Search

BACKGROUND: We performed an analysis of the cost and relative merits of different strategies for the diagnosis of multidrug-resistant/extensively drug-resistant TB (MDR/XDR-TB) in different settings. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the published evidence on cost/cost-effectiveness of rapid MDR/pre-XDR-TB and other methods for XDR-TB testing up to September 2022. PRISMA guidelines were followed. Collected data were analysed using Stata v17 software. Cost data were reported in USD ($) and summarised by mean, standard deviation, and range. Country income level was defined according to the World Bank country classification. Three simplified scenarios were also used to explore testing implications, based on low, intermediate and high TB incidence. RESULTS: Of 157 records, 25 studies were included with 24 reporting the cost of Xpert/RIF and two that evaluated the implementation of the MTBDR plus test. The total rapid test cost ranged from $12.41-$218, including $1.13-$74.60 for reagents/consumables and $0.40-$14.34 for equipment. CONCLUSION: The cost of MDR/XDR-TB diagnostics is lower in low resource settings. However, the cost-effective implementation of MDR/XDR-TB diagnostic algorithms requires careful consideration of local resources to avoid missed identification and the use of inappropriate regimen.

Objective: To evaluate lung function in a cohort of patients with a history of pulmonary tuberculosis in Brazil, as well as to evaluate the decline in lung function over time and compare it with that observed in similar cohorts in Mexico and Italy., Methods: The three cohorts were compared in terms of age, smoking status, pulmonary function test results, six-minute walk test results, and arterial blood gas results. In the Brazilian cohort, pulmonary function test results, six-minute walk test results, and arterial blood gas results right after the end of tuberculosis treatment were compared with those obtained at the end of the follow-up period., Results: The three cohorts were very different regarding pulmonary function test results. The most common ventilatory patterns in the Brazilian, Italian, and Mexican cohorts were an obstructive pattern, a mixed pattern, and a normal pattern (in 58 patients [50.9%], in 18 patients [41.9%], and in 26 patients [44.1%], respectively). Only 2 multidrug-resistant tuberculosis cases were included in the Brazilian cohort, whereas, in the Mexican cohort, 27 cases were included (45.8%). Mean PaO2 and mean SaO2 were lower in the Mexican cohort than in the Brazilian cohort (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.002 for PaO2 and SaO2, respectively). In the Brazilian cohort, almost all functional parameters deteriorated over time., Conclusions: This study reinforces the importance of early and effective treatment of drug-susceptible tuberculosis patients, because multidrug-resistant tuberculosis increases lung damage. When patients complete their tuberculosis treatment, they should be evaluated as early as possible, and, if post-tuberculosis lung disease is diagnosed, they should be managed and offered pulmonary rehabilitation because there is evidence that it is effective in these patients.

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends countries introduce new anti-TB drugs in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. The aim of the study is to prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of bedaquiline (and/or delamanid)- containing regimens in a large cohort of consecutive TB patients treated globally. This observational, prospective study is based on data collected and provided by Global Tuberculosis Network (GTN) centres and analysed twice a year. All consecutive patients (including children/adolescents) treated with bedaquiline and/or delamanid were enrolled, and managed according to WHO and national guidelines. Overall, 52 centres from 29 countries/regions in all continents reported 883 patients as of January 31st 2021, 24/29 countries/regions providing data on 100% of their consecutive patients (10-80% in the remaining 5 countries). The drug-resistance pattern of the patients was severe (>30% with extensively drug-resistant -TB; median number of resistant drugs 5 (3-7) in the overall cohort and 6 (4-8) among patients with a final outcome). For the patients with a final outcome (477/883, 54.0%) the median (IQR) number of months of anti-TB treatment was 18 (13-23) (in days 553 (385-678)). The proportion of patients achieving sputum smear and culture conversion ranged from 93.4% and 92.8% respectively (whole cohort) to 89.3% and 88.8% respectively (patients with a final outcome), a median (IQR) time to sputum smear and culture conversion of 58 (30-90) days for the whole cohort and 60 (30-100) for patients with a final outcome and, respectively, of 55 (30-90) and 60 (30-90) days for culture conversion. Of 383 patients treated with bedaquiline but not delamanid, 284 (74.2%) achieved treatment success, while 25 (6.5%) died, 11 (2.9%) failed and 63 (16.5%) were lost to follow-up., (Copyright © 2021 Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

BACKGROUND: Evidence on the impact of tuberculosis (TB) treatment on lung function is scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate post-treatment sequelae in drug-susceptible and drug-resistant-TB (DR-TB) cases in Mexico and Italy. METHODS: At the end of TB treatment the patients underwent complete clinical assessment, functional evaluation of respiratory mechanics, gas exchange and a 6-minute walking test. Treatment regimens (and definitions) recommended by the World Health Organization were used throughout. RESULTS: Of 61 patients, 65.6% had functional impairment, with obstruction in 24/61 patients (39.4%), and 78% with no bronchodilator response. These effects were more prevalent among DR-TB cases (forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity [FEV 1 /FVC] < lower limit of normality, 14/24 vs. 10/34; P = 0.075). DR-TB patients showed moderately severe (FEV 1 < 60%) and severe obstruction (FEV 1 < 50%) ( P = 0.008). Pre- and post-bronchodilator FEV 1 and FEV 1 /FVC (% of predicted) were significantly lower among DR-TB cases. Plethysmography abnormalities (restriction, hyperinflation and/or air trapping) were more frequent among DR-TB cases ( P = 0.001), along with abnormal carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO) ( P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: The majority of TB patients suffer the consequences of post-treatment sequelae (of differing levels), which compromise quality of life, exercise tolerance and long-term prognosis. It is therefore important that lung function is comprehensively evaluated post-treatment to identify patient needs for future medication and pulmonary rehabilitation.

The continuous flow of new research articles on MDR-TB diagnosis, treatment, prevention and rehabilitation requires frequent update of existing guidelines. This review is aimed at providing clinicians and public health staff with an updated and easy-to-consult document arising from consensus of Global Tuberculosis Network (GTN) experts. The core published documents and guidelines have been reviewed, including the recently published MDR-TB WHO rapid advice and ATS/CDC/ERS/IDSA guidelines. After a rapid review of epidemiology and risk factors, the clinical priorities on MDR-TB diagnosis (including whole genome sequencing and drug-susceptibility testing interpretations) and treatment (treatment design and management, TB in children) are discussed. Furthermore, the review comprehensively describes the latest information on contact tracing and LTBI management in MDR-TB contacts, while providing guidance on post-treatment functional evaluation and rehabilitation of TB sequelae, infection control and other public health priorities., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that countries implement pharmacovigilance and collect information on active drug safety monitoring (aDSM) and management of adverse events.The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the frequency and severity of adverse events to anti-tuberculosis (TB) drugs in a cohort of consecutive TB patients treated with new ( i.e. bedaquiline, delamanid) and repurposed ( i.e. clofazimine, linezolid) drugs, based on the WHO aDSM project. Adverse events were collected prospectively after attribution to a specific drug together with demographic, bacteriological, radiological and clinical information at diagnosis and during therapy. This interim analysis included patients who completed or were still on treatment at time of data collection.Globally, 45 centres from 26 countries/regions reported 658 patients (68.7% male, 4.4% HIV co-infected) treated as follows: 87.7% with bedaquiline, 18.4% with delamanid (6.1% with both), 81.5% with linezolid and 32.4% with clofazimine. Overall, 504 adverse event episodes were reported: 447 (88.7%) were classified as minor (grade 1-2) and 57 (11.3%) as serious (grade 3-5). The majority of the 57 serious adverse events reported by 55 patients (51 out of 57, 89.5%) ultimately resolved. Among patients reporting serious adverse events, some drugs held responsible were discontinued: bedaquiline in 0.35% (two out of 577), delamanid in 0.8% (one out of 121), linezolid in 1.9% (10 out of 536) and clofazimine in 1.4% (three out of 213) of patients. Serious adverse events were reported in 6.9% (nine out of 131) of patients treated with amikacin, 0.4% (one out of 221) with ethionamide/prothionamide, 2.8% (15 out of 536) with linezolid and 1.8% (eight out of 498) with cycloserine/terizidone.The aDSM study provided valuable information, but implementation needs scaling-up to support patient-centred care., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: S. Borisov has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E. Danila has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Maryandyshev has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Dalcolmo has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Miliauskas has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Kuksa reports personal fees for trial participation from Otsuka and Tibotec, personal fees for lectures from Johnson and Johnson Services Inc., outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: S. Manga has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Skrahina has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Diktanas reports personal fees for trial participation from Otsuka, grants for meeting attendance from Janssen (Sirturo), outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: L.R. Codecasa has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Aleksa has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. Bruchfeld has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Koleva has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Piubello has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: Z.F. Udwadia has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: O.W. Akkerman has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E. Belilovski has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E. Bernal has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M.J. Boeree has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. Cadiñanos Loidi has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: Q. Cai has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.J. Cebrian Gallardo has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Dara has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E. Davidavičienė has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Davies Forsman has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. De Los Rios has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. Denholm has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. Drakšienė has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R. Duarte has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S.E. Elamin has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: N. Escobar Salinas has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Ferrarese has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Filippov has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Garcia has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.M. García-García has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: I. Gaudiesiute has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: B. Gavazova has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R. Gayoso has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R. Gomez Rosso has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: V. Gruslys has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G. Gualano has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: W. Hoefsloot has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. Jonsson has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E. Khimova has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: H. Kunst has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R. Laniado-Laborín has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: Y. Li has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. Magis-Escurra has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: V. Manfrin has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: V. Marchese has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E. Martínez Robles has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Matteelli has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. Mazza-Stalder has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. Moschos has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Muñoz-Torrico has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: H. Mustafa Hamdan has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: B. Nakčerienė has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Nicod has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Nieto Marcos has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D.J. Palmero has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: F. Palmieri has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Papavasileiou has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M-C. Payen has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Pontarelli has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Quirós has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Rendon has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Saderi has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Šmite has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: I. Solovic has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M.B. Souleymane has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Tadolini has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. van den Boom has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Vescovo has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: P. Viggiani has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Yedilbayev has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R. Zablockis has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D. Zhurkin has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Zignol has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D. Visca has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Spanevello has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.A. Caminero has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J-W. Alffenaar has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Tiberi has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R. Centis has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. D'Ambrosio has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E. Pontali has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G. Sotgiu has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G.B. Migliori has nothing to disclose., (Copyright ©ERS 2019.)

The World Health Organization launched a global initiative, known as aDSM (active TB drug safety monitoring and management) to better describe the safety profile of new treatment regimens for drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB) in real-world settings. However, comprehensive surveillance is difficult to implement in several countries. The aim of the aDSM project is to demonstrate the feasibility of implementing national aDSM registers and to describe the type and the frequency of adverse events (AEs) associated with exposure to the new anti-TB drugs. Following a pilot study carried out in 2016, official involvement of TB reference centres/countries into the project was sought and cases treated with bedaquiline- and/or delamanid-containing regimens were consecutively recruited. AEs were prospectively collected ensuring potential attribution of the AE to a specific drug based on its known safety profile. A total of 309 cases were fully reported from 41 centres in 27 countries (65% males; 268 treated with bedaquiline, 20 with delamanid, and 21 with both drugs) out of an estimated 781 cases the participating countries had committed to report by the first quarter of 2019., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Objectives: No study evaluated the contribution of adjunctive surgery in bedaquiline-treated patients. This study describes treatment outcomes and complications in a cohort of drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) cases treated with bedaquiline-containing regimens undergoing surgery., Methods: This retrospective observational study recruited patients treated for TB in 12 centres in 9 countries between January 2007 and March 2015. Patients who had surgical indications in a bedaquiline-treated programme-based cohort were selected and surgery-related information was collected. Patient characteristics and surgical indications were described together with type of operation, surgical complications, bacteriological conversion rates, and treatment outcomes. Treatment outcomes were evaluated according to the time of surgery., Results: 57 bedaquiline-exposed cases resistant to a median of 7 drugs had indication for surgery (52 retreatments; 50 extensively drug-resistant (XDR) or pre XDR-TB). Sixty percent of cases initiated bedaquiline treatment following surgery, while 36.4% underwent the bedaquiline regimen before surgery and completed it after the operation. At treatment completion 90% culture-converted with 69.1% achieving treatment success; 21.8% had unfavourable outcomes (20.0% treatment failure, 1.8% lost to follow-up), and 9.1% were still undergoing treatment., Conclusions: The study results suggest that bedaquiline and surgery can be safely and effectively combined in selected cases with a specific indication., (Copyright © 2018 The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: Multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis (TB) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR)-TB epidemics are key obstacles towards TB control and elimination., Recent Findings: Diagnosis of MDR/XDR-TB is difficult and requires several weeks. New diagnostic tools are being tested and proposed allowing for shorter time to diagnosis and reduced delays in starting an adequate treatment regimen. MDR/XDR-TB treatment strategies are currently on an evolving stage. New shortened treatments based on the recommended 'Bangladesh regimen' or on the newer anti-TB drugs, delamanid and bedaquiline may represent part of the future scenario. In addition, more information on safety and efficacy of delamanid and bedaquiline has been published, allowing to better position these drugs. Recent information on treatment regimens for the paediatric age, with or without delamanid or bedaquiline, has become available. This is of great help in designing safer and more efficacious regimens for the treatment of MDR/XDR-TB in children and adolescents., Summary: The accessibility, sustainability and scale-up of new diagnostic technologies are lagging behind and more efforts are needed. In addition, we need high-quality information on safety and efficacy of various combinations of drugs to obtain the best possible regimens to treat the largest possible proportion of patients.

The classification of anti-tuberculosis (TB) drugs is important as it helps the clinician to build an appropriate anti-TB regimen for multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) TB cases that do not fulfil the criteria for the shorter MDR-TB regimen. The World Health Organization (WHO) has recently approved a revision of the classification of new anti-TB drugs based on current evidence on each drug. In the previous WHO guidelines, the choice of drugs was based on efficacy and toxicity in a step-down manner, from group 1 first-line drugs and groups 2-5 second-line drugs, to group 5 drugs with potentially limited efficacy or limited clinical evidence. In the revised WHO classification, exclusively aimed at managing drug-resistant cases, medicines are again listed in hierarchical order from group A to group D. In parallel, a possible future classification is independently proposed. The aim of this viewpoint article is to describe the evolution in WHO TB classification (taking into account an independently proposed new classification) and recent changes in WHO guidance, while commenting on the differences between them. The latest evidence on the ex-group 5 drugs is also discussed., (Copyright © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)