Search

Background: Diagnosing non-gestational uterine choriocarcinoma in children is challenging because of its rarity and nonspecific imaging findings. Herein, we report a case of non-gestational uterine choriocarcinoma in a child, which was unexpectedly found during exploratory laparotomy and confirmed by histopathological findings. However, the tumor did not respond to chemotherapy., Case Presentation: A 4-year-old Indonesian female patient was brought into the emergency unit with chief complaint of vaginal bleeding. She had suffered from vaginal spotting 4 months before being admitted to the hospital. Physical examination revealed a distended abdomen in the left lumbar region and a palpable fixed mass with a smooth surface. Abdominal computed tomography scans revealed a large mass (10 × 6 × 12 cm) with fluid density and calcification. Thus, we suspected left ovarian teratoma. The patient's luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and lactate dehydrogenase levels were 25.2 mIU/ml, 0.1 mIU/ml, and 406 U/l, respectively. According to the clinical and radiological findings, we decided to perform an exploratory laparotomy and found a tumor originating from the uterus, not the ovarium. We did not observe liver nodules and any enlargement of abdominal lymph nodes. Subsequently, we performed hysterectomy. The histopathological findings supported the diagnosis of choriocarcinoma. The patient was discharged uneventfully on postoperative day 5. Thereafter, the patient underwent nine cycles of chemotherapy, including carboplatin (600 mg/m 2 IV), etoposide (120 mg/m 2 IV), and bleomycin (15 mg/m 2 IV). However, on the basis of the clinical findings of a palpable mass and partial intestinal obstruction, the tumor relapsed soon after the ninth cycle of chemotherapy. Currently, the patient is undergoing chemotherapy again., Conclusions: Although pure non-gestational uterine choriocarcinoma is rare, it should be considered as one of the differential diagnoses for intraabdominal tumors in a child, so as to better guide and counsel families regarding the surgical plan and prognosis, respectively. In the present case, the patient's response to chemotherapy was poor, implying that the treatment of non-gestational choriocarcinoma is still challenging, particularly in the pediatric population., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Choriocarcinoma is an uncommon malignant neoplasm, which can be either gestational or nongestational in origin. Distinction of these subtypes has prognostic and therapeutic implications. Twenty-two tumors were genotyped using polymerase chain reaction amplification of 15 short tandem repeat loci and the amelogenin locus (XY determination). DNA patterns from tumor and maternal tissue, as well as villous tissue from any available prior or concurrent gestation, were compared, to determine gestational versus nongestational nature (containing vs. lacking a paternal chromosome complement, respectively) and the relationship between the tumor and any prior or concurrent gestation. Nineteen tumors were gestational. Of these, 14 were purely androgenetic/homozygous XX: 6 uterine tumors with a concurrent or prior genetically related complete hydatidiform mole (CHM), 4 uterine tumors without an accompanying villous component, 1 uterine cornual tumor separate from a genetically distinct second trimester intrauterine placenta, 1 ectopic ovarian tumor separate from a genetically distinct third trimester intrauterine placenta, and 2 ectopic fallopian tube tumors. Five gestational tumors were biparental: 3 (2 XX, 1 XY) intraplacental choriocarcinomas genetically related to the placenta and 2 uterine tumors without accompanying placental tissue after term deliveries (1 XX 4 weeks postpartum and 1 XYY with allelic imbalances 1 year postpartum; prior placentas not available for analysis). Three tumors were nongestational: all XX with allelic imbalances; 2 ovarian, 1 pelvic. Gestational choriocarcinoma can be androgenetic or biparental. Most are androgenetic/homozygous XX, often associated with a genetically related concurrent or prior CHM, and thus of molar-associated type. These findings support that homozygous XX CHMs are associated with some risk of significant gestational trophoblastic disease. Intraplacental choriocarcinomas are biparental and genetically related to the placenta. Biparental choriocarcinoma detected in a postpartum uterine sample is consistent with undetected intraplacental choriocarcinoma. Eutopic or ectopic androgenetic choriocarcinoma separate from a concurrent intrauterine placenta is not derived from intraplacental tumor and is consistent with either a form of dispermic twin gestation (molar-type choriocarcinoma and coexistent nonmolar fetus) or origin from an antecedent molar pregnancy. While fallopian tube tumors are usually gestational, tumors in other sites (ovary, pelvis) can be nongestational and should not be assumed to be metastatic from a regressed or occult intrauterine or intraplacental gestational tumor.

Introduction: Gestational trophoblastic diseases (GTD) are a spectrum of tumors with a various of biological behavior and potential for metastases. It consists of hydatiform mole, invasive mole, choriocarcinoma and placental site trophoblastic tumor. Choriocarcinoma presents a very aggressive tumor with high malignant potential., Case Report: We presented the two cases of choriocarcinoma with brain metastases. The first one was manifested by neurological deterioration as the first sign of metastasis, while the second patient had firstly metrorrhagia and in the further couse neurological disturbances that suggested the presence of brain tumor. In both cases we applied a combined treatment of surgery, chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Both patient survived with high quality of life., Conclusion: A successful outcome of brain metastases of choriocarcinoma was obtained by the use of a combined treatment of surgery, chemotherapy and radiation therapy. In cases of young women with brain metastases, gynecological malignancy should be always considered.

Females with 46,XY complete gonadal dysgenesis are at significant risk of developing germ cell tumors, mostly gonadoblastomas. We present here the case of 2 half-sisters, sharing the same father, diagnosed with 46,XY complete gonadal dysgenesis. The 1st sister developed a gonadoblastoma and an invasive dysgerminoma, whereas the 2nd sister developed a gonadoblastoma and an invasive choriocarcinoma within the same gonad. No SRY mutation, chromosome abnormalities, or mosaicism were detected in blood. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) profiling of the choriocarcinoma revealed a complex hyperdiploid pattern with gains of 1 to 4 copies of material from several autosomes, as well as the loss of the Y chromosome and a homozygous SNP profile without copy number change for the X chromosome. Our results are in agreement with the recurrent chromosome gains and losses previously published in germ cell tumors, and the coexistence of both tumors within the same gonad suggests that choriocarcinomas may derive from gonadoblastomas.