Search

Simple Summary: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly changed the treatment paradigm in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and brought an unprecedented durable response. However, there is still a significant proportion of patients who do not response to ICIs, and there are no biomarkers to select responders. In this study, we investigated the change in neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) during ipilimumab/nivolumab treatment and clinical response in mRCC. We found that mRCC patients who responded to immunotherapy had lower on-treatment NER during ipilimumab/nivolumab induction. In addition, after accounting for baseline tumor biological characteristics and patient sociodemographic factors, we found that the decrease in NER at week 6 was independently associated with improved outcomes in ipilimumab/nivolumab-treated mRCC. Given that the NER can be easily obtained through routine laboratory work-ups, our results provide initial evidence that the decrease in on-treatment NER during immunotherapy, as a biomarker to predict ICI treatment response, warrants further investigation in prospective studies. A lower baseline neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) has been associated with improved responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)-treated metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). This study investigated the decrease in NER at week 6 after ipilimumab/nivolumab (ipi/nivo) initiation and treatment responses in mRCC. A retrospective study of ipi/nivo-treated mRCC at two US academic cancer centers was conducted. A landmark analysis at week 6 was performed to assess the association between the change in NER and clinical responses (progression-free survival (PFS)/overall survival (OS)). Week 6 NER was modeled as a continuous variable, after log transformation (Ln NER), and a categorical variable by percent change. There were 150 mRCC patients included: 78% had clear cell histology, and 78% were IMDC intermediate/poor risk. In multivariable regression analysis, every decrease of 1 unit of Ln NER at week 6 was associated with improved PFS (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR): 0.78, p-value:0.005) and OS (AHR: 0.67, p-value: 0.002). When NER was modeled by percent change, decreased NER > 50% was associated with improved PFS (AHR: 0.55, p-value: 0.03) and OS (AHR: 0.37, p-value: 0.02). The decrease in week 6 NER was associated with improved PFS/OS in ipi/nivo-treated mRCC. Prospective studies are warranted to validate NER change as a biomarker to predict ICI responses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have improved outcomes for patients with numerous hematological and solid cancers. Hematologic toxicities have been described, but the spectrum, timing, and clinical presentation of these complications are not well understood. We used the World Health Organization's pharmacovigilance database of individual‐case‐safety‐reports (ICSRs) of adverse drug reactions, VigiBase, to identify cases of hematologic toxicities complicating immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. We identified 168 ICSRs of immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), hemolytic anemia (HA), hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, aplastic anemia, and pure red cell aplasia in 164 ICSRs. ITP (n = 68) and HA (n = 57) were the most common of these toxicities and occurred concomitantly in four patients. These events occurred early on treatment (median 40 days) and were associated with fatal outcome in 12% of cases. Ipilimumab‐based therapy (monotherapy or combination with anti‐programmed death‐1 [PD‐1]) was associated with earlier onset (median 23 vs. 47.5 days, p = .006) than anti‐PD‐1/programmed death ligand‐1 monotherapy. Reporting of hematologic toxicities has increased over the past 2 years (98 cases between January 2017 and March 2018 vs. 70 cases before 2017), possibly because of increased use of checkpoint inhibitors and improved recognition of toxicities. Future studies should evaluate incidence of hematologic toxicities, elucidate risk factors, and determine the most effective treatment algorithms. Key Points: Immune‐mediated hematologic toxicities are a potential side effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).Providers should monitor complete blood counts during treatment with ICIs.Corticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment for immune‐mediated hematologic toxicities.Further research is needed to define patient‐specific risk factors and optimal management strategies for hematologic toxicities. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved outcomes for patients with cancer but related hematologic toxicities have been poorly described. Using VigiBase, the World Health Organization's pharmacovigilance database of individual case safety reports of adverse drug reactions, this study aimed to identify such cases of hematologic toxicities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]