Search

Forest growing stem volume (GSV) reflects the richness of forest resources as well as the quality of forest ecosystems. Remote sensing technology enables robust and efficient GSV estimation as it greatly reduces the survey time and cost while facilitating periodic monitoring. Given its red edge bands and a short revisit time period, Sentinel-2 images were selected for the GSV estimation in Wangyedian forest farm, Inner Mongolia, China. The variable combination was shown to significantly affect the accuracy of the estimation model. After extracting spectral variables, texture features, and topographic factors, a stepwise random forest (SRF) method was proposed to select variable combinations and establish random forest regressions (RFR) for GSV estimation. The linear stepwise regression (LSR), Boruta, Variable Selection Using Random Forests (VSURF), and random forest (RF) methods were then used as references for comparison with the proposed SRF for selection of predictors and GSV estimation. Combined with the observed GSV data and the Sentinel-2 images, the distributions of GSV were generated by the RFR models with the variable combinations determined by the LSR, RF, Boruta, VSURF, and SRF. The results show that the texture features of Sentinel-2's red edge bands can significantly improve the accuracy of GSV estimation. The SRF method can effectively select the optimal variable combination, and the SRF-based model results in the highest estimation accuracy with the decreases of relative root mean square error by 16.4%, 14.4%, 16.3%, and 10.6% compared with those from the LSR-, RF-, Boruta-, and VSURF-based models, respectively. The GSV distribution generated by the SRF-based model matched that of the field observations well. The results of this study are expected to provide a reference for GSV estimation of coniferous plantations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Traditional parametric methods for classification of land use and land cover (LULC) types using remote sensing imagery assume a global distribution model and fail to consider local variation of categorical variables. Differently, non-parametric methods do not make any statistical assumptions but are typically sensitive to the sample sizes of training sample data that usually require a high cost to collect in the field. Geostatistical classifiers, such as indicator kriging and simulation, are local variability-based methods that exhibit great potential for image-based classification of LULC types. However, variogram models required are highly sensitive to the spatial configuration of training samples as well as sample size given a study area. Moreover, when a large number of spectral variables are considered into kriging systems, modeling the variograms and cross-variograms would be problematic. To circumvent these issues, this study extended the geostatistical methods from a 2-dimensional geographic space to a m -dimensional image feature space to derive feature-space indicator variograms (FSIVs). Moreover, a novel stochastic simulation classification algorithm, Feature-Space Indicator Simulation (FSIS), was proposed and examined for classification of LULC types in Duolun County located in Inner Mongolia and in Huang-Feng-Qiao (HFQ) forest farm, Hunan of China. In Duolun, six LULC types were involved and in HFQ a complicated forest landscape consisting of nine forest types plus water, built-up area, and agricultural/bare soil, was classified. The classification results of FSIS were compared with another feature-space geostatistical classifier – feature-space indicator kriging (FSIK), a traditional parametric method – maximum likelihood (ML), a widely used nonparametric method – support vector machine (SVM), and a recently popular method – random forest (RF). The results showed that compared with ML, SVM and RF, in both study areas FSIS statistically significantly increased the accuracy of the classifications by 10.0–29.9% for percentage correct and 19.0–47.6% for Kappa statistic. Compared with FSIK, FSIS also improved the classification accuracy but the accuracy increases were relatively smaller with the percentages correct of 3.5% and 7.6% and the Kappa values of 4.6% and 8.6% for Duolun and HFQ, respectively. Moreover, FSIS led to the spatial uncertainties of the classification estimates as the quality measure of the estimates. In addition, the results also demonstrated that FSIVs were sensitive to the within-class heterogeneity but not very much to the size of training samples. Overall, FSIS exhibited the greater potential to improve the classification accuracy of LULC and forest types using remote sensing image. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]