Search

Background and Aims Several faecal microbial transplantation [FMT] approaches for ulcerative colitis [UC] have been investigated with conflicting results. We have recently published the clinical outcomes from the CRAFT UC Trial using FMT with the UC Exclusion Diet [UCED], compared with FMT alone. Here we aimed to compare the two FMT strategies in terms of microbial profile and function. Methods Subjects recruited to the CRAFT UC study with available pre- and post-intervention faecal samples were included. Donors received diet conditioning for 14 days based on the UCED principles. Group 1 received single FMT by colonoscopy [Day 1] and enemas [Days 2 and 14] without donors' dietary conditioning [ N = 11]. Group 2 received FMT but with donors' dietary pre-conditioning and UCED for the patients [ N  = 10]. Faecal samples were assessed by DNA shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Results Following diet conditioning, donors showed depletion in metabolic pathways involved in biosynthesis of sulphur-containing amino acids. Only Group 2 showed significant shifts towards the donors' microbial composition [ADONIS: R 2 = 0.15, p  = 0.008] and significantly increased Eubacterium AF228LB post-intervention [β-coefficient 2.66, 95% confidence interval 2.1–3.3, q  < 0.05] which was inversely correlated with faecal calprotectin [rho = −0.52, p  = 0.035]. Moreover, pathways involved in gut inflammation and barrier function including branched chain amino acids were enriched post-intervention in Group 2 and were significantly inversely correlated with faecal calprotectin. Conclusion FMT from diet conditioned donors followed by the UCED led to microbial alterations associated with favourable microbial profiles which correlated with decreased faecal calprotectin. Our findings support further exploration of the additive benefit of dietary intervention for both donors and patients undergoing FMT as a potential treatment of UC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background We evaluated whether integration of novel diets for donors and patients, in addition to faecal transplantation [FT], could increase FT remission rate in refractory ulcerative colitis [UC]. Methods This was a blinded, randomised, controlled trial in adults with active UC, defined by a simple clinical colitis activity index [SCCAI] of ≥5 and ≤11 and endoscopic Mayo score 2–3, refractory to medication. Group 1 received free diet and single donor standard FT by colonoscopy on Day 1and rectal enemas on Days 2 and 14 without dietary conditioning of the donor. Group 2 received FT as above but with dietary pre-conditioning of the donor for 14 days and a UC Exclusion Diet [UCED] for the patients. Group 3 received the UCED alone. The primary endpoint was Week 8 clinical steroid-free remission, defined as SCCAI <3. Results Of 96 planned patients, 62 were enrolled. Remission Week 8 Group 1 was 2/17 [11.8%], Group 2 was 4/19 [21.1%], Group 3 was 6/15 [40%] [non-significant]. Endoscopic remission Group 1 was 2/17 [12%], Group 2 was 3/19 [16%], Group 3 was 4/15 [27%] [Group 1 vs 3 p  = 0.38]. Mucosal healing [Mayo 0] was achieved only in Group 3 [3/15, 20%] vs 0/36 FT patients [ p  = 0.022]. Exacerbation of disease occurred in 3/17 [17.6%] of Group 1, 4/19 [21.1%] of Group 2, and 1/15 [6.7%] of Group 3 [Group 2 vs 3, p  = 0.35]. Conclusions UCED alone appeared to achieve higher clinical remission and mucosal healing than single donor FT with or without diet. The study was stopped for futility by a safety monitoring board. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background & Aims: Subcutaneous vedolizumab formulation has been shown to be as effective and safe as the intravenous one in randomized control trials. Real-life data are limited especially for patients receiving long-term intravenous therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of switching from intravenous to subcutaneous vedolizumab in a large cohort of patients with stable clinical remission. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, we enrolled consecutive patients attending our center between September 2021 and April 2022. The baseline demographic characteristics, 12- and 24-weeks follow-up clinical activity, C-reactive protein levels, and adverse events were recorded. The primary endpoint was to assess combined steroid-free clinical remission plus biochemical remission 24-week after the switch. Results: 93 patients (43 Crohn's disease, 50 ulcerative colitis), switched to subcutaneous vedolizumab after a median duration of intravenous treatment of 36 months [IQR 16-52]. At baseline, 80 patients (86%) had a combined remission. At 24-week, 89.2% (n=74) maintained combined steroid-free clinical remission plus biochemical remission. 25 adverse events were reported, mostly SARS-CoV-2 infections and injection site reactions, with a further four recurrence episodes. Twelve patients (12.9%) discontinued subcutaneous administration and restarted intravenous vedolizumab. Conclusions: Switching from intravenous to subcutaneous vedolizumab can be considered effective and safe for maintaining remission in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. In addition, this might reduce healthcare costs. However, large-scale real-life studies with long-term follow-up are necessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]