Search

Purpose: The use of tissue adhesive instead of a drain following mastectomy was a point of interest for many breast surgeons. Postoperative formation of multiple unusual sonographic lesions was observed in patients that underwent mastectomy with TissuGlu. The aim of this study was to describe the sonographic features of these lesions and, when possible, to examine them histologically., Materials and Methods: This study includes 98 patients, 49 underwent mastectomy with the application of TissuGlu and 49 with drain insertion. Unusual postoperative sonographic findings were thoroughly described. A histological examination was carried out according to the guideline recommendations., Results: Unusual sonographic findings were detected in 87.8% of patients in the TissuGlu group and in only 4% of the patients in the drain group. These lesions were detectable between 6 and 59 months postoperatively. 47 breasts of the TissuGlu group were classified as category 3, while only 2 breasts as category 4. Lesions were on average 7.5 mm in diameter, echogenic or isoechoic with posterior shadowing, an irregular and ill circumscribed marginal contour, and a horizontal axis. All histologically examined lesions (n=29) were benign. Granulomatous tissue was histologically proven in 63% of those lesions (n=17), while residual adhesive material could be detected in 18.5% of lesions (n=5)., Conclusion: The use of TissuGlu adhesive after mastectomy may cause the formation of unusual palpable granulomas, with or without residual adhesive materials. Sonographic description of lesions will help physicians to differentiate between granulomas and local relapse., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Alongside mammography, breast ultrasound is an important and well-established method in assessment of breast lesions. With the "Best Practice Guideline", the DEGUM Breast Ultrasound (in German, "Mammasonografie") working group, intends to describe the additional and optional application modalities for the diagnostic confirmation of breast findings and to express DEGUM recommendations in this Part II, in addition to the current dignity criteria and assessment categories published in Part I, in order to facilitate the differential diagnosis of ambiguous lesions.The present "Best Practice Guideline" has set itself the goal of meeting the requirements for quality assurance and ensuring quality-controlled performance of breast ultrasound. The most important aspects of quality assurance are explained in this Part II of the Best Practice Guideline., Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Purpose:  The aim of the present study was to determine the accuracy of breast cancer measurement with 2 D shear wave elastography (2 D SWE), B-mode ultrasound, and mammography by comparing these methods with the actual histopathological tumor size., Materials and Methods:  135 patients with proven malignant breast lesions at two centers were included in a prospective study. The maximum lesion diameter was measured by 2 D SWE, B-mode ultrasound, and mammography. After surgery, the histopathological tumor size was measured by a pathologist., Results:  The mean difference in tumor size on 2 D SWE, B-mode ultrasound, and mammography on the one hand, and the actual tumor size on the other, was -0.03 cm, 0.16 cm and 0.10 cm, respectively. Lesion size on histopathological investigation was overestimated by 2 D SWE (p = 0.004) and underestimated by B-mode imaging (p < 0.001). All three imaging methods underestimated the size of invasive lobular cancers and lesions > 15 mm; 2 D SWE was most accurate in this regard., Conclusion:  2 D SWE predicted lesion size more precisely than B-mode ultrasound or mammography. In cases of invasive lobular carcinoma, all three imaging methods underestimated lesion size, with 2 D SWE coming closest to the actual tumor size., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality standard of the nationwide breast ultrasound training program of the German Society of Ultrasound in Medicine (DEGUM) through objective parameters., Materials and Methods: 10 quality criteria, based on the recommendations of The National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (KBV), were defined for this study. All training units of the DEGUM received a questionnaire. The questionnaires and training material were analyzed., Results: All units met the required criteria pertaining to the trainer's qualification, duration per training course and the maximum number of participants per ultrasound machine. Only 1 course did not fulfill the required 50 % practical training time. The requirements to participate in the graduate course (200 self-made and documented cases) were not clearly conceived and a defined training log could be improved., Conclusion: DEGUM breast ultrasound training offers trainees a high level of education based on the requirements of the KBV. Despite the high quality of training, the content of course announcements could be improved and an official and structured educational index could be meaningful., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Purpose: To determine the benefit of ShearWave™ Elastography (SWE™) in the ultrasound characterization of BI-RADS® 3 breast lesions in a diagnostic population., Materials and Methods: 303 BI-RADS® 3 lesions (mean size: 13.2 mm, SD: 7.5 mm) from the multicenter BE1 prospective study population were analyzed: 201 (66%) had cytology or core biopsy, and the remaining 102 had a minimum follow-up of one year; 8 (2.6%) were malignant. 7 SWE features were evaluated with regard to their ability to downgrade benign BI-RADS® 3 masses. The performance of each SWE feature was assessed by evaluating the number of lesions correctly reclassified and the impact on cancer rates within the new BI-RADS® 3' lesion group., Results: No malignancies were found with an E-color "black to dark blue", which allowed the downgrading of 110/303 benign masses (p < 0.0001), with a non-significant increase in BI-RADS® 3' malignancy rate from 2.6% to 4.1%. E-max ≤ 20 kPa (2.6 m/s) was able to downgrade 48/303 (p < 0.0001) lesions with a lower increase in BI-RADS® 3' malignancy rate (3.1%). No other SWE features were useful for reclassifying benign BI-RADS® 3 lesions., Conclusion: Applying simple reclassification rules, SWE assessment of the maximum stiffness of lesions allowed the downgrading of a sub-group of benign BI-RADS® 3 lesions. This was accompanied by a non-significant increase in the malignancy rate in the new BI-RADS® 3 class., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Purpose: This retrospective study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of mammography, breast ultrasonography, and palpation in diagnosing fibroadenomas, making consistent use of the BI-RADS classification. The impact of breast density, patient age, and the size and palpability of the mass will be evaluated., Patients and Methods: Between January 2000 and December 2009, a total of 339 fibroadenomas suitable for inclusion in this study were diagnosed and histologically verified at our institution. Based on their BI-RADS or BI-RADS analog classification, all lesions were categorized as benign or malignant. These results were compared to the corresponding histopathological findings. Specificities were calculated for each of the abovementioned parameters. Chi-square test results with p-values < 0.05 were considered significant. Congruence between mammography and ultrasonography was assessed based on Cohen's kappa., Results: Palpation had a specificity of 100 %, mammography 83.9 %, and ultrasonography 88.2 %. Considering the parameters under investigation, ultrasonography is superior to mammography. The specificity of the ultrasonographic assessment "benign" vs. "malignant" varied with patient age and palpability of the lesion (p = 0.001 and p = 0.025). Mammography and ultrasonography were most congruent for lesions rated ACR 1 - 2 and for lesions > 1.9 cm (κ = 0.464, κ = 0.444)., Conclusion: For diagnosing fibroadenomas, ultrasonography is more specific than mammography when all examined variables are taken into account. Ultrasonography should therefore be favored, especially in younger patients. One needs to be aware of the effects of palpability and patient age on the ultrasonographic differentiation "malignant" vs. "benign". In some cases, mammography should be considered as an adjunct., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Purpose: To determine whether adding shear-wave (SW) elastographic features could improve accuracy of ultrasonographic (US) assessment of breast masses., Materials and Methods: From September 2008 to September 2010, 958 women consented to repeat standard breast US supplemented by quantitative SW elastographic examination in this prospective multicenter institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant protocol. B-mode Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) features and assessments were recorded. SW elastographic evaluation (mean, maximum, and minimum elasticity of stiffest portion of mass and surrounding tissue; lesion-to-fat elasticity ratio; ratio of SW elastographic-to-B-mode lesion diameter or area; SW elastographic lesion shape and homogeneity) was performed. Qualitative color SW elastographic stiffness was assessed independently. Nine hundred thirty-nine masses were analyzable; 102 BI-RADS category 2 masses were assumed to be benign; reference standard was available for 837 category 3 or higher lesions. Considering BI-RADS category 4a or higher as test positive for malignancy, effect of SW elastographic features on area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity after reclassifying category 3 and 4a masses was determined., Results: Median participant age was 50 years; 289 of 939 (30.8%) masses were malignant (median mass size, 12 mm). B-mode BI-RADS AUC was 0.950; eight of 303 (2.6%) BI-RADS category 3 masses, 18 of 193 (9.3%) category 4a lesions, 41 of 97 (42%) category 4b lesions, 42 of 57 (74%) category 4c lesions, and 180 of 187 (96.3%) category 5 lesions were malignant. By using visual color stiffness to selectively upgrade category 3 and lack of stiffness to downgrade category 4a masses, specificity improved from 61.1% (397 of 650) to 78.5% (510 of 650) (P<.001); AUC increased to 0.962 (P=.005). Oval shape on SW elastographic images and quantitative maximum elasticity of 80 kPa (5.2 m/sec) or less improved specificity (69.4% [451 of 650] and 77.4% [503 of 650], P<.001 for both), without significant improvement in sensitivity or AUC., Conclusion: Adding SW elastographic features to BI-RADS feature analysis improved specificity of breast US mass assessment without loss of sensitivity., (© RSNA, 2012)

Background: The objective was the investigation of a possible predictive quantitative impact of initial tumor sphericity, measured by 3D sonography, on response to pre-operative chemotherapy., Patients and Methods: This 3D ultrasound study was conducted on 41 consecutive primary breast cancer patients who received pre-operative epirubicin and paclitaxel chemotherapy; the tumors were measured by 3D sonography and by pathology after chemotherapy. Sphericity was defined as the ratio of the smallest to the largest extent by 3D sonography., Results: A predictive impact of initial tumor sphericity on response to pre-operative chemotherapy was quantitatively identified for the first time. Sphericity was a significant predictor of pathological complete remission with a rank difference of 0.34 or about 1/3 i.e., spherical tumors were more likely to show successful remission., Conclusion: Tumor sphericity as defined from 3D sonography could be predictive of response to pre-operative chemotherapy regimens; prospective investigation is suggested.

Purpose: Rational therapy planning should aim to minimize the rate of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients without metastatic disease. By the same token, the frequency of sentinel lymph node biopsies (SLNB) should not be unnecessarily high in patients with axillary node disease. Preoperative axillary ultrasonography is a generally available noninvasive technique for assessing nodal status., Materials and Methods: Based on retrospective data, we analyzed the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and efficiency of preoperative ultrasonography US. A total of 429 axillary ultrasonographic examinations were included, and the management decisions were based on the ultrasonographic findings. Patients with suspicious US results were scheduled for ALND, while patients with unremarkable findings underwent SLNB., Results: Axillary metastases were found in 146 of 429 (34 %) cases. In 75 of 429 (17 %) axillary examinations, ultrasonography revealed suspicious findings. In these cases, we proceeded with ALND, thereby reducing the number of SLNB by 17 %. 219 of 429 cases were classified correctly as not having metastasis, thus lowering the rate of ALND, which is associated with higher postoperative morbidity, by 51 %. Preoperative ultrasonography had a sensitivity of 53.6 %, specificity of 75.5 %, and a positive predictive value of 77.3 %. The negative predictive value was 51.3 % and the efficiency was 68.5 %., Conclusion: Ultrasonography is a moderately sensitive, but quite specific, preoperative method for assessing the axillary lymph nodes., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Purpose: This prospective study evaluates whether sonoelastography can improve B-mode ultrasonographic sizing of breast tumors. Precise measuring is important for effective therapy planning for breast cancer patients., Materials and Methods: The size of 100 surgically excised breast lesions (92 patients: 77 malignant, 23 benign) was compared to preoperative measurements. Lesions were imaged with both ultrasonographic techniques in identical planes. The largest sizes measured with each modality were compared to the largest histopathological measurements. The interobserver variability was also computed from measurements made by two examiners assessing identical planes., Results: Both ultrasonographic measuring techniques underestimate lesion size. The sonoelastography measurements were within ± 5 mm of the histological size in 70.1 % of malignant lesions, and the B-mode measurements in 57.1 % of cases. Sonoelastography leads to more accurate measurements of 13.0 % of cases (statistically not significant). A total of 22 lesions were also imaged by a second examiner. Sonoelastography had 27.3 % less interobserver variability (examiners agreed in 36.4 % of sonoelastography and in 9.1 % of B-mode results)., Conclusion: In this study there is no significant advantage of sonoelastography, although a tendency is apparent. The low interobserver variability also favors sonoelastography for preoperative diagnostics, since it may be less dependent on the observer than conventional B-mode imaging. The results of this prospective study require validation in a prospective multicenter study with larger case numbers., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Purpose: This prospective study aimed to compare sonoelastography, B-mode ultrasonography, and mammography in terms of their ability to distinguish benign from malignant breast lesions. We also assessed how the diagnostic value of sonoelastography differs between palpable and clinically occult lesions., Materials and Methods: Evaluation revealed a total of 97 lesions (66 benign; 31 malignant) without histological confirmation at the time of the initial examination. The sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) as well as efficiency were calculated. These parameters were separately assessed for palpable lesions and for non-palpable lesions. We subsequently compared these results., Results: Sonography had a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 82% (PPV: 71 %, NPV: 98%, efficiency: 87%). For mammography, the respective figures were 84% and 89% (PPV: 79%, NPV: 92%, efficiency: 88%). Sonoelastography had a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 48% (PPV: 39%, NPV: 78%, efficiency: 56%). The combination of sonography and sonoelastography yielded a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 38% (PPV: 43%, NPV: 100%, efficiency: 58%). The sensitivity and specificity were not statistically different between the groups of palpable and non-palpable lesions., Conclusion: Sonoelastography is easily performed and not very time-consuming. Used by itself, the method is not more efficacious than alternative techniques. When used in conjunction with B-mode ultrasonography, the latter's sensitivity was increased, albeit at the expense of specificity., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Purpose: According to the current interdisciplinary S 3 guideline for breast cancer diagnostics, treatment, and follow-up (1st update 2008), palpation is one of the diagnostic mainstays for follow-up examinations after mastectomy. Although recommended in the manuscript, regular ultrasonographic examinations are neither explicitly mentioned in the statement nor in the follow-up plan. In ambiguous cases, MRI can serve as a supplementary diagnostic method. In order to evaluate the value of palpation and ultrasonography for diagnosing recurrent disease after mastectomy, we analyzed the sensitivity of each method individually and the sensitivity of both methods combined., Materials and Methods: Over a 12-year time span, histological data from 57 patients suspected to have recurrent disease after mastectomy (benign lesions: n = 15, 26.3% malignant lesions: n = 42, 73.7%) were collected. Prior to biopsy, the benign versus malignant character of all lesions was assessed by palpation and ultrasonography (BI-RADS). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (ppv), negative predictive value (npv), and efficacy were calculated using a contingency table., Results: Palpation had a sensitivity of 85.7 % and a specificity of 6.7% the respective figures for ultrasonography were 90.5% and 46.7%. The sensitivity of palpation and ultrasonography combined was 100%, i. e. 14.3% higher than the sensitivity of palpation alone. Five cases of recurrent disease which remained undetected by palpation were only recognized by ultrasonography., Conclusion: In agreement with several other studies, the results of our retrospective study show that ultrasonography is superior to palpation for diagnosing recurrent disease after mastectomy. Prospective multicenter studies are needed to evaluate ultrasonographic follow-up before an amendment of the current S 3 guidelines can be recommended with a high degree of evidence., (Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart, New York.)

This report summarises the imaging findings of juvenile papillomatosis (JP) in a 16-year-old woman. Sonographically, the lesion was oval, well defined, heterogeneous with multiple small, cystic spaces. Ultrasonography can be helpful in differentiating between JP and similar cystic lesions, fibroadenomas, phyllodes tumours, intracystic papillomas and carcinomas. A core needle biopsy is still needed to confirm the diagnosis. An open biopsy with excision of the lesion is mandatory, mere observation is inadequate because of insufficient knowledge about the direct relationship between JP and subsequent cancer.

Objective: The investigation of the value of sonographic criteria for the assessment of the character of solid breast lesions., Methods: 281 preoperative sonographic studies of breast lesions were analysed and classified according to the following features: characteristics of the contour, echodensity, echo pattern, posterior acoustic properties, mobility, compressibility, axis of the lesion, L/T ratio (longitudinal size divided by transverse size), and architecture of surrounding tissue. We assessed the differential diagnostic value of each feature based on frequency distribution and odds ratio (OR)., Results: 152 (54.1 %) benign and 129 (45.9 %) malignant breast lesions were evaluated by ultrasound. The following sonographic criteria were the most clear-cut signs for lesions to be malignant: ill-defined borders (OR: 19.8), incompressibility (OR: 9.7), and discontinuity of Cooper's ligaments (OR: 4.8). Benign lesions were characterised by compressibility (OR: 0.12), smooth borders (OR: 0.12), and displacement of Cooper's ligaments (OR: 0.24)., Conclusion: When distinguishing benign from malignant breast lesions, ultrasound examiners should be primarily guided by the lesion's contour and compressibility and the architecture of the surrounding tissue. Aiming for the widest possible consensus on terminology issues and standardised interpretation of the above criteria would help to advance breast sonography from its current status as a supplementary technique to the status of the modality of choice for the early diagnosis of breast cancer.