Search

Background: Comorbidities can complicate the management of severe asthma; therefore, the presence of comorbid conditions or traits often need to be considered when considering treatment options for patients with severe asthma. The aim of this analysis is to investigate the efficacy of mepolizumab in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma and comorbidities.Methods: This was a post hoc analysis (GSK ID:209140) of data from the Phase IIb/III studies DREAM, MENSA, SIRIUS, and MUSCA. Patients aged ≥ 12 years with severe eosinophilic asthma were randomized to: mepolizumab 750, 250, or 75 mg intravenously or placebo (DREAM); mepolizumab 75 mg intravenously or 100 mg subcutaneously or placebo (MENSA); or mepolizumab 100 mg subcutaneously or placebo (SIRIUS and MUSCA) every 4 weeks for 24 weeks in SIRIUS and MUSCA, 32 weeks in MENSA or 52 weeks in DREAM. In this analysis the primary endpoint was the annual rate of clinically significant exacerbations; secondary endpoints were Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 score, St George's Respiratory Questionnaire total score, and pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s at study end. Subgroups were based on comorbidities at baseline.Results: Overall, 1878 patients received placebo (n = 689) or mepolizumab (n = 1189). Across all comorbidity subgroups mepolizumab reduced the rate of clinically significant exacerbations by 44-68% versus placebo, improved Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 score by 0.27-0.59 points, and improved St George's Respiratory Questionnaire total score by 5.0-11.6 points. Pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s was improved by 27.1-286.9 mL in all but one comorbidity subgroup, the diabetes mellitus subgroup.Conclusions: Mepolizumab reduces exacerbations, and improves asthma control, health-related quality of life, and lung function in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma despite comorbid conditions, including upper respiratory conditions, psychopathologies, cardiovascular conditions, gastroesophageal reflux disease, diabetes mellitus, and obesity.Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ DREAM, MEA112997/NCT01000506; MENSA, MEA115588/NCT01691521; SIRIUS, MEA115575/NCT01842607; MUSCA, 200862/NCT02281318. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Previous research has shown greater efficacy of dupilumab in patients with uncontrolled asthma and type 2 inflammation. We analyzed dupilumab's efficacy in patients from the TRAVERSE study with or without evidence of allergic asthma and type 2 inflammation per current GINA guidelines (≥150 eosinophils/μL or FeNO ≥20 ppb). Methods: All patients aged ≥12 years who rolled over from the placebo‐controlled QUEST study (NCT02414854) to TRAVERSE (NCT02134028) received add‐on dupilumab 300 mg every 2 weeks for up to 96 weeks. We assessed annualized severe asthma exacerbation rates (AERs) and changes from parent‐study baseline (PSBL) in pre‐bronchodilator FEV1 and 5‐item asthma control questionnaire (ACQ‐5) score in patients with moderate‐to‐severe type 2 asthma with and without evidence of allergic asthma at PSBL. Results: In TRAVERSE, dupilumab consistently reduced AER across all subgroups. By Week 96, dupilumab increased pre‐bronchodilator FEV1 from PSBL by 0.35–0.41 L in patients receiving placebo during QUEST (placebo/dupilumab) and 0.34–0.44 L in those receiving dupilumab during QUEST (dupilumab/dupilumab) with an allergic phenotype at baseline. In patients without evidence of allergic asthma, pre‐bronchodilator FEV1 improved by 0.38–0.41 L and 0.33–0.37 L, respectively. By Week 48, ACQ‐5 scores decreased from PSBL by 1.63–1.69 (placebo/dupilumab) and 1.74–1.81 (dupilumab/dupilumab) points across subgroups with allergic asthma, and 1.75–1.83 (placebo/dupilumab) and 1.78–1.86 (dupilumab/dupilumab) in those without. Conclusions: Long‐term treatment with dupilumab reduced exacerbation rates and improved lung function and asthma control in patients with asthma with type 2 inflammation as per current GINA guidance and irrespective of evidence of allergic asthma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]