Search

Introduction: Jaw defect reconstructions have been transformed by the development of free tissue transfer using vascularized bone incorporating osseointegrated dental implants. We recently developed a modification our method this procedure and termed it the Modified Alberta Reconstruction Technique (MART). The objective of this study aimed to assess the soft tissue component and outcomes of the MART as compared to the Alberta Reconstructive Technique (ART) or conventional (BDD) reconstructions., Patients and Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of adult patients who underwent jaw reconstruction with dental implant rehabilitation between 2000 and 2019 in Edmonton, Alberta. Patients were aged-matched and placed into a cohort based on the type of reconstruction they received. Outcomes were compared between the groups. Expert and aesthetic analyses were performed. Statistical analysis was conducted to determine significance., Results: A total of 46 patients (15 BDD, 15 ART and 16 MART) were included. Demographics were similar between groups. There was no difference in complications. The soft tissue component of the MART cohort was more favourable to work with as judged by the occlusal reconstructive experts. The MART was rated as more aesthetically appealing in comparison to the BDD and ART (p = 0.049)., Conclusions: The MART is a safe, effective, and aesthetically appealing procedure. It yields a good functional result and a clinically better soft tissue component for occlusal reconstructions. For a select group of patients requiring jaw reconstruction, the MART is an ideal reconstructive option as the modification provides good control of the soft tissue around the implants., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Facial nerve paralysis has functional, psychological and social consequences for patients. Traditionally, outcome measurements for facial nerve injuries have been clinician derived. Recent literature has shown that patient perspective is valuable and necessary in outcomes research. This study aimed to identify patient domains of concern and subsequently, develop a point-of-care questionnaire for clinical use., Design: This mixed-methods prospective study was completed in three phases. In Phase I, 15 facial nerve injury patients were interviewed individually. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed and coded with NVivo software. Analysis led to a conceptual framework detailing the most important quality of life outcomes. During Phase II, a focus group was held with five new patients in order to prioritise the outcome themes to a top six list. A second focus group was held with Otolaryngology-Head and Neck staff surgeons to create a 25-item questionnaire based on these six themes. In Phase III, the questionnaire was administered to 10 new patients to test for comprehension., Setting: University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada., Participants: A total of 30 patients with facial nerve injury were included in the various phases in the study. In addition, 5 staff Otolaryngology-Head and Neck surgeons participated as focus group contributors., Main Outcome Measures: Domains of concern and quality of life outcomes as reported by facial nerve injury patients., Results: Patients identified a total of 16 themes encompassing both functional and psychological deficits related to their facial nerve injury. From these findings, a 25-item Likert-type scale, the A-FaCE scale, was developed for clinical use., Conclusions: Patients with facial nerve paralysis experience functional and psychological deficits. This study led to the creation of the first patient-reported instrument for this population that addresses functional impairment, social function, psychological well-being and self-perception of appearance., (© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: Video teaching modules are proven effective tools for enhancing student competencies and technical skills in the operating room. Integration into post-graduate surgical curricula, however, continues to pose a challenge in modern surgical education. To date, video teaching modules for neck dissection have yet to be described in the literature., Purpose: To develop and validate an HD video-based teaching module (HDVM) to help instruct post-graduate otolaryngology trainees in performing neck dissection., Methods: This prospective study included 6 intermediate to senior otolaryngology residents. All consented subjects first performed a control selective neck dissection. Subjects were then exposed to the video teaching module. Following a washout period, a repeat procedure was performed. Recordings of the both sets of neck dissections were de-identified and reviewed by an independent evaluator and scored using the Observational Clinical Human Reliability Assessment (OCHRA) system., Results: In total 91 surgical errors were made prior to the HDVM and 41 after exposure, representing a 55% decrease in error occurrence. The two groups were found to be significantly different. Similarly, 66 and 24 staff takeover events occurred pre and post HDVM exposure, respectively, representing a statistically significant 64% decrease., Conclusion: HDVM is a useful adjunct to classical surgical training. Residents performed significantly less errors following exposure to the HD-video module. Similarly, significantly less staff takeover events occurred following exposure to the HDVM.