1. [Peripheral vertigo classification of the Otoneurology Committee of the Spanish Otorhinolaryngology Society: diagnostic agreement and update (version 2-2011)].
- Author
-
Soto-Varela A, Arán-González I, López-Escámez JA, Morera-Pérez C, Oliva-Domínguez M, Pérez-Fernández N, Pérez-Garrigues H, Pérez-Vázquez P, Rossi-Izquierdo M, and Santos-Pérez S
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Child, Consensus, Female, Humans, Male, Medical Records, Middle Aged, Otolaryngology, Societies, Medical, Spain, Vertigo diagnosis, Vertigo physiopathology, Young Adult, Observer Variation, Vertigo classification
- Abstract
Introduction: In 2008, the Otoneurology committee of the SEORL-PCF published a classification of peripheral vertigo, based on clinical criteria. The objective of this study was to validate this classification through analysing the diagnostic agreement among several medical assessors., Methods: Seven medical assessors, all with clinical experience, from 6 different hospitals, participated in the study. One of them selected the clinical histories of 50 consecutive patients who had consulted as a result of balance disorders (24 men and 26 women) with an average age of 53.5 years. These clinical histories -without any information that would identify the patient, the diagnosis established and the treatment- were sent to another 6 assessors. Each of these investigators established their own diagnosis, trying to adjust it to the epigraphs of the classification., Results: Of the 50 patients, there was substantial agreement as to the diagnosis (4 or more evaluators indicated the same one) in 31 cases (26 with a positive diagnosis and 5 with a negative one, which could not be included in any epigraph). The kappa index, which measures the level of accordance between 2 or more assessors, was 0.4198 (moderate level of agreement). Unanimity was achieved in only 7 cases (4 BPPV, 2 Ménière's disease and 1 vertigo associated with migraine)., Conclusions: The current classification, with the criteria it includes, allows labelling with an acceptable consensus to only 62% of the patients. Therefore, a modification in the classification is proposed in relation with the probable BPPV epigraph, as well a revision of the entries for vertigo-migraine and vertigo associated with migraine., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier España, S.L. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF