Search

Background: Acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections (ABSSSIs) are common causes of hospital admissions. These infections are often caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; therefore, vancomycin remains a commonly used therapy. The purpose of this study was to compare hospital length of stay (LOS) in patients treated with vancomycin monotherapy vs combination therapy with clindamycin for ABSSSIs., Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 269 patients admitted with ABSSSIs to a 941-bed hospital in northern Alabama. Patients who received either vancomycin monotherapy or vancomycin in combination with clindamycin were included. The primary outcome was hospital LOS; secondary outcomes included 90-day readmission rate and the impact of the following on the primary outcome: organisms cultured, presence of abscess, incision and debridement (I&D), failure of a trial of outpatient antibiotics, and presence of diabetes., Results: Hospital LOS was similar between groups when evaluating all ABSSSIs (3.7 ± 1.5 days vs 4.0 ± 2.0 days, P = .192, combination and monotherapy, respectively). In patients with abscesses, combination therapy was significantly associated with decreased LOS by 18.2% compared with monotherapy (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.818 [.679 to .985]; P = .034). Among the entire population, significantly fewer patients in the combination group were readmitted within 90 days (5.3% vs 15.3%; P = .006; odds ratio [OR], 3.2; 95% CI [1.35 to 7.66]). The 90-day readmission rates were significantly lower among patients with abscesses as well (2.0% vs 24.3%; P = .0001; OR, 14.6; 95% CI [2.98 to 71.37])., Conclusions: Combination therapy with vancomycin and clindamycin was associated with decreased hospital LOS for patients with an abscess. The 90-day hospital readmission rates for those with ABSSSIs may be reduced when combination therapy is utilized. A larger, prospective, multicentered study is needed to validate these findings., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Vancomycin was bactericidal against Clostridium difficile at eightfold the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) using a traditional minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) assay. However, at higher concentrations up to 64 × MIC, vancomycin displayed a paradoxical “more-drug-kills-less” Eagle effect against C. difficile. To overcome challenges associated with performing the labor-intensive agar-based MBC method under anaerobic growth conditions, we investigated an alternative more convenient ATP-bioluminescence assay to assess the Eagle effect in C. difficile. The commercial BacTiter-GloTM assay is a homogenous method to determine bacterial viability based on quantification of bacterial ATP as a marker for metabolic activity. The ATP-bioluminescence assay was advantageous over the traditional MBC-type assay in detecting the Eagle effect because it reduced assay time and was simple to perform; measurement of viability could be performed in less than 10 min outside of the anaerobic chamber. Using this method, we found C. difficile survived clinically relevant, high concentrations of vancomycin (up to 2048 μg/mL). In contrast, C. difficile did not survive high concentrations of metronidazole or fidaxomicin. The Eagle effect was also detected for telavancin, but not for teicoplanin, dalbavancin, oritavancin, or ramoplanin. All four pathogenic strains of C. difficile tested consistently displayed Eagle effect resistance to vancomycin, but not metronidazole or fidaxomicin. These results suggest that Eagle effect resistance to vancomycin in C. difficile could be more prevalent than previously appreciated, with potential clinical implications. The ATP-Bioluminescence assay can thus be used as an alternative to the agar-based MBC assay to characterize the Eagle effect against a variety of antibiotics, at a wide-range of concentrations, with much greater throughput. This may facilitate improved understanding of Eagle effect resistance and promote further research to understand potential clinical relevance.