1. COVID-19 vaccination preferences during a pause in Johnson & Johnson vaccine administration
- Author
-
Abram L. Wagner, Felicia Zhang, Stefania Kerekes, Shu-Fang Shih, and Lili Zhao
- Subjects
COVID-19 ,Vaccines ,Adverse reactions ,Risk perceptions ,Immunologic diseases. Allergy ,RC581-607 - Abstract
In April 2021, the US paused Janssen (J&J) COVID-19 vaccination because of reported blood clots post vaccination. This paper explores how vaccine decision-making--receiving a J&J vaccine right away vs waiting for a Pfizer vaccine--changed during the pause. In an opt-in internet-based survey April 2021 with 915 participants, 37 % were not vaccinated. Of these, 18 % would accept a J&J vaccine, 5 % would wait 1 month for a Pfizer vaccine, 25 % would wait 3 months, and 52 % would not want any vaccine. Among the unvaccinated, 56 % had heard of blood clots; 61 % of these did not want any vaccine, compared to 41 % of those who had not heard of blood clots. Moreover, among those vaccine hesitant in general, 11 % would still obtain a J&J vaccine if offered right away. These findings may suggest spillover of brand-specific adverse event concerns to the vaccine product as a whole.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF