Search

Point-of-care ultrasound is a useful tool in the evaluation of women with pelvic complaints in the emergency department. Transabdominal and transvaginal approaches may be employed to assess a variety of obstetric or gynecologic pathologies., Competing Interests: Disclosure No disclosure., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Vascular point-of-care ultrasound is a useful tool for emergency department (ED) clinicians to evaluate lower extremity pain and swelling. It can quickly and safely detect deep vein thrombosis, a serious condition that can lead to pulmonary embolism and post-thrombotic syndrome as well as diagnose pseudoaneurysm, hematoma, and acute arterial occlusion, a vascular emergency that requires urgent surgical intervention. Point-of-Care Ultrasound can be a useful tool for the evaluation of ED patients with vascular emergencies., Competing Interests: Disclosure M.K. Frederick has nothing to disclose. L.A. Stolz has done consulting work for Philips, Caption Health, GE, Butterfly and ThinkSono. P.E. Duran-Gehring has done consulting work for Caption Health., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

With the growing use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in various clinical settings, it is essential for users of ultrasound to have a thorough understanding of the basics of ultrasound physics, including sound wave properties, its interaction with various tissues, common artifacts, and knobology. The authors introduce and discuss these concepts in this article, with a focus on clinical implications., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors have nothing to disclose, (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Airway and thoracic ultrasound applications can provide critical information to improve patient safety for procedures and management of pulmonary conditions. Emergency physicians should utilize airway ultrasound in the preparation for an anatomically and/or physiologically difficult airway, which may include site demarcation for surgical airway planning. Thoracic ultrasound is useful in the prompt evaluation of a dyspneic patient. This article underscores the crucial role of airway and thoracic ultrasound in emergency medicine, emphasizing its utility for assessing difficult airways, planning surgical airways, and promptly evaluating dyspneic patients., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This article reviews point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in the perioperative period. Ultrasound-guided techniques for regional anaesthesia and vascular access have been well-established in anaesthesia for many years. However, integration of whole-body POCUS into UK anaesthetic practice remains limited. There is a growing body of evidence highlighting the benefits of POCUS throughout the perioperative period. Widespread use may help to improve patient care in anaesthesia.

Background: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has gained popularity as a bedside diagnostic imaging modality. In obstetrical populations, particularly in acute care settings, POCUS serves as a valuable complement to clinical assessment. Despite its many applications, only a few have been defined and validated in the obstetric population. This scoping review aims to delineate literature on the diagnostic applications of POCUS in obstetric anesthesia and critical care., Methods: This review will adhere to the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews, as updated by Arksey and O'Malley and in stages elaborated by Levac et al. Relevant literature will be identified using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), keyword, and proximity searches and combined using Boolean operators in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from January 1, 2000, to the present. Two independent reviewers will screen literature against predefined eligibility criteria in abstract and full-text forms. A third reviewer will be consulted if consensus cannot be reached. Data extraction will be systematic, focusing on pre-specified variables aligned with the review's aims. Descriptive statistical and thematic analysis will follow data extraction, with findings presented in graphical and tabular forms. The reporting will follow Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR)., Conclusion: This review will present the scope of the current literature on diagnostic POCUS in obstetric anesthesia and critical care, highlighting both strengths and gaps in existing knowledge. The insights gained will support future research, knowledge synthesis, and development of educational programs. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal publications, conferences, and social media platforms., Systematic Review Registration: Not applicable., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Bedside ultrasonography, also known as point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS), is a promising technological tool that enhances clinical assessment, enriching diagnostic capabilities and clinical reasoning. Its use in nursing spans various patient populations and health care settings, providing nurses with a valuable health assessment tool to improve care quality and patient safety. Despite its growing integration into clinical practice, PoCUS training has mainly focused on physicians, leaving a gap for trained nurses who demonstrate similar proficiency in conducting scans and interpreting images. Previous research highlights the value of digital tools in PoCUS training, showing their role in improving professionals' and students' knowledge, image interpretation skills, and clinical acumen., Objective: This study aimed to (1) establish an assessment instrument gauging nurses' competency milestones in PoCUS and evaluate its content and appearance validity, (2) develop a series of 5 educational videos focused on PoCUS and assess their content and appearance validity, and (3) construct an online learning environment tailored to nurses' PoCUS training needs and evaluate its content and appearance validity., Methods: We will conduct a methodological study of technological production guided by Rogers' diffusion of innovations theory. Subproject 1 will design and validate a comprehensive assessment tool for evaluating nurses' competency milestones in PoCUS use. For this purpose, a scoping review will be conducted. The review will be based on JBI Collaboration guidelines and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extended for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. Subproject 2 involves an evaluation of content and appearance validity for a series of 5 educational videos on PoCUS, designed specifically for nurses about applying peripherally inserted central catheter lines, inserting nasogastric feeding tubes, assessing gastric residual volume, assessing pressure injuries and soft tissue conditions, and assessing muscle mass to monitor patient nutritional status. In subproject 3, a comprehensive online learning environment dedicated to PoCUS training for nurses will be developed and validated. The launch of an online learning environment represents a cornerstone of our dissemination strategy, scheduled to coincide with the inaugural Brazilian PoCUS symposium for nurses, an event organized by the project members. This platform will serve as a pivotal resource for continuous learning and professional development., Results: Subproject 1 will start in the second half of 2024 and is expected to be completed by mid-2025. Subproject 2 is currently ongoing and is expected to be completed in early 2026. Subproject 3 is set to begin in early 2025 and is planned to be completed by 2026., Conclusions: Through these concerted efforts, the project aims to bridge the existing gap in PoCUS training for nurses, thereby fostering their proficiency and enhancing patient care outcomes., International Registered Report Identifier (irrid): PRR1-10.2196/58030., (©Fernanda Raphael Escobar Gimenes, Angelita Maria Stabile, Rodrigo Magri Bernardes, Vinicius Batista Santos, Mayra Gonçalves Menegueti, Patricia Rezende do Prado, Mauricio Serra Ribeiro, Flavia Giron Camerini, Soraia Assad Nasbine Rabeh. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 23.10.2024.)

Objectives: A bowel diameter threshold of ≥2.5 cm, originally derived from the research using computed tomography, is frequently used for diagnosing small bowel obstruction (SBO) with point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). We sought to determine the optimal bowel diameter threshold for diagnosing SBO using POCUS and its accuracy in predicting surgical intervention., Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis using individual patient-level data from a previous systematic review on POCUS for SBO diagnosis across five academic EDs. Patient data were collected, including imaging results, surgical findings, and final diagnosis. The measured diameter of the small bowel using POCUS was recorded. ROC area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) were constructed to determine the optimal threshold for bowel diameter in predicting SBO diagnosis and surgical intervention. Subgroup analyses were performed based on sex and age., Results: A total of 403 patients had individual patient-level data available, with 367 patients included in the final analysis. The most accurate bowel diameter overall for predicting SBO was 2.75 cm (AUC = 0.76, 95% CI 0.71-0.81). A bowel diameter of ≤1.7 cm had 100% sensitivity with no miss rate, while a bowel diameter of ≥4 cm had 90.7% specificity in confirming SBO. Patients under 65 had an optimal threshold of 2.75 cm versus 2.95 cm in patients over 65. Females had an optimal threshold of 2.75 cm, while males had a value of 2.95 cm. There was no significant correlation between bowel diameter thresholds and surgical intervention., Conclusion: A bowel diameter threshold of 2.75 cm on POCUS is more discriminative diagnostic accuracy for diagnosing SBO. Patients' age and sex may impact diagnostic accuracy, suggesting that tailored approaches may be needed., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest HS, NAJ, GDP, KMD, BB, KB, SL, MS, MC, TJ, and MG report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Point-of-care ultrasound is rapidly gaining traction in clinical practice, including primary care. Yet, logistical challenges and geographical isolation hinder skill acquisition. Concurrently, an evidentiary gap exists concerning such guidance's effectiveness and optimal implementation in these settings., Methods: We developed a lung point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) curriculum for primary care physicians in a rural, medically underserved region of the south of Israel. The course included recorded lectures, pre-course assessments, hands-on training, post-workshop lectures, and individual practice. To evaluate our course, we measured learning outcomes and physicians' proficiency in different lung POCUS domains using hands-on technique assessment and gathered feedback on the course with a multi-modal perception approach: an original written pre- and post-perception and usage questionnaire., Results: Fifty primary care physicians (PCPs) showed significant improvement in hands-on skills, increasing from 6 to 76% proficiency (p < 0.001), and in identifying normal versus abnormal views, improving from 54 to 74% accuracy (p < 0.001). Ten weeks after training, primary care physicians reported greater comfort using lung ultrasound, rising from 10 to 54% (p < 0.001), and improved grasp of its potential and limits, increasing from 27.5% to 84% (p < 0.001). Weekly usage increased from none to 50%, and the number of primary care physicians not using at all decreased from 72 to 26% (p < 0.001)., Conclusions: A two-day focused in-person and remote self-learning lung-POCUS training significantly improved primary care physicians' lung ultrasound skills, comfort, and implementation., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Clinicians from multiple professional backgrounds are increasingly using point-of-care ultrasound in clinical practice. Performing ultrasound is a complex skill, and training is required to ensure competency and patient safety. There is a lack of skilled trainers within health professions to meet this increasing educational demand. The role of sonographers in educating other health professionals in point-of-care ultrasound has not yet been well defined. Sonographers can provide ultrasound education interprofessionally, if equipped with appropriate clinical knowledge and educational skills., Methods: A Delphi consensus study was conducted to define the knowledge, skills and attributes required of sonographers teaching point-of-care ultrasound to other health professionals in Australia and New Zealand. Health professionals with subject matter expertise in the leadership, facilitation, and delivery of ultrasound education by sonographers were invited to participate., Results: There were 72 expert participants in survey round one, and 49 in round two. Participants included physicians, sonographers, and other health professionals. Consensus was reached on 31 competency items for sonographers teaching ultrasound interprofessionally, with agreement of greater than 94% reached by participants., Conclusions: This consensus study has defined the knowledge, skills and attitudes required for sonographer competence in point-of-care ultrasound education. This is an important step to developing a training pathway for sonographers engaging in this emerging area., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Although the number of point-of-care ultrasound devices available in Hungarian primary care practices are increasing due to government funding, their use in day-to-day patient care is limited and unregulated. Our study aimed to evaluate the attitudes and needs of general practitioners (GPs) and patients in Hungary regarding the introduction of bedside ultrasonography in primary care practices., Methods: As a part of a cross-sectional study, an anonymous, self-administered questionnaire was distributed to GPs and patients on a social media platform. Data collection was carried out from August 2023 to October 2023. Chi-square test was used to determine the associations between categorical variables., Results: The survey was completed by 415 GPs (mean age 53.8 ± 11.1 years, 54.9% female, mean 19.5 ± 11.9 years of practice) and 693 patients (mean age 45.5 ± 12.3 years, 95.2% female). There was a statistically significant increase in interest in PoCUS among young and middle-aged GPs (age 28-59; p = 0.02). In addition, this population of GPs was also more likely to undertake training in PoCUS than their older colleagues (p < 0.0001). An inverse relationship was found between the duration of practice and training willingness (p = 0.0011). Even with the government's financial support, only 8.2% of GPs currently use PoCUS in a daily basis, and 59.5% of GPs are unfamiliar with the indications and the ways of using it. Patients would even pay to have the examination done in a primary care setting, even though only 45.9% of patients would pay a GP who is not certified in PoCUS, but the willingness to pay increased to 99.4% for those with formal training (p = 0.024)., Conclusion: Our findings indicate a significant interest in adapting PoCUS in primary care from both GPs and patients. Based on the fact that a significant proportion of Hungarian GPs are unaware of PoCUS and its indications, it is particularly important to develop educational frameworks, and practical guidelines for the effective incorporation of PoCUS in Hungary., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: To undertake a global assessment of existing ultrasound practices, barriers to access, point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) training pathways, and the perceived clinical utility of POCUS in Child Surgery., Methods: An electronic survey was disseminated via the GICS (Global Initiative of Children's Surgery) network. 247 anonymized responses from 48 countries were collated. 71.3% (176/247) worked in child surgery., Results: Ultrasound was critical to practice with 84% (147/176) of requesting one daily or multiple times per week. Only 10% (17/176) could access emergency ultrasound < 1 h from request. The main barrier was a lack of trained personnel. HIC surgeons were more likely to have ultrasound training (24/29; 82.8%) compared with LMICs (74/147; 50.3%) (p = .001319; CI 95%). Self-perceived POCUS competence was associated with regularity of POCUS use (p < 0.001; CI 95%). Those who already practice POCUS most commonly use it for trauma, intussusception, and ultrasound-guided procedures. Majority (90%; 159/176) of child surgeons would attend formal POCUS training if available., Conclusions: Ultrasound is critically important in children's surgery globally, however, many surgeons experience barriers to timely access. There is a strong interest in learning POCUS for relevant pediatric surgical applications. Further research is needed to evaluate the best methods of training, accreditation, and governance., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) refers to the use of portable ultrasound machines to perform quick and focused ultrasound examinations at a patient’s bedside or point-of-care. POCUS can be performed by all health workers with specific training to use POCUS. The aim of this study was to investigate the radiological performance and feasibility of POCUS using a handheld ultrasound device (HHUSD) in children for examining the thyroid gland., Methods: A pediatric endocrinologist performed thyroid imaging in children referred to our hospital with suspected thyroid disease using an HHUSD. The same children underwent ultrasonography (US) imaging using the same device by the first radiologist, and a second radiologist performed thyroid US using an advanced high-range ultrasound device (AHUSD) (defined as the gold-standard method) within two hours. The data obtained by the three researchers were compared with each other., Results: This study included 105 patients [68.6% girls (n=72)] with a mean age 12.8±3.6 years. When the thyroid volume was evaluated, a strong correlation was found between the measurements of the three researchers (AA vs. MG: r=0.963, AA vs. GT: r=0.969, MG vs. GT: r=0.963, p<0.001). According to the Bland-Altman analysis for total thyroid volume, AA measured 0.43 cc [95% confidence interval (CI): -0.89-0.03] smaller than MG, and 0.11 cc (95% CI: -0.30-0.52) larger than GT, whereas MG measured 0.52 cc (95% CI: 0.09-0.94) larger than GT. When evaluated for the presence of goiter and nodules, a near-perfect agreement was found between the results of the three researchers (AA vs. GT; κ=0.863, MG vs. GT; κ=0.887, p<0.001, and AA vs. GT; κ=1.000, MG vs. GT; κ=0.972, p<0.001, respectively). When evaluated in terms of the longest axis of nodules, a high correlation was found between the measurements of the three researchers (AA vs. MG; r=0.993, AA vs. GT; r=0.996, MG vs. GT; r=0.996, p<0.001). When evaluated in terms of the final diagnosis, the evaluations of the three researchers showed excellent agreement with each other (AA vs. GT; κ=0.893, MG vs. GT; κ=0.863, p<0.001, accuracy rate AA vs. GT: 93.3%; MG vs. GT: 91.4%)., Conclusion: A pediatric endocrinologist, equipped with sufficient training in thyroid US evaluation, incorporated HHUSD examination as a routine clinical tool in an outpatient setting. It was shown that, they could effectively assess normal thyroid tissue in pediatric patients. Moreover, the HHUSD proved to be useful in detecting thyroid pathologies. However, it is important to note that for a more comprehensive evaluation of thyroid nodules, including detailed assessment and Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) classification, patients should be referred to radiology departments equipped with AHUSD systems. These specialized devices, along with the expertise of radiologists, are essential for in-depth evaluations and accurate classification of thyroid nodules., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: None declared., (©Copyright 2024 by Turkish Society for Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes / The Journal of Clinical Research in Pediatric Endocrinology published by Galenos Publishing House.)

Background: The gold standard diagnostic method for acute lateral ankle ligament sprain is magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, it is hardly accessible and is time-consuming. Therefore, additional diagnostic methods are warranted. Point-of-care ultrasound, on the other hand, is inexpensive, widely available, time-efficient testing method., Purpose: Therefore, the aim of this meta-analysis is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for acute ankle ligament injuries compared to MRI., Methods: In our systematic review and meta-analysis, we followed the recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook. We searched the following databases from inception to March 31, 2022: Medline (PubMed), EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Eligible studies investigated the diagnostic accuracy of US compared to MRI for diagnosing acute lateral ankle ligament injuries. Finally, we calculated pooled sensitivity and specificity with a 95 % confidence interval (CI)., Results: Eight studies met our eligibility criteria, involving 434 patients. For anterior tibiofibular ligament (ATFL) injury, the summary sensitivity and specificity were Se = 0.97 (CI: 0.89-0.99) and Sp = 0.93 (CI: 0.84-0.97). For calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) injury, the summary sensitivity and specificity were Se.: Se = 0.81 (CI: 0.58-0.93) and Sp = 0.92 [0,81;0,97]. In addition, subgroup analysis based on US performed by different types of investigators was comparable between each other (radiologist group Se = 0.98, CI: 0.24-1, and Sp = 0.91, CI: 0.74-0.97, and the orthopedic/ emergency department group Se = 0.96, CI: 0-1, and Sp = 0.97, CI: 0-1)., Conclusion: Ultrasound showed high diagnostic accuracy for acute lateral ankle ligament injury, irrespective of the investigator. Therefore, based on the current available data, it could be used in primary diagnostics of acute lateral ankle ligament injury., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a valuable adjunct to traditional imaging and physical exam. Adult-Gerontology Acute Care Nurse Practitioners (AGACNPs) serve as primary providers for acutely ill patients across the country, yet there is limited literature to describe the AGACNP experience with POCUS training and clinical application., Purpose: This integrative review was to describe barriers to learning and performing POCUS that AGACNP's experience, identify necessary components of a successful POCUS curriculum, and synthesize evidence to propose solutions., Method: CINAHL, PubMed, and Ovid databases were systematically searched for publications. Two reviewers completed the quality appraisal of the 12 articles identified during the literature search., Results: Common barriers include: formal training; access to ultrasound machines; quality assurance; time to perform exams; inability to use findings in documentation/decision making. Low confidence may be an underrepresented barrier. Successful training programs include an introductory class with mixed didactic and hands-on training, training with live models, direct supervision and image review by experts, and longitudinal training., Conclusion: Adult-Gerontology Acute Care Nurse Practitioners are capable of learning and incorporating POCUS use into clinical practice. Broad solutions can be instituted to remove barriers, but more research is needed to describe necessary components of a successful POCUS training program., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Practical Relevance: Cats are great pretenders; they often hide illness until they are critical. This makes patients of this species challenging to assess and manage in the emergency setting where quick and stress-free diagnosis and treatment are necessary. Veterinary point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a rapid, evidence-based, non-invasive, repeatable, cage-side ultrasonographic examination designed to answer clinically driven questions without compromising feline wellbeing. Integrating feline friendly POCUS as an extension of the physical examination to streamline diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, thereby limiting stress and improving overall patient care, is advocated by the authors of this article., Equipment: Given the multitude of ultrasound machines and probes available that are portable, meaning they can be moved around the clinic and used patient-side, it should be possible for most practitioners to integrate POCUS into daily practice. The authors' preferred equipment for feline POCUS is a microconvex probe and a portable machine with a fixed pre-set. This set-up allows the clinician to complete all POCUS (abdominal, lung and pleural space, and heart) without needing to move the patient, change probes or restrain the patient in a particular position, ultimately saving time, personnel and cost while maintaining patient comfort and safety., Aim: This review aims to serve as a valuable resource for veterinarians seeking to improve their feline patient care through the judicious utilisation of POCUS. In this article, the complex challenges posed by cats are addressed, and the different POCUS techniques, applications and clinical recommendations are discussed., Evidence Base: This review draws on the published literature, as well as the authors' own collective experience when providing recommendations., Competing Interests: Conflict of interestThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Introduction: Evaluating outpatient cases in internal medicine consultations presents a significant diagnostic challenge. Ultrasound can be a highly useful tool in assessment and decision-making., Patients and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted on a cohort of patients attending an internal medicine rapid assessment clinic. Eighty patients were prospectively recruited. A medical consultation was conducted as per usual clinical practice, followed by a POCUS evaluation; collecting pulmonary, cardiac, and abdominal data. All findings were analyzed and recorded, particularly those that were significant or altered the initial diagnosis, subsequent tests, or treatment., Results: Significant ultrasound findings were found in 37.5% of the patients. Of all ultrasound scans, the most clinically relevant were in the heart region (31.9%), followed by the abdomen (26%). These findings led to a change in overall management in 27.5% of patients. Using logistic regression, a model was developed to estimate the presence of clinically relevant findings with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.78 (95% CI 0.66-0.89; p < 0.001) with 80% Sensitivity and 66% Specificity., Conclusion: The systematic and standardized incorporation of clinical ultrasound in internal medicine consultations contributes to decision-making, can provide significant findings that allow for modifications in clinical suspicion and therapeutic management., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Pediatric tendon injuries to the finger are rare, and their diagnosis can be challenging due to the difficulty in sensorimotor assessment in pediatric patients. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has currently been used for identifying tendon injury in adult acute care, but reports of its use in pediatric emergency departments are scarce., Case Report: A previously healthy 14-year-old male patient visited our emergency department due to a finger laceration that occurred when he was cutting sausages using a knife. Physical examination revealed a 1.5 cm laceration over the palmer surface of the left fifth proximal phalanx. Tendon exposure was unremarkable, and the peripheral perfusion and sensation of the injured finger were intact. Flexion of the proximal and distal interphalangeal joints was limited due to pain. POCUS showed the disruption of the tendon structure over the laceration site, suggesting the flexor tendon rupture. Wound exploration by the orthopedic team revealed a transected flexor digitorum superficialis and flexor digitorum profundus and a tendon repair was performed. The patient was discharged with immobilization of the injured hand. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Pediatric tendon injuries to the finger are rare, and their diagnosis can be challenging to diagnose due to the difficulty in sensorimotor assessment in pediatric patients. POCUS can directly visualize a tendon structure without procedural sedation or radiation exposure, empowering physicians to diagnose tendon injuries and optimize patient care., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is an important tool for clinical diagnosis and decision-making in critical and non-critical scenarios. Dyspnea, chest pain, and shock are conditions susceptible to evaluation with ultrasound considering diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact already proven. There is scarce evidence in diagnosis agreement using ultrasound as an extension of physical examination. We aimed to evaluate ED patients in whom POCUS was performed, to analyze agreement between clinical initial diagnosis using ultrasound images and final diagnosis. Furthermore, we analyze failed diagnosis, inconclusive POCUS exams, and discuss details. A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted on adults who visited the emergency department with any of these three chief complaints: dyspnea, chest pain, and shock. All were evaluated with ultrasound at admission. Agreement between initial diagnosis using POCUS and final definite diagnosis was calculated. Failed diagnosis and inconclusive exams were analyzed. A total of 209 patients were analyzed. Populations: mostly males, mean age 64 years old, hypertensive. Agreement on patients with dyspnea and suspicion of acute decompensated heart failure was 0.98; agreement on chest pain suspicion of non-ST acute coronary syndrome was 0.96; agreement on type of shock was 0.90. Among the population, 12 patients had an inconclusive POCUS exam, and 16 patients had a failed diagnosis. The use of POCUS in the emergency department shows almost perfect agreement when compared with the final diagnosis in individuals experiencing acutely decompensated heart failure, acute coronary syndrome, and shock. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate the impact of this tool on mortality and prognosis when there are diagnostic errors., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of lung ultrasonography (LUS) performed by novice users' general practitioners (GPs) in diagnosing lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) in primary health care settings., Design: A prospective interventional multicenter study (December 2019-March 2020)., Settings and Subjects: Patients aged >3 months, suspected of having LRTI consulting in three different general practices (GPs) (rural, semirural and urban) in France., Main Outcome Measures: Feasibility of LUS by GPs was assessed by (1) the proportion of patients where LUS was not performed, (2) technical breakdowns, (3) interpretability of images by GPs, (4) examination duration and (5) patient perception and acceptability., Results: A total of 151 patients were recruited, and GPs performed LUS for 111 (73.5%) patients (LUS group). In 99.1% ( n  = 110) of cases, GPs indicated that they were able to interpret images. The median [IQR] exam duration was 4 [3-5] minutes. LRTI was diagnosed in 70.3% and 60% of patients in the LUS and no-LUS groups, respectively ( p  = .43). After LUS, GPs changed their diagnosis from 'other' to 'LRTI' in six cases (+5.4%, p  < .001), prescribed antibiotics for five patients (+4.5%, p  = .164) and complementary chest imaging for 10 patients (+9%, p  < .001). Patient stress was reported in 1.8% of cases, 81.7% of patients declared that they better understood the diagnosis, and 82% of patients thought that the GP diagnosis was more reliable after LUS., Conclusions: LUS by GPs using handheld devices is a feasible diagnostic tool in primary health care for LRTI symptoms, demonstrating both effectiveness and positive patient reception., Trial Registration Number: Clinicaltrial.gov: NCT04602234, 20/10/2020.

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) bridges diagnostic gaps across the continuum of care worldwide and is a particularly potent tool in resource-limited settings (RLS). To capture the scope of its current impact in RLS, this narrative review of POCUS use in public health, primary care, outpatient specialty, pre-hospital, and palliative care settings discusses its use in reducing diagnostic health care inequities. Disease-specific protocols, longitudinal training, quality assurance, and task shifting are key to robust expansion of POCUS in RLS., Competing Interests: Disclosures There was no funding supplied in support of the researching/writing of this article., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

While point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use is expanding within Internal Medicine, basic yet important practices and key infrastructure are frequently underutilized. This is appropriately raising concerns that patients may be unintentionally harmed by POCUS. To mitigate this risk, this article advocates for ensuring POCUS users have adequate training to include understanding limitations and pitfalls arising from acquisition, interpretation, and clinical integration. It is also important to build infrastructure to allow for ongoing monitoring and quality assurance with an emphasis on transparency and objectivity of the clinician's POCUS findings. This will ensure the safe and effective integration of POCUS in Internal Medicine., Competing Interests: Disclosure Dr M. Wagner disclosed that within the past 3 years, his employer (Prisma Health) has received funding for consulting work for Philips. Dr I.W.Y. Ma discloses research funds as Chair Holder of the John A. Buchanan Chair in General Internal Medicine at the University of Calgary, Canada. There are no other financial conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Errors and pitfalls associated with the performance of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) are common and can stem from errors in image acquisition, interpretation, and clinical integration. In this article, the author discuss the technical and cognitive mechanisms involved and propose a framework in systematically approaching potential errors in POCUS, as well as strategies to mitigate them., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) of the vasculature has expanded beyond procedural guidance and is utilized by multiple specialties in varied clinical settings. Evidence supports the use of POCUS for diagnosing deep venous thrombosis in the lower extremities, while for thrombosis in the upper extremities or abdominal aortic aneurysm screening, the evidence is still nascent. Here, we review POCUS of the extremity veins and abdominal aorta with a summary of the pertinent literature, review of the relevant anatomy, description of the appropriate acquisition technique, introduction to associated pathology, and discussion of pitfalls one could encounter., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Integrated multi-organ ultrasound is increasingly used across various medical specialties. It should be performed in conjunction with history, physical examination, and other investigations in the diagnostic process to enhance the detection of conditions in the lung, heart, and abdomen. Multi-organ ultrasound has been shown to improve diagnostic accuracy in a sizeable portion of patients, potentially altering treatment plans. Specifically, it aids in assessing shock, sepsis, dyspnea, delirium, and in the perioperative setting, contributing to a more comprehensive patient assessment process., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Semaglutide is a long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist known to delay gastric emptying. Despite a growing body of evidence, its peri-operative safety profile remains uncertain, particularly with regard to the risk of increased residual gastric content and aspiration of gastric contents during anaesthesia. We hypothesised that semaglutide interruption of ≤ 10 days before elective surgical procedures is insufficient to reduce or normalise the residual gastric content, despite fasting intervals that comply with current guidelines., Methods: In this prospective observational study, we recruited patients who received pre-operative once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide within 10 days of the procedure (semaglutide group) and control patients who had not been exposed to semaglutide (non-semaglutide group). On the day of surgery, all patients underwent pre-operative point-of-care gastric ultrasound to evaluate their residual gastric content. Increased residual gastric content was defined as any solid content or > 1.5 ml.kg -1 of clear fluids as assessed by gastric ultrasound., Results: We recruited 220 patients, 107 in the semaglutide group and 113 in the non-semaglutide group. Increased residual gastric content was found in 43/107 patients (40%) in the semaglutide group and 3/113 (3%) in the non-semaglutide group (p < 0.001). In propensity-weighted analysis, semaglutide use (OR 36.97, 95%CI 16.54-99.32), age (OR 0.95, 95%CI 0.93-0.98) and male sex (OR 2.28, 95%CI 1.29-4.06) were significantly associated with increased residual gastric content. There were no cases of pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents., Conclusion: Pre-operative semaglutide use within 10 days of elective surgical procedures was independently associated with increased risk of residual gastric content on pre-operative gastric ultrasound assessment., (© 2024 The Author(s). Anaesthesia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Anaesthetists.)

Objectives: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use is widespread in EDs and throughout those practising medicine. Between institutions and specialities, there is widespread variety and training. With this comes the risk of patient harm and backlash to a clinically useful modality. Our objective is to form a statement that encompasses current published and unpublished guidance for creating and maintaining robust POCUS programs in EDs., Methods: Emergency Medicine Ultrasound Group (EMUG) identified this gap and volunteers from the group undertook a literature search of current best practice and institution guidelines relating to POCUS programs. They contacted colleagues from other specialities to find and get access to other countries and colleges' POCUS guidelines. EMUGs regularly run discussion forums (Collab-labs) and points from these were considered. Recommendations were then formed from these and recurrent unpublished obstacles the group had encountered. The result was reviewed by clinical leaders in ultrasound and POCUS users in Australasia., Results: The recommendations were organised under five pillars: Infrastructure, Governance, Administration, Education and Quality., Conclusion: These recommendations complement existing guidelines and are not intended to replace them; however, we hope to promote discussion and provide reference support for those developing POCUS programs. Implementing a comprehensive and robust ED POCUS program will ensure safe, effective and standardised high-quality POCUS use, with the aim of improving patient care across Australia and New Zealand. Patient safety will be enhanced through effective risk management and quality assurance and there will be consistency in POCUS education, training and credentialing across institutions., (© 2024 The Author(s). Emergency Medicine Australasia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australasian College for Emergency Medicine.)

Objectives: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use is widespread in EDs and throughout those practising medicine. Between institutions and specialities, there is widespread variety and training. With this comes risk of patient harm and backlash to a clinically useful modality. Our objective is to form a statement that encompasses current published and unpublished guidance for creating and maintaining robust POCUS programs in EDs., Methods: Emergency Medicine Ultrasound Group (EMUG) identified this gap and volunteers from the group undertook a literature search of current best practice and institution guidelines relating to POCUS programs. They contacted colleagues from other specialities to find and get access to other countries and colleges' POCUS guidelines. EMUGs regularly run discussion forums (Collab-labs) and points from these were considered. Recommendations were then formed from these and recurrent unpublished obstacles the group had encountered. The result was reviewed by Clinical Leads in Ultrasound and POCUS users in Australasia., Results: The recommendations were organised under five pillars: Infrastructure, Governance, Administration, Education and Quality., Conclusion: These recommendations complement existing guidelines and are not intended to replace them; however, we hope to promote discussion and provide reference support for those developing POCUS programs. Implementing a comprehensive and robust ED POCUS program will ensure safe, effective, and standardised high-quality POCUS use, with the aim of improving patient care across Australia and New Zealand. Patient safety will be enhanced through effective risk management and quality assurance and there will be consistency in POCUS education, training and credentialing across institutions., (© 2024 The Author(s). Emergency Medicine Australasia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australasian College for Emergency Medicine.)

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a safe, noninvasive technique performed at the patient's bedside, providing immediate results to the operator. It complements physical examination and facilitates clinical decision-making. In infectious diseases, POCUS is particularly valuable, offering an initial assessment in cases of suspected infection. It often leads to an early tentative diagnosis enabling the prompt initiation of antimicrobial treatment without the delay associated with traditional radiology. POCUS provides direct visualization of affected organs, assists in evaluating fluid balance, and facilitates various interventions, all while reducing patient discomfort. For infectious disease specialists, becoming proficient in POCUS is a critical future challenge, requiring dedicated training for effective utilization., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. The authors: No reported conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is rapidly accelerating in adoption and applications outside the traditional realm of diagnostic radiology departments. Although the use of this imaging technology in a distributed fashion has great potential, there are many associated challenges. To address these challenges, the authors developed an enterprise-wide POCUS program at their institution (Stanford Health Care). Here, the authors share their experience, the governance organization, and their approaches to device and information security, training, and quality assurance. The authors also share the basic principles they use to guide their approach to manage these challenges. Through their work, the authors have learned that a foundational framework of defining POCUS and the different levels of POCUS use and delineating program management elements are critical. The authors hope that their experience will be helpful to others who are also interested in POCUS or in the process of creating POCUS programs at their institutions. With a clearly established framework, patient safety and quality of care are improved for everyone., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in clinical medicine and inclusion in medical training is increasing. Some professional societies recommend that 25-50 POCUS examinations be completed for each application learned; however, the amount of practice required is not well studied. As such, a better understanding of the learning curves of POCUS psychomotor skills is needed. This systematic review characterizes the learning curves for POCUS psychomotor skill acquisition., Methods: With the assistance of a research librarian, the available literature through August 28, 2023, was identified. The titles and abstracts, and then the full text were reviewed by two reviewers to screen for inclusion. All studies included after full-text review then underwent data extraction and analysis., Results: The search identified 893 unique studies. Forty-five studies underwent full-text review, with 17 meeting full inclusion criteria. Substantial heterogeneity was noted in study design, duration of education, number and type of learners, and methods for statistical analysis. Clear and validated definitions for learning endpoints, such as plateau points or competency, are lacking. Learning curves and endpoints differ for different applications of POCUS., Conclusion: The results are overall supportive of the recommendations to complete 25-50 examinations per application of POCUS learned. However, specific applications require more practice than others. Certain applications, such as cardiac and the Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST) exams, are closer to 50; while others, such as soft tissue, airway, and eye require no more than 25., (© 2024 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.)

Purpose: To evaluate bowel management for children with colorectal pathology by measuring transverse rectal diameter (TRD) and assessing fecal load with transabdominal rectal ultrasound (TRU)., Methods: Prospective case-control study of children receiving bowel management (BM) between 04/2023 and 04/2024 was done. There was inclusion of patients with Hirschsprung disease (HD), anorectal malformation (ARM) and functional constipation (FC). Patients with other congenital or neurological conditions were excluded. Control group consisted of inpatients and outpatients without abdominal complaints. FC was diagnosed according to ROM-IV-criteria. For HD and ARM, we followed a list of symptoms. To assess fecal load, we visualized the TRD using the Klijn (Klijn et al. in J Urol 172:1986-1988, 2004) method. The bladder was moderately full. The fecal load was assessed retrograde from the rectum. Follow-up was at 1/3/6 months. Secondary data were collected from medical records. Sample size calculated a priori and follow-up group with new gathered data., Results: p value for TRD in all groups significant with p < 0.05 and in grouped follow-up., Conclusion: Ultrasound is a useful tool for assessing fecal load and helps diagnose constipation and monitor BM. Irrespective of colorectal pathology, a cut-off of 3 cm seems to discriminate between children without constipation/overload symptoms and asymptomatic patients. We present a radiation-free method for monitoring bowel management., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Machine learning (ML) models can yield faster and more accurate medical diagnoses; however, developing ML models is limited by a lack of high-quality labeled training data. Crowdsourced labeling is a potential solution but can be constrained by concerns about label quality., Objective: This study aims to examine whether a gamified crowdsourcing platform with continuous performance assessment, user feedback, and performance-based incentives could produce expert-quality labels on medical imaging data., Methods: In this diagnostic comparison study, 2384 lung ultrasound clips were retrospectively collected from 203 emergency department patients. A total of 6 lung ultrasound experts classified 393 of these clips as having no B-lines, one or more discrete B-lines, or confluent B-lines to create 2 sets of reference standard data sets (195 training clips and 198 test clips). Sets were respectively used to (1) train users on a gamified crowdsourcing platform and (2) compare the concordance of the resulting crowd labels to the concordance of individual experts to reference standards. Crowd opinions were sourced from DiagnosUs (Centaur Labs) iOS app users over 8 days, filtered based on past performance, aggregated using majority rule, and analyzed for label concordance compared with a hold-out test set of expert-labeled clips. The primary outcome was comparing the labeling concordance of collated crowd opinions to trained experts in classifying B-lines on lung ultrasound clips., Results: Our clinical data set included patients with a mean age of 60.0 (SD 19.0) years; 105 (51.7%) patients were female and 114 (56.1%) patients were White. Over the 195 training clips, the expert-consensus label distribution was 114 (58%) no B-lines, 56 (29%) discrete B-lines, and 25 (13%) confluent B-lines. Over the 198 test clips, expert-consensus label distribution was 138 (70%) no B-lines, 36 (18%) discrete B-lines, and 24 (12%) confluent B-lines. In total, 99,238 opinions were collected from 426 unique users. On a test set of 198 clips, the mean labeling concordance of individual experts relative to the reference standard was 85.0% (SE 2.0), compared with 87.9% crowdsourced label concordance (P=.15). When individual experts' opinions were compared with reference standard labels created by majority vote excluding their own opinion, crowd concordance was higher than the mean concordance of individual experts to reference standards (87.4% vs 80.8%, SE 1.6 for expert concordance; P<.001). Clips with discrete B-lines had the most disagreement from both the crowd consensus and individual experts with the expert consensus. Using randomly sampled subsets of crowd opinions, 7 quality-filtered opinions were sufficient to achieve near the maximum crowd concordance., Conclusions: Crowdsourced labels for B-line classification on lung ultrasound clips via a gamified approach achieved expert-level accuracy. This suggests a strategic role for gamified crowdsourcing in efficiently generating labeled image data sets for training ML systems., (©Nicole M Duggan, Mike Jin, Maria Alejandra Duran Mendicuti, Stephen Hallisey, Denie Bernier, Lauren A Selame, Ameneh Asgari-Targhi, Chanel E Fischetti, Ruben Lucassen, Anthony E Samir, Erik Duhaime, Tina Kapur, Andrew J Goldsmith. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 04.07.2024.)

Background: Gallbladder distention has been described in radiology literature but its value on point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) performed by emergency physicians is unclear. We sought to determine the test characteristics of gallbladder distention on PoCUS for cholecystitis (acute or chronic), and secondarily whether distention was associated with an obstructing stone-in-neck (SIN), acute cholecystitis on subsequent pathology report, and longer cholecystectomy operative times., Methods: This was a dual-site retrospective cohort study of all Emergency Department (ED) patients that underwent diagnostic biliary PoCUS and were subsequently admitted from 11/1/2020 to 10/31/2022. Patients with pregnancy, liver failure, ascites, hepatobiliary cancer, prior cholecystectomy, or known cholecystitis were excluded. Gallbladder distention was defined as a width ≥4 cm or a length ≥10 cm. Saved ultrasound images were reviewed by three independent reviewers who obtained measurements during the review. Test characteristics, Cohen's kappa (κ), and strength of association between distention and our variables (acute cholecystitis on pathology report and SIN on PoCUS) were calculated using a Chi Square analysis, where intervention (cholecystectomy, percutaneous cholecystostomy, or intravenous antibiotics) was used as the reference standard for AC. A one-tail two sample t-test was calculated for mean operative times., Results: Of 280 admitted patients who underwent ED biliary PoCUS, 53 were excluded, and 227 were analyzed. Of the 227 patients, 113 (49.8%) had cholecystitis according to our reference standard, and 68 (30.0%) had distention on PoCUS: 32 distended by both width and length, 16 distended by width alone, and 20 distended by length alone. Agreement between investigators was substantial for width (κ 0.630) and length (κ 0.676). Distention was 85.09% (95% CI 77.20-91.07%) specific and 45.1% (95% CI 35.8-54.8%) sensitive for cholecystitis. There was an association between distention and SIN; odds ratio (OR) 2.76 (95% CI 1.54-4.97). Distention of both length and width was associated with acute over chronic cholecystitis; OR 4.32 (95% CI 1.42-13.14). Among patients with acute cholecystitis, mean operative times were 114 min in patients with distention and 89 min in patients without distention (p = 0.03)., Conclusion: Gallbladder distention on PoCUS was specific for cholecystitis (acute or chronic), and associated with SIN, acute cholecystitis on subsequent pathology report, and longer cholecystectomy operative times. Measurement of gallbladder dimensions as part of the assessment of cholecystitis may be advantageous., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The democratization of ultrasound imaging refers to the process of making ultrasound technology more accessible. Traditionally, ultrasound imaging has been predominately used in specialized medical facilities by trained professionals. Advancements in technology and changes in the health-care landscape have inspired efforts to broaden the availability of ultrasound imaging to various settings such as remote and resource-limited areas. In this review, we highlight several key factors that have contributed to the ongoing democratization of ultrasound imaging, including portable and handheld devices, recent advancements in technology, and training and education. Examples of diagnostic point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) imaging used in emergency and critical care, gastroenterology, musculoskeletal applications, and other practices are provided for both human and veterinary medicine. Open challenges and the future of POCUS imaging are presented, including the emerging role of artificial intelligence in technology development.

Objective: The objective was to describe the characteristics of the use of clinical ultrasound in two health centers (SC) of Health Area VII of the Region of Murcia (CS Murcia-Sur and CS Floridablanca)., Design: Observational, descriptive, longitudinal, prospective and multicenter study. SITE: CS Murcia-Sur and CS Floridablanca (Health Area VII of the Region of Murcia)., Participants: One hundred and thirty-five patients were included., Interventions: Performance of clinical ultrasound in the primary care (PC) consultation., Main Measurements: Demographic variables (age, sex), as well as clinical variables (reason for consultation, type of ultrasound, results, referrals to the second hospital level, degree of diagnostic agreement) were collected., Results: One hundred and thirty-five patients were included, more than 50% were female. The main reason for consultation was musculoskeletal and soft tissue symptoms (44.4%), followed by digestive symptoms (21.5%). 44.4% of the ultrasounds were classified as normal, while pathological findings were found in 55.6%. Confirmatory tests were requested in 43.7% and the findings were confirmed in 67% of the patients., Conclusions: The use of ultrasound in PC allows to show the high prevalence of pathological findings in the examination of patients. In a technique that helps the clinician in his diagnostic-therapeutic process. The integration of clinical ultrasound in the PC consultation can save complementary studies and referrals to a second level of care. Its implementation in PC requires proper training of professionals., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Publicado por Elsevier España S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) allows for rapid bedside assessment and guidance of patient care. Recently, POCUS was included as a mandatory component of Canadian anesthesiology training; however, there is no national consensus regarding the competencies to guide curriculum development. We therefore aimed to define national residency competencies for basic perioperative POCUS proficiency., Methods: We adopted a Delphi process to delineate relevant POCUS competencies whereby we circulated an online survey to academic anesthesiologists identified as POCUS leads/experts (n = 25) at all 17 Canadian anesthesiology residency programs. After reviewing a list of competencies derived from the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada's National Curriculum, we asked participants to accept, refine, delete, or add competencies. Three rounds were completed between 2022 and 2023. We discarded items with < 50% agreement, revised those with 50-79% agreement based upon feedback provided, and maintained unrevised those items with ≥ 80% agreement., Results: We initially identified and circulated (Round 1) 74 competencies across 19 clinical domains (e.g., basics of ultrasound [equipment, nomenclature, clinical governance, physics]; cardiac [left ventricle, right ventricle, valve assessment, pericardial effusion, intravascular volume status] and lung ultrasound anatomy, image acquisition, and image interpretation; and clinical applications [monitoring and serial assessments, persistent hypotension, respiratory distress, cardiac arrest]). After three Delphi rounds (and 100% response rate maintained), panellists ultimately agreed upon 75 competencies., Conclusion: Through national expert consensus, this study identified POCUS competencies suitable for curriculum development and assessment in perioperative anesthesiology. Next steps include designing and piloting a POCUS curriculum and assessment tool(s) based upon these nationally defined competencies., (© 2024. Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.)

Background: The aim of this exploratory survey is to describe the current state of US (ultrasound) technique across different pediatric settings nationwide., Methods: A questionnaire was emailed to all members of the Italian Society of Pediatrics, including pediatric residents. The survey was open from December 2021 to March 2022., Results: There were 1098 respondents. Seven hundred and seven pediatricians (84.1%) reported any use of US, while 51 (44.3%) residents denied it. The majority of participants (n = 956, 87.1%) reported to have a US machine available within the department, mostly cart-based (n = 516, 66.9%) and provided from 1 to 5 years prior to the survey (n = 330, 42.8%). Lung and neonatal cerebral regions were the most frequently scanned (n = 289, 18.7% and n = 218, 14.1%, respectively). The suspicion of pneumonia or respiratory distress represented the main reasons for performing US in emergency room (n = 390, 78% and n = 330, 66%, respectively). The majority of family pediatricians reported to scan lung and kidney/urinary tract regions (n = 30, 16.9%, and n = 23,12.9%, respectively). Regarding US training, the majority of respondents (n = 358, 34.6%) declared an experience-based education, with a deficient certification enabling the use of US in 71.6% (n = 552) of cases. The most common barriers included the lack of a well-defined training program (n = 627, 57.1%), unavailability of the US machine (n = 196, 17.9%) and legal responsibility concern (n = 175, 15.9%)., Conclusions: Despite the growing interest on pediatric US nationally, significant barriers still limit widespread adoption. These obstacles may be addressed through the dissemination of a specific US education plan and providing additional resources., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: There has been a rapid expansion in the use of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) by emergency medical services (EMS). However, less than a third of UK EMS utilise imaging archiving for POCUS, and fewer review saved images as part of a clinical governance structure. This paper describes the implementation of a novel image archiving system and a robust clinical governance framework in our UK physician-paramedic staffed helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS)., Methods: A retrospective database review was conducted of all patients attended by East Anglian Air Ambulance (EAAA) between the introduction of a new POCUS device and image archiving system on 1 December 2020 to 31 January 2024. All patients with recorded POCUS examinations were included. Images from POCUS examinations at EAAA are archived on a cloud-based server, and retrospectively reviewed within 24 h by an EAAA POCUS supervisor. Image quality is graded using a 5-point Likert-type scale, agreement between reviewer and clinician is recorded and feedback is provided on scanning technique. T-tests were used to assess the difference in image quality between physicians and paramedics. Inter-rater reliability between reviewers and clinicians was assessed using Cohen's kappa (κ)., Results: During the study period, 5913 patients were attended by EAAA. Of these, 1097 patients had POCUS images recorded. The prevalence of POCUS during the study period was 18.6%. 1061 patient examinations underwent quality assurance (96.7%). The most common POCUS examination was echocardiography (60%), predominantly during cardiac arrest. The primary scanning clinician was a paramedic in 25.4% of POCUS examinations. Across all examination types; image quality was not significantly different between physicians and paramedics and agreement between reviewers and clinicians was strong (κ > 0.85)., Conclusions: In this service evaluation study, we have described outcomes following the introduction of a new POCUS device, image archiving system and governance framework in our HEMS. Paramedics were the primary scanning clinician in a quarter of scans, with image quality comparable to physicians. Almost all scans underwent quality assurance and inter-rater reliability was strong between clinicians and reviewers. Further research is required to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS and to demonstrate the effect of utilising prehospital POCUS to refine diagnosis on clinical outcomes., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: This study assesses musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) knowledge, attitudes, and practices among young rheumatologists in Mexico, aiming to identify barriers and facilitators to its clinical use., Methods: An online survey distributed to a network of young rheumatologists captured demographics, institutional, and personal MSUS information. Multivariable analysis identified factors associated with positive MSUS attitudes., Results: Ninety-six rheumatologists (39.18% national response rate) completed the survey. Of respondents (54.2% females, median age 35.1 years), 81.2% deemed MSUS necessary in clinical rheumatology. The main barriers included limited training access (56.2%) and required training time (54.1%). Lack of scientific evidence was not a major barrier (60.4%). Positive MSUS attitudes were associated with learning from conferences (p = 0.029) and colleagues (p = 0.005), formal (p = 0.043), and in-person training (p = 0.020), MSUS use in practice (p = 0.027), and use by radiologists in their institute (p < 0.001). Interest in learning MSUS (88.5%) was significantly higher in those with positive attitudes (94.4%, p < 0.001). Elastic net analysis identified key drivers, including learning MSUS from conferences, colleagues, and in residency; using MSUS in practice; respondent-performed MSUS; and MSUS use by radiologists. Statistically significant associations were found with using MSUS for synovitis/inflammatory joint disease (OR = 1.43, 95% CI 1.00-2.05) and MSUS use by radiologists in respondent's institutes (OR = 1.70, 95% CI 1.20-2.90)., Conclusion: Most young rheumatologists in Mexico recognize the necessity of MSUS in clinical practice. By addressing identified barriers, encouraging rheumatologist-radiologist collaboration, and establishing a regulatory body to certify rheumatologist's MSUS experience, there is an opportunity to empower them with the necessary skills for effective MSUS use, ultimately benefiting patient care., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR).)

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound secondary signs of fractures in pediatric patients aged 5-15 y presenting to the emergency department with a clinically non-deformed distal forearm injury., Methods: This diagnostic study was conducted in South East Queensland, Australia. Emergency clinicians performed point-of-care ultrasound on eligible patients and recorded secondary signs of fractures (pronator quadratus hematoma [PQH] sign, periosteal hematoma, visible angulation) or physeal fractures (fracture-to-physis distance [FPD], physis alteration). The reference standard was the final fracture diagnosis determined by expert panel. The primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of secondary signs for cortical breach and physeal fractures. Diagnostic statistics were reported for each relevant secondary sign., Results: A total of 135 participants were enrolled. The expert panel diagnosed 48 "no" fracture, 52 "buckle" fracture and 35 "other" fracture. All "other" fractures were cortical breach fractures and included 15 Salter-Harris II fractures. The PQH sign demonstrated high sensitivity and moderate specificity to diagnose cortical breach fractures (91%, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 78%-97% and 82%, 73%-88%). Poor sensitivity but high specificity was observed for the visible angulation and periosteal hematoma secondary signs. FPD <1cm showed perfect sensitivity and moderate specificity (100%, 80%-100% and 85%, 78%-90%) for diagnosis of Salter-Harris II fracture. Conversely, physis alteration showed poor sensitivity but excellent specificity (40%, 20%-64% and 99%, 95%-100%) for the diagnosis of Salter-Harris II fractures., Conclusion: Ultrasound secondary signs showed good diagnostic accuracy for both cortical breach fractures and Salter-Harris II fractures. Future research should consider optimal use of secondary signs to improve diagnostic accuracy., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Point-of-care ultrasound is an invaluable bedside tool for anesthesiologists and has been integrated into anesthesiology residency training and board certification in the United States. Little is known about point-of-care ultrasound training practices in pediatric anesthesia fellowship programs., Aims: To describe the current state of point-of-care ultrasound education in pediatric anesthesia fellowship programs in the United States., Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey study distributed to 60 American Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited pediatric anesthesia fellowship programs. Two programs were in their initial accreditation period and were excluded due to lack of historical data. Program directors or associate program directors were invited to complete this 23-item survey., Results: Thirty-three of fifty-eight programs (57%) completed the survey. Of those, 15 programs (45%) reported having a point-of-care ultrasound curriculum. Programs with ≤3 fellows per year were less likely to have an ultrasound curriculum compared to programs with ≥4 fellows per year (30% programs 0-3 fellows/year vs. 69% programs ≥4 fellows/year, odds ratio 0.19 [95% confidence intervals 0.04-0.87]; p = .03). Program directors and associate program directors rated point-of-care ultrasound training as highly valuable to fellows' education. Barriers to use most commonly included lack of experience (64%), lack of oversight/interpretive guidance (58%), and lack of time (45%). Programs without point-of-care ultrasound training had significantly higher odds of listing lack of ultrasound access as a primary barrier (50% programs without vs. 13% programs with, odds ratio 6.5, [95% confidence intervals 1.3-50]; p = .04)., Conclusions: This observational survey-based study suggests that fewer than half of pediatric anesthesia training programs in the United States offer point-of-care ultrasound education. Additional research is needed to optimize this education and training in pediatric anesthesia fellowship programs., (© 2024 The Authors. Pediatric Anesthesia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Lung ultrasound (LUS) is widely used as a diagnostic and monitoring tool in critically ill patients. Lung ultrasound score (LUSS) based on the examination of twelve thoracic regions has been extensively validated for pulmonary assessment. However, it has revealed significant limitations: when applied to heterogeneous lung diseases with intermediate LUSS pattern (LUSS 1 and 2), for instance, intra-observer consistency is relatively low. In addition, LUSS is time-consuming and a more rapid overview of the extent of lung pathology and residual lung aeration is often required, especially in emergency setting. We propose a Visual Lung Ultrasound Protocol (VLUP) as a rapid monitoring tool for patients with acute respiratory failure. It consists of a probe sliding along the mid-clavicular, mid-axillary and scapular lines in transversal scan. VLUP allows a visualization of a large portion of the antero-lateral and/or posterior pleural surface. Serial assessments of two clinical cases are recorded and visually compared, enabling rapid understanding of lung damage and its evolution over time. VLUP allows a semi-quantitative and qualitative point-of-care assessment of lung injury. Through this standardized approach it is possible to accurately compare subsequent scans and to monitor the evolution of regional parenchymal damage. VLUP enables a quick estimation of the quantitative-LUSS (qLUSS) as the percentage of pleura occupied by artifacts, more suitable than LUSS in inhomogeneous diseases. VLUP is designed as a standardized, point-of-care lung aeration assessment and monitoring tool. The purpose of the paper is to illustrate this new technique and to describe its applications., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: Spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) is a vascular ultrasound finding associated with increased thromboembolism risk. However, identification requires expert determination and clinician time to report. We developed a deep learning model that can automatically identify SEC. Our model can be applied retrospectively without deviating from routine clinical practice. The retrospective nature of our model means future works could scan archival data to opportunistically correlate SEC findings with documented clinical outcomes., Methods: We curated a data set of 801 archival acquisitions along the femoral vein from 201 patients. We used a multisequence convolutional neural network (CNN) with ResNetv2 backbone and visualized keyframe importance using soft attention. We evaluated SEC prediction performance using an 80/20 train/test split. We report receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC-AUC), along with the Youden threshold-associated sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, true negative, false negative, false positive and true positive., Results: Using soft attention, we can identify SEC with an AUC of 0.74, sensitivity of 0.73 and specificity of 0.68. Without soft attention, our model achieves an AUC of 0.69, sensitivity of 0.71 and specificity of 0.60. Additionally, we provide attention visualizations and note that our model assigns higher attention score to ultrasound frames containing more vessel lumen., Conclusion: Our multisequence CNN model can identify the presence of SEC from ultrasound keyframes with an AUC of 0.74, which could enable screening applications and enable more SEC data discovery. The model does not require the expert intervention or additional clinician reporting time that are currently significant barriers to SEC adoption. Model and processed data sets are publicly available at https://github.com/Ouwen/automatic-spontaneous-echo-contrast., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This study investigated the reliability of measuring the median nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) at the carpal tunnel inlet using a handheld ultrasound device (HUD) compared to a standard ultrasound system, focusing on intra- and inter-operator reproducibility among novice and expert operators. Employing a prospective cross-sectional design, 37 asymptomatic adults were assessed using both devices, with measurements taken by an expert with over five years of experience and a novice with less than six months. The CSA was determined using manual tracing and ellipse methods, with reproducibility evaluated through intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and agreement assessed via Bland-Altman plots. Results showed a high degree of agreement between the devices, with excellent intra-operator reproducibility (ICC > 0.80) for the expert, and moderate reproducibility for the novice (ICCs ranging from 0.539 to 0.841). Inter-operator reliability was generally moderate, indicating acceptable consistency across different experience levels. The study concludes that HUDs are comparable to standard ultrasound systems for assessing median nerve CSA in asymptomatic subjects, with both devices providing reliable measurements. This supports the use of HUDs in diverse clinical environments, particularly where access to traditional ultrasound is limited. Further research with a larger sample and symptomatic patients is recommended to validate these findings.

Background: Left-sided intracardiac thrombi are most commonly seen in conditions with decreased cardiac flow, such as myocardial infarction or atrial fibrillation. They can be propagated into the systemic circulation, leading to a cerebrovascular accident. Identification of thrombus-in-transit via point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has the potential to change patient management given its association with high patient morbidity and mortality., Case Report: An intubated 60-year-old man was transferred to our emergency department for management of altered mental status and seizure-like activity. The patient was markedly hypotensive on arrival, and cardiac POCUS was performed to identify potential causes of hypotension. A left ventricular thrombus-in-transit was identified. The thrombus was notably absent on a repeat POCUS examination < 10 min later, which led to concern for thrombus propagation. Furthermore, the patient's vasopressor requirements had significantly increased in that time period. Subsequent emergent neuroimaging revealed a large ischemic stroke in the left internal carotid and middle cerebral artery distribution. The patient was, unfortunately, deemed to not be a candidate for either thrombectomy or thrombolysis and ultimately expired in the hospital. Why Should an Emergency Physician Be Aware of This? Serial POCUS examinations identified the propagation of this patient's thrombus-in-transit, leading the physician to change the initial presumptive diagnosis and treatment course, and pursue further imaging and workup for ischemic stroke. Identification of a thrombus-in-transit is a clue to potentially underlying critical pathology and should be followed with serial POCUS examinations to assess for treatment efficacy and thrombus propagation., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

A spectrum of critical abdominal pathological conditions that might occur in neonates and children warrants real-time point-of-care abdominal ultrasound (abdominal POCUS) assessment. Abdominal radiographs have limited value with low sensitivity and specificity in many cases and have no value in assessing abdominal organ perfusion and microcirculation (Rehan et al. in Clin Pediatr (Phila) 38(11):637-643, 1999). The advantages of abdominal POCUS include that it is non-invasive, easily available, can provide information in real-time, and can guide therapeutic intervention (such as paracentesis and urinary bladder catheterization), making it a crucial tool for use in pediatric and neonatal abdominal emergencies (Martínez Biarge et al. in J Perinat Med 32(2):190-194, 2004) and (Alexander et al. in Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 106(1):F96-103, 2021).  Conclusion: Abdominal POCUS is a dynamic assessment with many ultrasound markers of gut injury by two dimensions (2-D) and color Doppler (CD) compared to the abdominal X-ray; the current evidence supports the superiority of abdominal POCUS over an abdominal X-ray in emergency situations. However, it should still be considered an adjunct rather than replacing abdominal X-rays due to its limitations and operator constraints (Alexander et al. in Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 106(1):F96-103, 2021). What is Known: • Ultrasound is an important modality for the assessment of abdominal pathologies. What is New: • The evidence supports the superiority of abdominal POCUS over an abdominal X-ray in emergency abdominal situations in the neonatal and pediatric intensive care units., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Limited diagnostic capabilities represent an ongoing obstacle in out-of-hospital emergency settings. Prehospital deployment of ultrasound might reduce this particular diagnostic gap. So far, little is known about the availability and usage of ultrasound in emergency medical services (EMS) or about the level of education of EMS physicians regarding prehospital ultrasound (point-of-care ultrasound, POCUS)., Methods: A nationwide survey was conducted among emergency physicians in Germany focusing on POCUS education and experience., Results: Between 02/2022 and 05/2022, 1079 responses were registered, of which 853 complete responses were analyzed. Of the emergency physicians, 71.9% consider POCUS beneficial for out-of-hospital diagnostics and 43.8% had participated in a certified POCUS training prior to the survey. The self-evaluation of POCUS skills among emergency physicians depended significantly on their participation in a certified training (p < 0.001) and frequent ultrasound routine (p < 0.001)., Conclusion: The majority of participating emergency physicians in Germany consider POCUS to improve out-of-hospital diagnostic capabilities. Participation in a certified POCUS training and frequent use of ultrasound facilitated higher self-confidence in POCUS skills., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: The current point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) assessment of gastric fluid volume primarily relies on the traditional linear approach, which often suffers from moderate accuracy. This study aimed to develop an advanced machine learning (ML) model to estimate gastric fluid volume more accurately., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data and POCUS data (D1: craniocaudal diameter, D2: anteroposterior diameter) of 1386 patients undergoing elective sedated gastrointestinal endoscopy (GIE) at Nanjing First Hospital to predict gastric fluid volume using ML techniques, including six different ML models and a stacking model. We evaluated the models using the adjusted Coefficient of Determination (R 2 ), mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE). The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was used to interpret the importance of the variables. Finally, a web calculator was constructed to facilitate its clinical application., Results: The stacking model (Linear regression + Multilayer perceptron) performed best, with the highest adjusted R 2 of 0.718 (0.632 to 0.804). The mean prediction bias was 4 ml (MAE: 4.008 (3.68 to 4.336)), which is better than that of the linear model. D1 and D2 ranked high in the SHAP plot and performed better in the right lateral decubitus (RLD) than in the supine position. The web calculator can be accessed at https://cheason.shinyapps.io/Stacking&#95;regressor/., Conclusion: The stacking model and its web calculator can serve as practical tools for accurately estimating gastric fluid volume in patients undergoing elective sedated GIE. It is recommended that anesthesiologists measure D1 and D2 in the patient's RLD position.