Search

Background: Elderly patients with Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) are frequently transferred to designated Trauma Centers (TC). We hypothesized that TC transfer is associated with improved outcomes., Methods: Retrospective study utilizing the National Trauma Databank. Demographics, injury and outcomes data were abstracted. Patients were dichotomized by transfer to a designated level I/II TC vs. not. Multivariate regression was used to derive the adjusted primary outcome, mortality, and secondary outcomes, complications and discharge disposition., Results: 19,664 patients were included, with a mean age of 78.1 years. 70% were transferred to a level I/II TC. Transferred patients had a higher ISS (12 vs. 10, p < 0.001). Mortality was significantly lower in patients transferred to level I/II TCs (5.6% vs. 6.2%, Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) 0.84, p = 0.011), as was the likelihood of discharge to skilled nursing facilities (26.4% vs. 30.2%, AOR 0.80, p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Elderly patients with mild TBI transferred to level I/II TCs have improved outcomes. Which patients with mild TBI require level I/II TC care should be examined prospectively., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Early thoracotomy (ET) is a procedure performed on patients in extremis. Identifying factors associated with ET survival may allow for optimization of guidelines and improved patient selection., Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess whether ETs performed at Level I trauma centers (TC) are associated with improved survival., Methods: This was a retrospective study utilizing the National Trauma Databank 2014-2015. We included all thoracotomies performed within 1 h of hospital arrival. Patients were stratified according to TC designation level. Patient demographics, outcomes, and center characteristics were compared. We conducted multivariable regression with survival as the outcome., Results: There were 3183 ETs included in this study; 2131 (66.9%) were performed at Level I TCs. Patients treated at Level I and non-Level I TCs had similar median injury severity scores, as well as signs of life and systolic blood pressures on admission. Patients treated at Level I TCs had significantly higher survival rates (21.6% vs. 16.3%, p < 0.001), with 40% greater odds of survival after controlling for injury-specific factors and emergency medical services transportation time (adjusted odds ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.89, p = 0.03). Penetrating injuries had 23.1% survival after ET vs. 12.9% for blunt injuries (adjusted odds ratio 1.86, 95% confidence interval 1.37-2.53, p < 0.001)., Conclusions: ETs performed at Level I TCs were associated with 40% greater odds of survival compared with ETs at non-Level I TCs. This demonstrates that factors extrinsic to the patient may play a role in survival of severely injured patients., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Level I trauma centers serve as a community resource, with most centers using an inclusive transfer policy that may result in overtriage. The financial burden this imparts on an urban trauma system has not been well examined. We sought to examine the incidence of secondary overtriage (SOT) at an urban Level I trauma center. This was a retrospective study from an urban Level I trauma center examining patients admitted as trauma transfers (TT) from 2010 to 2014. SOT was defined as patients not meeting the "Orange Book" transfer criteria and who had a length of stay of <48 hours. Average ED and transport charges were calculated for total transfer charges. A total of 2397 TT were treated. The number of TT increased over the study interval. The mean age of TT was 59.7 years (SD ± 26.4 years); patients were predominantly male (59.2%), white (83.2%), with at least one comorbidity (71.5%). Blunt trauma accounted for 96.8 per cent of admissions with a median Injury Severity Score of nine (IQR: 5-16). Predominant injuries were isolated closed head trauma (61.4%), skin/soft tissue injury (18.9%), and spinal injury (17.6%). SOT was 48.2 per cent and increased yearly (P < 0.001). The median trauma center charge for SOT was ($27,072; IQR: $20,089-34,087), whereas ED charges were ($40,440; IQR: $26,150-65,125), resulting in a total cost of $67,512/patient. A liberal TT policy results in a high SOT rate adding significant unnecessary costs to the health-care system. Efforts to establish transfer guidelines may allow for significant cost savings without compromising care.

With a considerably increasing elderly population, we sought to determine whether the volume of elderly trauma patients treated impacted outcomes at two different Level I trauma centers. This is a retrospective review of all elderly patients (>60 years) at two state-verified Level I trauma centers over the past five years. The elderly trauma center (ETC) saw a greater proportion (52%) of elderly patients than the reference trauma center (30%, TC). Demographic and clinical characteristics were abstracted and stratified into ETC and TC groups for comparison. Primary outcomes were overall postinjury complication and mortality rates, as well as death after major complication (failure to rescue). ETC patients were older (78.6 vs 70.5), more likely to be admitted with severe head injuries (head abbreviated injury score ≥ 3, 50.0% vs 32%), had a greater overall injury burden (injury severity score > 16 41.4% vs 21.1%), and required intensive care unit admission (81.3% vs 64%) than the TC group. Need for operative intervention, mechanism of injury, and comorbidities were similar between the two groups. Overall complications were higher in trauma patients admitted to the TC (21.9% vs 14.3%), as well as failure to rescue (4.0% vs 1.8%). Adjusting for confounding factors, ETC had significantly lower chance of developing a postinjury complication (adjusted odds ratios [AOR] = 0.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.3, 0.5]), failure to rescue (AOR = 0.3, 95% CI = [0.1, 0.5]), and overall mortality (AOR = 0.3, 95% CI = [0.2, 0.4]). Improved outcomes were demonstrated in the Level I center treating a higher proportion of elderly patients. Exact etiology of these benefits should be determined for quality improvement in care of the injured geriatric patient.

Background: Recent data suggest that specialty intensive care units (ICUs) have outcomes better than those of mixed ICUs. The cause for this apparent discrepancy has not been well established. We hypothesized that trauma patients admitted to a dedicated trauma ICU (TICU) would have a lower complication rate as well as death after complication (failure to rescue [FTR])., Methods: This was a retrospective review of the ICUs of two Level I trauma centers covered by one group of surgical intensivists. One center has a dedicated TICU, while the other has a mixed ICU. Demographic and clinical characteristics were stratified into TICU and ICU groups. The primary outcomes were postinjury complications and FTR. Multivariate regression was used to derive factors associated with complications and FTR., Results: During the 5-year study period, 3,833 patients were analyzed. TICU patients were older (57.8 vs. 47.0 years, p < 0.0001), had higher Charlson score (2 vs. 1, p = 0.001), had more severe head injuries (Head Abbreviated Injury Scale [AIS] score ≥ 3, 50.0% vs. 37.5%, p < 0.0001), and had greater injury burden (Injury Severity Score [ISS] > 16, 49.6% vs. 38.6%, p < 0.0001) than those admitted to the mixed ICU. Need for immediate operative intervention was similar (18.0% vs. 17.6%, p = 0.788). Overall complications were significantly higher in trauma patients admitted to the mixed ICU (27.5% vs. 17.0%, p < 0.0001), as well as FTR (3.7% vs. 1.8%, p < 0.0001). Trauma patients admitted to a dedicated TICU had significantly lower chance of developing a postinjury complication (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.5; p < 0.0001), FTR (AOR, 0.3; p < 0.0001), and overall mortality (AOR, 0.4; p < 0.0001)., Conclusion: Admission of critically ill trauma patients to a TICU staffed by a surgical intensivist is associated with a lower complication rate and FTR. Factors such as trauma nursing experience, education, and unit management structure should be further explored to elucidate the observed improved outcomes., Level of Evidence: Prognostic study, level III.

Introduction: Studies on blood product transfusions after trauma recommend targeting specific ratios to reduce mortality. Although crystalloid volumes as little as 1.5 L predict increased mortality after trauma, little data is available regarding the threshold of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion volume that predicts increased mortality., Materials and Methods: Data from a level I trauma center between January 2000 and December 2008 were reviewed. Trauma patients who received at least 100 mL RBC in the emergency department (ED) were included. Each unit of RBC was defined as 300 mL. Demographics, RBC transfusion volume, and mortality were analyzed in the nonelderly (<70 y) and elderly (≥70 y). Multivariate logistic regression was performed at various volume cutoffs to determine whether there was a threshold transfusion volume that independently predicted mortality., Results: A total of 560 patients received ≥100 mL RBC in the ED. Overall mortality was 24.3%, with 22.5% (104 deaths) in the nonelderly and 32.7% (32 deaths) in the elderly. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that RBC transfusion of ≥900 mL was associated with increased mortality in both the nonelderly (adjusted odds ratio 2.06, P = 0.008) and elderly (adjusted odds ratio 5.08, P = 0.006)., Conclusions: Although transfusion of greater than 2 units in the ED was an independent predictor of mortality, transfusion of 2 units or less was not. Interestingly, unlike crystalloid volume, stepwise increases in blood volume were not associated with stepwise increases in mortality. The underlying etiology for mortality discrepancies, such as transfusion ratios, hypothermia, or immunosuppression, needs to be better delineated., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Increased emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS) has been associated with increased mortality in trauma patients. In 2010, we implemented a 24/7 open trauma bed protocol in our designated trauma intensive care units (TICUs) to facilitate rapid admission from the ED. This required maintenance of a daily bump list and timely transferring of patients out of the TICU. We hypothesized that ED LOS and mortality would decrease after implementation., Methods: The following data from patients admitted directly from the ED to any ICU were retrospectively compared before (2009) and after (2011) the implementation of a trauma bed protocol at a Level I trauma center: age, sex, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, shock on admission (systolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg), mechanism, injury severity scores (Injury Severity Score [ISS] and Abbreviated Injury Scale [AIS] score), ED LOS, ICU readmission rates, and mortality., Results: Of the patients, 267 (17%) of 1,611 before and 262 (21%) of 1,266 (p < 0.01) after the protocol were admitted directly to the ICU, despite similar characteristics. ED LOS decreased from 4.2 ± 4.0 hours to 3.1 ± 2.1 hours (p < 0.01) in all patients as well as patients with an ISS of greater than 24 (3.1 ± 2.5 vs. 2.2 ± 1.6, p < 0.05) and a head AIS score of greater than 2 (4.2 ± 4.9 vs. 3.1 ± 2.0, p = 0.01). Mortality was unchanged for all patients (9% vs. 8%, p = 0.58) but trends toward improved mortality were found after protocol implementation inpatients with an ISS of greater than 24 (30% vs. 13%, p = 0.07) and in patients with a head AIS score of greater than 2 (12% vs. 6%, p = 0.08). A greater proportion of total patients were admitted to a designated TICU after implementation (83% vs. 93%, p < 0.01). ICU readmissions were unchanged (0.3% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.21)., Conclusion: The implementation of a 24/7 open trauma bed protocol in the surgery ICU was associated with a decreased ED LOS and increased admissions to designated TICUs in all patients. Improved throughput was achieved without increases in ICU readmissions., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, level IV.

Background: Cirrhosis is known to be a significant risk factor for morbidity and mortality following trauma such that its presence is a requirement for trauma center transfer. The impact of trauma center level on post-injury survival in cirrhotic patients has not been well studied., Methods: The National Trauma Databank (version 7) was used to identify patients admitted with cirrhosis as a preexisting comorbidity. Patients who were dead on arrival, died in the emergency department, or had missing trauma center information were excluded. Our primary outcome measure was overall mortality stratified by admission trauma center level. Logistic regression analysis was used to derive adjusted mortality results., Results: A total of 3,395 patients met inclusion criteria (0.16% of all National Trauma Databank patients). Patients admitted to a Level I center were more likely to be younger and minorities, experience penetrating injuries, and require immediate operative intervention despite similar Injury Severity Scores (ISS). Overall mortality was lower at Level I centers compared with other centers (10.3% vs. 14.0%, p = 0.001). After logistic regression, Level I centers were associated with significantly lower mortality compared with non-Level I centers (adjusted odds ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.89; p = 0.004)., Conclusion: The mortality for cirrhotic patients admitted to a Level I trauma center was significantly less compared with those admitted to non-Level I centers. The etiology of this improved outcome needs to be identified and transmitted to non-Level I centers., Level of Evidence: Epidemiologic study, level III.

Background: Systemic hypotension is a well documented predictor of increased mortality following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Hypotension is traditionally defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP)<90 mmHg. Recent evidence defines hypotension by a higher SBP in injured (non-TBI) trauma patients. We hypothesize that hypotension threshold requires a higher SBP in isolated moderate to severe TBI., Patients and Methods: A retrospective database review of all adults (≥ 15 years) with isolated moderate to severe TBI (head abbreviated injury score (AIS)≥ 3, all other AIS ≤ 3), admitted from five Level I and eight Level II trauma centres (Los Angeles County), between 1998 and 2005. Several fit statistic analyses were performed for each admission SBP from 60 to 180 mmHg to identify the model that most accurately defined hypotension for three age groups: 15-49 years, 50-69 years, and ≥ 70 years. The main outcome variable was mortality, and the optimal definition of hypotension for each group was determined from the best fit model. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) were then calculated to determine increased odds in mortality for the defined optimal SBP within each age group., Results: A total of 15,733 patients were analysed. The optimal threshold of hypotension according to the best fit model was SBP of 110 mmHg for patients 15-49 years (AOR 1.98, CI 1.65-2.39, p<0.0001), 100 mmHg for patients 50-69 years (AOR 2.20, CI 1.46-3.31, p=0.0002), and 110 mmHg for patients ≥ 70 years (AOR 1.92, CI 1.35-2.74, p=0.0003)., Conclusions: Patients with isolated moderate to severe TBI should be considered hypotensive for SBP<110 mmHg. Further research should confirm this new definition of hypotension by correlation with indices of perfusion., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

We sought to investigate the effect of trauma center designation on organ donor outcomes during a 5-year period. A retrospective study of the southern California regional Organ Procurement Organization database comparing trauma centers (n = 25) versus nontrauma centers (n = 171) and Level I (n = 7) versus Level II (n = 18) trauma centers between 2004 and 2008 was performed. A total of 16,830 referrals were evaluated and 44 per cent were from trauma centers. When compared with nontrauma centers (n = 171), trauma centers (n = 25) had a higher percentage of medically suitable eligible deaths (29 vs 16%, P < 0.001), total eligible deaths (22 vs 12%, P < 0.001), and eligible donors (14 vs 7%, P < 0.001). Trauma Centers had a significantly higher number of organs procured per donor (4.0 ± 1.6 vs 3.5 ± 1.6, P < 0.001), organs transplanted per donor (OTPD) (3.6 ± 1.8 vs 2.8 ± 1.8, P < 0.001), and higher organ yield (per cent 4 or greater OTPD [48 vs 31%, P < 0.001]). No significant differences were found between Level I and Level II trauma centers. Trauma centers demonstrate significantly better organ donor outcomes compared with nontrauma centers. Factors responsible for improved outcomes at trauma centers should be evaluated, reproduced, and disseminated to nontrauma centers to alleviate the growing organ shortage crisis.

Trauma centers are designated by the American College of Surgeons (ACS) into four different levels based on resources, volume, and scientific and educational commitment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between ACS center designation and outcomes after early thoracotomy for trauma. The National Trauma Databank (v. 7.0) was used to identify all patients who required early thoracotomy. Demographics, clinical data, and outcomes were extracted. Patients were categorized according to ACS trauma center designation. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the impact of ACS trauma center designation on mortality. From 2002 to 2006, 1834 (77.4%) patients were admitted to a Level I ACS verified trauma center, 474 (20.0%) to a Level II, and 59 (3.6%) to a Level III/IV facility. After adjusting for differences between the groups, there were no significant differences in mortality (overall: 53.3% for Level I, 63.1% for Level II, and 52.5% for Level III/IV, adjusted P = 0.417; or for patients arriving in cardiac arrest: 74.9% vs 87.1% vs 85.0%, P = 0.261). Subgroup analysis did not show any significant difference in survival irrespective of mechanism of injury. Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤ 8, Injury Severity Score > 16, no admission systolic blood pressure, time from admission to thoracotomy, and nonteaching hospitals were found to be independent predictors of death. For trauma patients who have sustained injuries requiring early thoracotomy, ACS trauma center designation did not significantly impact mortality. Nonteaching institutions however, were independently associated with poorer outcomes after early thoracotomy. These findings may have important implications in educational commitment of institutions. Further prospective evaluation of these findings is warranted.