Search

CD4+ T-cell activation through recognition of Human Leukocyte Antigen II (HLAII)-presented peptides is a key step in the development of unwanted immune response against biotherapeutics, such as the generation of anti-drug antibodies (ADA). Therefore, the identification of HLAII-presented peptides derived from biotherapeutics is a crucial part of immunogenicity risk assessment and mitigation strategies during drug development. To date, numerous CD4+ T-cell epitopes have been identified by HLAII immunopeptidomics in antibody-based biotherapeutics using either their native or aggregated form. Antibody-target immune complexes have been detected in patients with ADA and are thought to play a role in ADA development by enhancing the presentation of CD4+ T-cell epitopes at the surface of antigen presenting cells (APCs). The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of biotherapeutic antibody-target immune complexes on the HLAII peptide presentation of biotherapeutics in human primary monocyte-derived dendritic cells (DCs). The trimeric tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and its biotherapeutic antagonists infliximab (INFL), adalimumab (ADAL), and a single armed Fab' were used as a model system. The HLAII immunopeptidome of DCs loaded with antagonists or their immune complexes with TNF was analyzed by trapped ion mobility time-of-flight mass spectrometry (timsTOF MS) leading to the identification of ~ 12,000 unique HLAII-associated peptides per preparation. Anti-TNF sequences were detected at a median of 0.3% of the total immunopeptidome, against a majority background of peptides from endogenous and media-derived proteins. TNF antagonist presentation spanned the variable and constant regions in a widespread manner in both light and heavy chains, consistent with previously discovered HLAII peptides. This investigation extends the collection of observed HLAII peptides from anti-TNF biotherapeutics to include sequences that at least partially span the complementary determining regions (CDRs), such as the LCDR1 for both INFL and ADAL. Although antagonist presentation varied significantly across donors, peptides from both bivalent antagonists INFL-and ADAL were more highly presented relative to the Fab'. While TNF immune complexes did not alter overall HLAII presentation, a moderate increase in presentation of a subset of peptide clusters was observed in the case of INFL-TNF, which included HCDR2, HCDR3 and LCDR2 sequences. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients treated with the TNF antagonist adalimumab develop anti-therapeutic antibodies (ATA), the prevalence of which varies depending on the assay used. Most assays are compromised due to the presence of adalimumab in the clinical samples. Our objective was to develop an antibody assay, applicable for clinical testing, which overcomes the limitation of therapeutic interference and to further determine the relationship between ATA development, adalimumab levels and disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) or ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Use of an electrochemiluminescence platform permitted development of fit-for-purpose immunoassays. Serum samples from patients, taken prior to and at 12 and 24 weeks of treatment, were retrospectively analysed for levels of adalimumab and ATA. Overall, the antibody prevalence was 43.6% at 12 weeks and 41% at 24 weeks of treatment. Disruption of immune complexes by acid dissociation, a strategy often adopted for this purpose, only marginally increased the antibody prevalence to 48.7% and 46% at 12 and 24 weeks respectively. We found that antibody formation was associated with decreasing levels of circulating adalimumab, but no direct effect on disease activity was evident as assessed using DAS28 for RA patients and BASDAI for PsA and AS patients. However, a negative correlation of free adalimumab trough levels with disease activity scores was observed. Data showed that adalimumab levels can serve as an indicator of ATA development which can then be confirmed by ATA testing. Monitoring of both therapeutic and antibodies should be considered during adalimumab therapy to allow clinicians to personalise treatments for maximal therapeutic outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients treated with the TNF antagonist adalimumab develop anti-therapeutic antibodies (ATA), the prevalence of which varies depending on the assay used. Most assays are compromised due to the presence of adalimumab in the clinical samples. Our objective was to develop an antibody assay, applicable for clinical testing, which overcomes the limitation of therapeutic interference and to further determine the relationship between ATA development, adalimumab levels and disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) or ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Use of an electrochemiluminescence platform permitted development of fit-for-purpose immunoassays. Serum samples from patients, taken prior to and at 12 and 24 weeks of treatment, were retrospectively analysed for levels of adalimumab and ATA. Overall, the antibody prevalence was 43.6% at 12 weeks and 41% at 24 weeks of treatment. Disruption of immune complexes by acid dissociation, a strategy often adopted for this purpose, only marginally increased the antibody prevalence to 48.7% and 46% at 12 and 24 weeks respectively. We found that antibody formation was associated with decreasing levels of circulating adalimumab, but no direct effect on disease activity was evident as assessed using DAS28 for RA patients and BASDAI for PsA and AS patients. However, a negative correlation of free adalimumab trough levels with disease activity scores was observed. Data showed that adalimumab levels can serve as an indicator of ATA development which can then be confirmed by ATA testing. Monitoring of both therapeutic and antibodies should be considered during adalimumab therapy to allow clinicians to personalise treatments for maximal therapeutic outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Central nervous system (CNS) demyelination in a patient receiving tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) antagonist therapy in our practice prompted a search of the literature to assess the evidence for a causal relationship between TNF antagonist therapy and demyelination. We summarise clinical data extracted on 65 reported cases of CNS demyelination in patients receiving TNF antagonist therapy and show that the data are consistent with a drug-related aetiology given the temporal relationship between TNF antagonist initiation and symptoms, de-challenge-re-challenge phenomenon and the later age of disease onset compared with sporadic multiple sclerosis. Research on TNF signalling pathways also suggests a plausible causative role of TNF antagonist therapy in demyelination. However to date, controlled trial and pharmacovigilance data do not show an increased risk of demyelination in patients receiving TNF antagonist therapy. These data may be underpowered to exclude such a risk and pooled, collaborative data from multiple registries are warranted. Given the uncertainty in this area, clinicians should adhere to existing clinical guidance advising avoidance of TNF antagonist therapy in patients with a personal or family history of demyelination, and ensure all suitable patients are enrolled in long term safety registries in countries where these are established. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. To determine the incidence of and risk factors for non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) in a national cohort of veterans with RA.Methods. We examined skin cancer risk in a cohort of 20 648 patients with RA derived from the Department of Veterans’ Affairs (VA) national administrative databases. The cohort was divided into two medication groups: patients treated with non-biologic and TNF-α antagonist DMARDs. We defined skin cancer as the first occurrence of an International Classification of Disease, Version 9, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code for NMSC after initiation of a DMARD. Outcome risk was described using hazard ratios (HRs) with Cox proportional hazards regression for time-to-event analysis and logistic regression. We performed medical record review to validate the diagnosis of NMSC.Results. Incidence of NMSC was 18.9 and 12.7 per 1000 patient-years in patients on TNF-α antagonists and non-biologic DMARDs, respectively. Patients on TNF-α antagonists had a higher risk of developing NMSC (HR 1.42; 95% CI 1.24, 1.63). Risk factors for NMSC included older age, male gender, NSAID and glucocorticoid use and a history of prior malignancies. There was substantial agreement between ICD-9-CM diagnosis of NMSC and medical record validation (κ = 0.61).Conclusion. TNF-α antagonist therapy in veterans with RA may be associated with an increased risk of NMSC, compared with therapy with non-biologic DMARDs. Rheumatologists should carefully screen patients receiving TNF-α antagonists for pre-cancerous skin lesions and skin cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Objectives. To compare the clinical manifestations of spinal disease, peripheral arthritis and enthesitis, and to evaluate the effectiveness of adalimumab in a large cohort of patients with AS in relation to the presence or absence of psoriasis. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

We evaluated the short-term effects of the anti-interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptor antibody tocilizumab (TCZ) in six patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had been refractory to tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist therapy. All subjects were considered to be secondary nonresponders to TNF antagonists as decided by each physician. The Disease Activity Score of 28 Joints (DAS28) appeared to improve slowly by TCZ compared with TNF antagonist therapy, but significantly decreased at 24 weeks. One patient achieved DAS28 remission [DAS28–erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) <2.60, and 5 of 6 patients showed good or moderate clinical response. The change in the clinical Disease Activity Index was similar to that of the DAS28–ESR. The serum level of matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3), a marker for synovial overgrowth, also significantly decreased after the treatment (518 ± 567 at baseline, 141 ± 90 ng/ml at 24 weeks, p < 0.05). One patient discontinued TCZ because of tuberculous peritonitis. Although physicians need to watch for infectious adverse events, these data indicate that TCZ is effective for treating RA patients refractory to TNF antagonists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) is a central regulator of chronic inflammatory diseases and plays a major role in the host immune system against tuberculosis (TB). TNF antagonists, infliximab and etanercept are effective in treating chronic inflammatory diseases by inhibiting TNF, but increase the risk of TB as a result of immunosuppression. Previous studies have shown that the risk of TB is greater in patients who received infliximab than in those who received etanercept and several hypotheses on the action mechanisms of the two agents have been presented in order to explain this difference in the risk of TB. As the clinical use of TNF antagonists increase, the incidence rate of TB may increase. Therefore, it is necessary that clinicians considering the use of TNF antagonists pay much attention to the prevention and control of TB and understand the mechanisms of action of the TNF antagonists. This case shows that etanercept treatment can be safely administered during the treatment of TB. In the future, additional studies will be needed to determine the safety of etanercept and the optimal time for the administration of etanercept during the TB treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who previously discontinued tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists for any reason in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Abstract: Thromboembolic (TE) events have been observed in about 4.5% of patients treated with TNF antagonists. It has been suggested that anti-drug antibodies could be involved. However, another mechanism fits more with the available immunochemical data and could lead to practical measures to prevent TE events during anti-TNF therapies. Adverse effects are not related to the type of antagonist, but well to the combination of the inhibition of TNF and the predisposition of some patients to lupus-like reactions, including antiphospholipid syndrome. The overproduction of interferon-α, caused by the inhibition of TNF in these individuals would foster the development of lupus-like syndrome. Therefore, seeking conventional markers of systemic lupus erythematosus (e.g. anti-dsDNA, anti-phospholipid, anti-β2-glycoprotein antibodies) before the administration of an anti-TNF could be a prudent measure. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]