Search

To improve the management of cirrhotic patients diagnosed with new renal masses, we used a nationally representative cohort to assess the perioperative outcomes of nephrectomy in the setting of liver disease. The incidences of liver disease and renal masses are both rising in the US. Delaying liver transplantation to address other health concerns may have life changing consequences in these patients, thus these results help to guide treatment decisions at this critical junction in care.A retrospective study of the 2016-2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database was performed in adults undergoing nephrectomy for non-emergent indications. Outcomes were compared between three cohorts: no chronic liver disease (no CLD), chronic liver disease (CLD), and decompensated cirrhosis (DC). Mixed regression models were used to evaluate the association between CLD and DC with outcomes of interest including morbidity, mortality, readmission rates, non-home discharges, length of stay, and costs.A total of 183,362 patients were evaluated. The mortality rate in the DC cohort (7%) was higher than with CLD (0.4%) and no CLD (0.3%), (p0.001). DC was associated with higher mortality (OR 8.29, 95% CI 4.07 - 16.88), post-operative bleeding requiring transfusion (OR 5.55, 95% CI 3.72 - 8.26), non-home discharge (OR 5.12, 95% CI 3.16 - 8.30) and readmission (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.09 - 2.94) compared to no CLD. The DC cohort had the greatest length of stay and costs.Patients undergoing nephrectomy with DC have increased morbidity, mortality, readmission rates, non-home discharges, LOS and costs. Alternative management strategies may be considered in these patients.

Introduction:Treatment of benign renal masses may often be unnecessary and can lead to significant morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. However, individual burdens such as decisiona...

Introduction:We assessed current utilization and sequencing of renal mass biopsy (RMB) and thermal ablation for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients in the United States.Methods:The 2004–201...

Renal oncocytoma (RO) accounts for 5% of renal cancers and generally behaves as a benign tumor with favorable long-term prognosis. It is difficult to confidently distinguish between benign RO and other renal malignancies, particularly chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC). Therefore, RO is often managed aggressively with surgery. We sought to identify molecular biomarkers to distinguish RO from chRCC and other malignant renal cancer mimics. In a 44-patient discovery cohort, we identified a significant differential abundance of nine genes in RO relative to chRCC. These genes were used to train a classifier to distinguish RO from chRCC in an independent 57-patient cohort. The trained classifier was then validated in five independent cohorts comprising 89 total patients. This nine-gene classifier trained on the basis of differential gene expression showed 93% sensitivity and 98% specificity for distinguishing RO from chRCC across the pooled validation cohorts, with a c-statistic of 0.978. This tool may be a useful adjunct to other diagnostic modalities to decrease the diagnostic and management uncertainty associated with small renal masses and to enable clinicians to recommend more confidently less aggressive management for some tumors. PATIENT SUMMARY: Renal oncocytoma is generally a benign form of kidney cancer that does not necessarily require surgical removal. However, it is difficult to distinguish renal oncocytoma from other more aggressive forms of kidney cancer, so it is treated most commonly with surgery. We built a classification tool based on the RNA levels of nine genes that may help avoid these surgeries by reliably distinguishing renal oncocytoma from other forms of kidney cancer.

We reviewed the literature surrounding the role of opioids and their receptors in urological malignancy. Recent studies have suggested clinically significant effects of agonism or antagonism of opioid receptors on cancer related outcomes and tumorigenesis. The focus of these efforts has centered on nonurological malignancies. However, a compelling body of evidence is growing in the fields of prostate, bladder and kidney cancer.A systematic review of English language articles published through 2020 was conducted with key phrases related to kidney, bladder or prostate cancer, and opioids or narcotics. A total of 837 unique records were identified, of which 49 were selected for full text review and 33 were included in the qualitative analysis. Eight records were identified via citation review and 1 study was recently presented at a national meeting.Retrospective reviews suggest poorer disease specific and recurrence-free survival with increased perioperative opioid administration in patients undergoing prostate or bladder cancer surgery. However, the data are controversial. Kappa opioid receptors are implicated in both proliferation and inhibition of prostate cancer cell growth across in vitro studies, with a proposed interaction with the androgen cascade. Similarly opioid growth factor receptor is highly expressed in prostate cancer cells and repressed by androgens. Prostate cancer tissue stains more intensely for the mu opioid receptor, and patients with higher expression have poorer oncologic outcomes. Opioid agonism in vitro induces urothelial cell carcinoma proliferation, migration and invasion, with possible additional influence from interactions with the bradykinin b2 receptor. Agonism of the mu, kappa and delta opioid receptors induces renal cell carcinoma tumorigenesis, possibly via upregulation of survivin. Meanwhile, opioid growth factor receptor agonism has the opposite effect in renal cell carcinoma.Evidence surrounding the role of opioids and their receptors in urological malignancy is provocative and should serve as an impetus for further investigation.

Improvements in chemistry, molecular biology, genetics, and bioinformatics have allowed broad use of transcriptomic profiling. Understanding the population of ribonucleic acid (RNA) transcripts can provide important clinical information relevant to kidney cancer care. This includes a better understanding of kidney cancer subtype and distinct clusters within these categories. RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) is typically done on a region within the tumor, which represents thousands to millions of heterogeneous cells and various components of the microenvironment. Computational tools can deconvolute these populations to provide insight into the microenvironment. Specific signatures of hypoxia, proliferation, angiogenesis and immune infiltration can predict response and survival. Prognostic signatures can risk stratify tumors to aid in identification of patients who might derive benefit from adjuvant therapy. As the cost of sequencing continues to decline and improved bioinformatic tools are developed, the barriers to clinical use of transcriptomic data continue to crumble. Here we review the current literature around the use of transcriptomics in kidney cancer diagnosis and management.

International variations in the rates of kidney cancer (KC) are considerable. An understanding of the risk factors for KC development is necessary to generate opportunities to reduce its incidence through prevention and surveillance.To retrieve and summarize global incidence and mortality rates of KC and risk factors associated with its development, and to describe known familial syndromes and genetic alterations that represent biologic risk factors.A systematic review was conducted via Medline (PubMed) and Scopus to include meta-analyses, reviews, and original studies regarding renal cell carcinoma, epidemiology, and risk factors.Our narrative review provides a detailed analysis of KC incidence and mortality, with significant variations across time, geography, and sex. In particular, while KC incidence has continued to increase, mortality models have leveled off. Among the many risk factors, hypertension, obesity, and smoking are the most well established. The emergence of new genetic data coupled with observational data allows for integrated management and surveillance strategies for KC care.KC incidence and mortality rates vary significantly by geography, sex, and age. Associations of the development of KC with modifiable and fixed risk factors such as obesity, hypertension, smoking, and chronic kidney disease (CKD)/end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) are well described. Recent advances in the genetic characterization of these cancers have led to a better understanding of the germline and somatic mutations that predispose patients to KC development, with potential for identification of therapeutic targets that may improve outcomes for these at-risk patients.We reviewed evidence on the occurrence of kidney cancer (KC) around the world. Currently, the main avoidable causes are smoking, obesity, and high blood pressure. Although other risk factors also contribute, prevention and treatment of these three factors provide the best opportunities to reduce the risk of developing KC at present.

There are more than a dozen recognized hereditary forms of kidney cancer. While classic syndromic forms are readily recognizable, more recently described conditions are subtler because of lower penetrance. Adequate counseling and implementation of risk assessment before or after management are important aspects of clinical care. Germline testing to assess hereditary risk has rapidly evolved thanks to multigene panel testing, which can be performed quickly and at relatively low cost. This review discusses what is known about germline risk assessment, namely which individuals should be tested and when and how, and covers many of the uncertainties around this process. Patient summary More than a dozen genes have been linked to predisposition to kidney cancer. We review genetic testing in terms of who should be tested and when and how the testing should be carried out. Results from genetic tests can help in tailoring screening and surgical management and in selecting the most suitable chemotherapy.

CONTEXT: Small renal masses (SRMs; tumors

PURPOSE: We aimed to determine whether insurance expansions implemented through the Affordable Care Act (ACA) were associated with changes in coverage status, disease stage, and treatment of younger adults with testicular germ cell tumors (GCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified men aged 18–64 diagnosed with testicular GCTs between 2010 and 2015 in the National Cancer Data Base. We defined time periods as: pre-ACA (2010–2013) and post-ACA (2014–2015) and used difference-in-differences (DID) modeling to examine associations between state Medicaid expansion status and changes in insurance, stage at diagnosis, and treatment. RESULTS: Following the ACA, the proportion of patients with any health insurance increased 3.7% (95% CI 3–4.5) in Medicaid expansion states and 3.0% (95% CI 1.5–4.5) in non-expansion states, mainly by gaining Medicaid and private insurance, respectively. The largest increases occurred in low-income patients, where Medicaid expansion was associated with an adjusted increase of 14.5 percentage points (95% CI 7.2–21.8) in Medicaid coverage following the ACA. We did not observe reductions in late-stage diagnoses during the observation period. Changes in the proportion of patients receiving chemotherapy or radiation for advanced-stage cancers were ongoing prior to the ACA and differed between expansion and non-expansion states, limiting assessment of ACA-related effects on individual treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Post-ACA, the proportion of newly diagnosed testicular cancer patients with health insurance increased, with the largest effects seen among lowest income individuals. Our findings that changes in practice preceded the ACA and differed by expansion status highlight the need for caution in assessing the legislation’s impact.

Trials SWOG 8949 and EORTC 30947 had the same eligibility criteria and established the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The more recently published CARMENA trial calls into question the need for cytoreductive nephrectomy. A systematic comparison of CARMENA and SWOG 8949 suggests that cytoreductive nephrectomy may be beneficial for patients receiving immunotherapy but not targeted therapy. The approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors for previously untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma underlines the need for another randomized phase 3 trial of cytoreductive nephrectomy for patients receiving powerful modern immunotherapies.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW To describe current paradigms for genetic testing, screening, and treatment of patients with inherited kidney cancer syndromes. RECENT FINDINGS We describe various new aspects of hereditary kidney cancer. Recent data now support that hereditary kidney cancer may account for 5-8% of kidney cancers diagnosed. Methods of testing have evolved including the introduction of multigene next-generation sequencing panels. We continue to learn more about the natural history and management of classic hereditary cancer syndromes. New emerging conditions with lower kidney cancer penetrance have been recognized adding the growing list of syndromes associated with kidney cancer development. The surgical management strategies of enucleation remain however systemic therapy options are being explored both for localized and advanced settings. SUMMARY Genetic predisposition to kidney cancer is likely more common than once thought. Knowledge of clinical manifestation and genetic testing strategies are needed to properly identify and treat patient and their families.

To evaluate trends in the utilization of active surveillance (AS) in a nationally representative cancer database. AS has been increasingly recognized as an effective strategy for patients with small renal masses but little is known about national usage patterns.We identified patients with clinical T1a renal masses within the National Cancer Database in 2010 through 2014. Patients were classified according to initial management strategy received including AS, surgery, ablation, or other treatment. We characterized time trends in the use of AS vs definitive therapy and examined clinical and socio-demographic determinants of AS among patients with small renal masses using multivariable logistic regression models.We identified 59,189 patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria. Of the total cohort, 1733 (2.9%) individuals received initial management with AS, while 57,456 (97.1%) received definitive treatment. Surveillance rates remained below 5% in all years. On multivariate analysis, patient age (OR: 1.08, 95% CI 1.08-1.09), smaller tumor size of2 cm vs ≥2 cm (OR: 2.43, 95% CI: 2.20-2.7, P.0001), management at an academic center vs community center (OR: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.83-2.29), and African American vs Caucasian race (OR: 1.56, 95% CI:1.35-1.80) were independently associated with use of AS as initial management.In a representative national cohort of patients with small renal masses, we observed clinical and facility-level differences in the utilization of active surveillance in patients with T1a renal masses. Further investigation is warranted to better understand the forces underlying initial management decisions for patients with small renal masses.

Context The epidemiological signature of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) during the past decades is explained by overdetection and overtreatment of indolent cancers; furthermore, a non-negligible proportion of patients undergoing surgery for suspected RCC harbour benign renal tumours. As the gold standard for RCC diagnosis remains histopathological analysis of surgical or biopsy specimens, implementation of noninvasive diagnostic strategies to discriminate between benign and malignant renal masses is an urgent unmet need. Objective To systematically review novel liquid biomarkers and imaging modalities for RCC diagnosis. Evidence acquisition A systematic review of the recent English-language literature was conducted according to the European Association of Urology guidelines and the PRISMA statement recommendations (PROSPERO ID: CRD42020190773) using the MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. Risk-of-bias assessment was performed according to the QUADAS 2 tool. Evidence synthesis Overall, 15 studies (six on biomarkers and nine on imaging) and eight clinical trials were included. None of the biomarkers or imaging modalities has been validated or shown to have a distinct clinical value for RCC. Specific combinations of urinary cell-free and exosomal miRNAs, urinary miR-15a, and specific panels of urinary metabolites assessed by metabolomics appear promising. In addition, machine/deep learning algorithms and radiomics applied to cross-sectional images may have potential to improve RCC diagnosis. Most studies are limited by the retrospective design, size, and lack of external validation. Conclusions Liquid biomarkers or imaging modalities are not ready for integration in the clinic and further well-designed studies must validate preliminary findings and explore utility in clinical decision-making. Patient summary We provide a comprehensive overview of the currently available biomarkers (measured in blood or urine) and novel imaging tests (other than conventional imaging) to discriminate kidney cancer from benign renal masses in a noninvasive fashion. None of the biomarkers or imaging modalities studied was validated or added clinical value; therefore, none of them can be implemented in the clinic. However, these approaches appear to be promising for improving the diagnosis of kidney cancer in the future.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:Surgical resection remains the standard of care for localized Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC). Approximately 75 percent of RCC patients will be diagnosed with localized diseas...

Introduction The modern treatment paradigms for early stage kidney cancer include ablative therapies. Unlike surgical ablation, percutaneous ablation uses a radiographic platform, potentially altering the role of the urologist. We compared surgical and percutaneous ablation regarding treatment processes and outcomes. Methods Using SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results)-Medicare data, we identified subjects undergoing surgical or percutaneous ablation between 2006 and 2009 for stage I kidney cancer. We evaluated outcomes relating to 30-day complications, unplanned hospital admissions, long-term survival and mortality. Adjusting for patient characteristics, we compared processes and outcomes according to ablation approach using generalized estimating equations and Cox proportional hazard models, respectively. Results We identified 376 subjects (45.8%) treated with surgical ablation and 444 (54.1%) treated with percutaneous ablation. Use of percutaneous ablation increased substantially during the study period. Compared to surgical ablation, percutaneous ablation was applied more often in the outpatient setting (71.2% vs 2.4%, p Conclusions Percutaneous ablation has become the most common ablative modality for early stage kidney cancer. Although percutaneous ablation carries a more favorable safety profile, posttreatment morbidity occurs with some frequency, highlighting the need for continued urologist engagement.

Background Brain metastases (BM) are frequently observed in advanced renal-cell carcinoma (RCC). Historically these individuals have been excluded from clinical trials, but recently, with better local control, many can receive aggressive therapy after treatment. We evaluate our single-institution experience over various treatment eras. Patients and Methods Patients undergoing evaluation for RCC BM from 2001 to 2018 were identified from our institutional database. Clinical notes, demographics, comorbidities, histology, central nervous system (CNS) treatments, systemic therapy, and outcomes were reviewed. Overall survival (OS) and CNS recurrence-free survival (RFS) were evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cumulative incidence was evaluated using a competing risk model. Results We identified 158 patients with RCC BM, of whom 94.4% had clear-cell RCC, and 90.6% had extracranial metastases at diagnosis. Of these patients, 94 (60%) developed RCC BM over time, while 46 (29.1%) had RCC BM at initial presentation. Clinical symptoms were noted in 81.9% of patients. The median OS after diagnosis of RCC BM was 8.4 months, with a 3-year OS of 28.2%. The median CNS RFS was 8.5 months overall; however, those with one and more than one lesion had median CNS RFS of 12.4 and 6 months, respectively (P Conclusion The majority of RCC patients with BM are symptomatic and had prior metastatic disease that progressed to the brain. Those with a solitary RCC BM are less likely to develop CNS recurrence after local therapy and are ideal candidates for enrollment onto clinical trials.

Context Hereditary cases account for about 5% of all cases of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). With advances in next-generation sequencing, several new hereditary syndromes have been described in the last few years. Objective To review and summarise the recent preclinical and clinical literature in hereditary renal cancer. Evidence acquisition A systematic review of the literature was performed in November 2018 using PubMed and OMIM databases, with an emphasis on kidney cancer, genetics and genomics, clinical criteria, and management. Evidence synthesis Several autosomal dominant hereditary RCC syndromes have been described, including those related to germline pathogenic variants in VHL, MET, FH, TSC1/TSC2, FLCN, SDHA/B/C/D, BAP1, CDC73, and MITF. Clinical spectrum of SDH, BAP1, and MITF is still being defined, although these appear to be associated with a lower incidence of RCC. FH and likely BAP1 RCC are associated with more aggressive disease. Preclinical and clinical studies show that using systemic therapy that exploits specific genetic pathways is a promising strategy. Conclusions There are several well-described hereditary RCC syndromes, as well as recently identified ones, for which the full clinical spectrum is yet to be defined. In the new era of precision medicine, identification of these syndromes may play an important role in management and systemic treatment selection. Patient summary This review covers updates in the diagnosis and management of familial kidney cancer syndromes. We describe updates in testing and management of the most common syndromes such as von Hippel-Lindau, and hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma. We also provide insights into recently described familial kidney cancer syndromes.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES:Young adults are historically the least likely to have health insurance in the United States. We aimed to investigate whether implementation of key provisions of the Aff...

e17066 Background: Minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (PN) and percutaneous cryoablation (Cryo) are treatment strategies for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The purpose of this study is to assess the cost-effectiveness of PN and Cryo for stage Ia RCC. Methods: A decision-analysis model was constructed over 5 years from a health care sector’s perspective using TreeAge Pro Suite 2019 (TreeAge Software LLC, Cambridge, MA). The two evaluated strategies were PN and Cryo. The model incorporated the clinical course of stage Ia RCC after either treatment, including costs and quality of life associated with major complications, imaging surveillance (based on 2014 National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines), local and metastatic recurrences, and cancer-specific mortality. All clinical parameters were derived from the literature. A willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/quality adjusted life year (QALY) was used. 1 QALY is equivalent to 1 year of life in perfect health. Outcomes were measured by incremental effectiveness ratio. Base case calculations, Monte Carlo Simulations with 10,000 iterations using bootstrapping for parameters from their distributions, and multiple sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: Five-year local recurrence-free, metastasis-free, and cancer-specific survival from recent literature were 97.7% versus 95.9% ( p = 0.18), 98.0% versus 100% ( p = 0.14), 99.3% versus 100% % ( p = 0.7) for PN and Cryo. PN and Cryo yielded similar health benefits of 3.63 QALY and 3.64 QALY. Overall costs were $26,343 and $19,346 for PN and Cryo. A total of 89.28% of the 10,000 simulations showed higher cost-effectiveness of Cryo than PN. One-way sensitivity analyses varying long-term outcomes after Cryo while keeping outcomes after PN constant, revealed that Cryo is more cost-effective than PN when its local recurrence risk is < 3.94% per year (18.2% over 5 years), metastasis risk is < 1.51% per year (7.33% over 5 years), or cancer-specific mortality risk is < 0.96% per year (4.7% over 5 years). PN is more cost-effective if Cryo local recurrence risk is 3.5% higher than PN per year, when the metastasis risk is 1.1% higher than PN per year, or when its cancer-specific mortality is more than 0.9% higher than PN per year. Cryo is more cost-effective than PN if its cost is not more than $1,000 higher than PN. Conclusions: Our study showed that Cryo is more cost-effective than PN for stage Ia RCC patients with comparable effectiveness at a lower cost, based on multiple probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses.

Purpose Guidelines are limited for genetic testing for prostate cancer (PCA). The goal of this conference was to develop an expert consensus-driven working framework for comprehensive genetic evaluation of inherited PCA in the multigene testing era addressing genetic counseling, testing, and genetically informed management. Methods An expert consensus conference was convened including key stakeholders to address genetic counseling and testing, PCA screening, and management informed by evidence review. Results Consensus was strong that patients should engage in shared decision making for genetic testing. There was strong consensus to test HOXB13 for suspected hereditary PCA, BRCA1/2 for suspected hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, and DNA mismatch repair genes for suspected Lynch syndrome. There was strong consensus to factor BRCA2 mutations into PCA screening discussions. BRCA2 achieved moderate consensus for factoring into early-stage management discussion, with stronger consensus in high-risk/advanced and metastatic setting. Agreement was moderate to test all men with metastatic castration-resistant PCA, regardless of family history, with stronger agreement to test BRCA1/2 and moderate agreement to test ATM to inform prognosis and targeted therapy. Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive, multidisciplinary consensus statement to address a genetic evaluation framework for inherited PCA in the multigene testing era. Future research should focus on developing a working definition of familial PCA for clinical genetic testing, expanding understanding of genetic contribution to aggressive PCA, exploring clinical use of genetic testing for PCA management, genetic testing of African American males, and addressing the value framework of genetic evaluation and testing men at risk for PCA—a clinically heterogeneous disease.

Objective To investigate the outcomes of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) with non-definitive therapy, which currently remains unknown. Patients and Methods We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to identify individuals with a localised, histologically confirmed kidney/renal pelvis and ureteric UC. Survival analysis using the Kaplan–Meier method was performed. A competing risk model evaluated the cumulative incidence and predictors of cancer-specific mortality (CSM). Results We identified 633 (7.6%) individuals who did not receive surgery. These individuals were significantly older (median age 81 vs 71 years, P < 0.001) than surgically managed patients. The median overall survival (OS) was significantly shorter compared to the surgical cohort (1.9 vs 7.8 years, P < 0.001). The 3-year disease-specific survival (DSS) for patients without surgery was significantly lower compared to those with surgery, at 73.7% vs 92.4%, respectively (P < 0.001). The 3-year DSS for patients with high-grade tumours was worse when compared to patients with low-grade tumours, at 65.1% vs 82.9%, respectively (P < 0.001). The 3-year cumulative CSM was 26.3%. On multivariable analysis, older age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.05, P < 0.001) and high tumour grade (HR 1.88, P < 0.001) were predictors of worse outcomes. Conclusions In this population-based cohort, 7.6% of patients with UTUC were managed with a non-definitive approach. The median OS for the untreated cohort was significantly shorter compared to the surgical cohort (1.9 vs 7.8 years, respectively). These data may be helpful in counselling patients who are poor surgical candidates, as non-definitive therapy may provide reasonable oncological outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Disparities in disease incidence and outcomes are common in genitourinary cancers including renal cell carcinoma (RCC). As limited studies evaluate ethnic disparities, we used data from an equal access healthcare system to investigate differences between Hispanics and non-Hispanic whites with RCC. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study within the Kaiser Permanente healthcare system using records from RCC cases. Ethnicity was identified as Hispanic or non-Hispanic whites. Patient characteristics, comorbidities, tumor characteristics and treatment were compared. Overall survival and disease-specific survival was calculated and a Cox proportion hazard model estimated the association of ethnicity and survival. RESULTS: 2577 patients (2152 non-Hispanic whites, 425 Hispanic) were evaluated. Hispanics were diagnosed at a younger age (59.6 vs 65.3 years). Clear cell RCC was more prevalent while papillary RCC less common among Hispanics. Hispanics had a lower AJCC stage (I/II vs III/IV) than non-Hispanic whites (67.4% vs 62.2%). Hispanics were found to have a greater frequency of comorbidities such as chronic kidney disease and diabetes, but still were more likely to receive surgery. The presence of metastases, nodal involvement, increased tumor size, non-surgical management, increasing age, and Hispanic ethnicity were independent predictors of worse cancer specific outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Within an equal access healthcare system, Hispanics were diagnosed RCC at younger ages, had greater comorbidities, and more frequently had clear cell RCC. Despite lower stage and greater receipt of surgery, Hispanic ethnicity was an independent predictor of mortality. Further work is necessary to confirm these findings perhaps due to differences in disease biology or treatment.

Context The European Association of Urology Renal Cell Carcinoma Guideline Panel recently conducted a systematic review of treatment options for patients with advanced non–clear-cell renal cell carcinomas (RCCs), which showed a substantial lack of evidence for management recommendations. Objective To improve the outcomes of patients with rare kidney cancers (RKCs), we performed a subsequent unstructured review to determine current treatment strategies and druggable pathways, involving key stakeholders with a global perspective to generate recommendations. Evidence acquisition Based on the systematic review, literature was queried in Pubmed, Medline, and abstracts from proceedings of European Society for Medical Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology, in addition to consulting key opinion leaders and stakeholders. A conventional narrative review strategy was adopted to summarize the data. Evidence synthesis The systematic review showed an absence of evidence for treating RKCs, with data only supporting sunitinib or MET inhibitors for some specific subtypes. However, a growing body of evidence implicates druggable pathways in specific RKC subtypes. To test hypotheses, the small patient numbers in each subtype require coordinated multicenter efforts. Many RKC patients are currently excluded from studies or are not analyzed using subtype-specific parameters, despite their unmet medical need. Conclusions We recognize the need for additional multicenter studies and subtype-specific analyses; however, we present management recommendations based on the data available. Web-based tools facilitating subtype-specific global registries and shared translational research resources will help generate sufficient data to formulate evidence-based recommendations for guidelines. Patient summary Patients confronted with rare kidney cancers are often treated the same way as clear-cell renal cell carcinoma patients, despite little evidence from randomized trials. Molecular characterization of tumors to stratify patients may improve outcomes. Availability of potential agents and trials remain a problem. Collaboration among medical centers is important to pool scarce data.

Background Papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) is a rare subset of RCC. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data largely reflect localized disease, and there are limited data for advanced PRCC. Objective To characterize the frequency of genomic alterations (GAs) in patients with advanced PRCC for whom comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) was performed in the context of routine clinical care. Design, setting, and participants Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue was obtained for 169 consecutive patients with confirmed PRCC. DNA was extracted and comprehensive genomic profiling was performed in a certified central laboratory. Measurements Hybrid-capture, adaptor ligation-based libraries of up to 315 genes were sequenced to a median coverage of 648×. All classes of GAs were identified, including substitutions, insertions/deletions, copy number alterations, and rearrangements. Results and limitations From 169 patients, either primary tumor tissue (102 patients, 60%) or metastatic tissue (67 patients, 40%) was collected. In patients with type 1 PRCC, commonly altered genes were MET (33%; 8 activating mutations, 5 amplifications at >6 copies), TERT (30%), CDKN2A/B (13%), and EGFR (8%). In patients with type 2 PRCC, commonly altered genes were CDKN2A/B (18%), TERT (18%), NF2 (13%), and FH (13%); MET GAs (5 mutations, 3 amplifications) were observed in 7% of type 2 cases. Notable differences from TCGA data include higher frequencies of MET , NF2 , and CDKN2A/B GAs, association of alterations in SWI/SNF complex genes with type 2 PRCC, and observation of frequent CDKN2A/B alterations in both type 1 and type 2 disease. Conclusions Both the current study and the TCGA experience represent similarly sized cohorts of patients with PRCC. Key differences in GA frequency probably underscore the marked difference in stage distribution between these data sets. These results may inform planned precision medicine trials for metastatic PRCC. Patient summary Papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) is a rare subtype of kidney cancer, and understanding of the biology of advanced PRCC is limited. This report highlights some of the unique biologic features of PRCC that may inform on future use of targeted therapies for the treatment of metastatic disease.

The management of patients with hereditary kidney cancers presents unique challenges to clinicians. In addition to an earlier age of onset compared with patients with sporadic kidney cancer, those with hereditary kidney cancer syndromes often present with bilateral and/or multifocal renal tumors and are at risk for multiple de novo lesions. This population of patients may also present with extrarenal manifestations, which adds an additional layer of complexity. Physicians who manage these patients should be familiar with the underlying clinical characteristics of each hereditary kidney cancer syndrome and the suggested surgical approaches and recommendations of genetic testing for at-risk individuals.

Venous invasion is common in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) due to the unique biology of this cancer. The presence of a tumor thrombus often makes clinical management challenging. In this review, we detail specific preoperative, perioperative, and surgical strategies involving the care of the complex kidney cancer patient with venous tumor involvement.We performed a comprehensive review of selected peer-reviewed publications regarding RCC tumor thrombus biology, medical and surgical management techniques, and immediate and long-term outcomes.The perioperative management may require special imaging techniques, preoperative testing, very recent imaging, and consultation with other surgical services. There are various approaches to these patients as the clinical presentation, stage of disease, primary tumor size, level of thrombus, degree of venous occlusion, presence of bland thrombus, and primary tumor laterality influence management. Select patients with metastatic disease can do well with cytoreductive nephrectomy and thrombectomy. Those with localized disease have a high risk of recurrence; however, some patients can exhibit durable survival with surgery alone. The evolving surgical and medical treatments are discussed.Even when these surgeries are performed in high volume centers, significant perioperative complications are common and greater complications are seen with higher thrombus extent. If surgery is attempted, it is important for urologic oncologists to follow strict attention to specific surgical principles. These general principles include complete vascular control, avoidance of thrombus embolization, close hemodynamic monitoring, and institutional resources for caval resection/replacement and venous bypass if necessary.

Purpose: Partial and radical nephrectomy are treatments for the small renal mass. Partial nephrectomy is considered the gold standard as it may protect against renal dysfunction compared to radical nephrectomy. However, both treatments may cause adverse health outcomes.Materials and Methods: A matched cohort study was performed using the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results)-Medicare data set. Individuals treated with partial or radical nephrectomy for 4 cm or smaller nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma were compared to 2 control groups (nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer and noncancer). A greedy algorithm matched surgical groups to controls. Medicare claims were examined for renal, cardiovascular and secondary cancer events.Results: Patients who underwent partial nephrectomy (1,471) and radical nephrectomy (4,299) were matched to controls. The time to event model demonstrated an increased risk of renal events for both treatments. Compared to the bladder cancer control and noncancer control grou...