Search

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of a surgically constructed bilateral peritoneal flap (PIF) as an adjunct to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) on the incidence of lymphoceles.A total of 530 men with localized prostate cancer underwent a RARP with bilateral extended standardized PLND in a prospective randomized controlled trial. In group A, a PIF was created by suturing the margins of the bladder peritoneum to the ipsilateral endopelvic fascia at 2 points on each side. In group B, no PIF was created. The patients were followed 30 and 90 days after the surgery to assess the incidence, extent and treatment of lymphoceles.Lymphoceles occurred in 22% of group A patients and 33% of group B patients (p=0.008). Symptomatic lymphoceles were observed in 3.3% of group A patients and 8.1% of group B patients (p=0.027). Lymphoceles requiring intervention occurred significantly less frequently in group A patients (1.3%) than in group B patients (6.8%, p=0.002). The median lymphocele size was 4.3 cm in group A and 5.0 cm in group B (p=0.055). No statistically significant differences were observed in minor or major complications unrelated to lymphocele, blood loss, or surgical time between groups A and B.Bilateral PIFs in conjunction with RARP and PLND significantly reduce the total incidence of lymphoceles, the frequency of symptomatic lymphoceles and the rate of associated secondary interventions.

Background: Evidence-practice gaps exist in urology. We previously surveyed European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines for strong recommendations underpinned by high-certainty evidence that impact patient experience for which practice variations were suspected. The recommendation “Do not offer neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) before surgery for patients with prostate cancer” was prioritised for further investigation. ADT before surgery is neither clinically effective nor cost effective and has serious side effects. The first step in improving implementation problems is to understand their extent. A clear picture of practice regarding ADT before surgery across Europe is not available. Objective: To assess current ADT use before prostate cancer surgery in Europe. Design, setting, and participants: This was an observational cross-sectional study. We retrospectively audited recent ADT practices in a multicentre international setting. We used nonprobability purposive sampling, aiming for breadth in terms of low- versus high-volume, academic, versus community and public versus private centres. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Our primary outcome was adherence to the ADT recommendation. Descriptive statistics and a multilevel model were used to investigate differences between countries across different factors (volume, centre type, and funding type). Subgroup analyses were performed for patients with low, intermediate, and high risk, and for those with locally advanced prostate cancer. We also collected reasons for nonadherence. Results and limitations: We included 6598 patients with prostate cancer from 187 hospitals in 31 countries from January 1, 2017 to May 1, 2020. Overall, nonadherence was 2%, (range 0–32%). Most of the variability was found in the high-risk subgroup, for which nonadherence was 4% (range 0–43%). Reasons for nonadherence included attempts to improve oncological outcomes or preoperative tumour parameters; attempts to control the cancer because of long waiting lists; and patient preference (changing one's mind from radiotherapy to surgery after neoadjuvant ADT had commenced or feeling that the side effects were intolerable). Although we purposively sampled for variety within countries (public/private, academic/community, high/low-volume), a selection bias toward centres with awareness of guidelines is possible, so adherence rates may be overestimated. Conclusions: EAU guidelines recommend against ADT use before prostate cancer surgery, yet some guideline-discordant ADT use remains at the cost of patient experience and an additional payer and provider burden. Strategies towards discontinuation of inappropriate preoperative ADT use should be pursued. Patient summary: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is sometimes used in men with prostate cancer who will not benefit from it. ADT causes side effects such as weight gain and emotional changes and increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and osteoporosis. Guidelines strongly recommend that men opting for surgery should not receive ADT, but it is unclear how well the guidance is followed. We asked urologists across Europe how patients in their institutions were treated over the past few years. Most do not use ADT before surgery, but this still happens in some places. More research is needed to help doctors to stop using ADT in patients who will not benefit from it.

Since the introduction of minimally invasive surgery, the number of simulation models available for teaching new surgeons has continued to increase.To evaluate and validate use of a model for teaching robot-assisted pyeloplasty.Twenty simulated robot-assisted pyeloplasty procedures were performed by experienced (We evaluated the time needed to perform the procedure, and the sufficiency and patency of the anastomosis. Participants rated the efficiency, face validity, and possible acceptance of the model as part of a structured curriculum on a scale from 0 to10. Statistical significance for comparison of results was set atRobot-assisted pyeloplasty was successfully performed by 75% of the participants. The completion time was significantly higher in the novice group (The chicken crop model is a low-cost and reproducible simulation model for accomplishing both the resection and reconstructive steps during the learning phase for robot-assisted pyeloplasty.We assessed the use of chickens as a model for practicing a robot-assisted operation called pyeloplasty to fix narrowing of the ureter (the tube that drains urine from the kidney to the bladder) where it attaches to the kidney. This model can be used for simulation of robot-assisted pyeloplasty when training new robotic surgeons.