Search

Abstract: Background: Guidelines and protocols assist in the clinical management of patients, helping to utilise available resources efficiently, however, there is limited documented guidance on surveillance of patients following open arterial surgery. The frequency of clinical follow up, Doppler ultrasound measurements and radiological imaging should all be justified. Here we review the available literature to offer an evidenced based approach to postoperative care. Method: An electronic search was made of Medline and Embase databases through September 2009 revealing over 2300 studies in the initial searches. Following title and abstract screening, the relevant medical literature concerning post-operative surveillance of open vascular procedures was reviewed (300 papers). 42 papers were included in this review. Surveillance recommendations were constructed from the evidence presented. Results and conclusion: Detailed anatomical imaging is available for the technical assessment in the majority of patients’ postoperative management; however there is little Level 1 evidence to guide modality or timing. Grades B and C recommendations form the majority of surveillance recommendations. Clinical review remains the mainstay of surveillance following open peripheral arterial surgery. Duplex scanning is the imaging modality of choice when indicated in most instances. Minimal data exists to quantify quality of life or intervention efficacy. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Objectives: The peri-operative use of antiplatelet, anticoagulant and other drugs for patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is unclear and consensus is lacking. This study aimed to assess the current peri-operative practice of European vascular surgeons with respect to antiplatelet and other medications for patients undergoing CEA. Design: Online questionnaire study. Methods: Members of the Vascular Society of Great Britain & Ireland and European Society for Vascular Surgery were invited to complete an online survey in March 2008. Surgeons were asked about their preferences for the peri-operative administration of antiplatelet, statin and other medications for patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. Results: Partial or complete responses were received from 399/650 (61.4%) surgeons with a collective annual throughput of >11500 CEA procedures. For symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, 20/392 (5%) and 47/392 (12%) of surgeons would stop aspirin before surgery and 170/392 (43%) and 217/392 (55%) of surgeons would stop Clopidogrel prior to CEA. Of surgeons who would stop Clopidogrel, 84/170 (49%) and 124/217 (57%) would do so >7 days before surgery for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients respectively. 12/393 (3%) surgeons would prescribe one 75mg dose of Clopidogrel on the evening before surgery. Intra-operative Dextran was used selectively by 40/395 (10%). Only 78/393 (20%) would delay surgery to commence a statin. Intra-operatively, 348/394 (88%) used intravenous heparin, which was reversed routinely by 47/348 (13%) and selectively by 60/348 (17%). Conclusions: There appears to be broad consensus between vascular surgeons in the pharmacological management of patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy, although some variations do exist. Further clinical studies may help clarify the optimum management strategy in this patient group. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Venous disorder is common in the general population. Uncomplicated varicose veins represent a significant proportion of the disease burden, and can impact considerably on quality of life, producing a wide spectrum of symptoms. Little is known about the natural course of the disease at this stage and the treatment strategy employed is often not based on robust scientific evidence. The aim of this article is to elucidate the options to manage uncomplicated varicose veins. There are likely to be significant geographic differences in the treatment strategy employed, and it is hoped that we will arouse discussion among physicians regarding the management of this very common medical condition. The reader will be asked for their preferred treatment choice for a given clinical case vignette. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: The concept of chronic critical limb ischaemia (CLI) emerged late in the history of peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD). The historical background and changing definitions of CLI over the last decades are important to know in order to understand why epidemiologic data are so difficult to compare between articles and over time. The prevalence of CLI is probably very high and largely underestimated, and significant differences exist between population studies and clinical series. The extremely high costs associated with management of these patients make CLI a real public health issue for the future. In the era of emerging vascular surgery in the 1950s, the initial classification of PAOD by Fontaine, with stages III and IV corresponding to CLI, was based only on clinical symptoms. Later, with increasing access to non-invasive haemodynamic measurements (ankle pressure, toe pressure), the need to prove a causal relationship between PAOD and clinical findings suggestive of CLI became a real concern, and the Rutherford classification published in 1986 included objective haemodynamic criteria. The first consensus document on CLI was published in 1991 and included clinical criteria associated with ankle and toe pressure and transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO2) cut-off levels <50 mmHg, <30 mmHg and <10 mmHg respectively). This rigorous definition reflects an arterial insufficiency that is so severe as to cause microcirculatory changes and compromise tissue integrity, with a high rate of major amputation and mortality. The TASC I consensus document published in 2000 used less severe pressure cut-offs (≤50–70 mmHg, ≤30–50 mmHg and ≤30–50 mmHg respectively). The thresholds for toe pressure and especially TcPO2 (which will be also included in TASC II consensus document) are however just below the lower limit of normality. It is therefore easy to infer that patients qualifying as CLI based on TASC criteria can suffer from far less severe disease than those qualifying as CLI in the initial 1991 consensus document. Furthermore, inclusion criteria of many recent interventional studies have even shifted further from the efforts of definition standardisation with objective criteria, by including patients as CLI based merely on Fontaine classification (stage III and IV) without haemodynamic criteria. The differences in the natural history of patients with CLI, including prognosis of the limb and the patient, are thus difficult to compare between studies in this context. Overall, CLI as defined by clinical and haemodynamic criteria remains a severe condition with poor prognosis, high medical costs and a major impact in terms of public health and patients'' loss of functional capacity. The major progresses in best medical therapy of arterial disease and revascularisation procedures will certainly improve the outcome of CLI patients. In the future, an effort to apply a standardised definition with clinical and objective haemodynamic criteria will be needed to better demonstrate and compare the advances in management of these patients. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]