study involved 30 healthy subjects (14 females, 16 males) performing a visuomotor control task (eight trials) during an administration of either γ-tACS or a sham stimulation (15 subjects per condition) over their right M1 and left cerebellar hemisphere. Each subject performed five trials after 24 h. The motor learning efficiency, motor learning retention and re-motor learning efficiency in each condition were compared. The motor learning retention in the γ-tACS condition was significantly higher than that in the sham condition (p = 0.031). Thus, subjects who were administered γ-tACS maintained their motor performance the next day better than sham-stimulated subjects. There was no significant difference between the conditions in the motor learning efficiency and those in the re-motor learning efficiency. Our results demonstrate that γ-tACS administered over the M1 and cerebellar hemisphere during a motor learning task can enhance motor learning retention., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) can be used to modulate inhibitory circuits in primary somatosensory cortex, resulting in improved somatosensory function. However, efficacy may depend on the specific stimulus modality and patterns. For instance, transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), and transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS) were found to stably and effectively modulate neuronal excitability, while anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) appeared less effective overall but with substantial response heterogeneity among subjects. Therefore, we compared the effects of tES applied to primary somatosensory cortex on somatosensory evoked potential paired-pulse depression (SEP-PPD) and tactile discrimination performance in 17 neurologically healthy subjects. In Experiment 1, somatosensory evoked potential N20/P25&#95;SEP-PPD, N20&#95;SEP-PPD, and P25&#95;SEP-PPD responses were assessed before and immediately after anodal tDCS, tACS (stimulation frequency, 140 Hz), tRNS (stimulation frequency, 0.1-640 Hz), anodal tPCS (pulse width, 50 ms; inter-pulse interval, 5 ms), and sham stimulation applied to primary somatosensory cortex. In Experiment 2, a grating orientation task (GOT) was performed before and immediately after the same anodal tDCS, tRNS, anodal tPCS, and sham stimulation regimens. Anodal tDCS and anodal tPCS decreased N20&#95;SEP-PPD, and tRNS increased the first N20 SEP amplitude. Furthermore, tRNS and anodal tPCS decreased GOT discrimination threshold (improved performance). These results suggest that tRNS and anodal tPCS can improve sensory perception by modulating neuronal activity in primary somatosensory cortex., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) has been shown to modulate neural connectivity in the cortical area under experimental electrodes. Although gamma tACS over the M1 region and the cerebellar hemisphere has been shown to improve motor performance, the optimal stimulation method has not been clarified. In this study, we aimed to clarify whether the effect of gamma tACS over M1 and the cerebellar hemisphere depends on current intensity. Twenty healthy adults performed a visuomotor control task using their right index finger for 30 s during tACS (70 Hz) over the left M1 and the right cerebellar hemisphere. Each subject participated in 10 trials, separated by intervals of 3 min. Three stimulation conditions were applied: (1) pseudo-stimulation (sham condition), (2) tACS with a current intensity of 1.0 mA and (3) tACS with a current intensity of 2.0 mA. Our results indicated that regardless of the current intensity, participants with the lower motor performance had better motor performance under both tACS conditions. Such a correlation was not observed under the sham condition. Collectively, our findings demonstrated that the effect of gamma tACS over M1 and the cerebellar hemisphere does not depend on current intensity, and that motor performance slightly improved in both tACS conditions for participants with lower motor performance., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and peripheral nerve electrical stimulation (PES) can change corticospinal excitability. tDCS can be used to non-invasively modulate the cerebral cortex's excitability by applying weak current to an electrode attached to the head, and the effect varies with the electrode's polarity. Previous studies have reported the effect of combined tDCS and PES on corticospinal excitability; when compared to single stimulation, combined stimulation increases cortical excitability. In contrast, another study reported that the effect of tDCS is attenuated by PES; hence, there is no consensus opinion on the effect on combined stimulation. Therefore, this study aimed to clarify the effect of combined tDCS and PES on corticospinal excitability. In Experiment 1, the combined stimulation of anodal tDCS and PES (anodal tDCS + PES) was performed, and in Experiment 2, a combined stimulation with PES, after cathodal tDCS (PES after cathodal tDCS), was performed using a homeostatic metaplasticity theoretical model. In Experiment 1, anodal tDCS produced a significant increase from baseline in motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude 10 min after stimulation, but no significant changes in MEP amplitude were observed with PES or the anodal tDCS + PES condition. Experiment 2 showed a significant decrease in MEP amplitude immediately after cathodal tDCS, and a significant increase in MEP amplitude 15 min after PES, but no significant change in MEP amplitude was observed with sequential PES following cathodal tDCS. In conclusion, our data indicate that PES with anodal tDCS suppressed the effect of tDCS. Also, PES after cathodal tDCS did not induce homeostatic metaplasticity and increase corticospinal excitability., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) modulates neural connectivity in the cortical area under the electrodes. Although gamma tACS over the M1 and the cerebellar hemisphere has been shown to improve motor performance, the details of this effect remain unclear. This study aimed to clarify whether the effect of gamma tACS over the M1 and the cerebellar hemisphere is a phase-specific. We applied tACS at 70 Hz over the left M1 and the right cerebellar hemisphere to 20 healthy adults while they performed a visuomotor control task using their right index finger for 30 s. Three stimulation conditions were applied: (1) pseudo-stimulation (sham condition), (2) 180° phase difference in the two cortical target areas (anti-phase condition) and (3) 0° phase difference (in-phase condition). The anti-phase condition decreased task error compared to the sham condition (P =  0.021), but did not differ from the in-phase condition. Our study demonstrated that the effect of gamma tACS over the M1 and the cerebellar hemisphere has phase specificity. This result suggests that intercortical functional synchronization is involved in the improvement of motor performance during gamma tACS over the M1 and the cerebellar hemisphere., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The vestibular system is involved in the control of standing balance. Galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) is a noninvasive technique that can stimulate the vestibular system. In recent years, noisy GVS (nGVS) using noise current stimulation has been attempted, but it has not been clarified whether it affects postural sway in open-eye standing., Objective: The purpose of this study was to clarify the influence of nGVS on the center of pressure (COP) sway measurement in open-eye standing postural control and identify the responders of nGVS., Methods: nGVS (0.1-640 Hz) was delivered at 0.4 and 1.0 mA over the bipolar mastoid. COP sway root mean square area, sway path length, medio-lateral (ML) mean velocity, and antero-posterior (AP) mean velocity before and during nGVS in an open-eye standing posture was measured., Results: nGVS at 0.4 and 1.0 mA significantly reduced sway path length, mean velocity. The stimulation effect of nGVS was also large in subjects with a long sway path. For subjects with high COP sway of Baseline, nGVS was effective even with stimulation for a short duration (5 s)., Conclusions: These findings suggest that nGVS improves postural sway in an open-eye standing posture among young subjects., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)