Search

Background: Instrumented treadmills are potentially useful tools for the assessment of gait parameters in orthopaedic clinical settings, but their measurement properties remain uncertain., Research Question: What is the discriminant validity and reproducibility of spatiotemporal and kinetic gait parameters measured by a pressure-instrumented treadmill at different speeds and inclinations in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA)?, Methods: A total of 54 patients with unilateral KOA and 23 healthy controls took part in the study. Step length, single-limb support duration and ground reaction force were recorded during level and uphill walking at 3 and 4 km/h using a commercially-available treadmill instrumented with an integrated pressure platform. We examined discriminant validity (difference between involved and uninvolved side as well as against healthy controls) and test-retest reproducibility (reliability and agreement)., Results: Significant side differences were observed for single-limb support duration and ground reaction force at touchdown in all conditions (P < 0.05). All the investigated gait parameters showed acceptable reliability and agreement, except step length at 4 km/h uphill., Significance: We conclude that the pressure-instrumented treadmill used in this study may have good clinical utility for quantitative gait analysis in patients with KOA under different experimental conditions., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Regular infant carrying might be a contributing factor for the development and progression of low back and pelvic girdle pain in mothers after childbirth. However, the neuromechanical adaptations of the spine due to different sling-based carrying techniques are not sufficiently well understood in order to provide evidence-based carrying recommendations., Research Question: What are the immediate effects of different sling-based infant carrying techniques on trunk neuromechanics?, Methods: Using a Vicon motion capture and a wireless surface electromyography system, three-dimensional pelvis and spinal kinematics as well as activation patterns of eight trunk muscles were derived from fifteen healthy young women during upright standing and level walking without carrying a load and while carrying a 6 kg-dummy with a sling in front and on either side. Data were analyzed using Statistical Parametric Mapping, allowing group comparisons of discrete parameters (standing) as well as continuous data (walking). To distinguish between clinically relevant and clinically not relevant kinematic findings, statistically significant differences were only considered in case of ≥5°., Results: Compared to unloaded walking, carrying the dummy in front was mainly associated with increased lumbar lordosis (standing: (Δ8.8°, p = 0.006; walking: (Δ ≥ 8.2°, 1-100% of gait cycle [%GC], p < 0.001). When carrying the dummy on the preferred side, increased thoracic kyphosis (standing: ≥6.4°, p ≤ 0.003; walking: Δ ≥ 5.6°, 1-100%GC, p < 0.001) and axial rotation towards the ipsilateral side (standing: Δ5.3°, p = 0.003; walking: Δ ≥ 5.0°, 46-58%GC, p = 0.002) were observed. All three conditions entailed increased paraspinal muscle activity during walking, although only unilaterally in side carrying (lumbar, preferred condition: Δ ≥ 13.2%maxMVIC, 49-57%GC, p < 0.001; thoracic, non-preferred condition: Δ ≥ 5.3%maxMVIC, 47-58%GC, p < 0.001)., Significance: Carrying an infant alternating on both sides using a sling could be advantageous for preventing musculoskeletal pain resulting from excessive lumbar hyperextension and paraspinal muscle hyperactivation in women after childbirth., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Videofluoroscopy has been shown to provide essential information in the evaluation of the functionality of total knee arthroplasties. However, due to the limitation in the field of view, most systems can only assess knee kinematics during highly restricted movements. To avoid the limitations of a static image intensifier, a moving fluoroscope has been presented as a standalone system that allows tracking of the knee during multiple complete cycles of level- and downhill-walking, as well as stair descent, in combination with the synchronous assessment of ground reaction forces and whole body skin marker measurements. Here, we assess the ability of the system to keep the knee in the field of view of the image intensifier. By measuring ten total knee arthroplasty subjects, we demonstrate that it is possible to maintain the knee to within 1.8 ± 1.4 cm vertically and 4.0 ± 2.6 cm horizontally of the centre of the intensifier throughout full cycles of activities of daily living. Since control of the system is based on real-time feedback of a wire sensor, the system is not dependent on repeatable gait patterns, but is rather able to capture pathological motion patterns with low inter-trial repeatability.

Background: Understanding the functionality of total ankle arthroplasties (TAA) requires thorough knowledge of the kinematics during activities of daily life. Videofluoroscopy enables the in vivo measurement of the 3D kinematics of implant components more accurately than by means of skin marker tracking. The aim of the present preliminary study was to quantify the 3D kinematics of a TAA during the stance phase of level and slope walking using single plane videofluoroscopy., Methods: The experimental set up consisted of a videofluoroscopy system (BV Pulsera, Philips Medical Systems, Switzerland, 25 Hz, 1 ms shutter time) integrated in a walkway, allowing the assessment of free level gait, uphill, downhill and cross-slope walking. 2D/3D registration was performed using the CAD models of the TAA. In a preliminary feasibility study, the presented method was applied on four patients with successful unilateral TAA (Mobility™ Total Ankle, DePuy) with good outcomes., Results: Isolated 3D TAA kinematics was quantified with a rotational and translational error of 0.2 degrees and 0.4 mm in plane and 1.3 degrees and 2.1 mm out of plane. In the feasibility study it was found that only minor limitations occurred in sagittal plane motion. Any restrictions were caused by a limitation in dorsiflexion, whereas plantarflexion was for all gait conditions sufficiently provided. Transverse and frontal plane rotation was marginal, the main rotation occurred around the talar construction axis itself., Conclusion: The presented method enabled accurate estimation of the 3D TAA kinematics in vivo, without being limited by skin movement artifacts and isolated from subtalar motion. Since the available amount of dorsiflexion is the crucial factor to allow unrestrictive gait, walking uphill is an appropriate motion task to challenge and evaluate the performance of the TAA., Clinical Relevance: The presented method has the potential to identify specific kinematic patterns and thereby help clinicians and implant developers to evaluate current designs and future design modifications.

Background: Gait analysis is an important instrument in clinical research and results should be objective. The purpose of this study was to quantify clinical outcomes of two biomechanical models with different anatomical coordinate systems and angle decomposition strategies for knee joint kinematics., Methods: The study was designed to compare a functional approach and a predictive approach with a single comprehensive marker set. 10 healthy subjects and 12 subjects with knee osteoarthritis were analysed. Distinctive gait variables were averaged across five trials. Agreement between methods was illustrated with the so-called levels of agreement. Differences between models were quantified using a paired t-test or Wilcoxon-Signed Rank test in case of non-normality (Shapiro-Wilk test). Unpaired t-tests/Wilcoxon tests were used to compare gait variables between healthy subjects and subjects with knee osteoarthritis, and to examine whether statistical analysis of this comparison would yield different data interpretations when using different models., Findings: Outcome variables differed between the functional and predictive approaches in the sagittal plane (0.1-3.1°), and transverse plane (1.0-3.7°). With respect to the range of motion in the given movement plane, variables in the sagittal plane of the knee were more consistent between methods. The functional approach was more sensitive for detecting differences between groups for sagittal plane kinematics. Statistical analysis for transverse plane kinematics differed substantially between models., Interpretation: Sensitivity to detect differences of kinematic data between population groups can vary between biomechanical models. Rotational gait variables are inconsistent between models and should not be used as clinical outcome variables in daily routine., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Before conclusions can be drawn with respect to the quality of adaptations in human gait, the day-to-day consistency of the variables of interest must be known. The present study estimated the day-to-day consistency of kinematic variables collected during barefoot walking and running. Sixteen healthy subjects performed two gait analysis sessions based on skin markers. Test sessions were at least 1 week apart. In total, 48 ranges of motion were monitored for the hip, knee, ankle, and midfoot joint. Based on differences between the repeated gait analysis sessions, the day-to-day consistency was estimated. It was found that the day-to-day consistency was of the magnitude of 3 to 4 degrees for almost all ranges of motion independently of the test condition, the investigated joints, or the cardinal body plane. It was concluded that future studies on effects of interventions or on the characterization of pathological versus normative gait should consider the provided values of day-to-day consistency to improve their interpretation and conclusions.

The goal of this study was to compare selected parameters of vertical ground reaction forces (GRF) of good outcome patients with different prosthesis designs with a matched control group during level walking, stair ascent and descent. Forty subjects, 29 with three main implant designs (including four subjects with a passive knee flexion restriction), and 11 healthy controls were measured with 8-10 repetitions. Vertical ground reaction forces were measured during two consecutive steps with force plates embedded in the walkway and the staircase. Defined parameters of the force signals were used to compare the results of the test groups. The results show, that, postoperatively, good outcome patients produce gait patterns of the vertical ground reaction force which are comparable to normal healthy subjects with the exception of a few distinct differences: a significant reduction (p<0.05) in the vertical loading on the operated side during level walking at take-off, at weight acceptance and take-off during stair ascent of the normal stair. During stair descent, the patients did not reduce load on the operated side, but increased load variation and side-to-side asymmetry; thus, the mechanical loads on the implants were high, which may be important information with respect to loading protocols of knee implant simulators. No systematic differences in any of the test parameters were found between posterior cruciate-retaining (LCS MB and Innex CR) versus non-retaining (LCS RP and Innex UCOR) implant designs. The restricted group showed significant reductions (p<0.05) of several loading parameters as well as an increased side-to-side asymmetry. About one third of the force parameters of the good outcome patients showed a side-to-side asymmetry between two consecutive steps, which was over a proposed level of acceptance.

A comparison of natural versus replaced tibio-femoral kinematics in vivo during challenging activities of daily living can help provide a detailed understanding of the mechanisms leading to unsatisfactory results and lay the foundations for personalised implant selection and surgical implantation, but also enhance further development of implant designs towards restoring physiological knee function. The aim of this study was to directly compare in vivo tibio-femoral kinematics in natural versus replaced knees throughout complete cycles of different gait activities using dynamic videofluoroscopy. Twenty-seven healthy and 30 total knee replacement subjects (GMK Sphere, GMK PS, GMK UC) were assessed during multiple complete gait cycles of level walking, downhill walking, and stair descent using dynamic videofluoroscopy. Following 2D/3D registration, tibio-femoral rotations, condylar antero-posterior translations, and the location of the centre of rotation were compared. The total knee replacement groups predominantly experienced reduced tibial internal/external rotation and altered medial and lateral condylar antero-posterior translations compared to natural knees. An average medial centre of rotation was found for the natural and GMK sphere groups in all three activities, whereas the GMK PS and UC groups experienced a more central to lateral centre of rotation. Each total knee replacement design exhibited characteristic motion patterns, with the GMK Sphere most closely replicating the medial centre of rotation found for natural knees. Despite substantial similarities between the subject groups, none of the implant geometries was able to replicate all aspects of natural tibio-femoral kinematics, indicating that different implant geometries might best address individual functional needs. • Each total knee replacement design exhibited characteristic motion patterns. • GMK Sphere closest replicated the medial centre of rotation found in natural knees. • No implant was able to replicate all aspects of natural tibio-femoral kinematics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Prevalence of knee osteoarthritis increases because life expectancy continues to rise with an active patient population. Hence, the concept of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has regained popularity as a treatment option for unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis. Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency is widely considered as a contraindication for UKA, however, there are conflicting reports. If otherwise indicated, some surgeons consider UKA for ACL-deficient patients using a modified surgical technique, with a reduction of posterior tibial slope.Research Question: The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes in UKA patients with ACL deficiency in comparison to a conventional UKA group (intact ACL) by the measurement of knee kinematics and kinetics.Methods: Ten patients with conventional UKA and an intact ACL and eight patients with an ACL-deficient UKA and a reduced posterior tibial slope relative to the native knee were recruited. Three-dimensional joint kinematics of the knee were measured, using skin markers and an infrared optical motion capture system. Ground reaction forces (GRF) were measured with force plates in all three directions. Level walking, ramp descent and stair descent were analyzed, comparing implanted and contralateral native knees and the two UKA groups.Results: No significant differences in kinetics and kinematics were observed between conventional UKA and ACL-deficient UKA groups for any of the activities. However, some asymmetries in GRF between the implanted and contralateral side were present for the ACL-deficient group, during level walking (unloading rate) and stair descent (stance time).Significance: Promising outcomes of the ACL-deficient UKA group suggest that ACL deficiency may not always be a contraindication. Therefore, ACL-deficient UKA could be an alternative treatment option to total knee arthroplasty for an appropriate surgeon selected patient population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]