Search

We describe the first case of chancroid seen in the Czech Republic, diagnosed in a 40-year-old heterosexual HIV-positive man. Despite genital localization of the ulcer, the transmission of Haemophilus ducreyi infection in our patient remains unclear, as he denied having sexual intercourse and he did not travel outside the Czech Republic for several months before the ulcer appeared. The correct diagnosis has been revealed by a multiplex nucleic acid amplification test. Physicians in countries in the eastern and central Europe region should be aware that chancroid can occur in their patients.

We report the first case of chancroid seen at our clinic in 14 years. It was diagnosed by nuclear acid amplification test in a male patient returning from Madagascar. Although the disease is considered on the verge of disappearance even in tropical countries, its real potential for reemergence - due to new strains of Haemophilus ducreyi, underreporting and a lack of widespread use of molecular testing - could be underestimated., (© The Author(s) 2016.)

We report a case of chancroid in a white heterosexual man in the United Kingdom. This patient was seen by four separate health services over a period of five weeks with excruciatingly painful penile ulcers. Despite several negative herpes simplex virus polymerase chain reaction tests and a self-diagnosis of chancroid, he was repeatedly offered multiple courses of aciclovir. This case highlights the need for awareness of alternative diagnoses in persistent cases of genital ulcer disease., (© The Author(s) 2014 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav.)

Objectives: The goal of this study was to identify the causes and factors associated with genital ulcer disease (GUD) among patients attending a sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinic in Paris., Methods: This study was a prospective investigation of GUD cases. Data were collected from 1995 to 2005. In each case, a Dark Field Examination (DFE), Gram stain, inoculation onto Thayer Martin agar, Columbia agar and chocolate agar with 1% isovitalex and 20% fetal calf serum, PCR Chlamydia trachomatis (Amplicor Roche), culture for herpes simplex virus (HSV) on MRC 5 cells and PCR HSV (Argene Biosoft) were obtained from the ulceration. First Catch Urine (FCU) PCR for Chlamydia trachomatis and syphilis, HIV, HSV, and HBV serologies were also performed., Results: A total 278 cases of GUD were investigated, 244 (88%) in men and 34 (12%) in women. Primary syphilis accounted for 98 cases (35%), genital herpes for 74 (27%), chancroid for 8 (3%), other infections for 12 (5%). In 91 (32%) patients, no identifiable microorganism was documented. Primary syphilis was more prevalent in MSMs (P < 0.0001), while genital herpes and chancroid were significantly associated with heterosexuality (both P < 0.0001). A high level of HIV infection (27%) was found, particularly in patients with primary syphilis (33%). In the univariate analysis, no statistical difference was found between syphilis and herpes according to clinical presentation, pain being the only item slightly more frequent in herpes (P = 0.06). In the multivariable model syphilis was associated with being MSM (OR: 51.3 [95% CI: 14.7-178.7], P < 0.001) and with an ulceration diameter >10 mm (OR: 9.2 [95% CI: 2.9-30.7], P < 0.001). Genital herpes was associated with HIV infection in the subgroup of MSWs (OR: 24.4 [2.4-247.7], P = 0.007). We did not find significant differences in the clinical presentation of the ulcers according to HIV status., Conclusion: The profound changes of the epidemiology of GUD during the decade, due to disappearance of chancroid and reemergence of infectious syphilis have led to a new distribution of pathogens, genital herpes, primary syphilis and GUD from unknown origin, accounting each for one third of cases. No clinical characteristic is predictive of the etiology, underlining the importance of performing a thorough microbiologic evaluation. Close association with HIV is still a major public health problem.

Haemophilus ducreyi causes the sexually transmitted genital ulcer disease chancroid. In human inoculation experiments, bacteria colocalize with neutrophils and macrophages but remain extracellular. The organism also colocalizes with collagen and fibrin but not with keratinocytes, fibroblasts, laminin, or fibronectin. These relationships are established by 48 h postinoculation and persist through the pustular stage of disease. To extend these observations to the ulcerative stage of disease, and to compare results in the human model with those of natural disease, we obtained biopsies from patients with naturally acquired chancroid. All ulcers were culture positive for H. ducreyi and histologically very similar to pustules from the human model. Staining with H. ducreyi-specific monoclonal antibodies demonstrated H. ducreyi within 5 biopsies. The organism was chiefly found within the granulocytic infiltrate of the ulcer. Dual staining for H. ducreyi and eukaryotic tissue components showed that H. ducreyi colocalized with neutrophils and fibrin at the ulcerative stage of disease. No bacteria were associated with keratinocytes, fibroblasts, or collagen. Overall, these findings are consistent with results from the human model. This is the first reported study to localize bacteria specifically identified as H. ducreyi within naturally acquired chancroid.

In October 1982, penile ulcers were identified in 248 (19%) of 1282 men at Bangrak Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. The etiology of the ulcers was determined for 120 (48%) of these patients. Haemophilus ducreyi was isolated from 45 (38%), herpes simplex virus from 14 (12%), and Neisseria gonorrhoeae from two (2%) of 120 patients. Syphilis was detected in one patient. Two patients had both H. ducreyi and herpes simplex virus isolated from the same ulcer. Thirty-five per cent of patients had a single ulcer, 56% had two to four ulcers, and 9% had more than four. Ulcers were located on the prepuce or coronal sulcus (69%), frenulum (18%), shaft (9%), and glans (4%). Inguinal adenopathy was present in only 11% of patients. H. ducreyi infection was diagnosed by gram stain in 28 (62%) of 45 patients from whom H. ducreyi was isolated and in only one of 75 patients from whom H. ducreyi was not isolated. Of the 45 isolates of H. ducreyi, 42 (93%) were isolated with use of media containing horse blood and 34 (76%) with use of media containing rabbit blood.