Search

Nuclear receptors induce both transcriptional activation and repression programs responsible for development, homeostasis, and disease. Here, we report a previously overlooked enhancer decommissioning strategy underlying a large estrogen receptor alpha (ERα)-dependent transcriptional repression program. The unexpected signature for this E2-induced program resides in indirect recruitment of ERα to a large cohort of pioneer factor basally active FOXA1-bound enhancers that lack cognate ERα DNA-binding elements. Surprisingly, these basally active estrogen-repressed (BAER) enhancers are decommissioned by ERα-dependent recruitment of the histone demethylase KDM2A, functioning independently of its demethylase activity. Rather, KDM2A tethers the E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase NEDD4 to ubiquitylate/dismiss Pol II to abrogate eRNA transcription, with consequent target gene downregulation. Thus, our data reveal that Pol II ubiquitylation/dismissal may serve as a potentially broad strategy utilized by indirectly bound nuclear receptors to abrogate large programs of pioneer factor-mediated, eRNA-producing enhancers.

Enhancers in higher eukaryotes and upstream activating sequences (UASs) in yeast have been shown to recruit components of the RNA polymerase II (Pol II) transcription machinery. At least a fraction of Pol II recruited to enhancers in higher eukaryotes initiates transcription and generates enhancer RNA (eRNA). In contrast, UASs in yeast do not recruit transcription factor TFIIH, which is required for transcription initiation. For both yeast and mammalian systems, it was shown that Pol II is transferred from enhancers/UASs to promoters. We propose that there are two modes of Pol II recruitment to enhancers in higher eukaryotes. Pol II complexes that generate eRNAs are recruited via TFIID, similar to mechanisms operating at promoters. This may involve the binding of TFIID to acetylated nucleosomes flanking the enhancer. The resulting eRNA, together with enhancer-bound transcription factors and co-regulators, contributes to the second mode of Pol II recruitment through the formation of a transcription initiation domain. Transient contacts with target genes, governed by proteins and RNA, lead to the transfer of Pol II from enhancers to TFIID-bound promoters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A large portion of the human genome is transcribed into RNAs without known protein-coding functions, far outnumbering coding transcription units. Extensive studies of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have clearly demonstrated that they can play critical roles in regulating gene expression, development, and diseases, acting both as transcriptional activators and repressors. More recently, enhancers have been found to be broadly transcribed, resulting in the production of enhancer-derived RNAs, or eRNAs. Here, we review emerging evidence suggesting that at least some eRNAs contribute to enhancer function. We discuss these findings with respect to potential mechanisms of action of eRNAs and other ncRNAs in regulated gene expression.

Enhancers in higher eukaryotes and upstream activating sequences (UASs) in yeast have been shown to recruit components of the RNA polymerase II (Pol II) transcription machinery. At least a fraction of Pol II recruited to enhancers in higher eukaryotes initiates transcription and generates enhancer RNA (eRNA). In contrast, UASs in yeast do not recruit transcription factor TFIIH, which is required for transcription initiation. For both yeast and mammalian systems, it was shown that Pol II is transferred from enhancers/UASs to promoters. We propose that there are two modes of Pol II recruitment to enhancers in higher eukaryotes. Pol II complexes that generate eRNAs are recruited via TFIID, similar to mechanisms operating at promoters. This may involve the binding of TFIID to acetylated nucleosomes flanking the enhancer. The resulting eRNA, together with enhancer-bound transcription factors and co-regulators, contributes to the second mode of Pol II recruitment through the formation of a transcription initiation domain. Transient contacts with target genes, governed by proteins and RNA, lead to the transfer of Pol II from enhancers to TFIID-bound promoters.

Responses to developmental and environmental cues depend on precise spatiotemporal control of gene transcription. Enhancers, which comprise DNA elements bound by regulatory proteins, can activate target genes in response to these external signals. Recent studies have shown that enhancers are transcribed to produce enhancer RNAs (eRNAs). Do eRNAs play a functional role in activating gene expression or are they non-functional byproducts of nearby transcription machinery? The unstable nature of eRNAs and over-reliance on knockdown approaches have made elucidating the possible functions of eRNAs challenging. We focus here on studies using cloned eRNAs to study their function as transcripts, revealing roles for eRNAs in enhancer–promoter looping, recruiting transcriptional machinery, and facilitating RNA polymerase pause–release to regulate gene expression. Enhancers are regulatory regions in the genome that bind sequence-specific DNA-binding transcription factors. They are transcribed to produce enhancer RNAs (eRNAs). Current studies have relied on depletion of eRNAs ('subtraction' experiments) rather than on expressing them as physical entities from cloned cDNAs ('addition' experiments). This has left open questions about whether these non-coding transcripts have functions in regulating gene expression or whether they are merely transcriptional noise. A limited number of studies that have expressed eRNAs from cloned cDNAs suggest that they function by facilitating enhancer–promoter looping, stimulating the recruitment and activity of regulatory proteins, establishing a permissive chromatin environment for gene activation, and aiding in the release of paused RNA polymerase II. Future studies using genome-targeting approaches to study eRNAs in endogenous chromatin will further define the functions of eRNAs in the regulation of target gene expression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Since the discovery that enhancers can support transcription, the roles of enhancer RNAs have remained largely elusive. We identified that enhancer RNAs interact with and augment bromodomain engagement with acetylated chromatin. Here, we discuss our recent findings and the potential mechanisms underlying the regulation and functions of enhancer RNA-bromodomain associations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Eukaryotic genomes are pervasively transcribed, producing both coding and non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs). ncRNAs are diverse and a critical family of biological molecules, yet much remains unknown regarding their functions and mechanisms of regulation. ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeling complexes, in modifying chromatin structure, play an important role in transcriptional regulation. Recent findings show that ncRNAs regulate nucleosome remodeler activities at many levels and that ncRNAs are regulatory targets of nucleosome remodelers. Further, a series of recent screens indicate this network of regulatory interactions is more expansive than previously appreciated. Here, we discuss currently described regulatory interactions between ncRNAs and nucleosome remodelers and contextualize their biological functions.

Genome-wide RNA sequencing has shown that only a small fraction of the human genome is transcribed into protein-coding mRNAs. While once thought to be “junk” DNA, recent findings indicate that the rest of the genome encodes many types of non-coding RNA molecules with a myriad of functions still being determined. Among the non-coding RNAs, long non-coding RNAs (lncRNA) and enhancer RNAs (eRNA) are found to be most copious. While their exact biological functions and mechanisms of action are currently unknown, technologies such as next-generation RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and global nuclear run-on sequencing (GRO-seq) have begun deciphering their expression patterns and biological significance. In addition to their identification, it has been shown that the expression of long non-coding RNAs and enhancer RNAs can vary due to spatial, temporal, developmental, or hormonal variations. In this review, we explore newly reported information on estrogen-regulated eRNAs and lncRNAs and their associated biological functions to help outline their markedly prominent roles in estrogen-dependent signaling.

Mammalian genomes are pervasively transcribed, with long noncoding RNAs being the most abundant fraction. Recent studies have highlighted the central role played by these transcripts in several physiological and pathological processes. Despite several metabolic features shared between coding and noncoding transcripts, these two classes of RNAs exhibit multiple differences regarding their biogenesis and processing. Here we review such distinctions, focusing on the unique features of specific long noncoding RNAs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Active transcriptional enhancers are often transcribed to eRNAs, whose changing levels mirror those of the target gene mRNA. We discuss some of the reported functions of these eRNAs and their likely diversity to allow utilization of distinctcisregulatory regions to enhance transcription in diverse developmental and cellular contexts. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Macrophages play essential roles in tissue homeostasis, pathogen elimination, and tissue repair. A defining characteristic of these cells is their ability to efficiently adapt to a variety of abruptly changing and complex environments. This ability is intrinsically linked to a capacity to quickly alter their transcriptome, and this is tightly associated with the epigenomic organization of these cells and, in particular, their enhancer repertoire. Indeed, enhancers are genomic sites that serve as platforms for the integration of signaling pathways with the mechanisms that regulate m RNA transcription. Notably, transcription is pervasive at active enhancers and enhancer RNAs ( eRNAs) are tightly coupled to regulated transcription of protein-coding genes. Furthermore, given that each cell type possesses a defining enhancer repertoire, studies on enhancers provide a powerful method to study how specialization of functions among the diverse macrophage subtypes may arise. Here, we review recent studies providing insights into the distinct mechanisms that contribute to the establishment of enhancers and their role in the regulation of transcription in macrophages. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recent functional studies have unveiled the significant role chromatin topology plays in gene regulation. Several lines of evidence suggest genes access necessary factors for transcription by forming chromatin loops. A clearer picture of the players involved in chromatin organization, including lncRNA, is emerging. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Enhancers are traditionally viewed as DNA sequences located some distance from a promoter that act in cis and in an orientation-independent fashion to increase utilization of specific promoters and thereby regulate gene expression. Much progress has been made over the last decade toward understanding how these distant elements interact with target promoters, but how transcription is enhanced remains an object of active inquiry. Recent reports convey the prevalence and diversity of enhancer transcription and transcripts and support both as key factors with mechanistically distinct, but not mutually exclusive roles in enhancer function. Decoupling the causes and effects of transcription on the local chromatin landscape and understanding the role of enhancer transcripts in the context of long-range interactions are challenges that require additional attention. In this review, we focus on the possible functions of enhancer transcription by highlighting several recent enhancer RNA papers and, within the context of other enhancer studies, speculate on the role of enhancer transcription in regulating differential gene expression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The hormone-stimulated glucocorticoid receptor (GR) modulates transcription by interacting with thousands of enhancers and GR binding sites (GBSs) throughout the genome. Here, we examined the effects of GR binding on enhancer dynamics and investigated the contributions of individual GBSs to the hormone response. Hormone treatment resulted in genome-wide reorganization of the enhancer landscape in breast cancer cells. Upstream of the DDIT4 oncogene, GR bound to four sites constituting a hormone-dependent super enhancer. Three GBSs were required as hormone-dependent enhancers that differentially promoted histone acetylation, transcription frequency, and burst size. Conversely, the fourth site suppressed transcription and hormone treatment alleviated this suppression. GR binding within the super enhancer promoted a loop-switching mechanism that allowed interaction of the DDIT4 TSS with the active GBSs. The unique functions of each GR binding site contribute to hormone-induced transcriptional heterogeneity and demonstrate the potential for targeted modulation of oncogene expression. [Display omitted] • Dex treatment reorganizes the enhancer landscape in breast cancer cells • A Dex-specific super enhancer encompasses DDIT4 and four GR binding sites • Each binding site is uniquely required to promote or suppress DDIT4 expression • Dex treatment triggers a loop-switching mechanism to induce DDIT4 transcription Hoffman et al. show that the Dex-responsive gene DDIT4 is regulated by four GR binding sites (GBSs) within a Dex-specific super enhancer. GR promotes DDIT4 transcription via a loop-switching mechanism that disrupts a suppressive interaction between the four GBSs in favor of TSS interaction with the three enhancer-like GBSs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Eukaryotic genomes are pervasively transcribed, producing both coding and non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs). ncRNAs are diverse and a critical family of biological molecules, yet much remains unknown regarding their functions and mechanisms of regulation. ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeling complexes, in modifying chromatin structure, play an important role in transcriptional regulation. Recent findings show that ncRNAs regulate nucleosome remodeler activities at many levels and that ncRNAs are regulatory targets of nucleosome remodelers. Further, a series of recent screens indicate this network of regulatory interactions is more expansive than previously appreciated. Here, we discuss currently described regulatory interactions between ncRNAs and nucleosome remodelers and contextualize their biological functions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Genome-wide RNA sequencing has shown that only a small fraction of the human genome is transcribed into protein-coding mRNAs. While once thought to be "junk" DNA, recent findings indicate that the rest of the genome encodes many types of non-coding RNA molecules with a myriad of functions still being determined. Among the non-coding RNAs, long non-coding RNAs (lncRNA) and enhancer RNAs (eRNA) are found to be most copious. While their exact biological functions and mechanisms of action are currently unknown, technologies such as next-generation RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and global nuclear run-on sequencing (GRO-seq) have begun deciphering their expression patterns and biological significance. In addition to their identification, it has been shown that the expression of long non-coding RNAs and enhancer RNAs can vary due to spatial, temporal, developmental, or hormonal variations. In this review, we explore newly reported information on estrogen-regulated eRNAs and lncRNAs and their associated biological functions to help outline their markedly prominent roles in estrogen-dependent signaling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Transcriptional responses to external stimuli remain poorly understood. Using global nuclear run-on followed by sequencing (GRO-seq) and precision nuclear run-on sequencing (PRO-seq), we show that CDK8 kinase activity promotes RNA polymerase II pause release in response to interferon-γ (IFN-γ), a universal cytokine involved in immunity and tumor surveillance. The Mediator kinase module contains CDK8 or CDK19, which are presumed to be functionally redundant. We implemented cortistatin A, chemical genetics, transcriptomics, and other methods to decouple their function while assessing enzymatic versus structural roles. Unexpectedly, CDK8 and CDK19 regulated different gene sets via distinct mechanisms. CDK8-dependent regulation required its kinase activity, whereas CDK19 governed IFN-γ responses through its scaffolding function (i.e., it was kinase independent). Accordingly, CDK8, not CDK19, phosphorylates the STAT1 transcription factor (TF) during IFN-γ stimulation, and CDK8 kinase inhibition blocked activation of JAK-STAT pathway TFs. Cytokines such as IFN-γ rapidly mobilize TFs to "reprogram" cellular transcription; our results implicate CDK8 and CDK19 as essential for this transcriptional reprogramming. • Mediator kinases CDK8 and CDK19 are distinct transcription regulators in the IFN-γ pathway • CDK8 acts as a kinase while CDK19 functions as a scaffold in driving IFN-γ gene profiles • CDK8 and CDK19 activate distinct gene sets • Mediator kinase CDK8 promotes polymerase II pause release during the IFN-γ response Steinparzer et al. discover that the Mediator kinases CDK8 and CDK19 are functionally and mechanistically distinct transcription regulators in the IFN-γ antiviral program: CDK8 and CDK19 activate distinct gene sets, and they do so in kinase-dependent (CDK8) and kinase-independent (CDK19) ways. Further, CDK8 kinase activity promotes RNAPII pause release. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Enhancers are non-coding DNA elements that function in cis to regulate transcription from nearby genes. Through direct interactions with gene promoters, enhancers give rise to spatially and temporally precise gene expression profiles in distinct cell or tissue types. In the brain, the accurate regulation of these intricate expression programs across different neuronal classes gives rise to an incredible cellular and functional diversity. Newly developed technologies have recently allowed more accurate enhancer mapping and more sophisticated enhancer manipulation, producing rapid progress in our understanding of enhancer biology. Furthermore, identification of disease-linked genetic variation in enhancer regions has highlighted the potential influence of enhancers in brain health and disease. This review outlines the key role of enhancers as transcriptional regulators, reviews the current understanding of enhancer regulation in neuronal development, function and dysfunction and provides our thoughts on how enhancers can be targeted for technological and therapeutic goals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]