Search

Although human islet transplantation has proven to provide clinical benefits, especially the near complete amelioration of hypoglycemia, the supply of human islets is limited and insufficient to meet the needs of all people that could benefit from islet transplantation. Porcine islets, secreting insulin nearly identical to that of human insulin, have been proposed as a viable supply of unlimited islets. Further, encapsulation of the porcine islets has been shown to reduce or eliminate the use of immunosuppressive therapy that would be required to prevent rejection of the foreign islet tissue. The goal of the current study was to determine the long‐term safety and efficacy of agarose encapsulated porcine islets (macrobeads) in diabetic cynomolgus macaques, in a study emulating a proposed IND trial in which daily exogenous insulin therapy would be reduced by 50% with no loss of glucose regulation. Four of six animals implanted with macrobeads demonstrated ≥ 30% reduction in insulin requirements in year 1 of follow‐up. Animals were followed for 2, 3.5, and 7.4 years with no serious adverse events, mortality or evidence of pathogen transmission. This study supports the continued pursuit of encapsulated porcine islet therapy as a promising treatment option for diabetes mellitus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The use of porcine islets to replace insulin-producing islet β-cells, destroyed during the diabetogenic disease process, presents distinct challenges if this option is to become a therapeutic reality for the treatment of type 1 diabetes. These challenges include a thorough evaluation of the microbiological safety of the islets. In this study, we describe a robust porcine islet-screening program that provides a high level of confidence in the microbiological safety of porcine islets suitable for clinical trials. Methods A four-checkpoint program systematically screens the donor herd (Large White - Yorkshire × Landrace F1 hybrid animals), individual sentinel and pancreas donor animals and, critically, the islet macrobeads themselves. Molecular assays screen for more than 30 known viruses, while electron microscopy and in vitro studies are employed to screen for potential new or divergent (emergent) viruses. Results Of 1207 monthly samples taken from random animals over a 2-year period, only a single positive result for Transmissible gastroenteritis virus was observed, demonstrating the high level of biosecurity maintained in the source herd. Given the lack of clinical signs, positive antibody titers for Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus, Porcine parvovirus, and Influenza A confirm the efficacy of the herd vaccination program. Porcine respiratory coronavirus was found to be present in the herd, as expected for domestic swine. Tissue homogenate samples from six sentinel and 11 donor animals, over the same 2-year period, were negative for the presence of viruses when co-cultured with six different cell lines from four species. The absence of adventitious viruses in separate islet macrobead preparations produced from 12 individual pancreas donor animals was confirmed using validated molecular (n = 32 viruses), in vitro culture (cells from four species), and transmission electron microscopy assays (200 cell profiles per donor animal) over the same 2-year period. There has been no evidence of viral transmission following the implantation of these same encapsulated and functional porcine islets into non-immunosuppressed diabetic cynomolgus macaques for up to 4 years. Isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells from all time points were negative for PCV (Type 2), PLHV, PRRSV, PCMV, and PERV-A, PERV-B, and PERV-C by PCR analysis in all six recipient animals. Conclusion The four-checkpoint program is a robust and reliable method for characterization of the microbiological safety of encapsulated porcine islets intended for clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the 2009 IXA consensus, the requirements for the quality and control of manufacturing of porcine islet products were based on the U.S. regulatory framework where the porcine islet products fall within the definition of somatic cell therapy under the statutory authority of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ( FDA). In addition, porcine islet products require pre-market approval as a biologic product under the Public Health Services Act and they meet the definition of a drug under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act ( FD&C Act). Thus, they are subject to applicable provisions of the law and as such, control of manufacturing as well as reproducibility and consistency of porcine islet products, safety of porcine islet products, and characterization of porcine islet products must be met before proceeding to clinical trials. In terms of control of manufacturing as well as reproducibility and consistency of porcine islet products, the manufacturing facility must be in compliance with current Good Manufacturing Practices ( cGMP) guidelines appropriate for the initiation of Phase 1/2 clinical trials. Sponsors intending to conduct a Phase 1/2 trial of islet xenotransplantation products must be able to demonstrate the safety of the product through the establishment of particular quality assurance and quality control procedures. All materials (including animal source and pancreas) used in the manufacturing process of the porcine islet products must be free of adventitious agents. The final porcine islet product must undergo tests for the presence of these adventitious agents including sterility, mycoplasma (if they are cultured), and endotoxin. Assessments of the final product must include the safety specifications mentioned above even if the results are not available until after release as these data would be useful for patient diagnosis and treatment if necessary. In addition, a plan of action must be in place for patient notification and treatment in case the sterility culture results are positive. In terms of the characterization of porcine islet products and product release criteria, the information on the porcine islet products should be acquired from a sample of the final product to be used for transplantation and must include the morphology of the islets, specific identity, purity, viability, and potency of the product. In addition, information on the quantity of the islet products should also be provided in a standardized fashion and this should be in terms of islet equivalents and/or cell numbers. The current consensus was created to provide guidelines that manufacturing facilities may find helpful in the manufacture of and the release criteria for porcine islet products including encapsulated islets and combined islet products. Our intent with the above recommendations is to provide a framework for individual porcine islet manufacturing facilities to ensure a high level of safety for the initiation of Phase 1/2 clinical trials on porcine islet xenotransplantation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Allogeneic islet transplantation for the treatment of type 1 diabetes often requires multiple implant procedures, from as many as several human pancreas donors, to achieve lasting clinical benefit. Given the limited availability of human pancreases for islet isolation, porcine islets have long been considered a potential option for clinical use. Agarose‐encapsulated porcine islets (macrobeads) permit long‐term culture and thus a thorough evaluation of microbiological safety and daily insulin secretory capacity, prior to implantation. The goal of this study was the development of a method for determining an effective dose of encapsulated islets based on their measured in vitro insulin secretion in a preclinical model of type 1 diabetes. Methods: Spontaneously diabetic BioBreeding diabetes‐prone rats were implanted with osmotic insulin pumps in combination with continuous glucose monitoring to establish the daily insulin dose required to achieve continuous euglycaemia in individual animals. Rats were then implanted with a 1×, 2× or 3× dose (defined as the ratio of macrobead in vitro insulin secretion per 24 hours to the recipient animal's total daily insulin requirement) of porcine islet macrobeads, in the absence of immunosuppression. In vivo macrobead function was assessed by recipient non‐fasted morning blood glucose values, continuous glucose monitoring and the presence of peritoneal porcine C‐peptide. At the end of the study, the implanted macrobeads were removed and returned to in vitro culture for the evaluation of insulin secretion. Results: Diabetic rats receiving a 2× macrobead implant exhibited significantly improved blood glucose regulation compared to that of rats receiving a 1× dose during a 30‐day pilot study. In a 3‐month follow‐up study, 2× and 3× macrobead doses initially controlled blood glucose levels equally well, although several animals receiving a 3× dose maintained euglycaemia throughout the study, compared to none of the 2× animals. The presence of porcine C‐peptide in rat peritoneal fluid 3 months post‐implant and the recurrence of hyperglycaemia following macrobead removal, along with the finding of persistent in vitro insulin secretion from retrieved macrobeads, confirmed long‐term graft function. Conclusions: Increasing dosages of islet macrobeads transplanted into diabetic rats, based on multiples of in vitro insulin secretion matched to the recipient's exogenous insulin requirements, correlated with improved blood glucose regulation and increased duration of graft function. These results demonstrate the usefulness of a standardized model for the evaluation of the functional effectiveness of islets intended for transplantation, in this case using intraperitoneally implanted agarose macrobeads, in diabetic rats. The results suggest that some features of this islet‐dosing methodology may be applicable, and indeed necessary, to clinical allogeneic and xenogeneic islet transplantation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]