Search

The near-tropopause energy spectrum closely follows a -5/3 power law at mesoscales. Most theories addressing the mesoscale spectrum assume unbalanced dynamics but ignore the tropopause (near which the bulk of the data were collected). Conversely, it has also been proposed that the mesoscale spectrum results from tropopause-induced alterations of geostrophic turbulence. This paper seeks to reconcile these a priori mutually exclusive theories by presenting simulations that permit both unbalanced motion and tropopauseinduced effects. The model integrates the nonhydrostatic Boussinesq equations in the presence of a rapidly varying background stratification profile (an idealized tropopause). Decaying turbulence simulations were performed over a wide range of Rossby numbers. In the limit of weak flow (U ≲ 1ms-1), the essential features of the Boussinesq simulations are well captured by a quasigeostrophic version of the model: secondary roll-ups of filaments and shallow spectral slopes are observed near the tropopause but not elsewhere. However, these tropopause-induced effects rapidly disappear with increasing flow strength. For flow strengths more typical of the tropopause (U~10ms-1), the spectrum develops a shallow, near-5/3 tail associated with fast-time-scale, unbalanced motion. In contrast to weak flows, this spectral shallowing is evident at any altitude and regardless of the presence of a tropopause. Diagnostics of the fast component of motion reveal significant inertia-gravity wave activity at large horizontal scales (where the balanced flow dominates). However, no evidence points to such activity in the shallow range. That is, the mesoscale of the model is dominated by unbalanced turbulence, not waves. Implications and limitations of these findings are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Motivated by the substantial sensitivity of eddies in two-layer quasigeostrophic (QG) turbulence models to the strength of bottom drag, this study explores the sensitivity of eddies in more realistic ocean general circulation model (OGCM) simulations to bottom drag strength. The OGCM results are interpreted using previous results from horizontally homogeneous, two-layer, flat-bottom, f-plane, doubly periodic QG turbulence simulations and new results from two-layer, β-plane QG turbulence simulations run in a basin geometry with both flat and rough bottoms. Baroclinicity in all of the simulations varies greatly with drag strength, with weak drag corresponding to more barotropic flow and strong drag corresponding to more baroclinic flow. The sensitivity of the baroclinicity in the QG basin simulations to bottom drag is considerably reduced, however, when rough topography is used in lieu of a flat bottom. Rough topography reduces the sensitivity of the eddy kinetic energy amplitude and horizontal length scales in the QG basin simulations to bottom drag to an even greater degree. The OGCM simulation behavior is qualitatively similar to that in the QG rough-bottom basin simulations, in that baroclinicity is more sensitive to bottom drag strength than are eddy amplitudes or horizontal length scales. Rough topography therefore appears to mediate the sensitivity of eddies in models to the strength of bottom drag. The sensitivity of eddies to parameterized topographic internal lee wave drag, which has recently been introduced into some OGCMs, is also briefly discussed. Wave drag acts like a strong bottom drag in that it increases the baroclinicity of the flow, without strongly affecting eddy horizontal length scales. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The classic baroclinic, wind-driven, double gyre problem is considered over a range of deformation radii, wind stress amplitudes, and bottom friction coefficients with the aim of better understanding the transfer of energy across scales. In this β-plane basin setting, significant differences are found with respect to classic studies of geostrophic turbulence, which generally assume zonal periodicity and for which the β term does not play a direct role in the energy transfers. In a basin geometry, the β term can play a direct role in the transfers; for example, it can be the dominant term allowing for energy transfer between the basin scale and the baroclinic mesoscale. It is also found that barotropization of baroclinic energy forces the barotropic mode near scales at which bottom drag damps this mode. Associated with this, the barotropic, nonlinear, inverse energy cascade does not extend between mesoscale injection and large-scale dissipation wavenumbers, as is often assumed. Instead, it is part of a 'double cascade' of barotropic energy in which the nonlinear inverse cascade is nearly offset by a forward cascade associated with the β term. This is particularly evident in weak bottom drag simulations, for which a time eddy-mean decomposition of the flow reveals the double cascade to be associated with the eddy-only terms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]