1. Long-term outcome of abdominal sacrocolpopexy using xenograft compared with synthetic mesh.
- Author
-
Altman D, Anzen B, Brismar S, Lopez A, and Zetterström J
- Subjects
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Animals, Cervix Uteri, Cohort Studies, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Sacrum, Swine, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Urologic Surgical Procedures methods, Skin Transplantation, Surgical Mesh, Transplantation, Heterologous, Uterine Prolapse surgery
- Abstract
Objectives: To assess the clinical outcome after abdominal sacrocolpopexy using a porcine dermal graft compared with a synthetic mesh., Methods: Patients with vaginal vault prolapse Stage II or worse (Baden-Walker staging), underwent sacrocolpopexy using a synthetic mesh (n = 25) or porcine collagen graft (n = 27). The subjective outcome was measured using validated questionnaires., Results: The mean clinical follow-up from surgery was 7.1 months for the xenograft compared with 7.4 months for the synthetic cohort. At clinical follow-up, vaginal vault prolapse Stage II was present in 8 (29%) of 27 patients in the xenograft cohort and 6 (24%) of 25 patients in the synthetic mesh cohort (no significant difference). The mean follow-up from surgery to survey was 2.5 years in the xenograft cohort and 4.3 years in the synthetic cohort. None of the patients in either cohort had undergone a secondary sacrocolpopexy. No significant differences were found between the cohorts regarding surgical morbidity other than more patients experiencing fever for 1 to 3 days in the xenograft cohort (P < 0.001). No significant differences were found in lower urinary tract symptoms, anorectal symptoms, or quality-of-life variables between the two cohorts., Conclusions: Abdominal sacrocolpopexy using a porcine dermal graft was comparable to synthetic mesh in terms of subjective and anatomic outcomes at mid to long-term follow-up.
- Published
- 2006
- Full Text
- View/download PDF