1. Validation of an admission coagulation panel for risk stratification of COVID-19 patients.
- Author
-
Alabyad, Darwish, Rangaraju, Srikant, Liu, Michael, Imran, Rajeel, Kempton, Christine L., Sharifpour, Milad, Auld, Sara C., Gaddh, Manila, Sniecinski, Roman, Maier, Cheryl L., Guarner, Jeannette, Duncan, Alexander, and Nahab, Fadi
- Subjects
- *
COVID-19 , *DRUG-eluting stents , *FIBRIN tissue adhesive , *BLOOD coagulation factor X , *VENOUS thrombosis , *ISCHEMIC stroke , *TREATMENT effectiveness , *SARS-CoV-2 - Abstract
Background: There is limited data on the markers of coagulation and hemostatic activation (MOCHA) profile in Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and its ability to identify COVID-19 patients at risk for thrombotic events and other complications. Methods: Hospitalized patients with confirmed SARS-COV-2 from four Atlanta hospitals were included in this observational cohort study and underwent admission testing of MOCHA parameters (plasma d-dimer, prothrombin fragment 1.2, thrombin-antithrombin complex, fibrin monomer). Clinical outcomes included deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, access line thrombosis, ICU admission, intubation and mortality. Main results: Of 276 patients (mean age 59 ± 6.4 years, 47% female, 62% African American), 45 (16%) had a thrombotic endpoint. Each MOCHA parameter was independently associated with a thrombotic event (p<0.05) and ≥ 2 abnormalities was associated with thrombotic endpoints (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.2–8.8) as were admission D-dimer ≥ 2000 ng/mL (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.5–6.6) and ≥ 3000 ng/mL (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.6–7.9). However, only ≥ 2 MOCHA abnormalities were associated with ICU admission (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.7–5.2) and intubation (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.6–6.4). MOCHA and D-dimer cutoffs were not associated with mortality. MOCHA with <2 abnormalities (26% of the cohort) had 89% sensitivity and 93% negative predictive value for a thrombotic endpoint. Conclusions: An admission MOCHA profile is useful to risk-stratify COVID-19 patients for thrombotic complications and more effective than isolated d-dimer for predicting risk of ICU admission and intubation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF