1. Leveraging existing mid-end ultrasound machine for point-of-care intestinal ultrasound in low-resource settings: Prospective, real-world impact on clinical decision-making.
- Author
-
Pal P, Mateen MA, Pooja K, Marri UK, Gupta R, Tandan M, and Reddy DN
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Male, Adult, Prospective Studies, Middle Aged, Young Adult, Aged, Adolescent, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases diagnostic imaging, Feces, Pregnancy, Feasibility Studies, Crohn Disease diagnostic imaging, Colonoscopy methods, Colonoscopy instrumentation, Ultrasonography methods, Clinical Decision-Making, Point-of-Care Systems, Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex analysis
- Abstract
Background: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has transformed inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) management, but the cost to purchase high-end equipment can be prohibitive., Aim: To assess prospectively the feasibility of POCUS using pre-existing mid-end ultrasound equipment without incurring additional cost., Methods: Consecutive IBD patients underwent POCUS with or without faecal calprotectin (FCP) using a mid-end ultrasound machine. If POCUS with or without FCP could not guide management, we performed additional ileocolonoscopy or cross-sectional imaging. We evaluated the impact of POCUS on IBD management and its correlation with ileocolonoscopy or cross-sectional imaging. We analysed pregnant, paediatric and post-operative patients separately., Results: Among 508 patients with IBD, we analysed 419 (60.4% Crohn's disease [CD]; 61.3% male, age [years]: 36 [18-78]) undergoing 556 POCUS sessions. POCUS with or without FCP independently influenced clinical management in 42.8% of patients with CD and 49.7% with ulcerative colitis (UC). POCUS helped avoid colonoscopy in 51.4% of patients with CD and 51.8% with UC, and cross-sectional imaging in 38.1% of suspected active small bowel CD. In patients with additional diagnostics, POCUS-based decisions remained unchanged in 81.2% with CD and 85% with UC. Sensitivity and specificity of POCUS compared to ileocolonoscopy were 80% and 94.4% for CD and 80.8% and 92.8% for UC, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity compared to cross-sectional imaging were 87.2% and 87.5%, respectively., Conclusion: POCUS using existing mid-end ultrasound equipment in low-resource settings influenced IBD clinical decision-making with excellent accuracy, often avoiding colonoscopy and cross-sectional imaging., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF