Search

This study comprises a comparative description of the skull anatomy in the basal megatherioid sloth Schismotherium fractum, based on specimens from the Santa Cruz Formation (late early Miocene; Santacrucian SALMA) in southern Argentine Patagonia. We provide more detailed descriptions and illustrations of the skull bones and their sutural connections, as well as the cranial foramina and their contents, than have previously been available. The anatomy in S. fractum is compared to contemporaneous basal megatherioids from Santa Cruz, Hapalops elongatus and Pelecyodon cristatus. The latter is a close relative of S. fractum in several phylogenetic analyses, but given the high levels of anatomical variation and other taxonomic uncertainties that surround these sloths, previous authors have suggested that the two may not represent distinct taxa. Our observations demonstrate that although the skulls of S. fractum do indeed exhibit variation in a broad variety of features, there are invariant, apomorphic features that consistently distinguish Schismotherium and Pelecyodon from one another, including at least 17 features derived from virtually every region of the skull. While supporting the current taxonomic status of these important, basal-most megatherioids, the present study highlights the need for further anatomical and phylogenetic investigations of Santacrucian sloths. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

New remains of a relatively plesiomorphic nothrotheriid sloth have been recovered from upper Miocene-aged deposits near the village of Achiri in the Altiplano of Bolivia. The new specimens appear allied to other middle and late Miocene remains from Argentina and Bolivia that have been assigned to the pseudo-genus 'Xyophorus'. 'Xyophorus' has not previously been recognised as a distinct genus because of the paucity of material it encompasses. The new specimens, however, include a well-preserved squamosal with attached auditory region and an isolated astragalus. These elements, which are described in detail, provide a sufficient number of distinctive characters to place the previous fossils assigned to 'Xyophorus' into a new monotypic genus. Beyond exhibiting a suite of distinctive autapomorphies which justify its formal taxonomic designation, the new taxon not only shares several synapomorphies with more derived members of Nothrotheriidae but also retains a number of plesiomorphies characteristic of basal megatherioid taxa and shows a number of intermediate features. Although the new taxon is too incomplete to justify a full phylogenetic analysis, it appears to represent a basal member of Nothrotheriidae. Resolution of the taxonomic status of the genus Xyophorus awaits a better understanding of the taxonomy of early Miocene-aged basal megatherioids. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the fossil record of South America, both ground sloths and their tracks are well known. However, most tracks described were assignable to megatherians and mylodontids, while tracks assignable to scelidotheriines show a very scarce record. In this contribution, we present new records of fossil tracks assignable to scelidotheriines and review and expand the original description of the ichnotaxon Acugnaichnum dorregoensis. In addition, we explored the correlation between track features and limb morphology, finding that the tracks can help to better understand the posture and function of scelidotheriine limbs. Features of the handprint suggest that these ground sloths would not rest hands in the substrate by its palmar aspect, but on the knuckles or its lateral aspect, similar to the extant giant and lesser anteaters. Concerning the foot tracks, their features indicate that digits V and IV rested on the substrate in a different orientation than the digit III, whose large ungual phalanx provided additional support by resting of its lateral side, which is biomechanically coherent with the stability of the foot. In addition, some kind of soft tissue cushion would be present below the main arch of the foot. Evidence for locomotion style and bipedalism is discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There is a growing ethical concern in modern society about animals' quality of life. We hypothesize that zoo visitors' perception of zoo animal welfare, particularly in the case of lesser anteaters, changes positively after listening to scientific information. Visitors observing active lesser anteaters in their enclosures at Córdoba Zoo (Argentina) were asked to respond to a questionnaire about animal welfare. The treatment group (T) answered the questionnaire after listening to a brief informative talk based on local scientific studies on lesser anteaters. The control group (C) answered the questionnaire without hearing the informative talk. Visitors (87.2%) considered biological, sanitary, and sociocultural aspects to be necessary conditions for optimum wild zoo-housed animal welfare. The majority of visitors considered that natural surroundings provide the highest level of welfare for wild animals. Visitors in the T group ranked the zoo as providing a higher level of animal welfare than those in group C. In reference to management measurements, the T group agreed on the positive effect of the application of environmental enrichment (Likert Medians: C = 4 and T = 5; p = .0443). On the basis of their perception, most visitors in both groups stated that the lesser anteaters at Córdoba Zoo appeared to be in a good state of welfare. We interpret this as meaning that, what these Córdoba zoo visitors personally perceived while observing the lesser anteaters carried greater weight than what they learned from the informative talk, though the talk did slightly affect their opinion., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)