Search

Background: Nephro- or urolithiasis is a common disease. The prevalence of the disease is increasing in both pediatric and adult patients. The genomic calculation of prevalence may reveal higher levels than the previous diagnosis rates. Monogenic kidney stone disease has been identified in 30% of pediatric and 10% of adult patients., Objectives: Even if it seems legitimate to assume that there is no specific underlying disease in the case of a one-time stone episode, such a disease must be excluded in the pediatric patient. Therefore, the present study discusses in detail the evaluation and treatment of kidney stones in children., Methods: Repeated analysis of 24 h urine samples, or multiple spot urine samples in infants and young children, usually provides evidence of the underlying pathology. In addition, any stone removed should be analyzed. These findings are followed by directed genetic diagnostics. Ultrasonography is the preferred diagnostic method. For symptomatic stones, a minimally invasive method of stone removal is chosen if possible, but not every stone needs to be removed. Family workup must be performed, when a specific diagnosis is made in an index case., Conclusion: Early diagnosis is important to avoid recurrences despite the few treatment options available. Delayed diagnosis can have catastrophic consequences for patients (e.g., renal failure). Standard treatment with hyperhydration and alkali citrate treatment alone often helps prevent recurrences. New therapeutic options give hope that stone diseases will become more treatable. Finally, early diagnosis often avoids problematic courses., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Purpose of Review: Prevalence of pediatric urolithiasis is increasing, which is definitively visible in increasing numbers of presentations in emergency or outpatient clinics. In pediatric patients, a genetic or metabolic disease has to be excluded, so that adequate treatment can be installed as early as possible. Only then either recurrent stone events and chronic or even end-stage kidney disease can be prevented., Recent Findings: The genetic background of mostly monogenic kidney stone diseases was unravelled recently. In hypercalcuria, for example, the commonly used definition of idiopathic hypercalciuria was adopted to the genetic background, here three autosomal recessive hereditary forms of CYP24A1, SLC34A1 and SLC34A3 associated nephrocalcinosis/urolithiasis with elevated 1.25-dihydroxy-vitamin D3 (1.25-dihydroxy-vitamin D3) (calcitriol) levels. In addition either activating or inactivating mutations of the calcium-sensing receptor gene lead either to hypocalcemic hypercalciuria or hypercalcemic hypocalciuria. In primary hyperoxaluria, a third gene defect was unravelled explaining most of the so far unclassified patients. In addition, these findings lead to new treatment options, which are currently evaluated in phase III studies., Summary: Kidney stones are not the disease itself, but only its first symptom. The underlying disease has to be diagnosed in every pediatric patient with the first stone event.

Context: Urolithiasis has a high prevalence and recurrence rate. Prevention is key to patient management, but risk stratification is challenging. In particular, genetic predisposition for urinary stones is not fully understood., Objective: To review current evidence of potential causative genes for idiopathic urolithiasis and map their relationships to one another. This evidence is essential for future establishment of molecular targeted therapy., Evidence Acquisition: A systematic literature review from 2007 to 2017 was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses guidelines. The search was restricted to human studies conducted as either case-control or genome-wide association studies, and published in English. We also performed a causal network analysis of candidate genes gained from the systematic review using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA)., Evidence Synthesis: During the systematic screening of literature, 30 papers were selected for the review. A total of 20 genes with 42 polymorphisms/variants were found to be associated with urolithiasis risk. Their functional roles were mainly categorized as stone matrix, calcium and phosphate regulation, urinary concentration and constitution, and inflammation/oxidative stress. IPA network analysis revealed that these genes connected via signaling pathways and a proinflammatory/oxidative environment., Conclusions: This systematic review provides an updated gene list and novel causal networks for idiopathic urolithiasis risk. Although some genes such as SPP1, CASR, VDR, CLDN14, and SLC34A1 were identified by several studies and recognized by prior reviews, further investigation elucidating their roles in stone formation will be essential for future studies., Patient Summary: In this review, we summarized recent literature regarding genes responsible for kidney stone risk. Based on a detailed review of 30 articles and computational network analysis, we concluded that disorder of mineral regulation with local inflammation in the kidney may cause kidney stone disease., (Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Although we do not have reliable data for the true prevalence of urolithiasis during childhood, the number of patients seen in outpatient clinics and admitted for stone-related problems is steadily increasing worldwide. As for most pediatric patients a metabolic disease is the reason for stone development, because a high number of patients have severely recurrent urolithiasis, early and proper diagnostic evaluation is necessary to begin adequate and preventive treatment. However, diagnostic evaluation, especially in infants and younger children, is not always easy, and frequently a diagnosis is made late. Diagnostic evaluation should start with repeated urine analysis; but how and which urine should be collected and analyzed? What is the best and most accurate method for urine collection? In a paper published in a recent issue of Pediatric Nephrology, Torres and colleagues describe a more simplified method of urine collection. They propose analysis of late-afternoon spot-urine samples as well as an overnight collection of urine as the most appropriate to evaluate patient-specific urinary risk factors. Is this truly the case?

Background: Hypocitraturia is considered a major risk factor for calcium stone formation. However, there is no widely accepted reference database of urinary citrate excretion in children. The aim of our study was to determine the amount of citrate eliminated in the urine over a 24-h period in a pediatric cohort and to determine an optimal unit reflecting excretion., Methods: The study cohort comprised 2,334 healthy boys and girls aged 2-18 years. The levels of urinary citrate were assessed by an enzymatic method in 24-hour urine and expressed in absolute values, as urinary concentration, citrate/creatinine ratio, per kilogram of body weight, in relation to 1.73 m2, and as the calcium/citrate index., Results: Similar incremental age-related citraturia rates were observed in both male and female subjects until puberty during which time citrate excretion became significantly higher in girls. Urinary citrate adjusted for creatinine and for body weight showed a significantly decreasing trend with increasing age in both sexes. Urinary citrate corrected for body surface was weakly correlated with age. Thus, the assumption of 180 mg/1.73 m2/24 h for males and 250 mg/1.73 m2/24 h for females as lower cut-off values appeared to be reliable from a practical perspective., Conclusions: We found distinct sex-dependent differences in citraturia at the start of puberty, with significantly higher values of urinary citrate in girls than in boys. Further prospective studies are warranted to elucidate whether this difference represents a differentiated risk of urolithiasis.

Background: Prevalence of recurrent calcium-oxalate (CaOx) urolithiasis (UL) is up to fivefold higher in Crohn's disease than in the general population. Treatment options are scarce and the risk of recurrent UL or progressive renal CaOx deposition, (oxalosis) based early end-stage renal failure (ESRF), subsequent systemic oxalosis, and recurrence in the kidney graft is pronounced. We aimed to find proof that secondary hyperoxaluria is the main risk factor for the devastating course and correlates with intestinal oxalate absorption., Methods: 24-h urines were collected and analyzed for urinary oxalate (Uox) in 27 pediatric (6-18 years) and 19 adult patients (20-62 years). In the 21 patients (8 adults and 13 children) with hyperoxaluria a [(13)C(2)]oxalate absorption test was performed under standardized dietary conditions., Results: Mean Uox was significantly higher in patients with UL or oxalosis (0.92 ± 0.57) compared with those without (0.53 ± 0.13 mmol/1.73 m(2)/24 h, p<0.05, normal < 0.5). Hyperoxaluria then significantly correlated with intestinal oxalate absorption (p< 0.05)., Conclusion: As UL/oxalosis has major implications for the general health in patients with Crohn's disease (ESRF and systemic oxalosis), new medication, e.g. to reduce intestinal oxalate absorption, is definitely needed.

The incidence of adult urolithiasis has increased significantly in industrialized countries over the past decades. Sound incidence rates are not available for children, nor are they known for nephrocalcinosis, which can appear as a single entity or together with urolithiasis. In contrast to the adult kidney stone patient, where environmental factors are the main cause, genetic and/or metabolic disorders are the main reason for childhood nephrocalcinosis and urolithiasis. While hypercalciuria is considered to be the most frequent risk factor, several other metabolic disorders such as hypocitraturia or hyperoxaluria, as well as a variety of renal tubular diseases, e.g., Dent's disease or renal tubular acidosis, have to be ruled out by urine and/or blood analysis. Associated symptoms such as growth retardation, intestinal absorption, or bone demineralization should be evaluated for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Preterm infants are a special risk population with a high incidence of nephrocalcinosis arising from immature kidney, medication, and hypocitraturia. In children, concise evaluation will reveal an underlying pathomechanism in >75% of patients. Early treatment reducing urinary saturation of the soluble by increasing fluid intake and by providing crystallization inhibitors, as well as disease-specific medication, are mandatory to prevent recurrent kidney stones and/or progressive nephrocalcinosis, and consequently deterioration of renal function.

Urolithiasis and nephrocalcinosis are more frequent in children then currently anticipated, but still remain under- or misdiagnosed in a significant proportion of patients, since symptoms and signs may be subtle or misleading. All children with colicky abdominal pain or macroscopic hematuria should be examined thoroughly for urolithiasis. Also, other, more general, abdominal manifestations can be the first symptoms of renal stones. The patients and their family histories, as well as physical examination, are important initial steps for diagnostic evaluation. Thereafter, diagnostic imaging should be aimed at the location of calculi but also at identification of urinary tract anomalies or acute obstruction due to stone disease. This can often be accomplished by ultrasound examination alone, but sometimes radiological methods such as plain abdominal films or more sensitive non-enhanced computed tomography are necessary. Since metabolic causes are frequent in children, diagnostic evaluation should be meticulous so that metabolic disorders that cause recurrent urolithiasis or even renal failure, such as the primary hyperoxalurias and others, can be ruled out. The stone is not the disease itself; it is only one serious sign! Therefore, thorough and early diagnostic examination is mandatory for every infant and child with the first stone event, or with nephrocalcinosis.

Archeological findings give profound evidence that humans have suffered from kidney and bladder stones for centuries. Bladder stones were more prevalent during older ages, but kidney stones became more prevalent during the past 100 years, at least in the more developed countries. Also, treatment options and conservative measures, as well as 'surgical' interventions have also been known for a long time. Our current preventive measures are definitively comparable to those of our predecessors. Stone removal, first lithotomy for bladder stones, followed by transurethral methods, was definitively painful and had severe side effects. Then, as now, the incidence of urolithiasis in a given population was dependent on the geographic area, racial distribution, socio-economic status and dietary habits. Changes in the latter factors during the past decades have affected the incidence and also the site and chemical composition of calculi, with calcium oxalate stones being now the most prevalent. Major differences in frequency of other constituents, particularly uric acid and struvite, reflect eating habits and infection risk factors specific to certain populations. Extensive epidemiological observations have emphasized the importance of nutritional factors in the pathogenesis of urolithiasis, and specific dietary advice is, nowadays, often the most appropriate for prevention and treatment of urolithiasis.

The pathogenesis of calcium urolithiasis involves complex interactions of urinary promoters and inhibitors of crystallization. A variety of risk formulas have been established to approximate these interactions for clinical evaluation, and the aim of our study was to determine their usefulness as predictors of stone formation. The study cohort comprised 126 patients (63 boys and 63 girls) aged 6.7-18 years (mean age 14.1 +/- 2.9 years) with calcium urolithiasis (61 with chemically confirmed calcium oxalate stones and 65 children with a strong clinical suspicion of this type of urolithiasis). Of these, 36 children were classified as recurrent stone-formers, whereas the remaining 90 had experienced only one stone episode. The values obtained were compared to those of a control group of 60 age- and gender- matched healthy children. A number of crystallization risk indices were calculated from analytes obtained in 24-h urine: calcium/magnesium ratio (Ca/Mg), calcium/citrate ratio (Ca/Cit), (calcium x oxalate)/(magnesium x citrate) ratio (CaOx/MgCit), relative urinary CaOx supersaturation (RS(CaOx)), CaOx activity product index (AP(CaOx)), and standardized CaOx activity product index (AP(CaOx stand)). All indices, except for the AP(CaOx) index, were significantly higher in stone-formers than in the controls. The Ca/Mg, Ca/Cit, CaOx/MgCit, AP(CaOx), and AP(CaOx stand) indices were significantly higher in recurrent stone-formers than in first-episode ones. However, the determination of precise cutoffs between pathological and non-pathological values was problematic due to a considerable overlap of individual values. Based on our results, we conclude that calculation of the majority of risk indices may play a rather supplementary role in the evaluation of children with calcium urolithiasis.

Plasma oxalate (POx) concentration is significantly elevated in primary hyperoxaluria, severe renal failure or ethylene glycol poisoning. In these conditions, the degree of hyperoxalemia correlates with the severity of systemic calcium oxalate (CaOx) deposition and should be therefore carefully monitored. Although secondary hyperoxaluria (secHyOx) is a common finding in pediatric patients with kidney stone disease, very little is known about POx in this condition. We therefore evaluated POx level in 59 children and adolescence with calcium urolithiasis (34 confirmed by CaOx stone analysis and 25 children with a strong clinical suspicion of this type of urolithiasis), with or without "mild" secHyOx. A control group consisted of 41 healthy sex- and age-matched children. We found that POx was significantly increased in children with calcium urolithiasis and secHyOx compared to healthy children (9.16 +/- 3.60 vs. 6.42 +/- 2.53 micromol/l), but that was not the case in children with calcium urolithiasis but with normal urinary oxalate excretion (7.12 +/- 3.33 micromol/l). We conclude that POx may be slightly increased in some pediatric calcium stone formers with secHyOx, probably related to intestinal oxalate hyperabsorption.

Intestinal oxalate absorption is an important part of oxalate metabolism influencing its urinary excretion and its measurement can be a valuable diagnostic tool in hyperoxaluric disorders. In this study, we use [(13)C(2)]oxalate absorption under standardized dietary conditions to assess intestinal oxalate absorption and its impact on urinary oxalate excretion. Tests were conducted in age-matched pediatric patients that included 60 with idiopathic calcium oxalate urolithiasis, 13 with primary hyperoxaluria, and 35 healthy children. In the idiopathic stone formers, median oxalate absorption was significantly higher than that in the controls or in patients with primary disease. From standardized values obtained in control patients, oxalate hyperabsorption was detected in 23 patients with idiopathic disease but not in any patients with primary hyperoxaluria; therefore, a significant correlation between intestinal absorption and urinary excretion was found only in those with the idiopathic disease. We have shown that increased intestinal oxalate absorption is an important risk factor of idiopathic calcium oxalate urolithiasis. In contrast, low intestinal oxalate absorption in patients with primary hyperoxaluria indicates that only foods with excessive oxalate content be restricted from their diet.

Aims: To investigate urinary oxalate excretion in children with urolithiasis and/or nephrocalcinosis and to classify hyperoxaluria (HyOx).Methods: A total of 106 patients were screened. In those in whom the oxalate: creatinine ratio was increased, 24 hour urinary oxalate excretion was measured. Liver biopsy and/or genomic analysis was performed if primary hyperoxaluria (PH) was suspected. Stool specimens were examined for Oxalobacter formigenes in HyOx not related to PH type 1 or 2 (PH1, PH2) and in controls.Results: A total of 21 patients screened had HyOx (>0.5 mmol/24 h per 1.73 m(2)); they were classified into five groups. Eleven had PH (PH1 in nine and neither PH1 nor PH2 in two). Six had secondary HyOx: two enteric and four dietary. Four could not be classified. Seven patients had concomitant hypercalciuria. Only one of 12 patients was colonised with O formigenes compared to six of 13 controls.Conclusions: HyOx is an important risk factor for urolithiasis and nephrocalcinosis in children, and can coexist with hypercalciuria. A novel type of PH is proposed. Absence of O formigenes may contribute to HyOx not related to PH1. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Intestinal oxalate absorption is an important part of oxalate metabolism influencing its urinary excretion and its measurement can be a valuable diagnostic tool in hyperoxaluric disorders. In this study, we use [13C2]oxalate absorption under standardized dietary conditions to assess intestinal oxalate absorption and its impact on urinary oxalate excretion. Tests were conducted in age-matched pediatric patients that included 60 with idiopathic calcium oxalate urolithiasis, 13 with primary hyperoxaluria, and 35 healthy children. In the idiopathic stone formers, median oxalate absorption was significantly higher than that in the controls or in patients with primary disease. From standardized values obtained in control patients, oxalate hyperabsorption was detected in 23 patients with idiopathic disease but not in any patients with primary hyperoxaluria; therefore, a significant correlation between intestinal absorption and urinary excretion was found only in those with the idiopathic disease. We have shown that increased intestinal oxalate absorption is an important risk factor of idiopathic calcium oxalate urolithiasis. In contrast, low intestinal oxalate absorption in patients with primary hyperoxaluria indicates that only foods with excessive oxalate content be restricted from their diet.Kidney International (2008) 73, 1181–1186; doi:10.1038/ki.2008.63; published online 12 March 2008 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]