Search

Evidence from animal models and human studies clearly demonstrate that sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have systemic and tissue-specific anti-inflammatory effects that may be independent of glycemic control and weight loss. SGLT2 inhibitors may achieve their anti-inflammatory effects through various mechanisms, including reduction of reactive oxygen species, inflammasome activation, intracellular sodium and calcium levels, circulating uric acid, and mitochondrial dysfunction. The direct and indirect mitigation of inflammatory pathways by SGLT2 inhibitors may partially explain their cardiac and renoprotective effects. However, this remains to be formally demonstrated in human studies. Inflammation plays an essential role and is a common feature in the pathogenesis of many chronic diseases. The exact mechanisms through which sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors achieve their much-acclaimed clinical benefits largely remain unknown. In this review, we detail the systemic and tissue- or organ-specific anti-inflammatory effects of SGLT2 inhibitors using evidence from animal and human studies. We discuss the potential pathways through which SGLT2 inhibitors exert their anti-inflammatory effects, including oxidative stress, mitochondrial, and inflammasome pathways. Finally, we highlight the need for further investigation of the extent of the contribution of the anti-inflammatory effects of SGLT2 inhibition to improvements in cardiometabolic and renal outcomes in clinical studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: To investigate the hypothesis that weight loss with the glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist (GLP‐1RA) liraglutide alone would lead to a greater reduction in the proportion of fat to lean tissue mass when compared to caloric restriction (CR) alone, as well as when compared to treatment with sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 (DPP‐4) inhibitor, that also enhances GLP‐1 activity ‐ to determine the independent effects of each treatment. Methods: A total of 88 adults with obesity and prediabetes were randomized to 14 weeks of intervention with CR (−390 kcal/d), liraglutide (1.8 mg/d), or the dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitor sitagliptin (100 mg/d) as a weight‐neutral comparator. Changes between groups in appetite and hunger ratings measured via visual analogue scales, dietary intakes, body weight, body composition via dual energy x‐ray absorptiometry, and resting energy expenditure via indirect calorimetry were assessed using the Kruskal‐Wallis test or Pearson's chi‐squared test. Results: Weight loss ≥5% of baseline body weight occurred in 44% of participants in the CR group, 22% of the liraglutide group and 5% of the sitagliptin group (p = 0.02). The ratio of fat to lean mass decreased by 6.5% in the CR group, 2.2% in the liraglutide group, and 0% in the sitagliptin group (p = 0.02). Visceral fat reduced by 9.5% in the CR group, 4.8% in the liraglutide group, and 0% in the sitagliptin group (p = 0.04). A spontaneous reduction in dietary simple carbohydrates in the CR group was associated with improved homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance score (HOMA‐IR). Conclusions: Although both liraglutide and CR are valuable strategies for cardiometabolic risk reduction, CR was associated with greater weight loss and more favourable improvements in body composition than treatment with liraglutide alone. Differences in the response to each of these interventions enables patients to be stratified to the most optimal intervention for their personal risk factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To test the hypothesis that glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor (GLP‐1R) agonists have beneficial effects on vascular endothelial function, fibrinolysis and inflammation through weight loss‐independent mechanisms. Materials and Methods: Individuals with obesity and prediabetes were randomized to 14 weeks of the GLP‐1R agonist liraglutide, hypocaloric diet or the dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitor sitagliptin in a 2:1:1 ratio. Treatment with drug was double blind and placebo‐controlled. Measurements were made at baseline, after 2 weeks prior to significant weight loss and after 14 weeks. The primary outcomes were measures of endothelial function: flow‐mediated vasodilation (FMD), plasminogen activator inhibitor‐1 (PAI‐1) and urine albumin‐to‐creatinine ratio (UACR). Results: Eighty‐eight individuals were studied (liraglutide N = 44, diet N = 22, sitagliptin N = 22). Liraglutide and diet reduced weight, insulin resistance and PAI‐1, while sitagliptin did not. There was no significant effect of any treatment on endothelial vasodilator function measured by FMD. Post hoc subgroup analyses in individuals with baseline FMD below the median, indicative of greater endothelial dysfunction, showed an improvement in FMD by all three treatments. GLP‐1R antagonism with exendin (9‐39) increased fasting blood glucose but did not change FMD or PAI‐1. There was no effect of treatment on UACR. Finally, liraglutide, but not sitagliptin or diet, reduced the chemokine monocyte chemoattractant protein‐1 (MCP‐1). Conclusion: Liraglutide and diet reduce weight, insulin resistance and PAI‐1. Liraglutide, sitagliptin and diet do not change FMD in obese individuals with prediabetes with normal endothelial function. Liraglutide alone lowers the pro‐inflammatory and pro‐atherosclerotic chemokine MCP‐1, indicating that this beneficial effect is independent of weight loss. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]