Search

In this study, the bistatic radar scattering coefficients related to an oil-covered sea surface are predicted by modeling both the oil damping effect on surface roughness–through the advanced integral equation method–and the oil modification on the dielectric properties of the scattering surface. The bistatic scattering is analyzed in the whole upper scattering space under different radar frequencies, incidence angles, wind speeds, and oil thicknesses. Numerical predictions show that the scattering energy of an oil-covered sea surface is generally higher in the forward scattering zone than that in the backward one. In addition, the oil damping effect is the main mechanism ruling the scattering behavior in the backward region. The information related to the bistatic scattering geometry is also explored to retrieve oil thickness, representing one of the key parameters for radar-based marine oil pollution observation. A new index is proposed to quantify the sensitivity of bistatic scattering coefficients to oil thickness in different cases: single-polarization features, dual co-polarization features, namely, the polarization ratio (PR) and the normalized polarization difference index (NPDI), and dual-angular scattering features. Numerical results show that the bistatic scattering coefficients result in an enhanced sensitivity to oil thickness with respect to the monostatic case. The single HH-polarized scattering coefficients show better oil thickness sensitivity in the backward region, while the VV-polarized ones are more sensitive to oil thickness in the forward region. The combination of dual-polarized scattering coefficients significantly improves the oil thickness sensitivity compared to single-polarization radar observations, especially in the forward region. PR outperforms NPDI, even though the latter can suppress the effect of wind speed. The combination of dual-angular observations can significantly increase its sensitivity of oil thickness in the backward region but at the expense of reduced sensitivity in the forward region. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The upwind–downwind asymmetry in normalized radar backscattering cross section (NRBCS) from ocean surface is well known; one acceptable and convincing reasoning is explained by the fact that the surface height distribution deviates from Gaussian one, which causes a nonzero skewness function, and consequently affects the radar cross section in up and down wind directions. Specific forms of skewness function, in between Gaussian and exponential, have been proposed in previous studies to account for the upwind/downwind asymmetry in radar backscatter. Attempt is made, through numerical simulation, in this article to examine the impact of these two types of skewness functions on NRBCS. The simulated NBRCSs, with and without skewness contributions, are compared with measured data in upwind and downwind directions at L-, C-, and Ku-bands for different wind speeds. The results indicate that the Gaussian-type skewness function works better to account for the upwind/downwind asymmetry of NBRCS by choosing an appropriate root mean square (RMS) height appearing in skewness function and as the wind speed or radar frequency increases, the RMS height increases but regardless of wind direction and radar incidence angle. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Wind wave spectrum describes the quasi-periodic nature of the ocean surface oscillations and plays an indispensable role in the study of microwave electromagnetic scattering from sea surface. A reliable spectrum model suitable for radar cross section (RCS) predictions at different radar frequencies is desired. This paper evaluated the performances of five common spectrum models (i.e., Fung spectrum, Durden–Vesecky spectrum, Apel spectrum, Elfouhaily spectrum, and the newest version of Hwang spectrum, H18) on the normalized radar backscattering cross section (NRBCS) simulations based on advanced integral equation model (AIEM) at L-, C-, X-, and Ku-bands versus incidence angle, wind direction, and wind speed by comparing with the model and measured data for validation. These results indicate no single wave spectrum of them is satisfying for all the four radar frequencies, e.g., Apel and H18 spectra are better for L- and C-bands, Apel spectrum for X-band, and Elfouhaily and H18 spectra for Ku-band. Given this, three average composite spectrum models are constructed using different spectral models (i.e., all five spectra, Apel + Elfouhaily + H18, and Apel + H18) to simulate NRBCSs, similar to that of the individual spectrum model. It is concluded that the combination of Apel and H18 spectra overall performs best among the individual one and other composited spectra in like-polarized NRBCSs versus incidence angles, wind directions, and wind speeds, for wind speed greater than 30 m/s where the combination of the five spectra work well at Ku-band. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]