Search

OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcomes of pharmacistcompleted aMRRs. The 2018 installation of the Improving Medicare Post-Acute Care Transformation (IMPACT) Act requires medication regimen reviews (aMRR) upon admission to long-term care (LTC) hospitals, nursing facilities, and inpatient-rehabilitation facilities. While the legislation does not require that pharmacists perform the reviews, pharmacists are aptly suited to add value to this practice. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of residents admitted to LTC facilities. SETTING: Twenty-four LTC facilities located in Arizona served by one pharmacist-consult service. PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: Cohort of 603 LTC residents whose medical records were reviewed by consultant pharmacists during March 2020. RESULTS: For 603 residents, 1092 aMRRs were completed and 921 interventions were made. The most prevalent interventions were medication monitoring (N = 276), medications without appropriate indication (N = 130), and overdosage (N = 116). Of 921 interventions, 41 were classified as ECA Level 6, avoided hospital admission, and 30 as Level 7, avoided life-threatening event. Of 165 recommendations rated by both pharmacy student assessors and a supervising postgraduate year 2 resident, agreement occurred in 161 (97.6% agreement, kappa reliability = 0.934). CONCLUSION: Pharmacist-conducted aMRRs identified clinically important threats to patient safety. Study results demonstrate potential for positive economic and resident care outcomes from pharmacistperformed aMRR interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose The impact of goal setting in pharmacy preceptor development was evaluated using the Habits of Preceptors Rubric (HOP-R), a criterion-referenced assessment developed to assess, quantify, and demonstrate growth across 11 preceptor habits. Methods This study retrospectively evaluated initial and follow-up survey responses from the 2019-2020 Clinician Educators Program cohort at Midwestern University College of Pharmacy, Glendale Campus. Enrollees in this teaching and learning curriculum (TLC) were invited to assess their precepting habits using the HOP-R after attending the first seminar and again toward the end of the longitudinal program. Using online surveys, participants rated their precepting capabilities as developing, proficient, accomplished, or master level for each habit. In the initial survey, each participant selected a habit of focus for deliberate development and established an individualized goal using the specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) framework. In the follow-up survey, participants indicated their satisfaction with and progress toward accomplishing their precepting goal. Results Initial survey results from 55 study participants identified developing as the most frequently self-reported habit level (53%; n = 605 ratings), while master was the least frequently reported (1%). In the follow-up assessment, accomplished (45%) was the most frequently self-reported habit level, while master (5%) remained the least reported. The cohort reported a median progress in SMART goal accomplishment of 69% (range, 12% to 100%; n = 54). Conclusion Preceptor and resident pharmacists reported perceived advancement in precepting capabilities within the conceptual framework of the HOP-R encompassing both their self-selected habit of focus and adjacent habits while enrolled in a TLC. SMART goals facilitated qualitative and quantitative assessment of development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]