Search

Objective: Oure review aimed to examine evidence on the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) vs Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in patients with solid organ transplants. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science libraries were searched from inception to 25th November 2023 for all studies comparing DOAC with VKA in solid organ recipients. Results: Nine studies were included with patients who had undergone kidney, heart, or liver transplants. Meta-analysis showed that patients receiving DOAC had a significantly reduced risk of composite bleeding as compared to those with VKA (RR: 0.45 95% CI: 0.30, 0.68 I²=25%). However, the risk of major bleeding was not significantly different between the two groups (RR: 0.76 95% CI: 0.40, 1.42 I²=37%). Pooled analysis showed that the risk of VTE (RR: 0.90 95% CI: 0.72, 1.13 I²=0%) and ischemic stroke (RR: 0.87 95% CI: 0.39, 1.94 I²=12%) was not significantly different between DOAC and VKA groups. Conclusion: Limited data shows that DOAC are safe and effective in patients with solid organ transplants. The overall risk of bleeding may be reduced with the use of DOAC. There is a need for randomized controlled trials comparing DOAC and VKA in such patients to obtain high-quality evidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Oral anticoagulants (OACs), such as apixaban and warfarin, are indicated for reducing the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and are often initiated in the hospital. The aim of this study was to evaluate OAC continuity from inpatient to outpatient settings and the risk of recurrent VTE among patients with an initial event. Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized hospital charge data and medical and prescription claims from 1 July 2016 to 31 December 2022 to identify adults treated with apixaban or warfarin while hospitalized for VTE. Patients were followed to assess switching or discontinuation post-discharge and the risk of recurrent VTE. The index date was the date of the first apixaban or warfarin claim within 30 days post-discharge. Results: Of the 19,303 eligible patients hospitalized with VTE, 85% (n = 16,401) were treated with apixaban and 15% (n = 2902) received warfarin. After discharge, approximately 70% had ≥1 fill for their respective apixaban or warfarin therapy. The cumulative incidence of discontinuation over the 6 months following index was 50.5% and 52.2% for the apixaban and warfarin cohorts, respectively; the cumulative incidence of switching was 6.0% and 20.9%, respectively. The incidence rates of recurrent VTE were 1.2 and 2.5 per 100 person-years for the apixaban and warfarin cohorts, respectively. Conclusions: The majority of patients continued their apixaban or warfarin therapy following hospital discharge; however, a considerable proportion either switched or discontinued OAC upon transitioning from inpatient care. Among those who continued therapy, discontinuation, switch, and recurrent VTE occurred less often with apixaban vs. warfarin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Literature on the preferred anticoagulant for treating left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is lacking. Thus, our objective was to compare the efficacy of DOACs versus warfarin in treating LVT. Methods: Databases were searched for RCTs and adjusted observational studies that compared DOAC versus warfarin through March 2024. The primary efficacy outcomes of interest were LVT resolution, systemic embolism, composite of stroke, and TIA. The primary safety outcomes encompassed all-cause mortality and bleeding events. Results: Our meta-analysis including 31 studies demonstrated that DOAC use was associated with higher odds of thrombus resolution (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.86–1.31, p: 0.46). A statistically significant reduction in the risk of stroke/TIA was observed in the DOAC group versus the warfarin group (OR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.48–0.89, p: 0.007). Furthermore, statistically significant reduced risks of all-cause mortality (OR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.47–0.98, p: 0.04) and bleeding events (OR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.55–0.89, p: 0.004) were observed with DOAC use as compared to warfarin use. Conclusion: Compared to VKAs, DOACs are noninferior as the anticoagulant of choice for LVT treatment. However, further studies are warranted to confirm these findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) for managing atrial fibrillation (AF) encompasses vitamin K antagonists (VKAs, such as warfarin), which was the mainstay of anticoagulation therapy before 2010, and direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs, namely dabigatran etexilate, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban), approved for the prevention of AF stroke over the last thirteen years. Due to the lower risk of major bleeding associated with DOACs, anticoagulant switching is a common practice in AF patients. Nevertheless, there are issues related to OAT switching that still need to be fully understood, especially for patients in whom AF and heart failure (HF) coexist. Herein, the effective impact of the therapeutic switching from warfarin to DOACs in HF patients with AF, in terms of cardiac remodeling, clinical status, endothelial function and inflammatory biomarkers, was assessed by a machine learning (ML) analysis of a clinical database, which ultimately shed light on the real positive and pleiotropic effects mediated by DOACs in addition to their anticoagulant activity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Warfarin remains the most prescribed oral anticoagulant of choice in atrial fibrillation (AF) patient in resource-limited settings. Despite evidence linking Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR) to patient outcomes, its use in clinical practice is not widespread. This prospective study explores the impact of a TTR-INR guided Warfarin adjustment protocol on TTR in AF patients. Conducted at the Warfarin clinic of King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital. TTR was calculated using the Rosendaal linear interpolation method at baseline, and then at 6 and 12 months post-protocol implementation. The primary outcome was the improvement in TTR following the protocol's implementation. The study analyzed 57 patients, with a mean age of 72 years and an even gender distribution. At baseline, 53% of patients had a TTR of less than 65%. However, TTR significantly improved from 65% at baseline to 80% after 12 months of protocol implementation (p < 0.001). Furthermore, there was a significant increase in the proportion of patients with a TTR of 65% or more, from 47 to 88% (p < 0.001). During the follow-up period in the first 12 months, three patients died, but no ischemic or major bleeding events occurred. The significant improvement in TTR after 12 months of protocol implementation suggests that this strategy could provide additional value in improving TTR and outcomes in AF patients receiving Warfarin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) worsens the long-term prognosis of patients with cirrhosis; however, the optimal treatment remains to be determined. Reports on the efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants are increasing, and further evidence is needed. Therefore, we investigated the effectiveness of treatment with edoxaban in patients with PVT. We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of edoxaban and warfarin as antithrombotic therapies for PVT. The median overall survival time was 4.2 years in patients with PVT, with a 1-year survival rate of 70.7% and a 5-year survival rate of 47.9%. The leading cause of death was hepatocellular carcinoma. The overall response rate for thrombolysis in the edoxaban group was 76.7% compared to 29.4% in the warfarin group, and edoxaban significantly improved PVT compared to warfarin. In addition, edoxaban provided long-term improvement of PVT. Warfarin, on the other hand, was temporarily effective but did not provide long-term benefits. The Child–Pugh and albumin-bilirubin scores did not change after edoxaban or warfarin use. No deaths occurred due to adverse events associated with edoxaban or warfarin. Edoxaban as a single agent can achieve long-term recanalization without compromising the hepatic reserves. Edoxaban is easy to initiate, even in an outpatient setting, and could become a major therapeutic agent for the treatment of PVT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• There have been still limited data on the transition of management strategies and clinical outcomes after introduction of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the real-world clinical practice. • In the current historical comparison of cancer-associated VTE between the 2 large real-world registries, there was a striking change in the treatment strategies with decreased risks of recurrent VTE and major bleeding in the DOAC era (COMAAND VTE Registry-2) compared with those in the warfarin era (COMAAND VTE Registry-1). • The risks of recurrent VTE has decreased significantly with the transition to the DOAC era, while there seemed to be unmet needs of clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, DOAC-related gastrointestinal bleeding, and home treatment for pulmonary embolism patients with cancer. There have been still limited data on the transition of management strategies and clinical outcomes after introduction of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the real-world clinical practice. Using the 2 series of multicenter COMMAND VTE registries in Japan enrolling consecutive patients with acute symptomatic VTE, we compared 695 patients with cancer-associated VTE in the Registry-1 of the warfarin era and 1507 patients in the Registry-2 of the DOAC era. Regarding oral anticoagulation therapy, 576 patients (82.9 %) in the Registry-1 received warfarin, whereas 1119 patients (79.6 %) in the Registry-2 received DOACs. The cumulative 3-year incidence of discontinuation of anticoagulation was not significantly different between the 2 registries (56.7 % vs. 62.7 %, P = 0.11). The cumulative 5-year incidence of recurrent VTE was significantly lower in the Registry-2 than in the Registry-1 (17.7 % vs. 10.1 %, P < 0.001). The cumulative 5-year incidence of major bleeding was significantly lower in the Registry-2 than in the Registry-1 (26.6 % vs. 20.4 %, P = 0.045). The proportion of gastrointestinal bleeding numerically increased from the Registry-1 to the Registry-2 (46.7 % and 49.5 %), whereas that of intracranial bleeding numerically decreased from the Registry-1 to the Registry-2 (17.1 % and 14.1 %). In the current historical comparison of cancer-associated VTE between the 2 large real-world registries, there was a striking change in the treatment strategies with decreased risks of recurrent VTE and major bleeding in the DOAC era compared with those in the warfarin era, while there seemed to be unmet needs of DOAC-related gastrointestinal bleeding. URL: http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm UMIN000044816. We compared the management strategies and clinical outcomes of patients with cancer-associated VTE between the COMMAND VTE Registry-1 (Warfarin era) and Registry-2 (DOAC era). The lower adjusted risk of the Registry-2 relative to the Registry-1 was significant for recurrent VTE, but not for major bleeding. CRNMB, clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding; DOAC, direct oral anticoagulant; VTE, venous thromboembolism; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Warfarin is the only oral anticoagulant recommended in women who are breastfeeding. Although warfarin is a compatible and recommended agent in the postpartum period and during lactation, little is known regarding changes to warfarin dose requirements in this patient population. Here, we report the case of a 40‐year‐old woman who transitioned from enoxaparin monotherapy back to warfarin at 2 months postpartum, while she was breastfeeding. Despite resuming warfarin at her previously therapeutic dose, her international normalized ratio (INR) remained subtherapeutic and required multiple dose increases. She ultimately required a 100% increase in her warfarin dose postpartum, compared to pre‐pregnancy, to achieve a therapeutic INR. This case suggests patients may require higher warfarin doses postpartum, compared to pre‐pregnancy, especially if breastfeeding. Clinicians should closely monitor these patients and adjust warfarin doses as necessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recently, a once-daily dose of edoxaban (15-mg) has been approved for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients aged ≥ 80 years, in whom standard oral anticoagulants are not recommended because of high bleeding risk (HBR), based on the ELDERCARE-AF trial. However, information regarding the characteristics and clinical outcomes among such patients is limited. Thus, this study aimed to clarify the characteristics and event rates in elderly patients with NVAF and HBR defined by the ELDERCARE-AF criteria. Of the 7406 NVAF outpatients included in the J-RHYTHM Registry, 60 patients with creatinine clearance (CrCl) < 15 mL/min were excluded. The remaining 7346 patients (age, 69.7 ± 9.9 years; men, 70.9%; warfarin use, 78.7%) were divided into three groups: Group 1, aged < 80 years (n = 6165); Group 2, aged ≥ 80 years without HBR (n = 584); and Group 3, aged ≥ 80 years with HBR (at least one of the followings; CrCl, 15–30 mL/min, history of bleeding, body weight ≤ 45 kg, and antiplatelet use) (n = 597, eligible for 15-mg edoxaban). Patients in Group 3 had a higher prevalence of comorbidities, and therefore, both higher thromboembolic and bleeding risk scores than in the other groups. During the 2-year follow-up period, the incidence rates (per 100 person-years) of thromboembolism in Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 0.7, 1.5, and 2.1 (P < 0.001), major hemorrhage, 0.8, 1.2, and 2.0 (P < 0.001), and all-cause death, 0.8, 2.6, and 4.6 (P < 0.001), respectively. Adjusted hazard ratios of Group 3 were 1.64 (95% confidence interval 0.89–3.04, P = 0.116) for thromboembolism, 1.53 (0.85–2.72, P = 0.154) for major hemorrhage, and 1.84 (1.19–2.85, P = 0.006) for all-cause death compared with Group 1. The NVAF Patients aged ≥ 80 years with HBR defined by the ELDERCARE-AF criteria were certainly at a higher adverse event risk, especially for all-cause death. Clinical trial registration: The J-RHYTHM Registry is registered in the University Hospital Medicine Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry (unique identifier: UMIN000001569) http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Epistaxis is vascular bleeding in the area of the nasal mucosa. Anticoagulation therapy increases the incidence of epistaxis. Anticoagulants are divided into direct and indirect depending on their effects. Direct anticoagulants are primarily novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs). Warfarin belongs to the group of indirect anticoagulants. Methodology: The retrospective study evaluates the benefit of the introduction of NOACs for otorhinolaryngology in connection with the occurrence of severe epistaxis. A comparison was done of the number of hospitalized adult patients with epistaxis over the course of 6 years during warfarin and NOAC treatment who were hospitalized with epistaxis at the ENT department of KNTB in Zlín between 2017–2022. The patient's age and gender were also monitored. The severity of epistaxis was evaluated in relation to the used nasal packing and general anesthesia. The relationship with SÚKL data on the number of issued anticoagulant drugs is described. Results: During 6 years, a total of 221 patients were hospitalized for epistaxis, 32 were taking warfarin, and 20 were taking NOACs. The average age of patients with anticoagulant treatment was 78 years, represented by 61.5% men and 38.5% women. Over the years, we see a decrease in the number of epistaxis cases in warfarin patients; with NOACs the number is stationary. According to SÚKL statistics on preparations delivered to pharmacies in 2017 and 2022, there was a decrease in the prescription of warfarin by 44%; on the contrary, an increase of NOAC was up to 170%. Conclusion: With the decrease in the prescription of warfarin, we observe a reduced number of hospitalizations with severe epistaxis with this type of treatment. On the contrary, the increase in anticoagulation therapy with preparations from the NOAC group does not lead to an increase in the incidence of epistaxis, which also benefits the ENT field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of non–vitamin-K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) across the spectrum of body mass index (BMI) and body weight (BW) remain uncertain. METHODS: We analyzed data from COMBINE AF (A Collaboration Between Multiple Institutions to Better Investigate Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant Use in Atrial Fibrillation), which pooled patient-level data from the 4 pivotal randomized trials of NOAC versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were stroke or systemic embolic events (stroke/SEE) and major bleeding, respectively; secondary outcomes were ischemic stroke/SEE, intracranial hemorrhage, death, and the net clinical outcome (stroke/SEE, major bleeding, or death). Each outcome was examined across BMI and BW. Because few patients had a BMI <18.5 kg/m² (n=598), the primary analyses were restricted to those with a BMI ≥18.5 kg/m². RESULTS: Among 58464 patients, the median BMI was 28.3 (interquartile range, 25.2–32.2) kg/m², and the median BW was 81.0 (interquartile range, 70.0–94.3) kg. The event probability of stroke/SEE was lower at a higher BMI irrespective of treatment, whereas the probability of major bleeding was lower at a higher BMI with warfarin but relatively unchanged across BMI with NOACs. NOACs reduced stroke/SEE overall (adjusted hazard ratio [HRadj], 0.80 [95% CI, 0.73–0.88]; P<0.001), with a generally consistent effect across BMI (Ptrend across HRs, 0.48). NOACs also reduced major bleeding overall (HRadj, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.82–0.94]; P<0.001), but with attenuation of the benefit at a higher BMI (trend test across BMI [Ptrend], 0.003). The overall treatment effects of NOACs versus warfarin for secondary outcomes were consistent across BMI, with the exception of the net clinical outcome and death. While these outcomes were overall reduced with NOACs (net clinical outcome, HRadj, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.87–0.95]; P<0.001; death, HRadj, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.86–0.97]; P=0.003), these benefits were attenuated at higher BMI (Ptrend, 0.001 and 0.08, respectively). All findings were qualitatively similar when analyzed across BW. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment effect of NOACs versus warfarin in atrial fibrillation is generally consistent for stroke/SEE across the spectrum of BMI and BW, whereas the reduction in major bleeding is attenuated in those with higher BMI or BW. Death and the net clinical outcome are overall reduced with NOACs over warfarin, although there remain uncertainties for these outcomes at a very high BMI and BW. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Warfarin is the most commonly used oral anticoagulant in the treatment and prophylaxis of thromboembolic diseases. In order to prevent thrombosis and to avoid hemorrhagic complications, the patient's International Normalized Ratio (INR) is kept within a certain range according to the indication and monitored at certain intervals. Our aim in our study is to determine the percentage of patients using warfarin for various indications reaching target INR values. Methods: Patients who used warfarin for various indications at our hospital's Internal Medicine outpatient clinic between May 2023 and November 2023 were included in our study, and their INR results were recorded by retrospectively scanning them. Results: A study group was formed with a total of 130 patients. Patients using warfarin due to metallic heart valve replacement, AF, PTE and CVD were evaluated separately according to the target INR value. The percentage of patients with metallic heart valve replacement reaching the target INR value of 2.5-3.5 was calculated as 38.5% (n: 27). The percentages of patients with AF, PTE and CVD reaching their target INR values of 2-3 were calculated as 40% (n:16), 54% (n:7), 70% (n:5), respectively. Considering the entire study group, the percentage of reaching the target INR was calculated as 42% (n: 55). Conclusion: As a result, warfarin not being within the therapeutic range causes serious morbidity and mortality. In our study, the percentage of patients reaching the target INR was found to be 42%. This percentage is very low, and in order to increase this rate, it is necessary to increase patient awareness, increase the frequency of follow-up of patients and develop more effective follow-up strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Oral anticoagulation therapy with warfarin or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is the mainstay for stroke prevention in patients with non‐valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). The DOACs might have a lower risk of declining renal function than warfarin. This study aimed to compare renal outcomes among rivaroxaban, edoxaban, dabigatran, and warfarin. Method: This cohort study identified 2203 adults with AF who started anticoagulation therapy between 1 July 2013 and 31 December 2020, in a clinical database at a single centre. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was adopted to balance baseline characteristics among four anticoagulants treatment groups. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiac and renal outcomes, involving a ≥30% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), renal failure and cardiovascular death. Results: After propensity score weighting, dabigatran was associated with significantly lower risks of a ≥30% decline in eGFR (hazard ratio [HR]:.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]:.497–.951, p =.0237), doubling of the serum creatinine level (HR:.49, 95% CI:.259–.927, p =.0282) and the cardiac and renal outcome composite (HR:.67, 95% CI:.485–.913, p =.0115) than warfarin. Rivaroxaban and edoxaban did not show significant protective effects on renal outcomes compared to warfarin. Conclusion: In this study, patients treated with dabigatran had significantly reduced risks of declining renal function and composite cardiac and renal events than those treated with warfarin. However, rivaroxaban and edoxaban were not associated with lower risks of any renal outcomes than warfarin. More studies are warranted to investigate and compare the impact of renal function between different DOACs in patients with AF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) provides an alternative for poor candidates of long-term oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy; however, anticoagulant therapy after surgical procedures has limited use due to associated uncertainties. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the short-term use of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and warfarin after LAAO. Electronic databases such as PubMed, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to November 11, 2022. Our study compared DOAC therapy and warfarin in patients after LAAO. A meta-analysis was conducted with the Review Manager software (version 5.4). The meta-analysis included 13 cohort studies with a total of 32,607 patients. Our findings indicated that the incidence of stroke/TIA/SE, peri-device leaks>5 mm, device-related thrombosis , and all-cause mortality were not significantly different between the two groups after LAAO (P > 0.05). The DOAC group had a significantly lower incidence of major bleeding (OR = 0.83, 95 % CI: 0.74–0.94, P = 0.003), any bleeding (OR = 0.34, 95 % CI: 0.23–0.51, P < 0.001), stroke/TIA/SE and major bleeding (OR = 0.57, 95 % CI: 0.34–0.95, P = 0.03), and any major adverse event (OR = 0.89, 95 % CI:0.82–0.97, P = 0.010) than the warfarin group. The subgroup analysis revealed that the rate of stroke/TIA/SE was similar in the two groups in terms of the different regions, follow-up time, study type, anticoagulant strategy, and bleeding risk. The incidence of major bleeding in the DOAC group was significantly lower than that in the warfarin group in North America, as well as at follow-up period ≤6 months, retrospective cohort, HAS-BLED average score ≥ 3. In addition, the risk of major bleeding was higher with the combination of OAC and single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) than with OAC alone. Finally, in the North American region, retrospective cohort, and HAS-BLED average score ≥ 3, the incidence of any serious adverse event in the DOAC group was still significantly lower than that in the warfarin group. Compared to warfarin, DOAC reduced the risk of major bleeding and any serious adverse event in patients after LAAO. This advantage was particularly notable in North America and high-risk populations for bleeding. In addition, the incidence of device-related thrombosis, peri-device leaks, stroke/TIA/SE and all-cause mortality were similar in both groups. The risk of major bleeding was lower in patients taking OAC alone compared with those taking OAC plus SAPT, without increasing the risk of thrombosis. • There is currently no unified standard for anticoagulation after left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) surgery. • In 13 studies revealed that the incidence of stroke/TIA/systemic embolism and all-cause mortality were similar between direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) compared to warfarin. However, the incidence of bleeding and any major adverse event were higher among those who received warfarin. • The risk of major bleeding was lower among patients who received OAC alone compared to those who received OAC plus single antiplatelet therapy, without an increased risk of thrombosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: The discontinuation of oral anticoagulants (OACs) remains as a significant concern in the management of atrial fibrillation (AF). The discontinuation rate may vary depending on management strategy, and physicians may also discontinue OACs due to concerns about patient satisfaction with their care. We aimed to assess the incidence of OAC discontinuation and its relationship to patients' health in an outpatient AF registry. Methods and Results: From a multicenter registry for newly recognized AF patients (n = 3313), we extracted 1647 (49.7%) patients with OACs and a CHA2DS2-Vasc score of ≥2. Discontinuation was defined as sustained cessation of OACs within a 1-year follow-up. We examined predictors associated with discontinuation and its relations to health status defined by the AFEQT questionnaire. Of the 1647 patients, 385 (23.6%) discontinued OACs after 1 year, with discontinuation rates varying across treatment strategies (15.3% for catheter ablation, 4.9% for rhythm control with antiarrhythmic drugs, and 3.0% for rate control). Successful rhythm control was associated with discontinuation in the catheter ablation (OR 6.61, 95% CI 3.00–14.6, p < 0.001) and antiarrhythmic drugs (OR 6.47, 95% CI 2.62–15.9, p < 0.001) groups, whereas the incidence of bleeding events within 1 year was associated with discontinuation in the rate control group. One-year AFEQT scores did not significantly differ between patients who discontinued OACs and those who did not in each treatment strategy group. Conclusions: OAC discontinuation was common among AF patients with significant stroke risk but varied depending on the chosen treatment strategy. This study also found no significant association between OAC discontinuation and patients' health status. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared to warfarin in patients with inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombus. Methods: This was a single‐system, retrospective cohort study of hospitalized adult patients with IVC thrombus treated with a DOAC or warfarin therapy. The primary efficacy endpoint was the thrombus resolution on imaging, and the primary safety endpoint was major bleeding, both assessed within 6 months of hospital discharge. Secondary endpoints included hospitalization for a bleeding‐related event, pulmonary embolism, or death within 6 months of hospital discharge. Results: A total of 33 patients were included in the study. Twenty‐three (70%) patients received a DOAC, and 10 (30%) received warfarin. Of the 10 patients with repeat imaging available, complete resolution was noted in two (33%) DOAC patients and no warfarin patients (p =.5). Major bleeding occurred in two (8.7%) DOAC patients and one (10%) warfarin patient (p =.9). No significant differences in secondary endpoints were observed between groups. Conclusions: There were no differences in efficacy and safety between patients receiving DOACs or warfarin for the treatment of IVC thrombus, although results are limited by the small patient population and number of patients with repeat imaging available. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The 2021 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis' (ISTH) recommends standard doses of apixaban and rivaroxaban regardless of high body mass index (BMI) and weight, but had not compare DOACs head-to-head in obesity or address underweight patients. Our aim is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DOACs in underweight and obese patients compared to warfarin. The primary endpoints include incidence of thromboembolic and bleeding events. Descriptive statistics was used for continuous variables. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the four-groups for continuous measures and the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used to analyze categorical data. The chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, was used for categorical variables, and the Mann-Whitney test (the non-parametric counterpart to the two-sample t -test) for continuous data. Of 2940 patients receiving anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment or atrial fibrillation (AF), 492 met eligibility criteria. Within each group, 248 patients received warfarin, 101 received apixaban, 100 received rivaroxaban and 43 received dabigatran. Patients were characterized in 4 body mass index (BMI) categories, in which 80 were underweight and 412 were obese. When each DOAC was compared to warfarin in rates of VTE, apixaban showed statistically significant lower rate of VTE (p = 0.0149). However, no statistical significance was identified in the rate of VTE between DOACs combined vs. warfarin (p = 0.1529). When each DOAC was compared to warfarin, apixaban showed the lowest rate of overall bleeding (p = 0.0194). However, no statistical difference in the rate of bleeding was observed between DOACs combined vs. warfarin (p = 0.3284). Patients with extreme body weights requiring anticoagulation for VTE and AF may safety benefit from DOAC therapy. This evaluation showed apixaban with the lowest rate of VTE and bleeding compared to warfarin, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran. These results provide experience for the clinician to use DOACs, particularly apixaban, in underweight and obese populations. • What is the new aspect of your work? The new aspect of our work is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral anticoagulants in patients who are underweight or obese, since direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are fixed-dose and may have increased bleeding in underweight populations, but reduced efficacy in obese populations. • What is the central finding of your work? In underweight patients with BMI <18.5, DOACs have similar efficacy and safety to vitamin k antagonist (warfarin), p =0.1179 in the 4-group analysis and p =0.5658 in the 2-group analysis. When reviewed individually, apixaban has statistically significant less risk of bleeding in patients with BMI < 18.5, apixaban 1 (10%), rivaroxaban 5 (38.46%), dabigatran 5 (50%), and warfarin 7 (14.89%), p =0.0322. In obese patients with BMI > 40, there rate of VTE was lowest in the apixaban 0 (0%) and warfarin groups 0 (0%), followed by dabigatran 1 (12.5%), then rivaroxaban 3 (13.64%), p =0.0104 in the 4-group analysis and p =0.0346 in the 2-group analysis. In BMI > 40, the risk of bleeding was not statistically significant among the 4-group analysis, p=0.3417. • What is (or could be) the specific relevance of your work? The relevance of our work is DOACs may be safe and efficacious, compared to vitamin k agonist (warfarin), in patient with extreme weights. Monitoring DOAC plasma levels in extreme weights may be of utility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Post-hemorrhoidectomy bleeding is a serious complication after hemorrhoidectomy. In the setting of a new wave of anticoagulants, we aimed to investigate the relationship of post-operative anticoagulation timing and delayed bleeding. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomy at a single institution over a 10-year period. Fisher's exact and Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests were utilized to test for association between delayed bleeding and anticoagulation use. Results: Between January 2011 and October 2020, 1469 hemorrhoidectomies were performed. A total of 216 (14.7%) were taking platelet inhibitors and 56 (3.8%) other anticoagulants. Delayed bleeding occurred in 5.2% (n = 76) of which 47% (n = 36) required operative intervention. Mean time to bleeding was 8.7 days (SD ±5.9). Time to bleeding was longer in those taking antiplatelet inhibitors vs. non-platelet inhibitors vs. none (11 vs. 8 vs. 7 days, P =.05). Among anticoagulants (n = 56), novel oral anticoagulants were more common than warfarin (57% vs 43%) and had a nonsignificant increase in delayed bleeding (31% vs 16%, P =.21). Later restart (>3 days) of novel anticoagulants after surgery was associated with increased bleeding (10.5% vs 61.5%, P=.005). On multivariable analysis, only anticoagulation use (OR 4.5, 95% CI: 2.1–10.0), male sex (OR 1.8, 95% CI: 1.1–2.9), and operative oversewing (OR 3.5, 95% CI: 1.8–6.9) were associated with delayed bleeding. Conclusion: Post-hemorrhoidectomy bleeding is more likely to occur with patients on anticoagulation. Later restart times within the first week after surgery was not associated with a decrease in bleeding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Warfarin is the most commonly prescribed oral anticoagulant in Indonesia. However, the time in the therapeutic range (TTR) remains low across different countries worldwide. This study aimed to analyze the challenges associated with achieving optimal warfarin control. The analysis consisted of two distinct stages. The first stage was a prospective observational study that aimed to analyze anticoagulation control, dosing consistency, INR monitoring compliance, medication adherence, and knowledge of warfarin. Meanwhile, in the second stage, focus group discussion was used to propose strategies for overcoming the challenges. The result showed that the average TTR was 49.4 ± 32.1, where only 37.5% of patients had values = 65%. The average dosing consistency obtained was 62.33 ± 32.42%. The majority of patients with supratherapeutic INR values required a 1-month monitoring interval after dose adjustment. Further analysis indicated that only 43.8% of patients were classified as adherent and 39.5% had good knowledge of warfarin, suggesting the level of medication adherence and knowledge was not optimal. Approximately 14.6% of patients received other drugs that potentially interacted with warfarin, causing fluctuations in INR. In conclusion, this study found several challenges associated with achieving optimal warfarin control including barriers to dosing consistency, INR monitoring, medication adherence, and knowledge of warfarin, as well as drug interactions. The proposed solution is a holistic approach combining multifaceted strategies to address each barrier. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) remains an underdiagnosed disease. Anticoagulation is essential in its therapy to prevent recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE). According to some international guidelines, vitamin K antagonists (VKA) remain the gold standard. Nevertheless, direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are widely used, partly because of numerous advantages. The objective of this study was to determine if DOAC is an effective and safe alternative to VKA in CTEPH patients. A retrospective observational study was conducted between 2001 and 2021 in a CTEPH Clinic of a tertiary care hospital. We recorded demographic characteristics, anticoagulant therapies and pulmonary hypertension treatments received. Safety outcomes were bleeding events and deaths while efficacy outcomes were recurrent VTE events. Among the study population (N = 205), the distribution of anticoagulant used transitioned from majority on VKA to majority on DOAC. In 2020, 23 (19 %) were on VKA and 97 (78 %) on DOAC. Among 11 VTE events occurring during follow-up, 7 were in the VKA group (1.10 %/person-year) and 1 in the DOAC group (0.32 %/person-year). Rates of VTE recurrence were not significantly different in those treated with DOAC compared to VKA (P = 0.21). Total bleeding rate on VKA (2.52 %/person-year) and DOAC (2.52 %/person-year) were the same (P = 1.00). Among 27 patients who died, no deaths occurred as a consequence of bleeding or VTE events. Bleeding and VTE events were not higher in CTEPH patients receiving DOAC compared to VKA which adds confidence to considering DOAC as an effective and safe alternative for long term anticoagulation in CTEPH patients. • Anticoagulation is one of the cornerstones of CTEPH treatment. • VKA were the most commonly used anticoagulation until DOAC arrival. • International guidelines still recommend VKA over DOAC in CTEPH population. • In practice DOAC are widely used, partly because of numerous potential advantages. • Data seem reassuring that DOAC may be a safe and effective alternative to VKA in the CTEPH population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chronic kidney disease is an independent risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Traditionally, Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) followed by warfarin has been the conventional therapy for VTE treatment. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), including apixaban, have shown several advantages over the traditional therapy in individuals with normal kidney function. This meta-analysis aims to review the safety and efficacy of apixaban compared to warfarin or LMWH for the treatment of VTE in severe renal failure. We conducted literature search in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Retrospective observational studies involving clinical effectiveness and safety outcomes of apixaban compared to warfarin in adult patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 mL/min/m2 or on dialysis were included. Eight studies were included in the analysis. Significant reduction in VTE recurrence observed in apixaban compared to warfarin (RR, 0.65; 95 % CI, 0.43–0.98; P = 0.04; I2 = 78 %). No significant difference in all-cause mortality between apixaban and warfarin (RR, 0.99; 95 % CI, 0.91–1.07; P = 0.74; I2 = 0 %). Apixaban showed a significantly lower rate of major bleeding (RR, 0.72; 95 % CI, 0.62–0.84; P < 0.0001; I2 = 34 %) and minor bleeding events (RR, 0.42; 95 % CI, 0.21–0.86; P = 0.02; I2 = 10 %) compared to warfarin. No significant difference observed in clinically relevant non-major bleeding between apixaban and warfarin (RR, 0.81; 95 % CI, 0.65–1.00; P = 0.05; I2 = 67 %). Apixaban was favored over warfarin for treating VTE in severe renal failure, reducing VTE recurrence and bleeding risk. No differences were observed in all-cause mortality and CRNMB events. More evidence is required due to limited RCTs and prospective studies. • Chronic kidney disease is an independent risk factor of venous thromboembolism. • In advanced kidney disease, venous thromboembolism treated with low molecular weight heparin followed by warfarin. • Direct anticoagulants have several advantages over warfarin. • Apixaban showed better safety profile among direct anticoagulants in normal kidney function. • Apixaban found to be better alternative to warfarin in severe renal failure for venous thromboembolism [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

4-F PCC is administered for reversal of factor Xa inhibitor-associated coagulopathy despite a lack of quality evidence demonstrating hemostatic efficacy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the hemostatic efficacy of 4-F PCC in intracerebral hemorrhage patients who received factor Xa inhibitors versus warfarin. This was a multi-center, retrospective, observational cohort study at a large healthcare system. Patients taking warfarin received 4-F PCC 25–50 units/kg based on the presenting INR, while patients taking a factor Xa inhibitor received 35 units/kg. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients with good or excellent hemostatic efficacy as assessed by modified Sarode scale, with neurologic outcomes assessed as a secondary endpoint. Patients were included in the primary outcome population if they had a repeat CT scan within 24 h. One hundred fifty-seven patients were included in the primary outcome population; [warfarin (n = 76), factor Xa inhibitors (n = 81)]. Hemostatic efficacy was 83 % in the warfarin group versus 75 % in the factor Xa inhibitor group (p = 0.24). The hemostatic efficacy risk difference between the groups was 7.6 % (95 % CI 5.1 %, 20.2 %). Good neurologic outcome (mRS 0–2) at discharge was 17 % in warfarin patients versus 12 % in the factor Xa inhibitor patients (p = 0.40). There was no significant difference in hemostatic efficacy or clinical outcomes between patients taking warfarin or a factor Xa inhibitor following reversal with 4-F PCC. This study provides further support that 4-F PCC can be used for the reversal of factor Xa inhibitor-associated coagulopathy. • Patients experiencing intracerebral hemorrhage on oral anticoagulants require rapid reversal. • Efficacy of factor Xa inhibitor reversal with 4F-PCC is uncertain. • No difference in hemostatic efficacy found between anticoagulant groups following reversal. • 4-F PCC may be used for the reversal of factor Xa inhibitor-associated coagulopathy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: To investigate risks of hospitalization for upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) in H. pylori‐eradicated patients newly started on warfarin or direct oral anti‐coagulants (DOACs). Methods: We identified all patients who had previously received H. pylori eradication therapy or were found to have no H. pylori on endoscopy and were then newly started on warfarin or DOACs from a population‐based electronic healthcare database. Primary analysis was the risk of UGIB between warfarin and DOACs users in H. pylori‐eradicated patients. Secondary analysis included the UGIB risk between H. pylori‐eradicated and H. pylori‐negative patients who were newly started on warfarin or DOACs. The hazard ratio (HR) of UGIB was approximated by pooled logistic regression model incorporating the inverse propensity of treatment weightings with time‐varying covariables. Results: Among H. pylori‐eradicated patients, DOACs had a significantly lower risk of UGIB (HR: 0.26, 95% CI 0.09–0.71) compared with warfarin. In particular, lower UGIB risks with DOACs were observed among older (≥65 years) patients, female, those without a history of UGIB or peptic ulcer, or ischemic heart disease, and non‐users of acid‐suppressive agents or aspirin. Secondary analysis showed no significant difference in UGIB risk between H. pylori‐eradicated and H. pylori‐negative patients newly started on warfarin (HR: 0.63,95% CI 0.33–1.19) or DOACs (HR: 1.37, 95% CI 0.45–4.22). Conclusions: In H. pylori‐eradicated patients, new users of DOACs had a significantly lower risk of UGIB than new warfarin users. Furthermore, the risk of UGIB in new warfarin or DOACs users was comparable between H. pylori‐eradicated and H. pylori‐negative patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Warfarin is a widely used oral anticoagulant that can lead to bleeding complications, including intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). This case report describes a 68-year-old male with a history of atrial fibrillation and ischemic stroke who developed warfarin-induced ICH. The patient was started on warfarin therapy and monitored with INR measurements. On the eighth day of therapy, the patient presented with confusion and slurred speech and was found to have a large ICH on CT scan. The INR level was 5.5, well above the therapeutic range. Warfarin therapy was immediately stopped, and the patient was given Vitamin K and fresh frozen plasma to reverse the anticoagulant effect. Despite aggressive medical management, the patient's neurological status continued to deteriorate, and he eventually became comatose. The patient's family ultimately decided to withdraw care. Warfarin-induced ICH is a rare but potentially fatal complication of anticoagulant therapy, and its management requires prompt diagnosis and treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There is uncertainty surrounding the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with kidney dysfunction. Methods: Using the COMBINE AF (A Collaboration Between Multiple Institutions to Better Investigate Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant Use in Atrial Fibrillation) database (data from RE-LY [Randomized Evaluation of Long-term Anticoagulation Therapy], ROCKET AF [Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared With Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation], ARISTOTLE [Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation], and ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 [Effective Anticoagulation With Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation–Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 48]), we performed an individual patient-level network meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DOACs versus warfarin across continuous creatinine clearance (CrCl). A multivariable Cox model including treatment-by-CrCl interaction with random effects was fitted to estimate hazard ratios for paired treatment strategies (standard-dose DOAC, lower-dose DOAC, and warfarin). Outcomes included stroke and systemic embolism (S/SE), major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and death. Results: Among 71 683 patients (mean age, 70.6±9.4 years; 37.3% female; median follow-up, 23.1 months), the mean CrCl was 75.5±30.5 mL/min. The incidence of S/SE, major bleeding, ICH, and death increased significantly with worsening kidney function. Across continuous CrCl values down to 25 mL/min, the hazard of major bleeding did not change for patients randomized to standard-dose DOACs compared with those randomized to warfarin (P interaction=0.61). Compared with warfarin, standard-dose DOAC use resulted in a significantly lower hazard of ICH at CrCl values <122 mL/min, with a trend for increased safety with DOAC as CrCl decreased (6.2% decrease in hazard ratio per 10-mL/min decrease in CrCl; P interaction=0.08). Compared with warfarin, standard-dose DOAC use resulted in a significantly lower hazard of S/SE with CrCl <87 mL/min, with a significant treatment-by-CrCl effect (4.8% decrease in hazard ratio per 10-mL/min decrease in CrCl; P interaction=0.01). The hazard of death was significantly lower with standard-dose DOACs for patients with CrCl <77 mL/min, with a trend toward increasing benefit with lower CrCl (2.1% decrease in hazard ratio per 10-mL/min decrease in CrCl; P interaction=0.08). Use of lower-dose rather than standard-dose DOACs was not associated with a significant difference in incident bleeding or ICH in patients with reduced kidney function but was associated with a higher incidence4 of death and S/SE. Conclusions: Standard-dose DOACs are safer and more effective than warfarin down to a CrCl of at least 25 mL/min. Lower-dose DOACs do not significantly lower the incidence of bleeding or ICH compared with standard-dose DOACs but are associated with a higher incidence of S/SE and death. These findings support the use of standard-dose DOACs over warfarin in patients with kidney dysfunction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The comparative effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulant therapies to prevent a second recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains undetermined. We aimed to compare the benefits and harms of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and warfarin therapies in preventing second recurrent VTE and major bleeding events among patients with a recurrent VTE episode following anticoagulation therapy for incident VTE. A retrospective cohort analysis of two large national insurance claims databases was conducted for patients with two episodes of VTE. Cox proportional hazards models were used after inverse probability treatment weighting to compare risks of second recurrent VTE and major bleeding events. Compared with warfarin, DOAC therapy was associated with significantly decreased risk of second recurrent VTE with no significant difference in risk of major bleeding events. Our findings suggest that, compared with warfarin, DOACs may reduce risk of second VTE recurrence among patients who have experienced one recurrence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a life-threatening complication occurring in cancer patients. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) or warfarin are widely prescribed for treating cancer-associated VTE. However, data are sparse as to the effectiveness and bleeding complications associated with these medications in elderly patients. The purpose of this study was to compare effectiveness and safety profiles between DOACs and warfarin in elderly cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Methods: Using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database, we retrospectively identified cancer patients aged ≥75 years who developed VTE during chemotherapy (n = 4,278, January 2016 to March 2020). Eligible patients were divided into those receiving warfarin (n = 557) and DOACs (n = 3,721). We conducted a 1:4 propensity score matching analysis to adjust for measured confounders. The primary outcome was VTE recurrence requiring hospitalization. Secondary outcomes were major bleeding requiring hospitalization and inhospital death from all causes within 6 months. Results: The propensity-matched cohort included 557 patients in the warfarin group and 2,278 patients in the DOACs group. The proportion of VTE recurrence requiring hospitalization was lower in the DOACs group (5.3% vs. 7.5%; odds ratio [OR], 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48–0.98). The proportion of recurrent deep vein thrombosis was 6.3% and 4.4%, while that of recurrent pulmonary emboli was 1.3% and 1.3% in the warfarin and DOACs groups, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found in the proportion of major bleeding events requiring hospitalization (1.6% vs. 1.1%; OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 0.62–3.50) or all-cause inhospital mortality (11.1% vs. 9.9%; OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.84–1.56) between the DOACs and warfarin groups. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that DOACs may be more effective than warfarin in terms of VTE recurrence requiring hospitalization and that these medications may be equivalent in terms of safety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) including dialysis is growing. Several studies have shown favorable results of DOAC compared with warfarin regarding bleeding risk but no difference in stroke protection. However, these studies had poor time in therapeutic range (TTR), in the warfarin comparison group. Methods This was a Swedish national cohort study investigating the risk of ischemic stroke and major bleeding on DOAC compared with warfarin in patients with NVAF, glomerular filtration rate category 3–5D (G3–G5D), kidney transplant recipients excluded, between 2009 and 2018. Data extracted from high-quality national healthcare registries including the Swedish Renal Registry, AuriculA (the Swedish national quality register for AF and anticoagulation) and The Stroke Register. Results At enrolment, of 2453 patients 59% were treated with warfarin (mean TTR 67%) and 41% with DOAC. Overall, 693 (28.3%) had G3, 1113 (45.4%) G4, 222 (9.1%) G5 and 425 (17.3%) G5D. DOAC compared with warfarin showed lower hazard of major bleeding [hazard ratio 0.71 (95% confidence interval 0.53–0.96)] but no difference in ischemic stroke risk. Mortality was increased during DOAC treatment [1.24 (1.01–1.53)], presumably not a causal association since fewer fatal bleedings occurred on DOAC. Conclusions DOAC treatment, compared with warfarin, is associated with almost 30% lower risk of bleeding in patients with NVAF and CKD G3–G5D. The stroke risk is comparable between the treatments. This is the first study comparing DOAC and well-managed warfarin (TTR 67%) in advanced CKD. Ongoing and planned randomized controlled trials need to confirm the possible benefit of DOAC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We utilized a case control study to determine if novel oral anticoagulants were associated with a higher risk of inpatient epistaxis admission. Adult patients admitted with a principal diagnosis of epistaxis in 2019–2021 were identified as well as a control group of patients matched 1:1 for age, sex, race, and medical comorbidities. For both cohorts, the presence or absence of an oral anticoagulant, classified as vitamin K inhibitors, direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) or platelet inhibitors, was identified. 158 adult unique inpatient admissions with a principal diagnosis of epistaxis were identified. Vitamin K inhibition was present in 5.7% of cases versus 0.6% of controls (p = 0.02; OR 9.48, range 1.19‐75.77), DOACs in 4.4% of cases versus 5.1% of controls (p = 1.0) and platelet inhibitors in 2.5% of cases versus 3.8% of controls (p = 0.75). We concluded vitamin K inhibitors, compared to DOACs and platelet inhibitors, may be associated with higher likelihood of epistaxis admission. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Despite the fact that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are favoured over warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), physicians need to maintain competence in using and monitoring warfarin since many patients have contraindications or other barriers to using DOACs. Unlike DOACs, warfarin therapy requires regular blood testing to ensure that it is within a target range to ensure efficacy and safety. There is limited real-world data on the adequacy of warfarin control and the cost and burden of monitoring warfarin therapy in Canadian NVAF patients. Objectives: In a large cohort of Canadian patients with NVAF on warfarin we assessed time in therapeutic range (TTR), determinants of TTR, process of care, direct costs, health related quality of life and loss of work time and productivity related to warfarin therapy. Methods: Five hundred and fifty one patients with NVAF, either newly initiated or stable on warfarin were prospectively enrolled across 9 Canadian provinces from primary care practices and anticoagulant clinics. Participating physicians provided baseline demographic and medical information. Patients completed diaries for 48 weeks, capturing information about International Normalized Ratio (INR) test results, test locations, process of INR monitoring, direct costs of travel, health-related quality of life and work productivity measures. TTR was estimated using linear interpolation of INR results and linear regression used to investigate associations between TTR and factors (defined a priori). Results: Four hundred and eighty (87.1%) patients had complete follow-up with an overall TTR of 74.4% based on 7,175 physician-reported INR values from 501 patients. 88% of this cohort were monitored through routine medical care (RMC). The average number of INRs per patient during the 48-week period was 14.1 (standard deviation (SD) = 8.3) tests with a mean duration of 23.8 (SD = 11.1) days between tests. We did not find a relationship between TTR and age, sex, presence of major comorbidities, patient's province of residence or rural vs. urban residence. 12% of patients monitored through anticoagulant clinics had significantly better TTR than patients monitored through RMC (82% vs. 74%; 95% confidence interval: -13.8, -1.2; p = 0.02). Health related quality of life utility values were high and remained consistent throughout the study. The majority of patients reported no impact on either work productivity or impairment of regular activities due to being on long-term warfarin treatment. Conclusions: We showed excellent overall TTR in an observed Canadian cohort, with monitoring through a dedicated anticoagulant clinic being associated with a statistically and clinically significant improvement in TTR. The burden of warfarin therapy on patients' health related quality of life or daily work and activities was low. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: The objective of the study is to systematically evaluate the safety and efficacy of peri-procedural utilization of anticoagulation therapy during cardiovascular implantable electronic device procedures. Material and methods: The review materials were based on comprehensive retrieval of randomized controlled trials and observational studies published until April 2023. Studies which compared different management strategies of long-term anticoagulation therapy during peri-procedural cardiac rhythm device implantation and compared the complications of bleeding and/or thromboembolic events were selected and reviewed. Results: Studies analysing non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants interruption versus continuation during peri-procedural implantable cardiac device surgery found no statistically significant difference in bleeding or thromboembolic complications between these strategies. Studies comparing non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants with vitamin K antagonists also showed no statistically significant difference. One study comparing uninterrupted warfarin with interrupted warfarin with heparin bridging reported a reduced incidence of clinically significant device pocket haematoma in patients with continued warfarin treatment (relative risk = 0.19; 95% confidence interval: 0.10 to 0.36; p < 0.001). A sub-analysis of one study comparing dabigatran versus warfarin with heparin bridging and without bridging reported a lower risk of pocket haematoma with dabigatran when compared to warfarin with heparin bridging (risk difference: -8.62%, 95% confidence interval: -24.15 to -0.51%; p = 0.034). Both bleeding and thromboembolic complications were rare. Conclusions: The traditional method of vitamin K antagonists interruption with heparin bridging is less safe than continuing vitamin K antagonists at therapeutic levels. Both continuation and interruption strategies of non-vitamin K anticoagulants during cardiac device surgery seem to be safe and appropriate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anticoagulant therapy is the cornerstone of treatment and prevention of arterial and venous thromboembolism. Taking a historical perspective, starting in the 1960s, and progressing through to 2022, we discuss key clinical trials of anticoagulants that have changed clinical practice, and examine obstacles encountered in bringing these anticoagulants to the clinic. The design of some of the early studies that shaped clinical practice was poor by current standards, but their results were influential because nothing better was available. Both heparin and vitamin K antagonists had been in clinical use for several decades before well-designed trials in the 1980s optimized their dosing and enhanced their safety and efficacy. Low-molecular-weight heparin then replaced unfractionated heparin because it had a more predictable dose–response and a longer half-life, thereby allowing it to be used conveniently in out-of-hospital settings. More recently, direct oral anticoagulants became the oral anticoagulants of choice for most indications because they were shown to be at least as safe and effective as vitamin K antagonists when used in fixed doses without the need for laboratory monitoring. The design of the trials that led to the approval of the direct oral anticoagulants was excellent, but further studies are required to optimize their dosing in selected patients who were underrepresented in these trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The benefit-risk profile of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared with warfarin, and between DOACs in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic liver disease is unclear. Methods: We conducted a new-user, retrospective cohort study of patients with AF and chronic liver disease who were enrolled in a large, US-based administrative database between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2017. We assessed the effectiveness and safety of DOACs (as a class and individually) compared with warfarin, and between DOACs in patients with AF and chronic liver disease. The primary outcomes were hospitalization for ischemic stroke/systemic embolism and hospitalization for major bleeding. Inverse probability treatment weights were used to balance the treatment groups on measured confounders. Results: Overall, 10 209 participants were included, with 4421 (43.2%) on warfarin, 2721 (26.7%) apixaban, 2211 (21.7%) rivaroxaban, and 851 (8.3%) dabigatran. The incidence rates per 100 person-years for ischemic stroke/systemic embolism were 2.2, 1.4, 2.6, and 4.4 for DOACs as a class, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin, respectively. The incidence rates per 100 person-years for major bleeding were 7.9, 6.5, 9.1, and 15.0 for DOACs as a class, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin, respectively. After inverse probability treatment weights, the risk of hospitalization for ischemic stroke/systemic embolism was significantly lower between DOACs as a class (hazard ratio [HR], 0.64 [95% CI, 0.46–0.90]) or apixaban (HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.19–0.82]) compared with warfarin, but not significantly different between rivaroxaban versus warfarin (HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.47–1.21]) or rivaroxaban versus apixaban (HR, 1.73 [95% CI, 0.91–3.29]). Compared with warfarin, the risk of hospitalization for major bleeding was lower with DOACs as a class (HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.58–0.82]), apixaban (HR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.46–0.78]), and rivaroxaban (HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.62–1.0]). However, the risk of hospitalization for major bleeding was higher for rivaroxaban versus apixaban (HR, 1.59 [95% CI, 1.18–2.14]). Conclusions: Among patients with AF and chronic liver disease, DOACs as a class were associated with lower risks of hospitalization for ischemic stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding versus warfarin. However, the incidence of clinical outcomes among patients with AF and chronic liver disease varied between individual DOACs and warfarin, and in head-to-head DOAC comparisons. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A large number of patients under oral anticoagulant (OAC) or antiplatelet (AP) therapy require dental implantation. We systematically reviewed evidence on the risk of bleeding after implant placement with continued OAC or AP therapy. PubMed, Embase and CENTRAL were searched for studies comparing bleeding outcomes after implant placement between OAC/AP therapy vs. controls or OAC vs. AP therapy. Seven studies were included. Pooled analysis showed no significant difference in the risk of bleeding with continued OAC therapy vs. control (RR 1.81 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70, 4.63 I2 = 14% p =.22). Subgroup analysis depending on the type of OAC showed there was a non-significant tendency of increased risk of bleeding with Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) (RR 3.42 95% CI 1.00, 11.67 I2 = 23% p =.05) but not with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) (RR 1.67 95% CI 0.49, 5.70 I2 = 0% p =.41). Limited data suggest an increased risk of bleeding with OAC as compared to AP (RR 0.08 95% CI 0.01, 0.76 I2 = 0% p =.03). Continuation of OAC therapy in patients undergoing implant surgery does not increase the risk of bleeding provided local haemostatic measures are used. The indirect comparison suggests bleeding tendency may be higher with VKAs as compared to DOAC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Oral anticoagulants (OACs) are high-risk medications often used in older people with complex medication regimens. This study was the first to assess the association between overall regimen complexity and bleeding in people with atrial fibrillation (AF) initiating OACs. Methods Patients diagnosed with AF who initiated an OAC (warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban) between 2010 and 2016 were identified from the Hong Kong Clinical Database and Reporting System. Each patient's Medication Regimen Complexity Index (MRCI) score was computed. Baseline characteristics were balanced using inverse probability of treatment weighting. People were followed until a first hospitalization for bleeding (intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding, or other bleeding) and censored at discontinuation of the index OAC, death, or end of the follow-up period, whichever occurred first. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) between MRCI quartiles and bleeding during initiation and all follow-up. Results There were 19 292 OAC initiators (n = 9 092 warfarin, n = 10 200 direct oral anticoagulants) with a mean (standard deviation) age at initiation of 73.9 (11.0) years. More complex medication regimens were associated with an increased risk of bleeding (MRCI > 14.0–22.00: aHR 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93–1.49; MRCI > 22.0–32.5: aHR 1.32, 95%CI 1.06–1.66; MRCI > 32.5: aHR 1.45, 95%CI 1.13–1.87, compared to MRCI ≤ 14). No significant association between MRCI and bleeding risk was observed during the initial 30, 60, or 90 days of treatment. Conclusion In this cohort study of people with AF initiating an OAC, a more complex medication regimen was associated with higher bleeding risk over periods longer than 90 days. Further prospective studies are needed to assess whether MRCI should be considered in OAC prescribing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anti-tuberculosis treatment can cause significant drug-drug interaction and interfere with effective anticoagulation. However, there is a lack of evidence and conflicting data on the optimal oral anticoagulation in patients treated for tuberculosis. We investigated the safety and effectiveness of anticoagulation with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and warfarin in patients on anti-tuberculosis treatment. Patients on concomitant oral anticoagulation and anti-tuberculosis treatment including rifampin were identified from the Korean nationwide healthcare database. Subjects were censored at discontinuation of either anticoagulation or rifampin. The outcomes of interest were major bleeding, death, and ischemic stroke. A total 2090 patients (1153 on warfarin, 937 on NOAC) were included. NOAC users, compared to warfarin users, were older, had a lower prevalence of hypertension, heart failure, ischemic stroke, and aspirin use and a higher prevalence of cancer, with no significant differences in CHA2DS2-VASc or HAS-BLED scores. There were 18 major bleeding events, 106 deaths, and 50 stroke events during a mean follow-up of 2.9 months. After multivariable adjustment, the use of NOAC was associated with a lower risk of incident ischemic stroke (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.27–0.94), while there was no significant difference in risk for major bleeding or death compared with warfarin. These results suggest that NOACs have better effectiveness for stroke prevention and similar safety compared with warfarin in patients on concomitant anti-tuberculosis treatment. This is the first study assessing the safety and effectiveness of NOACs compared to warfarin in this clinical scenario. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients are at risk of stroke/systemic embolism. • Oral anticoagulants mitigate these risks but can increase risk of bleeding. • This study analyzed gains in clinical event-free time for these outcomes. • Patients initiating apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran and warfarin were assessed. • Apixaban and dabigatran conferred progressive increases in event-free time. Oral anticoagulants (OACs) mitigate stroke and systemic embolism (SE) risk in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients but can increase the risk of major bleeding (MB). This study analyzed the gains in event-free time for these outcomes among OAC treatment options represented in the ARISTOPHANES study. This sub-analysis consisted of NVAF patients who initiated warfarin, apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban from 01JAN2013-30SEP2015, with data pooled from Medicare and 4 US commercial claims databases. Propensity score matching was conducted between non-vitamin K antagonist OAC (NOAC) and warfarin cohorts in each database and results were pooled. Laplace regression was used to evaluate the delay in time to stroke/SE and MB events between NOACs and warfarin and between NOACs after the first 12-months of follow-up. The population included 466,991 patients (167,413 warfarin; 108,852 apixaban; 37,724 dabigatran; and 153,002 rivaroxaban). Event-free time gain (95% confidence interval) for apixaban versus warfarin was 101 days (78- 124) for stroke/SE and 116 (103- 130) days for MB. The gain in event-free time for dabigatran versus warfarin was 45 days (3- 87) for stroke/SE and 92 (68- 116) days for MB. The gain in event-free time for rivaroxaban versus warfarin was 63 days (42- 84) for stroke/SE but event-free time decreased by 18 (-31–6) days for MB. Over 12 months after initiation, apixaban and dabigatran conferred progressive increases in event free time for stroke/SE and MB vs warfarin, whereas rivaroxaban conferred an increase in stroke/SE-free time but a loss in MB-free time vs warfarin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Comparative safety of direct oral anticoagulants vs. warfarin in patients undergoing tooth extraction remains unclear. We compared the incidence of post-extraction bleeding between patients taking warfarin and those taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) using administrative claims data. We identified outpatients on anticoagulant therapy who underwent permanent tooth extraction between 2015 and 2020 and categorized them into the warfarin and DOAC groups based on medication prescribed within six months prior to tooth extraction. We used the overlap propensity score weighting method to balance the baseline characteristics between the groups and compared the incidence of post-extraction bleeding within seven days after tooth extraction. Among 5253 eligible patients, those in the DOAC group (n = 3696) were older and less frequently prescribed antiplatelets than those in the warfarin group (n = 1557). The distribution of tooth extraction type and number of teeth extracted in a single procedure did not differ between the groups. The unadjusted incidences of post-extraction bleeding in the warfarin and DOAC groups were 35 (2.2 %) and 71 (1.9 %), respectively. Moreover, the overlap weighting analysis showed that the adjusted odds ratio of post-extraction bleeding in the DOAC group in comparison with that in the warfarin group was 0.84 (95 % confidence interval, 0.54–1.31). The incidence of post-extraction bleeding in patients taking DOACs was comparable to that in patients taking warfarin. The findings suggest that dentists and physicians should exercise the same degree of caution when extracting teeth in patients on DOACs and those on warfarin in terms of post-extraction bleeding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Anticoagulants are the cornerstone therapy for thromboembolism prevention and treatment. Warfarin is the frequently prescribed drug and remains the oral anticoagulant of choice in low- and middle-income countries, including Ethiopia. It is a narrow therapeutic index drug that needs high-quality anticoagulation monitoring with frequent international normalization ratio (INR) testing. Objective: The study aimed to assess anticoagulation management with warfarin among adult outpatients at two selected private cardiac centers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Methods: A hospital-based retrospective study design that enrolled 374 patients receiving warfarin was employed at two private cardiac centres in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. The time in the therapeutic range (TTR) was calculated using the Rosendaal method. The data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Science version 25. Results: The mean age of the patients was 57 years, and 218 (58.3%) participants were females. Out of 3384 INR tests, 1562 (46.5%) were within the therapeutic range and the mean percentage of TTR was 47.24%. Only 25.67% of the patients spent their TTR ≥ 65%. The present study revealed that dose adjustments were required 1764 times. In non-therapeutic INR values of 1764 that required warfarin dose adjustment, 59.7% of the doses were adjusted. About 262 (70.1%) of co-prescribed medications had interaction with warfarin. Sixty-four patients (17.11%) experienced bleeding events. Conclusion: Anticoagulation management with warfarin was suboptimal in private cardiac Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, private cardiac centers. Warfarin adjustment practice for nontherapeutic INR values was not minimal, and many patients encountered bleeding during their course of therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The optimal strategy for thromboprophylaxis in patients with a Fontan circulation is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of aspirin, warfarin, and nonvitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in a network meta-analysis. Relevant studies published by February 2022 were included. The primary efficacy outcome was thromboembolic events; major bleeding was a secondary safety outcome. Frequentist network meta-analyses were conducted to estimate the incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of both outcomes. Ranking of treatments was performed based on probability (P) score. A total of 21 studies were included (26,546 patient-years). When compared with no thromboprophylaxis, NOAC (IRR: 0.11; 95% CI: 0.03-0.40), warfarin (IRR: 0.23; 95% CI: 0.14-0.37), and aspirin (IRR: 0.24; 95% CI: 0.15-0.39) were all associated with significantly lower rates of thromboembolic events. However, the network meta-analysis revealed no significant differences in the rates of major bleeding (NOAC: IRR: 1.45 [95% CI: 0.28-7.43]; warfarin: IRR: 1.38 [95% CI: 0.41-4.69]; and aspirin: IRR: 0.72 [95% CI: 0.20-2.58]). Rankings, which simultaneously analyze competing interventions, suggested that NOACs have the highest P score to prevent thromboembolic events (P score 0.921), followed by warfarin (P score 0.582), aspirin (P score 0.498), and no thromboprophylaxis (P score 0.001). Aspirin tended to have the most favorable overall profile. Aspirin, warfarin, and NOAC are associated with lower risk of thromboembolic events. Recognizing the limited number of patients and heterogeneity of studies using NOACs, the results support the safety and efficacy of NOACs in patients with a Fontan circulation. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Thromboembolic diseases are of great clinical concern because of their high prevalence and consequences, which are often fatal. Despite significant progress in the prevention and treatment of thrombotic events, patients remain at risk of life-threatening bleeding episodes and other side effects arising from anticoagulant therapy, so the issue of personalizing prescriptions taking into account the genetic characteristics of patients has become urgent. The purpose of the study is to substantiate the need for patient genotype analysis in order to increase the effectiveness and safety of individual pharmacotherapy. The article has a conceptual nature, therefore the following research methods were chosen: systematization and generalization; analysis and specification; abstract and logical. For the search, we used PubMed, PubMedCentral, Google Scholar, dbSNP, Elsevier, Springer from September 2000 to November 2022. The review included studies written in English and Ukrainian. There were analyzed literature data on two main subclasses of oral antithrombotic agents, including oral anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents, namely warfarin, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and clopidogrel. Prognostically significant for evaluating the effectiveness and safety of anticoagulant use, as well as the most studied in this aspect, are CYP2C9 (rs1799853, rs1057910), CYP2C19 (rs4244285, rs4986893, rs12248560), VKORC1 (rs9923231, rs7294, rs9934438), MDR1 (rs4148738, rs2032582, rs1045642), FGB (rs1800787), PAI-1 (rs1799889) genes. The results of CYP2B6, CYP3A4/5 (rs776746), CYP4F2 (rs2108622) genes analysis indicate a certain influence on the anticoagulants metabolism and require further detailed study. Factors such as age, race, sex, smoking, diet, and other medications are known to influence the effectiveness of antithrombotic therapy, but the most influential factor is genetics, which accounts a significant percentage of interindividual variability. Future research should focus on the study of known and novel genetic variants that influence drug metabolism, as well as the molecular mechanisms that contribute to changes in plasma anticoagulant levels. The article provides a brief overview of action mechanisms, pharmacogenetics, and interactions between drugs and the genes responsible for their metabolism. The results indicate the need for studies of gene variants considered in this review before starting anticoagulant therapy, and attention should also be paid to the possibility of inhibitors and inductors influence on components of the metabolic pathway of anticoagulants and gene expression products that participate in their metabolism. The totality of these measures will ensure an increase in the efficiency and safety of individual pharmacotherapy and allow optimizing the choice and dosage of anticoagulants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: For patients with persistent non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), chronic anticoagulation has traditionally been the mainstay of therapy. Warfarin and other vitamin K antagonists were the sole choices up until recently. Objective: To evaluate the healthcare effect and safety of patients with persistent with NVAF using Novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC) and those using warfarin group. Patients and Methods: The study consisted of 124 patients with non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation on their anticoagulation drug. Patients were classified into two main groups according to the drug used as an anticoagulant: Group I: 62 patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation take warfarin drug 39 men and 21 women ranging in age from 40 to 75 years old. Group II: 62 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation take NOAC drugs, 36 men and 25 women of varying ages 40 to 75 years. Results: Thrombotic complications: In NOAC group I: there were 5 cases of thrombotic complications per year. In Marivan group II: there were 15 cases of thrombotic complications per year. The net result showed that the incidence rate of occurrence of thrombosis among the marivan group was 25% per year compared to 8.2% in the NOAC group. There was a statistically significant difference between both groups regarding thrombotic complications. The net result showed that the incidence rate of occurrence of thrombosis among the marivan group was 20% per 6 months compared to 8.2% in the Noac group. There was a statistically significant difference between both groups regarding thrombotic complications. Conclusion: Overall evidence indicates that NOACs can be considered a safe and effective alternative to warfarin in these subgroups of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To provide an updated comparison of the risk and cost of stroke/systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding between direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC: apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran) and warfarin among non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients. Adults (≥65 years) initiating warfarin or DOACs between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2014 were selected from the Medicare database and propensity scores matched 1:1 to balance baseline characteristics. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the risks of stroke/SE and major bleeding of each DOAC vs. warfarin. Two-part models were used to compare the stroke/SE- and major bleeding-related medical costs in each matched cohort. Of the 264,479 eligible patients, 38,740 apixaban-warfarin pairs, 76,677 rivaroxaban-warfarin pairs, and 20,955 dabigatran-warfarin pairs were matched. Apixaban (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 0.46; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.38–0.56) and rivaroxaban (HR = 0.71; 95% CI 0.63–0.80) were associated with a significantly lower risk of stroke/SE compared to warfarin. Apixaban (HR = 0.57; 95% CI 0.51–0.63) and dabigatran (HR = 0.80; 95% CI 0.70–0.90) were associated with a significantly lower risk of major bleeding; rivaroxaban (HR = 1.14; 95% CI 1.07–1.21) was associated with a significantly higher risk of major bleeding compared to warfarin. Compared to warfarin, apixaban and rivaroxaban had significantly lower stroke/SE-related medical costs; and apixaban and dabigatran had significantly lower major bleeding-related medical costs. This real-world analysis showed DOACs to be associated with a lower risk of stroke/SE and major bleeding, and lower medical costs compared to warfarin. Among them, only apixaban appears to be associated with a significantly lower risk of all three outcomes collectively: stroke/SE, major bleeding, and lower related medical costs compared to warfarin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: The aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the risk of postpolypectomy bleeding (PPB) in patients exposed to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Methods: A systematic search was conducted by searching the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases using the following search terms: "(nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants or NOAC or apixaban or dabigatran or rivaroxaban or edoxaban or DOAC or direct oral anticoagulants) and polypectomy". Studies evaluating the association between DOACs and PPB were identified. Results: The bibliographical search yielded 103 studies. Twelve studies involving 621,279 participants were ultimately included (11 cohort studies, of which 10 were retrospective, and a randomized controlled trial.). Pooled estimates revealed a higher risk of PPB among patients using DOACs than among those without anticoagulation (odds ratio [OR]: 6.170, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.079 to 12.363). The same result occurred when DOACs were stopped 24 hours before polypectomy (OR: 8.66, 95% CI: 4.588 to 16.348). No significant difference was noted between overall DOACs and warfarin (OR 0.826, 95% CI 0.583 to 1.172), while for subgroups, dabigatran showed a lower PPB rate than warfarin (OR: 0.582, 95% CI: 0.340 to 0.994). Conclusions: DOACs can significantly raise the risk of PPB, even with 24-hour withdrawal before polypectomy. In addition, a lower risk of PPB was detected for dabigatran than for warfarin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chronic kidney disease is common in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and is associated with heightened risks of stroke/systemic embolisation and bleeding. In this review we outline the evidence for AF stroke prevention in kidney disease, identify current knowledge gaps, and give recommendations for anticoagulation at various stages of chronic kidney disease. Overall, anticoagulation is underused. Warfarin use becomes increasingly difficult with advancing kidney disease, with difficulty maintaining international normalised ratio (INR) in therapeutic range, increased risk of intracranial and fatal bleeding compared to non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs), and high rates of discontinuation. Similarly, the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran is not recommended as it is predominantly renally excreted with consequent increased plasma levels and bleeding risk with advanced kidney disease. The Factor Xa inhibitors apixaban and rivaroxaban have less renal excretion (25-35%), modest increases in plasma levels with advancing kidney disease, and are the preferred first line choice for anticoagulation in moderate kidney disease based on strong evidence from randomised clinical trials (RCTs). In severe kidney disease there is a paucity of RCT data, but extrapolation of the pharmacokinetic and RCT data for moderate kidney disease, and observational studies, support the considered use of dose-adjusted Factor Xa inhibitors unless the bleeding risk is prohibitive. In Australia, apixaban is approved for creatinine clearance down to 25 mL/min, and rivaroxaban down to 15 mL/min. For end-stage kidney disease warfarin is the only agent approved, but we recommend against anticoagulation (except in selected cases) due to high bleeding risk, multiple co-morbidities, and questionable benefit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is the most common type of bleeding occurring in patients on oral anticoagulation. A meta-analysis of the landmark randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for patients with atrial fibrillation demonstrated that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were associated with higher GIB rates compared to warfarin. However, significant heterogeneity existed between studies. While rivaroxaban, high-dose dabigatran, and high-dose edoxaban were associated with higher GIB rates than warfarin, GIB rates were similar between warfarin users and both apixaban and low-dose dabigatran users. Additionally, previous observational studies have yielded conflicting reports on whether GIB rates differ between warfarin and DOACs. Meta-analyses of observational studies demonstrated that warfarin is associated with lower rates of GIB compared to rivaroxaban, similar or lower rates compared to dabigatran, and higher rates compared to apixaban. Importantly, no RCT has compared individual DOACs directly and due to the different selection criteria of the initial RCTs, indirect comparisons between DOACs using these studies are unreliable. The best available information of comparisons between individual DOACs is therefore limited to observational studies. There is mounting evidence that suggests that rivaroxaban is associated with a higher risk of GIB compared to other DOACs. Finally, GIB induced by oral anticoagulation may have some positive aspects. Interestingly, there are studies that indicate oral anticoagulation facilitates colorectal cancer detection. Furthermore, results from RCTs and observational studies suggest that warfarin may even decrease the incidence of cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Warfarin is the most commonly prescribed oral anticoagulant in Nepal. It is commonly used for chronic anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation, venous thromboembolism, and artificial heart valves. The major side effect of warfarin is bleeding. Though extremely rare, a sublingual hematoma can lead to life‐threatening complications as it can cause severe airway obstruction. We present a case of a 55‐year‐old female patient who had sublingual hematoma secondary to the use of Warfarin therapy. In addition to the discontinuation of warfarin, she was managed conservatively without any surgical intervention. Early diagnosis, timely discontinuation of the drug, and application of appropriate medical treatment are of utmost importance for reducing morbidity and mortality due to bleeding and airway compromise. Isolated sublingual hematoma is a rare complication of warfarin treatment. We report a case of a 55‐year‐old woman with complaints of swelling below the tongue and upper neck and difficulty in swallowing and was successfully managed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Routine endomyocardial (EM) biopsies pose a challenge in the management of heart transplant recipients requiring anticoagulation. Apixaban is a direct‐acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) with a short half‐life allowing for brief interruptions of anticoagulation for procedures. The study objective was to determine the safety and efficacy of apixaban in heart transplant patients undergoing EM biopsies. Methods: This retrospective case series evaluated patients with a heart transplant from April 1, 2017 to July 30, 2020 who were treated with apixaban within 90 days post‐transplant. The primary outcome was the occurrence of a bleeding or thrombotic event. Results: A total of 12 patients with >100 biopsies were included. The median age was 54 years (IQR 37–59) with a mean weight of 91 ± 20 kg. There were no bleeding or thrombotic events. During therapy, patients underwent an average of eight biopsies. The median time from transplant to initiation of apixaban was 39.5 days (range 9–77). Therapy was maintained without any need for reversal for a median of 276 days (IQR 45–245). Conclusions: Apixaban is safe to use for anticoagulation of heart transplant recipients undergoing routine biopsies. Using apixaban allows for a short interruption of therapeutic anticoagulation to accommodate a biopsy without increased risk of bleeding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are frequently prescribed for the management of atrial fibrillation and venous thrombosis. There is a lack of published data on the utilization of DOACs in individuals who have undergone recent cardiac surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of apixaban and rivaroxaban compared to warfarin in patients postcardiac surgery. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, patients were separated into a DOAC cohort or a warfarin cohort based on the agent they received after cardiac surgery. Patients could be included if they were ≥18 years of age and received or were discharged on either rivaroxaban, apixaban, or warfarin within 7 days after cardiac surgery. The primary outcome for the study was the rate of International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) major bleeding during hospitalization and for 30 days following discharge or until first follow‐up appointment. Results: There were a total of 194 patients included in the analysis, 97 in the DOAC cohort and 97 in the warfarin cohort. Four patients (4.1%) in the DOAC group experienced ISTH major bleeding, while 2 patients (2.1%) in the warfarin cohort experienced ISTH major bleeding (p = 0.68). No patients in the DOAC cohort experienced a thrombotic event, whereas 2 patients (2.1%) in the warfarin cohort experienced a thrombotic complication (p = 0.5). Conclusion: Apixaban and rivaroxaban demonstrated similar safety when compared to a matched cohort of warfarin patients. Larger prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]