Search

Vegetation cover in the Loess Plateau region is an important component of ecological protection in the Yellow River Basin, and this study provides a scientific reference for further vegetation restoration. Based on Landsat images and related data, we utilized the dimidiate pixel model and Geodetector method to study the vegetation cover in the Wuding River Basin from 2000 to 2022. The results indicated the spatial and temporal distribution of the vegetation cover and its changes over the study period. Additionally, the driving factors influencing its spatial changes were also uncovered. We also propose a land use shift vegetation cover contribution formula to quantify the effect of land type change on the FVC. The study showed that (1) the overall vegetation cover of the watershed increased significantly, and the FVC showed an increasing trend from 2000 to 2013 and a slow decline from 2013 to 2022, with the gradual transformation of low-graded FVC into a higher graded one. (2) The FVC increased spatially from northwest to southeast, and the trend of future changes is mainly decreasing. (3) The strongest explanatory power for the FVC change is the land use type and its interactive combination with rainfall. (4) The conversion of grassland to cropland contributes the most to the vegetation cover at 1.52%, and the increase in the cropland area is more conducive to the increase in the vegetation cover. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Yan River Basin of the Loess Plateau is a key region for ensuring the environmental protection and sustainable development of the Yellow River Basin. Therefore, it is essential to identify how vegetation cover has changed and determine the factors that have driven these changes. In this study, we applied a three-dimensional vegetation cover model to examine the spatiotemporal variation characteristics of vegetation cover at the watershed scale in the Yan River Basin from 2001 to 2020 and forecast future trends. Subsequently, the driving forces of fractional vegetation cover (FVC) change were quantified based on meteorological, surface, and anthropogenic factors to explore the common driving relationships among these factors. (1) The accuracy of 3DFVC is better than that of FVC in the Yanhe River Basin, where the terrain is complex. (2) The temporal change trends indicated that the vegetation cover in the Yan River Basin significantly recovered and the basin FVC increased rapidly from 2001 to 2013 (S = 0.0152/a, p < 0.01) and increased gradually from 2013 to 2020 (S = 0.0015/a). The main reason for the increase in vegetation cover was the enhanced growth of medium FVC. (3) The vegetation spatial distribution showed that the FVC values varied substantially from north to south, indicating spatial heterogeneity, and 83.9% of the area presented a trend of increasing vegetation. Furthermore, vegetation cover was predicted to improve in the future. (4) The spatial heterogeneity of FVC was mainly influenced by relative humidity and rainfall, and the spatial variations in FVC were mainly determined by climate factors. Land use and cover change variations, which are influenced by human activities, represent major factors underlying the observed spatial heterogeneity. Most interactions between driving factors showed two-way enhancement or non-linear enhancement, with relative humidity and land use patterns presenting the strongest explanatory power. This study provides a scientific basis for vegetation conservation in the Yan River Basin and contributes theoretical support for decision-making regarding ecological environmental protection in the Loess Plateau and sustainable development in the Yellow River Basin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Understanding the response of vegetation to drought is of great significance to the biodiversity protection of terrestrial ecosystem. Based on the MOD13A2 NDVI, GOSIF, and SPEI data of the Yellow River Basin from 2001 to 2020, this paper used the methods of Theil–Sen median trend analysis, Mann–Kendall significance test, and Pearson correlation analysis to analyze whether the vegetation change trends monitored by MODIS and GOSIF are consistent and their sensitivity to meteorological drought. The results showed that NDVI and SIF increased significantly (p < 0.001) at the rate of 0.496 × 10−2 and 0.345 × 10−2, respectively. The significant improvement area of SIF (66.49%, p < 0.05) is higher than NDVI (50.7%, p < 0.05), and the spatial distribution trend of vegetation growth monitored by NDVI and SIF is consistent. The negative value of SPEI-12 accounts for 65.83%, with obvious periodic changes. The significant positive correlation areas of SIF-SPEI in spring, summer, and autumn (R > 0, p < 0.05) were 7.00%, 28.49%, and 2.28% respectively, which were higher than the significant positive correlation areas of NDVI-SPEI (spring: 1.79%; summer: 20.72%; autumn: 1.13%). SIF responded more strongly to SPEI in summer, and farmland SIF was significantly correlated with SPEI (0.3424, p < 0.01). The results indicate that SIF is more responsive to drought than NDVI. Analyzing the response of vegetation to meteorological drought can provide constructive reference for ecological protection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]