Search

Objective: To determine the value of ordering a routine chest CT (CCT) in patients with blunt trauma presenting to the emergency department with a high GCS and low ISS, we retrospectively collected patient data including CT scan results, when physical examination and initial chest X-ray were normal in the trauma bay area., Methods: A retrospective data collection of 901 consecutive blunt trauma patients seen in the ED between 2017 and 2019 was analyzed. Data included physical examination, age, gender, current use of anticoagulation therapy, comorbid conditions, as well as the result of radiologic images, hospital length of stay, surgical intervention, and mortality. The patients were divided into two groups: group one (patients with negative physical examination; chest x-ray and CT) and group 2 (negative physical examination, positive or negative chest x-ray, and positive CT). Statistical analysis was performed using student's t-test and chi-square test., Results: Of the 901 patients there were 489 (54%) males and 412 (46%) females with a mean age of 56 years. There were 461 patients who had a physical examination, chest x-ray, abdominal and CCT done. Group one included 442 (96%) patients, with negative physical examination, negative chest X-ray and CT scan. In group 2, 19 (4%) patients who had positive CT and or chest x-ray. Both groups were similar in GCS and ISS. Of the 19 patients, sixteen patients had a positive CCT, and thirteen of those had a positive chest x-ray. In the three patients who had negative physical examination and chest x-ray, the CT findings included one with a nondisplaced 10th rib fracture and two patients with osteoporotic compression fractures of dorsal vertebrae. The rate of both chest x-ray and CCT being positive among a group of screened patients was 16% (3/19) and the rate of a negative chest x-ray but positive CT was 16% (3/19). The odds ratio between the two outcomes was one., Conclusion: In blunt trauma patients presenting to the ED with a high GCS and low ISS score, when initial physical examination and chest x-ray are negative, routine CCT is of little value., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Introduction: Computed tomography scans became the mainstay of emergency department (ED) evaluation of trauma patients including those with a high Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and a low Injury Severity Score (ISS). We elected to find the value of abdominal and pelvic CT in patients with negative physical examination and Focused Assessment of Sonography for Trauma (FAST) on arrival to the ED., Methods: This study is a retrospective analysis of 901 consecutive patients from 2017 to 2019 who presented to the ED with level 2 and 3 activation criteria. Each patient received a physical examination, CT abdomen and pelvis, and FAST exam. Data were collected on external factor including GCS, ISS, age, sex, comorbidities, anticoagulation use, and surgical intervention. The patients were divided into 2 groups, Group A and B. Group A consisted of patients with a negative physical exam, FAST, and CT result. Group B included patients with a negative physical exam and FAST exam with positive CT findings. Statistical analysis was done using a Student's t-test and chi-square test for significance value of P < .05. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for this study., Results: A total of 901 patients were analyzed which included 489 (54.3%) male and 412 (45.7%) female with a mean age of 56.2 (SD = 22.62) years. Out of the 901 patients, 461 patients received a physical, FAST, and CT exam. Group A consisted of 442 (95.9%) patients and Group B had 19 (4.1%) patients. Both groups were similar in GCS and ISS scoring with no significance difference in age, sex, comorbidities, and anticoagulation use. There was a significant difference in the ICU and hospital mean length of stay when CT scan was positive [2 (SD = 4.23) days vs. .6 (SD = 1.33) days with P < .0001 and 4.57 (SD ± 4.17) days vs. 2.5 (SD = 2.00) days with P < .0001, respectively]. The CT findings of the 19 patients in group B consisted of 6 incidentalomas, 5 vertebral compression fractures, 4 pelvic bone fractures, 1 minor liver contusion, 1 non-specific bowel thickening, 1 non-displaced rib fracture, and 1 case of small amount of free fluid in the pelvis. None of the CT findings required surgical intervention., Conclusion: Computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis in trauma patients with high GCS and low ISS with initial negative physical and FAST examination did not provide additional critical information.