Search

Introduction: Identification of acute funisitis, a sign of foetal inflammatory response (FIR), is crucial as their presence is associated with ominous neonatal outcomes. Recommendation on which part of umbilical cord should be sampled to facilitate optimal identification of acute funisitis is limited. Methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study over a seven-month duration recruiting all patients with clinical suspicion of chorioamnionitis and/or maternal intrapartum pyrexia. The distribution and the degree of cord inflammation were assessed. The cases were also evaluated for maternal inflammatory response (MIR) and chorionic vasculitis (CV). Results: Of the 191 placentas, 88 (46.1%) had some degree of cord inflammation. Forty-nine (55.7%) had a differential in cord inflammation, with distal cord section (n = 38) demonstrating significant greater inflammation than that of proximal cord section (n = 11) (p<0.001). There were 20 cases with phlebitis only and 8 cases demonstrated arteritis only in either proximal or distal cord sections. Increasing magnitude of cord inflammation was significantly associated with increasing severity of MIR and the rate of CV (p<0.001). CV was observed in 25 (24.3%) cases showing absence of cord inflammation, while 12 (13.6%) cases with cord FIR demonstrated no CV. Discussion: Inflammatory reaction can occur variably throughout the length of the umbilical cord and chorionic plate vessels, with greater inflammation seen in the distal cord section. We affirm the current Amsterdam recommendation of submitting at least two cross sections of the cord representing proximal and distal sites and two sections from placental parenchyma to facilitate the identification of FIR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Neonates born with the fetal inflammatory response (FIR) are at risk of complications such as early-onset neonatal sepsis, meningitis, and pneumonia. Providing an early histopathological diagnosis of FIR is important to guide management but can be a challenge in busy laboratories. This is a retrospective cross-sectional study over a four-month duration recruiting all placental cases with histological chorioamnionitis in our institution. The diagnostic performance of the umbilical cord (UC) section in identifying FIR, relative to the corresponding subsequent placental sections, was assessed. Clinical predictors of umbilical cord FIR were also investigated. A total of 390 UC sections were analyzed, of which 206 (52.8%) were found positive for FIR: 111 cases (53.9%) stage 1, 87 (42.2%) stage 2, and 8 (3.9%) stage 3. Our data revealed a good diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and accuracy of 76.2% (95%CI: 68.6–82.7%), 82.4% (95%CI: 65.5–93.2%), 95.0% (95%CI: 90.2–97.6%), and 77.3% (95%CI: 70.6–83.1%) respectively, in cases when clinical chorioamnionitis, fever and/or prolonged rupture of membrane (PROM) were suspected, with the area under the curve of 0.793. A maternal inflammatory response (MIR) was correlated with FIR (p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that the higher the gestational age, clinical suspicion of chorioamnionitis, fever, and/or PROM, and the higher the stage of MIR significantly increased the odds of FIR (p < 0.001). UC section diagnosis of FIR is reasonably accurate in cases with clinical chorioamnionitis, fever, and/or PROM. Changing current laboratory practice to rapid processing of UC ahead of the rest of the other placental sections can be recommended in busy pathology departments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The 2016 Amsterdam Placental Workshop Group Consensus Statement recommends sampling a block of the placenta close to the umbilical cord insertion site (UCIB) for histopathological evaluation. This piece of placenta at the umbilical cord insertion is presumed to give a better yield of inflammation (if present). We aimed to investigate the utility of the UCIB in the detection of maternal and/or fetal inflammatory responses (MIR and/or FIR), in comparison with the other sections of the placental parenchyma. This is a retrospective cross‐sectional study including all placentas with histologic chorioamnionitis. The histopathological slides of placentas were reviewed as per Amsterdam consensus guidelines. Diagnostic performance of UCIB in identifying MIR and/or FIR, relative to the other placental sections, was assessed. UCIB revealed diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of 79.2% (95% CI: 74.2–83.6%), 100.0% (95% CI: 95.6–100.0%), and 83.6% (95% CI: 79.5–87.2%), respectively, in the detection of FIR, while showing a low sensitivity of 52.6% (95% CI: 47.5–57.6%) in detecting MIR. In 59 (24.6%) cases, FIR was not seen in the corresponding placental parenchymal sections but was detected in the UCIBs. This study is the first study to confirm that a section from the UCIB is essential for the detection of FIR, which affirms the Amsterdam consensus sampling recommendations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context.--The value of placental examination in investigations of adverse pregnancy outcomes may be compromised by sampling and definition differences between laboratories. Objective.--To establish an agreed-upon protocol for sampling the placenta, and for diagnostic criteria for placental lesions. Recommendations would cover reporting placentas in tertiary centers as well as in community hospitals and district general hospitals, and are also relevant to the scientific research community. Data Sources.--Areas of controversy or uncertainty were explored prior to a 1-day meeting where placental and perinatal pathologists, and maternal-fetal medicine specialists discussed available evidence and subsequently reached consensus where possible. Conclusions.--The group agreed on sets of uniform sampling criteria, placental gross descriptors, pathologic terminologies, and diagnostic criteria. The terminology and microscopic descriptions for maternal vascular malperfu-sion, fetal vascular malperfusion, delayed villous maturation, patterns of ascending intrauterine infection, and villitis of unknown etiology were agreed upon. Topics requiring further discussion were highlighted. Ongoing developments in our understanding of the pathology of the placenta, scientific bases of the maternofetoplacental triad, and evolution of the clinical significance of defined lesions may necessitate further refinements of these consensus guidelines. The proposed structure will assist in international comparability of clinicopathologic and scientific studies and assist in refining the significance of lesions associated with adverse pregnancy and later health outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]