Search

The United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) conducted a study on the Department of Defense's (DOD) financial management and the Marine Corps' transition to the Defense Agencies Initiative (DAI) platform. The GAO found that the DOD and Marine Corps did not fully implement leading practices in estimating cost and schedule, measuring progress, and developing performance metrics. The Marine Corps underestimated the complexity and time required for the transition and did not include all costs and effort in its estimates. The GAO made recommendations to improve cost, schedule, performance measures, data migration, and change management, and the DOD concurred with most of the recommendations. The Marine Corps has completed its transition to DAI and received a clean audit opinion for fiscal year 2023. However, there were areas where their efforts did not fully align with leading practices, such as comparing DAI output reports with legacy output reports and determining realistic data conversion goals. The lack of complete information and performance metrics poses risks to future transitions to DAI. Recommendations have been made to address these issues and improve the implementation of DAI. The GAO conducted the performance audit from October 2022 to June 2024. [Extracted from the article]

The article present a report of the Government Accountability Office (GAO) regarding financial management issues and challenges faced by the Department of Defense (DOD). Topics discussed include actions taken by DOD and the military services to prioritize financial statement audit findings; components developed corrective action plans (CAPs) to address audit findings in accordance; ability to monitor and report on audit remediation efforts.

The article presents a report of Government Accountability Office recommending the Department of Defense (DOD) to implement comprehensive plans to improve its systems environment. Topics include establishment of performance measures for DOD's financial management systems strategy; and planning to measure values and verify and validate those values.

The article presents a report of Government Accountability Office recommending the U.S. Navy to address the factors causing maintenance delays for aircraft carriers and submarines. Topics include the updation of workforce planning requirements to avoid the consistent use of overtime; and completion of the development of shipyard performance metrics.

The article presents report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office on the U.S. Army and Marine Corps need to improve efforts to address challenges in measuring performance and planning maintenance work. It discusses the challenges to meeting the depots' maintenance goals in fiscal years 2018 and 2019.

The article presents a reports of the U.S. Government Accountability Office recommending the U.S. Navy to improved planning to address persistent aircraft maintenance delays. Topics include the development of a plan to use data to set turnaround time targets for depot maintenance; and provision of planners information on maintenance performed outside the depots.

The article presents a report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) regarding the maintenance work performed at depots by the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD). It discusses the carryover in the fiscal years 2007 through 2018 of the Navy, Marine Corps and Air Force depots and the implications for depot maintenance management. It mentions the GAO reviewed DOD budget submissions to identify depot carryover.

The article presents a report submitted by U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) to congressional committees. GAO has made five recommendations to the U.S. Department of Defense which include improving completeness of budget estimates and making efforts to improve the accuracy of airlift workload predictions.

The article focuses on the result of the government agency Government Accountability Office's (GAO) analysis of the Army Industrial Operations (Industrial Operations) working capital fund in the U.S. It offers details of the analysis which aims to improve related budgeting and reduce carry over balances. It also mentions the agency's recommendation for the Department of Defense (DoD) to improve budgeting and management for carryover by creating correct procedures.

The article presents a report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) on the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) financial management as of September 2015. It informs that the report examines the need of the U.S. Navy to provide sufficient documentation to support its military payroll activity for April 2013, the Navy's military pay assertion efforts and the GAO recommends the Navy to establish controls with payroll services provided by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS).

The article offers information on a report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) on the implementation of financial management reform by the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD). Topics discussed include reviewing of the National Defense Authorization Act, valuation of the asset costs of DOD, progress in financial management workforce, and use of automated systems to perform tasks related to financial management.

The article discusses a report released by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) regarding the audit on the U.S. Marine Corps' Fiscal Year 2012 Schedule of Budgetary Activity (schedule). It reports on evaluation of the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) Office of Inspector General's (OIG) audit on the schedule under professional standards. It mentions DOD's inability to determine completeness of budgetary transactions, reliability of data and recording of obligations and outlays.

The article focuses on a report issued by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) to the Congressional Requesters on the U.S. Navy working capital fund at Fleet Readiness Centers (FRC). It mentions that the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) should improve the budgeting for carryover, that grew to 1 billion dollars in 2014. Also discussed are the factors identified for FRC balance carryover in 2014 which include FRC's inability to repair the F/A-18 Hornet aircraft.

The article presents a report prepared by the U.S. Government Accountability Office which reviewed schedule and cost estimates for selected U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) systems. Topics include failure of schedule and cost estimates for the Global Combat Support System-Army to meet best practices, need for the DOD to incorporate best practices for developing a reliable schedule.

The article discusses a report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) as July 2014 which analyzes the U.S. Air Force Working Capital Fund (AFWCF) cash data in fiscal year 2013 generated by repairing aircraft and engine, selling inventory items, and providing air, land, and sea transportation. Topics discussed include cash requirement of AFWCF, the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) cash management guidance, and recommendations made by GAO to DOD for cash balance initiative.

The article focuses on the report "DOD Needs to Reevaluate Its Approach to Better Manage the Effect of Market Fluctuations" by the U.S. Government Accountability Office as of July 2014. Topics discussed include the bulk fuel pricing, selling of fuel by the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) to military services, and fluctuations in fuel price over budget estimates. The GAO recommend that the DOD should re-evaluate the components of the standard price and manage the fuel consumption.

The article offers information on the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) report on the implementation of contract pay Financial Improvement Plan (FIP) by the U.S. Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS). Topics discussed include the compliance with the Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness (FIAR) Guidance, overall planning activities, and recommendations for action.

The article mentions a study by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) which examines the efforts of the U.S. Army to develop its financial improvement plan (FIP) for budget execution to assist General Fund Statement of Budgetary Resources' audit readiness efforts. It also examines the compliance of the Army's efforts with the Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness (FIAR) Guidance. It also presents GAO's recommendations for the Army to improve implementation of the FIAR Guidance.

The article focuses on a study conducted by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), an investigation arm of the U.S Congress, to examine the control of the U.S Department of Defense's (DOD) control over public funds. Topics discussed include establishment of a framework to provide training to financial management personnel, proper documentation and reporting of fund transactions and use of documents in management decision making.

The article focuses on a study conducted by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), an investigative arm of the U.S Congress, to examine the impact of weak financial management on the operations of the U.S Department of Defense to its financial management. Topics discussed include inaccurate reports on weapon system, importance of financial information in decision making and control over public funds.

The article presents a report on Department of Homeland Security (DHS) financial management by the U.S. Government Accountability Office. The purpose of the report as stated is to guide DHS on effectiveness of internal controls in addressing high-risk financial management issues. It examines DHS's efforts in obtaining opinions on financial statements and internal control over financial reporting. It reviews DHS guidance and evaluates the practices used by it.

The article provides information on the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) report regarding types of challenges faced by the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD). The report discusses efforts to improve the financial management of DOD and related business operations to achieve audit readiness. The report further mentions that DOD accounts for about 57 percent of the discretionary federal budget authority as per the fiscal year 2013 President's Budget.

The article presents a testimony based report on the United States (U.S.) Department of Defense (DOD) Financial Management: The Army Faces Significant Challenges in Achieving Audit Readiness for Its Military Pay by Washington DC-based Government Accountability Office (GAO), United States. The focus of the testimony is based on accepted government auditing standards. The standards require proper evidence to support the findings and conclusions in order to obtain audit's objectives.

The article presents the report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) concerning the Department of Defense (DOD) which faces various challenges in resolving serious problems in its financial management and related business operations and systems. Over the years, DOD has imposed several efforts to improve the department's financial management operations. GAO was asked to give its perspective on the condition of DOD's financial management weakness and its efforts to resolve them.

The article focuses on the report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) and the Department of Defense Inspector General (DOD IG) which reveals the inability of the Department of Defense (DOD) to provide effective funds and report reliable information such as budgetary information. It notes the report of GAO in 2008 regarding DOD's complex and inefficient payment processes. It further highlights DOD's risk in overspending appropriations.

The article presents a report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) on the efforts of the Department of Defense (DOD) on the implementation of its Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness (FIAR) Plan. It notes that the implementation of the plan is intended to help improve financial management operations. It also states the insufficiency and ineffectiveness of the financial improvement plans (FIPs) for Navy Civilian Pay and Air Force Military Equipment.

The article presents a report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) on the federal government's effort on the implementation of the Department of Defense's (DOD) Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness (FIAR) Plan. It notes the insufficient development and implementation of the Navy civilian pay and Air Force military equipment financial improvement plans (FIPs). It also notes the necessary improvement of FIP monitoring and oversight.

The article presents a report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) on the Statement of Budgetary Resources (SBR) audit results of Marine Corps. It notes Marine Corp's insufficient support for ineffective controls and accounting transactions which leads to disclaimer on SBR. It observes its ineffective internal control over key financial and accounting systems. It also mentions its remediation plan that centers on near-term outcomes.

The article presents a study conducted by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) which examines and analyzes the plans and policies of the Army that governs the implementation of the Logistics Modernization Program (LMP) which aims to replace the aging Army systems. The study evaluates how the Army will achieve the functionality from the LMP in the third deployment. It recommends the Army to periodically report to the Congress on the progress of the LMP deployment.

The article presents a report from Government Accountability Office (GAO) in the U.S. on army working capital funds (AWCF). It mentions that in 2009, AWCF collected more than 16 billion dollars for goods and services provided to customers wherein the cash generated from the sales were used to cover its expenses. It reveals that AWCF monthly cash balance fluctuated due to differences between receipts and disbursements which include receipt from AWCF operations and appropriations for wars.

The Logistics Modernization Program (LMP) is an Army business system that is intended to replace the aging Army systems that manage inventory and depot repair operations. Through 2009, the Army obligated more than $1 billion for LMP. LMP was originally scheduled to be completed by 2005, but after the first deployment in July 2003, the Army delayed fielding because of significant problems. The Army has since decided to field the system in two additional deployments: the second deployment occurred in May 2009, and the third deployment is scheduled to occur in October 2010. GAO was asked to evaluate the effectiveness of the Army's management processes in enabling the second deployment sites to realize the full benefits of LMP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents a report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) in relation to the military pay given by the Department of Defense. It states that the Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Indianapolis, Indiana could improve control activities over its processing of active duty army military personnel federal payroll taxes. It also suggests five standards of internal control to help management identify and address major performance and management challenges.

The article presents the report of the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) regarding the implementations required in enhancing the financing for carryover on Army ordnance activities in 2009. It states that the failure in controlling the increase in carryover in the Army ordnance activities has led in the extension of carryover amounts to two years. It cites that there was staggering growth of the carryover from 2004 to 2008 despite the Army's move in hiring more employees.

The article looks on the financial statement audit condition of the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD). It mentions the weaknesses cited by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) on the department's readiness for its management operations. It highlights the launching of the Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness (FIAR) in 2005. Strategic plan for the improvement of the auditing readiness of the department is also discussed.

The article presents a report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) on the position of the Department of Defense (DOD) on the recommendations for Defense Travel System (DTS). It notes that DOD does not have an accurate account and complete information on the number of legacy travel systems that are still in use of the military services. It also notes the difference between the costs of processing travel voucher manually and electronically.