Search

Copyright of Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia is the property of Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Objective: We aimed to describe the clinical and phenotypic manifestations as well as the visual prognosis of a family with CA in Northeastern Brazil. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study involving 31 individuals (56 eyes) from the same family presenting CA phenotypes. The study population resided in the municipality of Água Branca, in the backlands of the state of Alagoas, Northeastern Brazil. The clinical and phenotypic variables were analyzed. For the analysis, descriptive statistics (absolute and relative frequency and measures of central tendency and dispersion) and inferential statistics (Shapiro–Wilk and Student’s t tests) were used, with 95% confidence intervals and significance set at 5%. Results: Of the 31 individuals, 18 (58.1%) were male, with a mean age of 27.45 ± 17.49 years, with no difference between sexes. Of the 56 eyes evaluated, 26 and 30 were right and left eyes, respectively; 61.3% (n = 19) individuals had complete bilateral aniridia and 25.8% (n = 8) reported a total loss of light perception in both the eyes. The most prevalent ocular abnormalities were nystagmus (n = 27; 87.09%), cataract (n = 20; 64.5%), strabismus (n = 14; 45.2%), corneal changes such as opacities and/or vascularization (n = 13; 41.93%), and ectopia lentis (n = 6; 19.4%). Further, 13 individuals underwent retinal optical coherence tomography, six man and seven women aged 9–48 (mean, 30.15 ± 15.9) years. All patients presented absence of foveal depression as well as reduced macular thickness and visual acuity. Nine subjects underwent phacoemulsification. Conclusion: The study showed wide phenotypic variation among the studied individuals, with poor visual prognosis. The study highlights the need to establish comprehensive care mechanisms for families with the disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Autologous platelet concentrates are rich in growth factors and have shown potential for high anatomical success rates in macular hole treatment. However, no systematic review has yet assessed its impact. Therefore, this study aimed to conduct a comprehensive review and metaanalysis on the comparative efficacy and safety of autologous platelet concentrates in treating macular hole. A systematic review of the literature on autologous platelet concentrate therapy for macular hole was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines on September 9, 2023. Databases, including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase, were queried. A meta-analysis of random effects was performed. Efficacy was evaluated through anatomical closure, reopening of the macular hole at 6 months, average improvement of 2 lines, and visual field loss. Safety was evaluated by monitoring complications. A systematic search of multiple databases identified six studies (three randomized controlled trials and three non-randomized cohort studies) involving 616 patients (626 eyes). Autologous platelets concentrate therapy significantly improved macular hole closure compared to that in the controls (OR=4.35; 95%CI=2.08-9.10; p<0.0001; I²=9%). No significant differences were observed in hole reopening at 6 months, post-operative visual acuity improvement by 2 lines or more, or visual field loss between autologous platelets concentrate and control groups. The overall complication rates were similar between groups. Thus, autologous platelet concentrate therapy shows promise for promoting macular hole closure, particularly in smaller holes. Further research with standardized protocols, prolonged follow-ups, and larger sample sizes is needed to fully understand its benefits and limitations in macular hole closure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia is the property of Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)