Search

• Sobol' method is used to evaluate the sensitivity of APSIM-Wheat yield predictions. • Yield is most sensitive to initial nitrogen amount, soil parameters, precipitation. • Estimated yield is influenced most by the limiting resource under given conditions. • Scenarios for high fertilization level or dry seasons have lower yield variability. The performance of cropping system models is often limited by uncertainties in model parameters and inputs. This study aims to explore how model yield prediction responds to these uncertainties under various environmental and management conditions. The Sobol' method was used to investigate the sensitivity of the Agricultural Production Systems SIMulator (APSIM)-Wheat yield prediction to the following factors: air temperature (maximum and minimum), precipitation, initial soil nitrogen content, nitrogen fertilization amount, and soil hydraulic parameters. Eighteen scenarios were defined to consider a combination of three weather conditions (wet, normal, and dry growing season, based on the historical climatology of the Wimmera district of Victoria, Australia), three soil types (sandy, loamy, and clayey soils), and two nitrogen fertilization applications (50 and 100 kg N/ha). Eight thousand APSIM simulations were used to calculate the first order and total sensitivity indices for each scenario. The effects of weather, soil water characteristics and nitrogen availability were estimated by measuring their impacts on sensitivity indices. Our results show that yield was more sensitive either to variables that control water availability (precipitation and soil type) or variables that control nitrogen availability, depending on which was more limiting to wheat growth under the scenario. For example, in case of low nitrogen fertilization scenario, the initial nitrogen content sensitivity ranked first. Variation of this factor contributed 64% to 79% to the variance in simulated yield for clayey soils, nearly four times higher than the second-ranked factor (nitrogen fertilization amount). Soil hydraulic parameters and precipitation were most important when the crop growth was more constrained by water availability than by nitrogen availability. In the case of sandy soils in dry years with high nitrogen fertilization level, soil parameters and precipitation accounted for 83% of the yield variability. Minimum temperature consistently ranked as the least important factor under all scenarios. This work will help researchers better understand the model inputs' impacts on the simulated yield variability under various soil, management, and weather conditions. The results also support agronomists and practitioners in the optimal use of the APSIM-Wheat model as a management tool. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Process-based crop models provide ways to predict crop growth, evaluate environmental impacts on crops, test various crop management options, and guide crop breeding. They can be used to explore options for mitigating climate change impacts when combined with climate projections and explore mitigation of environmental impacts of production. The Agricultural Production Systems SIMulator (APSIM) is a widely adopted crop model that offers modules for simulation of various crops, soil processes, climate, and grazing within a modelling system that enables robust addition of new components. This study uses APSIM Classic-Wheat as an example to examine yield prediction accuracy of biophysically based crop yield modelling and to analyse the factors influencing the model performance. We analysed yield prediction results of APSIM Classic-Wheat from 76 published studies across thirteen countries on four continents. In addition, a meta-database of modelled and observed yields from 30 studies was established and used to identify factors that influence yield prediction uncertainty. Our analysis indicates that, with site-specific calibration, APSIM predicts yield with a root mean squared error (RMSE) smaller than 1 t/ha and a normalised RMSE (NRMSE) of about 28%, across a wide range of environmental conditions for independent evaluation periods. The results show increasing errors in yield with limited modelling information and adverse environmental conditions. Using soil hydraulic parameters derived from site-specific measurements and/or tuning cultivar parameters improves yield prediction accuracy: RMSE decreases from 1.25 t/ha to 0.64 t/ha and NRMSE from 32% to 14%. Lower model accuracy was found where APSIM overestimates yield under high water deficit condition and when it underestimates yield under nitrogen limitation. APSIM severely over-predicts yield when some abiotic stresses such as heatwaves and frost affect the crop growth. This paper uses APSIM-Wheat as an example to provide perspectives on crop model yield prediction performance under different conditions covering a wide spectrum of management practices, and environments. The findings deepen the understanding of model uncertainty associated with different calibration processes or under various stressed conditions. The results also indicate the need to improve the model's predictive skill by filling functional gaps in the wheat simulations and by assimilating external observations (e.g., biomass information estimated by remote sensing) to adjust the model simulation for stressed crops. [Display omitted] • Crop model is a tool to simulate crop growth, seek solutions for mitigating negative environmental impacts on production. • APSIM Classic has been used as an example to explore wheat yield prediction performance and the influential factors. • Reviewed and established a meta-database from 76 published studies. • Overall: the model predicts wheat yield with RMSE=1 t/ha. Fully calibrated and under stress-free condition: RMSE=0.64 t/ha. • Calibration method, heat, frost, water, and nitrogen stresses were identified as factors causing the model to mis-simulate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]