1. The urologist’s learning curve of 'in-bore' magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy
- Author
-
Jacob Ramon, Orit E. Raz, M. Shechtman, Dorit E Zilberman, G. Goldinger, Tomer Drori, Gadi Shlomai, Zohar A. Dotan, Barak Rosenzweig, and Orith Portnoy
- Subjects
Image-Guided Biopsy ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Prostate biopsy ,Urology ,Prostate MRI ,medicine ,Humans ,Learning curve ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Research ,Prostate ,Prostatic Neoplasms ,Magnetic resonance imaging ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,Diseases of the genitourinary system. Urology ,In-bore MRI ,Reproductive Medicine ,Radiology ,RC870-923 ,business - Abstract
Background The combination of multi-parametric MRI to locate and define suspected lesions together with their being targeted by an MRI-guided prostate biopsy has succeeded in increasing the detection rate of clinically significant disease and lowering the detection rate of non-significant prostate cancer. In this work we investigate the urologist’s learning curve of in-bore MRI-guided prostate biopsy which is considered to be a superior biopsy technique. Materials and methods Following Helsinki approval by The Chaim Sheba Medical Center ethics committee in accordance with The Sheba Medical Center institutional guidelines (5366-28-SMC) we retrospectively reviewed 110 IB-MRGpBs performed from 6/2016 to 1/2019 in a single tertiary center. All patients had a prostate multi-parametric MRI finding of at least 1 target lesion (prostate imaging reporting and data system [PI-RADS] score ≥ 3). We analyzed biopsy duration and clinically significant prostate cancer detection of targeted sampling in 2 groups of 55 patients each, once by a urologist highly trained in IB-MRGpBs and again by a urologist untrained in IB-MRGpBs. These two parameters were compared according to operating urologist and chronologic order. Results The patients’ median age was 68 years (interquartile range 62–72). The mean prostate-specific antigen level and prostate size were 8.6 ± 9.1 ng/d and 53 ± 27 cc, respectively. The mean number of target lesions was 1.47 ± 0.6. Baseline parameters did not differ significantly between the 2 urologists’ cohorts. Overall detection rates of clinically significant prostate cancer were 19%, 55%, and 69% for PI-RADS 3, 4 and 5, respectively. Clinically significant cancer detection rates did not differ significantly along the timeline or between the 2 urologists. The average duration of IB-MRGpB targeted sampling was 28 ± 15.8 min, correlating with the number of target lesions (p p Conclusions Our data suggest a very short learning curve for IB-MRGpB-targeted sampling duration, and that clinically significant cancer detection rates are not influenced by the learning curve of this technique.
- Published
- 2021