Search

With the continuous increase in the use of haploidentical donors for transplantation, the selection of donors becomes increasingly important. Haploidentical donors have been selected primarily based on clinical characteristics, while the effects of killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs) on outcomes of haploidentical-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) remain inconclusive. The present study aimed to thoroughly evaluate the effect of KIRs and binding ligands assessed by various models, in addition to other patient/donor variables, on clinical outcomes in haplo-HSCT. In a cohort of 354 patients undergoing their first haplo-HSCT, we found that a higher Count Functional inhibitory KIR score (CF-iKIR) was associated with improved progression-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.71; P = .029) and overall survival (OS) (HR, 0.66; P = .016), while none of the other models predicted for survival in these patients. Moreover, using exploratory classification and regression tree analysis, we found that donor age <58 years combined with cytomegalovirus-nonreactive recipient was associated with the best OS, whereas donor age >58 years was associated with the worst OS. In the rest of our cohort (80%), cytomegalovirus-reactive recipients with a donor <58 years old, a higher CF-iKIR was associated with superior OS. The 3-year OS rates were 73.9%, 54.1% (HR, 1.84; P = .044), 44.5% (HR, 2.01; P = .003), and 18.5% (HR, 5.44; P <.001) in the best, better, poor, and worse donor groups, respectively. Our results suggest that KIR alloreactivity assessed by CF-iKIR score can help optimize donor selection in haplo-HSCT., Competing Interests: Authors JS, FH, HB are/were employed by DKMS gemeinnützige GmbH, Tübingen, Germany. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Zou, Kongtim, Srour, Greenbaum, Schetelig, Heidenreich, Baldauf, Moore, Saengboon, Carmazzi, Rondon, Ma, Rezvani, Shpall, Champlin, Ciurea and Cao.)

Purpose: Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) are standard components of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Prior data suggested that CNI-free approaches using donor T-cell depletion, either by ex vivo CD34 selection or in vivo post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as a single agent, are associated with lower rates of chronic GVHD (cGVHD)., Methods: This multicenter phase III trial randomly assigned patients with acute leukemia or myelodysplasia and an HLA-matched donor to receive CD34-selected peripheral blood stem cell, PTCy after a bone marrow (BM) graft, or tacrolimus and methotrexate after BM graft (control). The primary end point was cGVHD (moderate or severe) or relapse-free survival (CRFS)., Results: Among 346 patients enrolled, 327 received HCT, 300 per protocol. Intent-to-treat rates of 2-year CRFS were 50.6% for CD34 selection (hazard ratio [HR] compared with control, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.15; P = .24), 48.1% for PTCy (HR, 0.86; 0.61 to 1.23; P = .41), and 41.0% for control. Corresponding rates of overall survival were 60.1% (HR, 1.74; 1.09 to 2.80; P = .02), 76.2% (HR, 1.02; 0.60 to 1.72; P = .95), and 76.1%. CD34 selection was associated with lower moderate to severe cGVHD (HR, 0.25; 0.12 to 0.52; P = .02) but higher transplant-related mortality (HR, 2.76; 1.26 to 6.06; P = .01). PTCy was associated with comparable cGVHD and survival outcomes to control, and a trend toward lower disease relapse (HR, 0.52; 0.28 to 0.96; P = .037)., Conclusion: CNI-free interventions as performed herein did not result in superior CRFS compared with tacrolimus and methotrexate with BM. Lower rates of moderate and severe cGVHD did not translate into improved survival., Competing Interests: Leo LuznikConsulting or Advisory Role: Gilead Sciences, Talaris Therapheutics, Precision BioSciences, Rubius Therapheutics, WindMiL TherapheuticsResearch Funding: Genentech, Amgen (I)Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Patent holder WindMIL therapheuticsUncompensated Relationships: WindMIL therapheutics Marcelo C. PasquiniHonoraria: HonorariaConsulting or Advisory Role: Pfizer, Medigene (Inst), Amgen¸ Bristol Myers SquibbResearch Funding: Kite/Gilead (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst) Brent LoganConsulting or Advisory Role: Daiichi Sankyo, Enlivex Therapeutics Ltd, Gamida Cell Robert J. SoifferLeadership: Kiadis Pharma, Be the Match/NMDPConsulting or Advisory Role: Juno Therapeutics, Gilead Sciences, Rheos Medicines, Cugene, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Precision Biosciences, Takeda, Jasper Therapeutics, Alexion PharmaceuticalsExpert Testimony: PfizerTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Gilead Sciences Steven M. DevineThis author is a member of the Journal of Clinical Oncology Editorial Board. Journal policy recused the author from having any role in the peer review of this manuscript.Honoraria: Kiadis PharmaConsulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers SquibbResearch Funding: Orca Bio (Inst), Kiadis Pharma (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Orca Bio Sergio GiraltThis author is a member of the Journal of Clinical Oncology Editorial Board. Journal policy recused the author from having any role in the peer review of this manuscript.Honoraria: Celgene, Takeda, Amgen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, SanofiConsulting or Advisory Role: Celgene, Takeda, Sanofi, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Janssen, Actinuum, Bristol Myers Squibb, Johnson & Johnson, PfizerResearch Funding: Celgene (Inst), Takeda, Miltenyi Biotec (Inst), Johnson & Johnson, Amgen, Actinuum, SanofiTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Celgene, Sanofi, Amgen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals Helen E. HeslopStock and Other Ownership Interests: Marker Therapeutics, Allovir, Fresh Wind BiotechnologiesConsulting or Advisory Role: Gilead Sciences, Novartis, Kiadis Pharma, Tessa Therapeutics, Marker Therapeutics, PACT Pharma, Mesoblast, GlaxoSmithKline, Takara BioResearch Funding: Tessa Therapeutics (Inst) Mary M. HorowitzConsulting or Advisory Role: MedacResearch Funding: Biovitrum (Inst), Jazz Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Magenta Therapeutics (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Kite/Gilead (Inst), Actinium Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Amgen (Inst), Bluebird Bio (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Chimerix (Inst), CSL Behring¸ Daiichi Sankyo (Inst), Gamida Cell (Inst), GlaxoSmithKline (Inst), Mesoblast (Inst), Miltenyi Biotec (Inst), Oncoimmune (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Pharmacyclics (Inst), Regeneron (Inst), Sanofi (Inst), Seattle Genetics (Inst), Shire (Inst), Astellas Pharma, Xenikos (Inst) Mark R. LitzowConsulting or Advisory Role: Omeros, Jazz PharmaceuticalsResearch Funding: Amgen, Astellas Pharma, Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Pluristem Therapeutic, AbbVie/Genentech, Tolero Pharmaceuticals, AbbVieOther Relationship: Biosight Lori MufflyStock and Other Ownership Interests: Corvus PharmaceuticalsHonoraria: UpToDateConsulting or Advisory Role: Pfizer, Amgen, medexus, Jazz PharmaceuticalsSpeakers' Bureau: Adaptive BiotechnologiesResearch Funding: Shire, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Astellas Pharma, Jasper Therapeutics Eneida R. NemecekConsulting or Advisory Role: Medexus, Medac, Novartis, Atara Biotherapeutics Richard J. O'ReillyConsulting or Advisory Role: Atara BiotherapeuticsResearch Funding: Atara BiotherapeuticsPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: I have received royalties following licensure of the EBV-specific T-cell bank by Atara Biotherapeutics Johannes ScheteligHonoraria: Roche, AbbVie, Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb/Sanofi, Gilead Sciences, AstraZenecaConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Janssen Sumithira VasuConsulting or Advisory Role: Omeros, Johnson and JohnsonResearch Funding: SanofiOpen Payments Link: https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/physician/725618 Vincent T. HoConsulting or Advisory Role: Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, OmerosResearch Funding: Jazz Pharmaceuticals Miguel-Angel PeralesStock and Other Ownership Interests: NexImmuneHonoraria: MorphoSysConsulting or Advisory Role: Incyte, Merck, Servier/Pfizer, NexImmune, Novartis, MolMed¸ Medigene, Takeda, Nektar, AbbVie, Cidara Therapeutics, Celgene, Kite/Gilead, Bristol Myers Squibb, Omeros, Vor BiopharmaResearch Funding: Incyte (Inst), Miltenyi Biotec (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Kite, a Gilead company (Inst), Nektar (Inst)No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Background: Further improvement of preparative regimens before allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is an unmet medical need for the growing number of older or comorbid patients with acute myeloid leukaemia or myelodysplastic syndrome. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of conditioning with treosulfan plus fludarabine compared with reduced-intensity busulfan plus fludarabine in this population., Methods: We did an open-label, randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial in 31 transplantation centres in France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, and Poland. Eligible patients were 18-70 years, had acute myeloid leukaemia in first or consecutive complete haematological remission (blast counts <5% in bone marrow) or myelodysplastic syndrome (blast counts <20% in bone marrow), Karnofsky index of 60% or higher, and were indicated for allogeneic HSCT but considered at an increased risk for standard myeloablative preparative regimens based on age (≥50 years), an HSCT-specific comorbidity index of more than 2, or both. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either intravenous 10 g/m 2 treosulfan daily applied as a 2-h infusion for 3 days (days -4 to -2) or 0·8 mg/kg busulfan applied as a 2-h infusion at 6-h intervals on days -4 and -3. Both groups received 30 mg/m 2 intravenous fludarabine daily for 5 days (days -6 to -2). The primary outcome was event-free survival 2 years after HSCT. The non-inferiority margin was a hazard ratio (HR) of 1·3. Efficacy was assessed in all patients who received treatment and completed transplantation, and safety in all patients who received treatment. The study is registered with EudraCT (2008-002356-18) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00822393)., Findings: Between June 13, 2013, and May 3, 2016, 476 patients were enrolled (240 in the busulfan group received treatment and transplantation, and in the treosulfan group 221 received treatment and 220 transplanation). At the second preplanned interim analysis (Nov 9, 2016), the primary endpoint was met and trial was stopped. Here we present the final confirmatory analysis (data cutoff May 31, 2017). Median follow-up was 15·4 months (IQR 8·8-23·6) for patients treated with treosulfan and 17·4 months (6·3-23·4) for those treated with busulfan. 2-year event-free survival was 64·0% (95% CI 56·0-70·9) in the treosulfan group and 50·4% (42·8-57·5) in the busulfan group (HR 0·65 [95% CI 0·47-0·90]; p<0·0001 for non-inferiority, p=0·0051 for superiority). The most frequently reported grade 3 or higher adverse events were abnormal blood chemistry results (33 [15%] of 221 patients in the treosulfan group vs 35 [15%] of 240 patients in the busulfan group) and gastrointestinal disorders (24 [11%] patients vs 39 [16%] patients). Serious adverse events were reported for 18 (8%) patients in the treosulfan group and 17 (7%) patients in the busulfan group. Causes of deaths were generally transplantation-related., Interpretation: Treosulfan was non-inferior to busulfan when used in combination with fludarabine as a conditioning regimen for allogeneic HSCT for older or comorbid patients with acute myeloid leukaemia or myelodysplastic syndrome. The improved outcomes in patients treated with the treosulfan-fludarabine regimen suggest its potential to become a standard preparative regimen in this population., Funding: medac GmbH., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The optimal dose intensity for conditioning prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is unknown., Methods: We retrospectively compared outcomes of patients who received a first alloHCST after non-myeloablative (NMA) and reduced intensity conditioning (RIC). Data of 432 patients with a median age of 55 years were included, of which 86 patients underwent NMA and 346 RIC., Results: The median follow-up after alloHSCT was 4.3 years. Compared to the RIC group, more NMA patients had purine-analog-sensitive disease, were in complete remission and received matched related donor transplantation. After RIC, the probabilities for 5-year OS, EFS, CIR, and NRM were 46%, 38%, 28%, and 35% and after NMA the respective probabilities were 52%, 43%, 25%, and 32%. In multivariate analysis, remission status prior to conditioning but not RIC versus NMA conditioning had a significant impact on CIR, EFS, and OS., Conclusion: Presumed higher anti-leukemic activity of RIC versus NMA conditioning did not translate into better outcomes after alloHSCT, but better remission status prior to conditioning did. Effective pathway inhibitor-based salvage therapies combined with NMA conditioning might thus represent the most attractive contemporary approach for alloHSCT for patients with CLL.

The use of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) has represented the standard of care in graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in patients undergoing a mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) transplant. The safety and feasibility of posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY) in this setting have been reported recently, but no study has compared the outcomes of PTCY vs ATG in 9/10 MMUD transplants. Using the registry data of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, we performed a matched-pair analysis comparing those 2 strategies in a 9/10 MMUD setting. Ninety-three patients receiving PTCY were matched with 179 patients receiving ATG. A significantly lower incidence of severe acute GVHD was observed with PTCY compared with ATG. Recipients of the former also showed higher leukemia-free survival and GVHD/relapse-free survival (GRFS). When performing a subgroup analysis including patients receiving peripheral blood stem cells, being in complete remission, or receiving the same associated immunosuppressive agents, superiority of PTCY over ATG was confirmed. Similar to the haploidentical setting, use of PTCY is an effective anti-GVHD prophylaxis in the 9/10 MMUD transplant. Use of PTCY may also provide better outcomes in long-term disease control. These results need confirmation in large prospective randomized trials., (© 2019 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Despite recent advances, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) continues to be accompanied by a high rate of morbidity and mortality. Several scores have been developed to predict outcome after allo-HSCT. The recently revised Pretransplant Assessment of Mortality (PAM) score is based on patient age, donor type, disease risk, cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus of patient and donor, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV 1 ). The aim of this study was to analyze the predictive power of the PAM score in an independent large cohort of patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). We selected adult patients with AML who underwent a first allo-HSCT at the University Hospital of Dresden, a tertiary care hospital with a large transplantation program. All adult patients treated between January 1, 2003, and July 1, 2015, were included. The PAM score was calculated as described previously. Overall survival (OS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) after allo-HSCT were analyzed. Age, AML type, sex match, CMV match, donor type, European Leukemia Net risk classification, type of conditioning, disease stage, and PAM score as a continuous variable were selected a priori for multivariate Cox regression analyses. A total of 544 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median patient age was 57 years. With a median follow-up of 47 months (range, 1 to 161 months), the estimated OS for the whole cohort at 4 years was 43%, with a CIR of 30% and an NRM of 31%. The probability of OS at 4 years was 65% for patients with a PAM score of 0, 52% in those with a PAM score of 1, 33% in those with a PAM score of 2, and 22% in those with a PAM score of 3 (P < .001, log-rank test). Both the CIR and NRM increased with higher PAM scores (P = .005 and P < .001, respectively, Gray test). In multivariate analysis, age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.02 per year; P = .004), disease stage (primary induction failure versus first complete remission (CR1); HR, 1.5; P = .03), and the PAM score (HR 1.04; P = .03) had a significant impact on OS. This is the first independent validation of the revised PAM score allowing for simple and valid estimation of transplantation outcomes. It can serve as an important tool in counseling patients with AML, as well as in designing future trials., (Copyright © 2018 The American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The impact of the intensity of conditioning before allogeneic haemopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has been studied in a randomised phase 3 trial comparing reduced-intensity conditioning with myeloablative conditioning in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia in first complete remission. Because of the short follow-up of the original trial, whether reduced-intensity conditioning increases the risk of late relapse compared with myeloablative conditioning remained unclear. To address this question, we present retrospective 10-year follow-up data of this trial and focus on late relapse., Methods: The original randomised phase 3 trial included patients aged 18-60 years, with intermediate-risk or high-risk acute myeloid leukaemia, an adequate organ function, and an available HLA-matched sibling donor or an unrelated donor with at least nine out of ten HLA alleles matched. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to 120 mg/m 2 fludarabine combined with four 2 Gy doses of total-body irradiation (reduced-intensity conditioning) or six 2 Gy doses of total-body irradiation and 120 mg/kg cyclophosphamide (myeloablative conditioning). The primary and secondary efficacy endpoints of this trial have been published previously. In this retrospective, long-term follow-up analysis, data were collected from medical reports from individual participating study centres, and from physician and patient interviews. Endpoints included in this analysis were cumulative relapse incidence, overall survival, disease-free survival, and non-relapse mortality in the original study population and in patients alive and relapse-free at 12 months after HCT (landmark analysis). 10-year time to event rates were calculated in the intention-to-treat population and were compared with the Gray test. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00150878., Findings: In the original trial, 195 patients were randomly assigned to receive reduced-intensity conditioning (n=99) or myeloablative conditioning (n=96). For this retrospective analysis, data were collected with a nearly complete follow-up (completeness index 99%). Median follow-up time for surviving patients was 9·9 years (IQR 8·5-11·4), during which the cumulative incidence of relapse in the complete study population was identical in both groups (30% [95% CI 20-39] in the reduced-intensity conditioning group vs 30% [21-40] in the myeloablative conditioning group; Gray test p=0·99). Relapse occurred at a median of 5·0 months (IQR 3·0-8·8) in the reduced-intensity conditioning group versus 9·5 months (4·5-20·5) in the myeloablative conditioning group. 10-year disease-free survival was 55% (95% CI 45-66) in the reduced-intensity conditioning group and 43% (34-55) in the myeloablative conditioning group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·76 [0·51-1·14]; p=0·19). 10-year non-relapse mortality was 16% (95% CI 8-24) in the reduced-intensity conditioning group and 26% (17-36) in the myeloablative conditioning group (subdistribution HR 0·60 [95% CI 0·32-1·11]; Gray test p=0·10). The incidence of long-term toxicities associated with total-body irradiation was comparable; secondary malignancies occurred in six (6%) of 94 patients in the reduced-intensity conditioning group and five (6%) of 90 in the myeloablative conditioning group (p=1·00)., Interpretation: There is no evidence that reduced-intensity conditioning increases the risk of late relapse compared with myeloablative conditioning. Given that the reduced-intensity conditioning group in the original trial was associated with lower early morbidity and toxicity, reduced-intensity conditioning with moderately reduced total-body irradiation doses could be the preferred conditioning strategy for patients with acute myeloid leukaemia who are younger than 60 years and transplanted in first complete remission., Funding: None., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

In patients with relapsed or refractory (r/r) acute myeloid leukemia (AML), allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is considered to be the only treatment providing long-term disease control. The BRIDGE trial studied the safety and efficacy of a clofarabine-based salvage therapy before HSCT in patients with r/r AML. Here, we report the long-term follow-up of this phase II multicenter trial and exploratory analyses on the impact of comorbidity on outcome. Eighty-four patients with a median age of 61 years (range, 40 to 75) were enrolled. Patients were scheduled for at least 1 cycle of salvage therapy with CLARA (clofarabine 30 mg/m 2 ; cytarabine 1 g/m 2 , days 1 to 5). Chemo-responsive patients with a donor received HSCT after first CLARA. The conditioning regimen consisted of clofarabine 30 mg/m 2 , day -6 to -3, and melphalan 140 mg/m 2 day -2. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score, the hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI), and the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale were obtained at study enrollment as well as before HSCT. Sixty-seven percent of the patients received HSCT within the trial. After a median follow up of 40 months, the estimated 3-year overall survival (OS) for all enrolled patients and those with HSCT within the trial was 40% and 55%, respectively. Relapse-free survival for patients who underwent transplantation with a complete remission afterwards (n = 50) was 48%, calculated from the day of transplantation. In multivariate analysis, both the HCT-CI and ECOG score had a statistically significant impact on OS with a hazard ratio of 1.22 (P = .025)and 1.72 (P = .001), respectively. Using a clofarabine-based salvage therapy combined with early allogeneic HSCT, we were able to achieve good long-term results for patients with r/r AML. In this cohort, both the HCT-CI and the ECOG scores gave prognostic information on OS, showing the feasibility and clinical relevance of comorbidity evaluation at the time of diagnosis of r/r AML patients., (Copyright © 2017 The American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In the field of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, the common approach is to focus outcome analyses on time to relapse and death, without assessing the impact of post-transplant interventions. We investigated whether a multi-state model would give insight into the events after transplantation in a cohort of patients who were transplanted using a strategy including scheduled donor lymphocyte infusions. Seventy-eight consecutive patients who underwent myeloablative T-cell depleted allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome were studied. We constructed a multi-state model to analyze the impact of donor lymphocyte infusion and graft-versus-host disease on the probabilities of relapse and non-relapse mortality over time. Based on this model we introduced a new measure for outcome after transplantation which we called 'treatment success': being alive without relapse and immunosuppression for graft-versus-host disease. All relevant clinical events were implemented into the multi-state model and were denoted treatment success or failure (either transient or permanent). Both relapse and non-relapse mortality were causes of failure of comparable magnitude. Whereas relapse was the dominant cause of failure from the transplantation state, its rate was reduced after graft-versus-host disease, and especially after donor lymphocyte infusion. The long-term probability of treatment success was approximately 40%. This probability was increased after donor lymphocyte infusion. Our multi-state model helps to interpret the impact of post-transplantation interventions and clinical events on failure and treatment success, thus extracting more information from observational data., (Copyright© Ferrata Storti Foundation.)

The combination of reduced-intensity conditioning, (188)rhenium anti-CD66 radioimmunotherapy, and in vivo T cell depletion was successfully applied in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome. Within a prospective phase II protocol, we investigated whether a dose reduction of alemtuzumab (from 75 mg to 50 mg MabCampath) would improve leukemia-free survival by reducing the incidence of relapse. Fifty-eight patients (median age, 67 years; range, 54 to 76) received radioimmunotherapy followed by fludarabine 150 mg/m(2) and busulfan 8 mg/kg combined with either 75 mg (n = 26) or 50 mg (n = 32) alemtuzumab. Although we observed a trend towards a shorter duration of neutropenia in the 50 mg group (median, 19 versus 21 days; P = .07), the time from transplantation to neutrophil and platelet engraftment as well as the overall incidence of engraftment did not differ. The incidence of severe acute graft-versus-host disease tended to be higher after the lower alemtuzumab dose (17% versus 4%; P = .15). No significant differences in the cumulative incidences of relapse (38% versus 35%; P = .81) or nonrelapse mortality (46% versus 27%; P = .31) were observed. Accordingly, disease-free and overall survival were not significantly different between groups. Although the feasibility of radioimmunotherapy plus reduced-intensity conditioning could be demonstrated in elderly patients, the dose reduction of alemtuzumab had no positive impact on overall outcome., (Copyright © 2015 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Outcomes after umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) are unknown. We analyzed outcomes of 68 patients with poor-risk CLL/SLL who underwent reduced-intensity (RIC) UCBT from 2004 to 2012. The median age was 57 years and median follow-up 36 months; 17 patients had del 17p/p53mutation, 19 patients had fludarabine-refractory disease, 11 relapsed after autologous stem cell transplantation, 8 had diagnosis of prolymphocytic leukemia, 4 had Richter syndrome, and 8 underwent transplantation with progressive or refractory disease. The most common RIC used was cyclophosphamide, fludarabine, and total body irradiation (TBI) in 82%; 15 patients received antithymocyte globulin. Most of the cord blood grafts were HLA mismatched and 76% received a double UCBT. Median total nucleated cells collected was 4.7 × 10(7)/kg. The cumulative incidences (CI) of neutrophil and platelet engraftment were 84% and 72% at 60 and 180 days respectively; day 100 graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (grade II to IV) was 43% and 3-year chronic GVHD was 32%. The CI of relapse, nonrelapse mortality, overall survival, and progression-free survival (PFS) at 3 years were 16%, 39%, 54%, and 45%, respectively. Fludarabine-sensitive disease at transplantation and use of low-dose TBI regimens were associated with acceptable PFS. In conclusion, use of RIC-UCBT seems to be feasible in patients with poor-risk CLL/SLL and improved outcomes were observed in patients with fludarabine-sensitive disease who received low-dose TBI regimens., (Copyright © 2015 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the only curative treatment in patients with higher risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), but the choice of the optimal alternative stem cell source is still a subject of debate in patients lacking an HLA-matched sibling donor. Here, we report on a large series of patients with MDS (N = 631) transplanted either with mobilized peripheral stem cells (PBs) from unrelated donors (n = 502) or with umbilical cord blood transplant (UCB, n = 129) as alternative grafts after reduced-intensity conditioning. Neutrophil engraftment was higher after PB (98% versus 78%, P < .0001). Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was similar after PB (31%) and UCB (29%), and chronic GVHD incidence was higher after PB (41% versus 23%). Two-year nonrelapse mortality was lower after PB (31% versus 42% P = .03). There was a better overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) after PB (49% ± 2% versus 30% ± 4%, P < .0001 and 44% ± 2% versus 28% ± 4%, P < .0001). Multivariate analysis confirmed the advantage of PB for treatment-related mortality, OS, and DFS, whereas relative risk of chronic GVHD was similar. A multivariate analysis comparing PB from a 10/10 HLA-matched donor, PB from a 9/10 HLA-matched donor, and UCB showed an advantage on treatment-related mortality, DFS, and OS only in 10/10 PB. We conclude that in MDS patients lacking an HLA-matched sibling donor, PB from a 10/10 HLA-matched unrelated donor is the preferred source of hematopoietic stem cells. HLA-mismatched unrelated donor or cord blood seem to give similar inferior results except for neutrophil engraftment, which is delayed after UCB., (Copyright © 2015 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Interleukin 17A (IL-17)-producing CD4(+) T helper type 17 (Th17) cells have recently drawn attention as possible effector cells of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in murine models. Their role after allogeneic HCT in humans is unknown. In this prospective study, Th17, Th1/17, and Th1 cells were quantified in the peripheral blood of 80 patients within the first 3 months after allogeneic HCT using intracellular cytokine staining and flow cytometry. Within the observation period, Th1, Th1/17, and Th17 cells did not reconstitute to levels of healthy control subjects. In contrast to Th1 cells, no further expansion of Th1/17 and Th17 cells was observed during the first month after HCT. Antithymocyte globulin during conditioning significantly reduced the frequency of Th1/17 and Th17 cells but not of Th1 cells. Acute GVHD was not associated with significant changes in the size of the Th1, Th1/17, or Th17 cell subsets. Cytomegalovirus reactivation triggered the expansion of all T helper subsets, and Th1 cells showed the strongest increase. In contrast, no significant changes were found in the T helper cell compartment of patients with bacterial infections compared with time-matched control subjects. In conclusion, quantitative reconstitution of Th1, Th1/17, and Th17 cells is impaired within the first 3 months after HCT, especially when antithymocyte globulin is administered during conditioning. Cytomegalovirus reactivation, but not acute GVHD or bacterial infection, triggered the absolute expansion of these T cell subsets., (Copyright © 2013 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Reduced-intensity conditioning regimens have been developed to minimise early toxic effects and deaths after allogeneic haemopoietic cell transplantation. However, the efficacy of these regimens before this procedure has not been investigated in a randomised trial. In this prospective, open-label randomised phase 3 trial we compared a reduced-intensity fludarabine-based conditioning regimen with a standard regimen in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia in first complete remission., Methods: Patients were aged 18-60 years and had intermediate-risk or high-risk acute myeloid leukaemia (defined by cytogenetics) in first complete remission; an available HLA-matched sibling donor or an unrelated donor with at least nine of ten HLA alleles; and adequate renal, cardiac, pulmonary, and neurological function. Between Nov 15, 2004, and Dec 31, 2009, patients were randomly assigned (1:1, by a computer-based minimisation procedure that balanced patients for age, cytogenetic risk, induction therapy, and donor type) to receive either reduced-intensity conditioning of four doses of 2 Gy of total-body irradiation and 150 mg/m(2) fludarabine or standard conditioning of six doses of 2 Gy of total-body irradiation and 120 mg/kg cyclophosphamide. All patients were given ciclosporin and methotrexate as prophylaxis against graft-versus-host disease. Neither investigators nor patients were blinded to study treatment. Our primary endpoint was the incidence of non-relapse mortality, analysed in the intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00150878., Findings: The trial was stopped early on Dec 31, 2009, because of slow accrual of patients. 99 patients were randomly assigned to receive reduced-intensity conditioning and 96 to receive standard conditioning. The incidence of non-relapse mortality did not differ between the reduced-intensity and standard conditioning groups (cumulative incidence at 3 years 13% [95% CI 6-21] vs 18% [10-26]; HR 0·62 [95% CI 0·30-1·31]). Relapse incidence (cumulative incidence 3 years 28% [95% CI 19-38] vs 26% [17-36]; HR 1·10 [95% CI 0·63-1·90]), disease-free survival (3 year disease-free survival 58% [95% CI 49-70] vs 56% [46-67]; HR 0·85 [95% CI 0·55-1·32]), and overall survival (3 year overall survival 61% [95% CI 50-74] vs 58% [47-70]; HR 0·77 [95% CI 0·48-1·25]) did not differ significantly between groups. Grade 3-4 of oral mucositis was less common in the reduced-intensity group than in the standard conditioning group (50 patients in the reduced-intensity conditioning group vs 73 patients in the standard conditioning group); the frequency of other side-effects such as graft-versus-host disease and increased concentrations of bilirubin and creatinine did not differ significantly between groups., Interpretation: Reduced-intensity conditioning results in a similar incidence of non-relapse mortality and reduced toxic effects compared with standard conditioning without affecting survival outcomes, and thus could be preferentially used in patients younger than 60 years with acute myeloid leukaemia transplanted in first complete remission., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Standard first-line therapy for older patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) includes hypomethylating agents, such as azacitidine (AZA). However, the only approach with curative potential remains allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). To date, no direct comparison of both strategies has been reported. The outcomes of 2 well-balanced cohorts of patients with high-risk MDS defined by age (60-70 years), performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score ≤2), and donor availability (yes/no) were compared, including 103 patients undergoing HCT and 75 patients without this option who received AZA. The estimated 2-year overall survival after the start of treatment was 39% (95% confidence interval, 30%-50%) for the patients undergoing HCT and 23% (95% confidence interval, 14%-40%) for the patients receiving AZA therapy. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis of all patients (n = 178), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score (0 versus 1 versus 2; hazard ratio [HR], 2.9/3.9; P <  .001), cytogenetics (good versus intermediate versus poor; HR, 1.2/1.7; P = .026), and treatment (HCT versus AZA; HR, 0.3; P = .007) were associated with overall survival. This retrospective cohort analysis suggests a survival advantage for allogeneic HCT compared with AZA therapy in medically fit patients with high-risk MDS age 60-70 years. Prospective controlled studies are warranted., (Copyright © 2012 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The addition of radioimmunotherapy to conventional and reduced-intensity conditioning has been shown to be feasible and effective. Within an ongoing prospective phase II trial, 22 patients with advanced myeloid malignancies and a median age of 65 years (range 54-76) received anti-CD66 Rhenium radioimmunotherapy followed by fludarabine (150 mg/m(2)), busulfan (8 mg/kg) and alemtuzumab (75 mg) before allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation from matched sibling (n = 7) and unrelated donors (n = 15). The extramedullary toxicity in the first 100 d post-transplantation was limited and all patients engrafted with complete donor chimaerism. The incidence of non-relapse mortality at day 100 and after 2 years was 4.5% and 23%, respectively. The probability of overall survival at 2 years was 40%. A comparison with a younger historical cohort (median age 57 years) having received the same dose of fludarabine and busulfan but neither radioimmunotherapy nor alemtuzumab showed no difference in outcome. Although the use of alemtuzumab reduced the incidence of acute graft-versus-host-disease, it was associated with a relapse incidence of 40% despite the incorporation of radioimmmunotherapy. In summary, we confirmed the feasibility of combined radioimmunotherapy and reduced-intensity conditioning in elderly patients. Further optimisation, probably involving less T cell depletion, is necessary before a randomized comparison with standard conditioning can be planned.

Purpose: Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) has been associated with an increased risk of liver sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) when applied within 3 months of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We hypothesized that GO might be safe and effective as part of a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen as salvage therapy of CD33+ acute myeloid leukemia., Experimental Design: Thirty-one patients with acute myeloid leukemia which relapsed following conventional therapy (n=15), autologous (n=3), or allogeneic (n=13) HCT were included in a prospective phase I/II trial. The preparative regimen contained 6 and 3 mg/m(2) of GO on days -21 and -14 before transplantation, leading to a reduction of marrow blasts in 18 patients (58%). Eight patients received further cytoreductive chemotherapy before conditioning therapy was initiated. Fludarabine-based reduced-intensity (n=11) or nonmyelablative (n=16) conditioning and peripheral blood stem cell infusion from related (n=6) or unrelated (n=21) donors could be done in 27 patients during cytopenia., Results: Primary engraftment occurred in all evaluable patients. Only one case of reversible hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome was documented. Non-relapse mortality until day 100 was 22% (n=6). The probabilities of overall and disease-free survival at 24 months were 39% and 35%, respectively. Relapse of leukemia occurring between 2 and 24 months after transplantation (median, 8 months) was the major reason for treatment failure and death., Conclusion: These data suggest that GO can be combined with reduced-intensity conditioning even after previous autologous or allogeneic HCT.

It is hypothesised that an effective graft-vs.-leukaemia reaction contributes substantially to the therapeutic effect of reduced intensity conditioning stem cell transplantation in chronic myeloid leukaemia. However, kinetic data on eradication of leukaemia cells and stem cell engraftement which could support this assumption are lacking. Thus, we investigated bcr/abl fusion transcripts and haematopoietic chimerism in 14 patients undergoing such a transplantation protocol. Ten of them obtained a complete molecular remission, and two patients achieved haematologic remissions but remained bcr/abl positive. Weekly determinations of bcr/abl transcript numbers by qualitative and quantitative polymerase chain reaction and donor chimerism revealed that 10 responders cleared bcr/abl positive cells from the peripheral blood within a median of 9 wk (range 3-22 wk). The close relation (P = 0.0075) between the first occurrence of graft-vs.-host disease and the complete clearance of bcr/abl positive blood cells argues in favour of an effective graft-vs.-leukaemia reaction.

Background and Objectives. We studied the toxicity and efficacy of reduced intensity conditioning followed by allogeneic stem cell transplantation in 50 patients over 50 years old or with relative contraindications against myeloablative regimens. Diagnoses were chronic myeloid leukemia (n=15), acute myeloid leukemia (n=9), myelodysplastic syndromes (n=9), lymphoma (n=11) and refractory solid tumors (n=6). Design and Methods. Donors were identical siblings (n=25), non-identical family members (n=6) and unrelated volunteers (n=19). Peripheral blood stem cells (n=36) or bone marrow (n=14) were transplanted. The conditioning regimen consisted of fludarabine 180 mg/m(2), busulphan 8 mg/kg and rabbit antithymocyte globulin 40 mg/kg (Fresenius). Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was carried out with cyclosporin A (CSA) alone (n=17) or in combination with methotrexate (n=18) or mycophenolate mofetil (n=15). Results. Neutrophil counts >0.5/nL and platelet counts > 20/nL were reached after 17 (range 0-66) and 19 days (range 0-111), respectively. Three graft failures occurred. Fever lasted for a median of 2 days (range 0-15). Six patients developed veno-occlusive disease of the liver. Acute GVHD grade II-IV occurred in 47% of the patients and chronic GVHD in 46%. The 1-year overall survival probability was 44% (95% CI: 30-58%). GVHD-related complications were a major cause of the probability of 1-year non-relapse mortality of 31% (95% CI: 16-46%). Interpretation and Conclusions. In conclusion, the regimen itself can be carried out safely in patients with relative contraindications against myeloablative conditioning. However, GVHD causes significant non-relapse mortality in high risk patients.

With the continuous increase in the use of haploidentical donors for transplantation, the selection of donors becomes increasingly important. Haploidentical donors have been selected primarily based on clinical characteristics, while the effects of killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs) on outcomes of haploidentical-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) remain inconclusive. The present study aimed to thoroughly evaluate the effect of KIRs and binding ligands assessed by various models, in addition to other patient/donor variables, on clinical outcomes in haplo-HSCT. In a cohort of 354 patients undergoing their first haplo-HSCT, we found that a higher Count Functional inhibitory KIR score (CF-iKIR) was associated with improved progression-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.71; P = .029) and overall survival (OS) (HR, 0.66; P = .016), while none of the other models predicted for survival in these patients. Moreover, using exploratory classification and regression tree analysis, we found that donor age 58 years was associated with the worst OS. In the rest of our cohort (80%), cytomegalovirus-reactive recipients with a donor