Search

Objective: To compare outcomes of ureteric and renal stone treatment with ureteroscopy (URS) in patients with or without the placement of a preoperative JJ stent., Patients and Methods: The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) URS Global Study collected prospective data for 1 year on consecutive patients with ureteric or renal stones treated with URS at 114 centres around the world. Patients that had had preoperative JJ stent placement were compared with those that did not. Inverse-probability-weighted regression adjustment (IPWRA) was used to examine the effect of preoperative JJ stent placement on the stone-free rate (SFR), length of hospital stay (LOHS), operative duration, and complications (rate and severity)., Results: Of 8 189 patients with ureteric stones, there were 978 (11.9%) and 7 133 patients with and without a preoperative JJ stent, respectively. Of the 1 622 patients with renal stones, 590 (36.4%) had preoperative stenting and 1 002 did not. For renal stone treatment, preoperative stent placement increased the SFR and operative time, and there was a borderline significant decrease in intraoperative complications. For ureteric stone treatment, preoperative stent placement was associated with longer operative duration and decreased LOHS, but there was no difference in the SFR and complications. One major limitation of the study was that the reason for JJ stent placement was not identified preoperatively., Conclusions: The placement of a preoperative JJ stent increases SFRs and decreases complications in patients with renal stones but not in those with ureteric stones., (© 2015 The Authors BJU International © 2015 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: The optimal management of lower pole renal calculi is controversial. We compared shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) and ureteroscopy (URS) for the treatment of patients with small lower pole stones in a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial., Materials and Methods: A total of 78 patients with 1 cm or less isolated lower pole stones were randomized to SWL or URS. The primary outcome measure was stone-free rate on noncontrast computerized tomography at 3 months. Secondary outcome parameters were length of stay, complication rates, need for secondary procedures and patient derived quality of life measures., Results: A total of 67 patients randomized to SWL (32) or URS (35) completed treatment. The 2 groups were comparable with respect to age, sex, body mass index, side treated and stone surface area. Operative time was significantly shorter for SWL than URS (66 vs 90 minutes). At 3 months of followup 26 and 32 patients who underwent SWL and URS had radiographic followup that demonstrated a stone-free rate of 35% and 50%, respectively (p not significant). Intraoperative complications occurred in 1 SWL case (unable to target stone) and in 7 URS cases (failed access in 5 and perforation in 2), while postoperative complications occurred in 7 SWL and 7 URS cases. Patient derived quality of life measures favored SWL., Conclusions: This study failed to demonstrate a statistically significant difference in stone-free rates between SWL and URS for the treatment of small lower pole renal calculi. However, SWL was associated with greater patient acceptance and shorter convalescence.

Endoscopic therapy for the management of upper urinary tract TCC is mainly indicated for patients with an anatomically or functionally solitary kidney, renal insufficiency, bilateral tumors, or severe medical comorbidity. It may be a reasonable alternative to distal ureterectomy with bladder-cuff resection in individuals with low-grade superficial distal ureteral tumors. Although use of this approach has been suggested for treating standard patients with low-grade, low-stage collecting system tumors, this recommendation should not be embraced until more supporting evidence is generated. The efficacy of adjuvant therapy for the prevention of recurrent or progressive disease needs to be defined. If current adjuvant strategies prove ineffective, alternative ones will need to be developed. It is anticipated that advancements in endoscopic technology will facilitate the performance of this type of surgery in the future.

Spatial anatomy of the lower renal pole, as defined by the infundibulopelvic angle (LIP angle), infundibular length (IL), and infundibular width (IW), plays a significant role in the stone-free rate after shockwave lithotripsy. A wide LIP angle, a short IL, and a broad IW, individually or in combination, favor stone clearance, whereas a LIP <70 degrees, an IL >3 cm, or an IW < or =5 mm are individually unfavorable. When all three unfavorable factors or an unfavorable LIP and IL coexist, the post-SWL stone-free rate falls to 50% or less. Using these criteria, more than one fourth of our patients with a lower-pole calculus might have been better served by an initial percutaneous or perhaps ureteroscopic procedure, neither of which is significantly affected by the lower-pole spatial anatomy.

In the last decade there have been major advances in endoscopic surgery including ureteroscopy and laparoscopy, both of which may cause ureteral injury. We sought to determine if increased use of these procedures affected the frequency and nature of major iatrogenic ureteral injuries managed at our medical center. From 1980 to 1984 we treated 8 patients with such injuries compared to 19 patients treated from 1985 to 1989. The most recent period corresponded to the institution of ureteroscopy and the use of more aggressive laparoscopic procedures. Of the patients 14 sustained injuries at our center while 13 were referred from other institutions. Between 1985 and 1989 the incidence of injuries per total hospital admissions at risk increased from 4 to 11 per 10,000 (p = 0.0067), the incidence of urological injuries increased from 4 to 23 per 10,000 (p = 0.0071) and the incidence of injuries occurring in gynecologic patients increased from 13 to 41 per 10,000 admissions (p = 0.0385). There was no difference in the incidence of injuries in the general surgical population. From 1980 to 1984 no laparoscopic or ureteroscopic injuries occurred. However, from 1985 to 1989, 25% of gynecologic injuries occurred during laparoscopy and 70% of urological injuries were sustained during ureteroscopic procedures. Depending on the extent of the injury, patients were initially treated with either endourological or open surgical procedures. Good results were obtained in the majority of cases. Contemporary therapeutic strategies for treating patients sustaining ureteral injuries are discussed.