Search

Objectives: The value of the "trace" result in Xpert Ultra for diagnosing active tuberculosis (TB) remains unclear. Our study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra) (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, USA) over Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, USA) and mycobacterial culture when compared with a composite reference standard (CRS)., Methods: A retrospective single-center observational study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital in South India. Over three months, patients (aged ≥15 years) data on Xpert Ultra tests and mycobacterial culture of pulmonary and extrapulmonary samples were extracted from their electronic medical records. Patients were defined as TB cases based on the CRS criteria. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of diagnostic tests were calculated by comparing them to the CRS., Results: Xpert Ultra was more sensitive (87.8%) than Xpert (72.1%) and culture (44.1%). The specificity of Xpert Ultra was lower (98.1%) than those of Xpert (100%) and culture (100%). The sensitivity (92%) and specificity (100%) of Xpert Ultra were highest when performed on pus samples., Conclusions: Xpert Ultra with the trace category is superior to the conventional Xpert, and mycobacterial culture in identifying TB., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Tuberculosis (TB) is a major global health problem, mainly in developing countries. Despite the availability of highly effective first-line antitubercular (ATT) drugs, ATT drug-induced liver injury (ATT DILI) leads to treatment interruption and consequently loss of therapeutic efficacy., Methods: In this prospective cohort study from India, all consecutive patients who met inclusion criteria and started on ATT were included. The incidence, risk factors, and outcome of ATT DILI were determined. A clinical prediction score for ATT DILI was derived., Results: A total of 393 patients were included. The incidence of ATT DILI was 9.7% (95% confidence interval 7%-13.2%). HIV infection, daily regimen, disseminated disease, and chronic liver disease were identified as significant risk factors (P < 0.05) for developing DILI. A prediction score derived from the risk factors showed that a score of >5 could predict DILI with a sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 67%. All-cause mortality in DILI was 4.7%., Conclusion: The incidence of ATT DILI was 9.7% in our cohort with higher incidence among the patients on daily regimen. The study suggests that the combination of risk factors of extensive TB disease, HIV infection, chronic liver disease, and under nutrition increases the vulnerability to DILI, particularly with daily treatment regimen, emphasizing the role of acquired risk factors in the development of DILI., Competing Interests: None