Search

The contribution of wound contraction to wound closure determines the speed of second intention wound healing and it has been shown that significant differences exist with regard to both contraction and inflammatory response between horses and ponies and between various areas of the body. In this study, the contraction capacity of fibroblasts from limbs and buttocks of 4 Dutch Warmblood horses and 4 Shetland ponies was studied in vitro, in order to determine whether differences in wound contraction are due to differences in the inherent contraction capacity of the fibroblasts or to differences in tissue environmental factors, such as the inflammatory response. Fibroblasts were harvested from subcutaneous tissue, cultured and then suspended in both floating and anchored collagen gels. Contraction capacity was assessed by measuring the decrease in area of the floating gels and by measuring the microforces generated in the anchored gels using a custom-built measuring device. In the floating gels, no difference existed in the contraction capacity of fibroblasts from horses and ponies, or from limbs and buttocks. In the anchored gels, no differences existed between horse and pony fibroblasts, but the fibroblasts from the limbs started to contract significantly sooner and produced significantly higher forces than those from the buttocks. It is concluded that the in vivo differences in wound contraction between horses and ponies and between different sites of the body are not caused by differences in the inherent contraction capacity of fibroblasts. The in vitro differences between fibroblasts from limbs and buttocks are thought to be due to the lower proliferation rate and the longer culture time of the fibroblasts originating from the limbs, because mature fibroblasts can develop higher contraction forces than immature fibroblasts. This means that tissue environmental factors, such as cytokine profiles during the inflammatory response, determine the extent of contraction during wound healing. Further research should be directed towards the role of the inflammatory response in wound healing.

Second-intention healing of deep wounds was studied in 5 horses and 5 ponies. Standardised wounds were created on the distal limbs and hind quarters. Wounds on the metatarsi extended onto the metatarsal bone; the depth of the wounds in the femoral biceps muscle was 18 mm. The wound margins were marked by tattoos. Photographs were taken at weekly intervals to determine the wound area. The relative contribution of contraction and epithelialisation to wound closure was quantified by means of the tattoos. Swelling of the limbs was measured; and regularity and aspect of the granulation tissue were semi-quantitatively scored. Second-intention wound healing occurred significantly faster in ponies than in horses, and muscle wounds healed significantly faster than metatarsal wounds. These marked differences reflected the greater contribution of contraction to wound healing. Moreover, demarcation was seen earlier and a healthy granulation bed developed more rapidly in ponies, whereas in horses the granulation tissue remained irregular and purulent for longer. Healing of the metatarsal wounds of horses differed markedly from that of all other wounds: these wounds increased to almost twice their original size in the first 2 weeks, exuberant granulation tissue was persistent, epithelialisation started later, and contraction played a minor role in wound closure. Limb swelling was greater in horses than in ponies. Periosteal new bone formation was more extensive, and was active over a longer period in the metatarsal bones of horses than of ponies. From this study it is concluded that second-intention healing of deep wounds occurs faster in ponies than in horses. This difference can be largely attributed to a more pronounced and faster wound contraction in ponies than in horses. Therefore, attempts to improve second-intention wound healing in clinical practice should be directed at stimulation of wound contraction.