1. Dual staining for p16/Ki-67 to detect high-grade cervical lesions: Results from the Screening Triage Ascertaining Intraepithelial Neoplasia by Immunostain Testing study.
- Author
-
El-Zein M, Gotlieb W, Gilbert L, Hemmings R, Behr MA, and Franco EL
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Atypical Squamous Cells of the Cervix metabolism, Atypical Squamous Cells of the Cervix pathology, Atypical Squamous Cells of the Cervix virology, Cervix Uteri pathology, Cervix Uteri virology, Early Detection of Cancer methods, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Papillomaviridae isolation & purification, Papillomavirus Infections metabolism, Papillomavirus Infections pathology, Papillomavirus Infections virology, Staining and Labeling methods, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms diagnosis, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms metabolism, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms virology, Young Adult, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia diagnosis, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia metabolism, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia virology, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16 analysis, Ki-67 Antigen analysis, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms pathology, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia pathology
- Abstract
We compared clinical performance of p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology and human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping, via different algorithms-alone, or in combination with cytology-to identify cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) and grade 3 or worse (CIN3+) in women referred to as colposcopy. We included 492 cervical specimens (134 normal, 130 CIN1, 99 CIN2, 121 CIN3, 8 cancers) randomly selected from 1158 specimens with valid conventional cytology, HPV (cobas 4800 HPV test) and biopsy results. Dual-stained cytology was retrospectively performed (CINtec PLUS assay) on PreservCyt material; slides were read by a cytologist and confirmed by two pathologists, blinded to cytology, biopsy and genotyping results. Sensitivity and specificity (95% confidence intervals in parentheses) of dual-stained cytology to detect CIN2+ and CIN3+ were compared to other screening tests available for the same women. Positivity rate for dual-stained cytology increased with histological severity: 30.6% in normal, 41.5% in CIN1, 72.7% in CIN2, 86.8% in CIN3 and 87.5% in cancer. Dual-stained cytology alone had lower sensitivity than HPV testing for CIN2+ [80.7% (75.0-85.6) vs 89.9% (85.3-93.5)] and CIN3+ [86.8% (79.7-92.1) vs 92.3% (86.2-96.2)]. However, corresponding specificity values were higher [64.0% (57.9-69.8) vs 56.1% (49.8-62.1) for CIN2+; 54.0% (48.7-59.2) vs 44.4% (39.2-49.6) for CIN3+]. Combining dual-stained cytology with an ASC-US abnormality threshold decreased specificity to 31.4% (25.9-37.4) for CIN2+ and 24.2% (19.9-29.0) for CIN3+. The corresponding values considering low squamous intraepithelial lesion threshold values were 42.8% (36.8-49.0) and 35.0% (30.1-40.1). Dual-stained cytology and HPV testing exhibited similar performance, although the former improved the specificity by 7.9% and 9.6% for CIN2+ and CIN3+, respectively., (© 2020 Union for International Cancer Control.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF