Search

Background: Tsetse flies (Glossina sp.) are vectors of Trypanosoma brucei subspecies that cause human African trypanosomiasis (HAT). Capturing and screening tsetse is critical for HAT surveillance. Classically, tsetse have been microscopically analysed to identify trypanosomes, but this is increasingly replaced with molecular xenomonitoring. Nonetheless, sensitive T. brucei-detection assays, such as TBR-PCR, are vulnerable to DNA cross-contamination. This may occur at capture, when often multiple live tsetse are retained temporarily in the cage of a trap. This study set out to determine whether infected tsetse can contaminate naïve tsetse with T. brucei DNA via faeces when co-housed. Methodology/Principle findings: Insectary-reared teneral G. morsitans morsitans were fed an infectious T. b. brucei-spiked bloodmeal. At 19 days post-infection, infected and naïve tsetse were caged together in the following ratios: (T1) 9:3, (T2) 6:6 (T3) 1:11 and a control (C0) 0:12 in triplicate. Following 24-hour incubation, DNA was extracted from each fly and screened for parasite DNA presence using PCR and qPCR. All insectary-reared infected flies were positive for T. brucei DNA using TBR-qPCR. However, naïve tsetse also tested positive. Even at a ratio of 1 infected to 11 naïve flies, 91% of naïve tsetse gave positive TBR-qPCR results. Furthermore, the quantity of T. brucei DNA detected in naïve tsetse was significantly correlated with cage infection ratio. With evidence of cross-contamination, field-caught tsetse from Tanzania were then assessed using the same screening protocol. End-point TBR-PCR predicted a sample population prevalence of 24.8%. Using qPCR and Cq cut-offs optimised on insectary-reared flies, we estimated that prevalence was 0.5% (95% confidence interval [0.36, 0.73]). Conclusions/Significance: Our results show that infected tsetse can contaminate naïve flies with T. brucei DNA when co-caged, and that the level of contamination can be extensive. Whilst simple PCR may overestimate infection prevalence, quantitative PCR offers a means of eliminating false positives. Author summary: Tsetse flies (Glossina sp.) are vectors of Trypanosoma brucei parasites that cause human African trypanosomiasis, also known as sleeping sickness. As part of disease surveillance, tsetse can be captured in traps and checked for parasite presence. The molecular screening of disease vectors (such as mosquitoes, ticks and blackflies) for the presence of pathogen DNA has gained popularity in recent years. However, DNA contamination may occur at capture when live vectors are retained for a limited period in a trap cage. To explore this, we conducted experiments, initially with laboratory-reared tsetse and then field-caught tsetse from Tanzania. Our results show that infected tsetse can contaminate uninfected tsetse with T. brucei DNA when retained together in a trap cage, and that the level of contamination can be extensive. Infected tsetse consistently shed T. brucei DNA in their faeces, which in turn contaminates other tsetse. This can produce false-positive results, leading to inaccurate reporting of infection prevalence. These findings impact not only trypanosomiasis surveillance, but may also have ramifications for the xenomonitoring of other vector-borne neglected diseases. Future work should explore whether pathogen DNA contamination routes exist in other vector species and, if so, the methods to mitigate DNA contamination in entomological traps. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Tsetse flies (Diptera: Glossinidae) are sole vectors for trypanosomiasis, which affect human health and livestock productivity in Africa. Little is known about the genetic diversity of Glossina fuscipes fuscipes, which is an important species in Tanzania and Kenya. The main objective of the study was to provide baseline data to determine the genetic variability and divergence of G. f. fuscipes in the Lake Victoria basin of Tanzania and Kenya in order to guide future vector control efforts in the region. Findings: Two hundred and seventy five G. f. fuscipes from 8 sites along the shores of Lake Victoria were screened for genetic polymorphisms at 19 microsatellite loci. Samples were collected from two sites in Kenya and six sites in Tanzania. Four of the Tanzanian sites were located in the Rorya district, on the eastern shores of Lake Victoria, while the other two sites were from Ukerewe and Bukoba districts from the southern and western Lake Victoria shores, respectively. Four genetically distinct allopatric clusters were revealed by microsatellite analysis, which sorted the sampling sites according to geography, with sites separated by as little as ~65 km belonging to distinct genetic clusters, while samples located within ~35 km from each other group in the same cluster. Conclusion: Our results suggest that there is ongoing genetic admixture within sampling sites located ~35 km from each other, while sites located ~65 km apart are genetically isolated from each other. Similar patterns emerged from a parallel study on G. f. fuscipes analyzed from the Lake Victoria Uganda shores. From a control perspective these results suggest that for sites within the same genetic cluster, control efforts should be carried out in a coordinated fashion in order to avoid re-invasions. Future work should focus on better quantifying the extent and spatial patterns of the observed genetic discontinuities of the G. f. fuscipes populations along the Tanzanian shores. This will aid in their control by providing guidelines on the geographical extent of the area to be treated at the same time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Microsatellite loci still represent valuable resources for the study of the population biology of non-model organisms. Discovering or adapting new suitable microsatellite markers in species of interest still represents a useful task, especially so for non-model organisms as tsetse flies (genus Glossina), which remain a serious threat to the health of humans and animals in sub-Saharan Africa. In this paper, we present the development of new microsatellite loci for four species of Glossina : two from the Morsitans group, G. morsitans morsitans (Gmm) from Zimbabwe, G. pallidipes (Gpalli) from Tanzania; and the other two from the Palpalis group, G. fuscipes fuscipes (Gff) from Chad, and G. palpalis gambiensis (Gpg) from Guinea. We found frequent short allele dominance and null alleles. Stuttering could also be found and amended when possible. Cryptic species seemed to occur frequently in all taxa but Gff. This explains why it may be difficult finding ecumenical primers, which thus need adaptation according to each taxonomic and geographic context. Amplification problems occurred more often in published old markers, and Gmm and Gpg were the most affected (stronger heterozygote deficits). Trinucleotide markers displayed selection signature in some instances (Gmm). Combining old and new loci, for Gmm, eight loci can be safely used (with correction for null alleles); and five seem particularly promising; for Gpalli, only five to three loci worked well, depending on the clade, which means that the use of loci from other species (four morsitans loci seemed to work well), or other new primers will need to be used; for Gff, 14 loci behaved well, but with null alleles, seven of which worked very well; and for G. palpalis sl , only four loci, needing null allele and stuttering corrections seem to work well, and other loci from the literature are thus needed, including X-linked markers, five of which seem to work rather well (in females only), but new markers will probably be needed. Finally, the high proportion of X-linked markers (around 30%) was explained by the non-Y DNA quantity and chromosome structure of tsetse flies studied so far. Unlabelled Image • Amplification problems frequently affects tsetse DNA. • Loci must be checked for amplification problems and cured or excluded when necessary. • Trinucleotides are more susceptible to display selection signatures. • The proportion of X-linked markers is proportional to non-Y DNA length. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]